Method and apparatus for collaborative document versioning of networked documents

• US 7,698,421 B2
• Filed: 12/28/2006
• Issued: 04/13/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 01/16/2002
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Xerox Corporation (Xerox Holdings Corp.)
• Original Assignee: Xerox Corporation (Xerox Holdings Corp.)
• Inventors: Meunier, Jean-Luc, Glance, Natalie S., Bernard, Pierre G.
• Primary Examiner(s): ISMAIL, SHAWKI SAIF
• Application Number:
  US11/646,372
• Publication Number:
  US 20070106793A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,202 Days
• Field of Search: 709/203, 709/223, 709/224, 709/226, 707/200, 707/203, 707/204, 713/200
• US Class Current: 709/224
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/93 Document management systems
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/958 Organisation or management of web site content, e.g. publishing, maintaining pages or automatic linking
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 707/99953 Recoverability

Abstract

The system comprises an improved document monitoring agent in which user evaluations are used to decide whether a changed document should be saved in the system or not. The evaluation of importance of the change in a document is performed by one or more users who collaboratively monitor a networked document, typically identified by a URL. By providing a user evaluation interface, it is possible for users to indicate their evaluation of the significance of the change. As such, only significantly changed documents, as indicated by the users themselves, are saved. Thus, a more efficient saving is obtained while at the same time reducing the risk of discarding potentially interesting changed documents which would have been discarded by conventional monitoring agents.

Claims

1. A system for providing document change information to at least one user and for saving a changed document, comprising:

document representation storage, for storing representations of saved changed documents;

a document registration element for enabling a user to identify documents for which they would like to be notified of changes;

a document change monitoring element coupled to said document registration element, said document change monitoring element for detecting a change to said document and evaluating whether said change is significant for user'"'"'s evaluation;

a user notification element coupled to said document change monitoring element, said user notification element for notifying users of said change; and

a user evaluation interface for enabling a user to indicate the significance of said notified change, wherein said system is arranged to store a predetermined number of changed versions of documents in said document representation storage based on said user'"'"'s indication of significance.

2. The system as recited in claim 1, wherein said system is arranged to store a copy of a changed version of a document in said document representation storage as a function of a plurality of users'"'"' indications of significance of said notified change.

3. The system as recited in claim 2, wherein said changed version of document is stored as a function of the maximum indication provided by said plurality of users'"'"' indications.

4. The system as recited in claim 2, wherein said changed version of document is stored as a function of the weighted sum of the indication provided by said plurality of users.

5. The system as recited in claim 4, wherein said changed version of document is stored when said weighted sum exceeds a predetermined threshold value.

6. The system as recited in claim 2, wherein said system uses collaborative filtering techniques for deciding to store said changed version of document.

7. The system as recited in claim 1, wherein said document representation storage stores a complete version of said changed document.

8. The system as recited in claim 1, wherein said user evaluation interface provides a plurality of predetermined values for indicating said significance.

9. The system as recited in claim 1, wherein said indication of significance is used to construct a revision history listing of the changed versions of documents stored in said document representation storage, said system further comprising user informing means for making said listing available to a user.

10. The system as recited in claim 1, wherein said system uses collaborative filtering techniques for deciding to store said changed version of document.

11. The system as recited in claim 2, wherein said indications of significance are used to construct a revision history listing of the changed versions of documents stored in said document representation storage, said system further comprising user informing means for making said listing available to said plurality of users.

12. The system as recited in claim 1, wherein said system is arranged to store a limited number of changed versions of documents in said document representation storage based on said user'"'"'s indication of significance.

13. A method for storing in a system a changed document in network-accessible documents, accessible to users of the system, the system including

a network for accessing a set of network-accessible documents;

and

user notification data indicating, for each of a subset of the network-accessible documents, one or more users to be notified when a change in the network-accessible document is detected;

the method comprising;

(a) using the network to automatically attempt to access one of the network-accessible documents in the subset and to detect whether the accessed document has changed or not;

(b) evaluating whether said change should be notified to users;

(c) notifying said users indicated for the network-accessible document by the user notification data that the network-accessible document is changed if said change is determined to be significant;

(d) receiving an evaluation of the changed network-accessible document from each notified user, each user providing an evaluation value selectable from a plurality of predetermined values; and

(e) in response to the received evaluation, deciding whether said changed document should be stored in said system.

14. The method as recited in claim 13, wherein the decision to store said changed document is based on a plurality of users'"'"' evaluations.

15. The method as recited in claim 14, wherein the decision to store said changed document is based on the maximum value amongst said users'"'"' evaluations.

16. The method as recited in claim 14, wherein the decision to store said changed document is based on a weighted sum of the users'"'"' evaluations.

17. The method as recited in claim 16, wherein said changed document is stored when said weighted sum exceeds a predetermined threshold value.

18. The method as recited in claim 13, wherein said users'"'"' evaluations are used to construct a revision history listing of the changed documents stored in said system, said method further displaying said listing to each user.

19. The method as recited in claim 13, further receiving users'"'"' comments relating to said user evaluations.

20. The method as recited in claim 13, wherein said method uses collaborative filtering techniques for deciding to store said changed version of document.