Non-contact cable state testing

• US 7,705,606 B2
• Filed: 05/12/2005
• Issued: 04/27/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 05/12/2004
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Cable Sense Limited
• Original Assignee: Lancaster University Business Enterprises Limited
• Inventors: Colton, Paul, Mackin, Robert, Kelly, John Anthony, Peyton, Anthony Joseph
• Primary Examiner(s): Nguyen; Vincent Q
• Application Number:
  US11/597,575
• Publication Number:
  US 20080224712A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,811 Days
• Field of Search: 324/539, 324/543, 324/533, 324/535
• US Class Current: 324/533
• CPC Class Codes: G01R 31/11 using pulse reflection methods
• CPC Class Codes: G01R 31/58 Testing of lines, cables or conductors testing of electric windings G01R31/72

Abstract

A method of determining the state of a cable including at least one electrical conductor, uses a generated test signal and applies it to at least one conductor by a non-contact coupling transmitter. The resulting signal is propagated along the at least one conductor and a non-contact electrical coupling receiver picks up a reflected signal, and compares the reflected signal to expected state signal values for the cable to determine its current state.

Claims

1. A method of determining the state of a cable at least one electrical conductor, in which method a test signal is generated and applied to at least one conductor of the cable by a non-contact electrical coupling transmitter, propagating the resulting signal along the at least one conductor and using a non-contact electrical coupling receiver to pick up a reflected signal, and comparing the reflected signal to expected state signal values for the cable to determine its current state, wherein at least one expected state signal value is stored in memory means, wherein the at least one expected state signal value is the signature for the ‘

empty’

state of the line under test, wherein the expected state signals include port connected and operating, outlet device connected and working, cable damaged, cable disconnected from port and device connected to outlet but not powered up, and wherein the signatures, other than for the ‘

empty’

state, are derived signal values rather than measured reference values.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the test signal has an expected signature.

3. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein a set of expected state signal values for the circuit cable are stored in memory means, with each signal of the set representing a specific state for the respective conductors of the cable under test.

4. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the expected state signal values are suitably encoded for storage and/or comparison purposes with the received reflected signals.

5. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the received reflected signals are encoded for storage and/or comparison purposes.

6. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the comparison is carried out automatically by suitable programming of the test circuitry.

7. A method as claimed in claim 1, in order to extract information from the received signals on the state of the network or system of which the cable is a part, the signals are passed to a signal processing unit.

8. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the means for applying a signal to the at least one conductor of the cable comprises an antenna/aerial that is placed adjacent to the circuit under test.

9. A method as claimed in claim 8, wherein the means for applying a signal comprises a wideband aerial.

10. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the test signal is frequency based or time based, or a combination of both.

11. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the non-contact electrical coupling receiver is an aerial.

12. A method as claimed in claim 11, wherein the non-contact electrical coupling receiver is the same aerial as that which is used to input the signal to the conductor.

13. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein several aerials are used for each cable.

14. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein, where a plurality of cables are involved in the network, a plurality of transmitters and receivers or transmitter/receivers are employed.

15. A method as claimed in claim 1, using portable apparatus that is manually positioned adjacent a cable to be tested.

16. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the apparatus is permanently installed as part of a network system.

17. A method as claimed in claim 16, using remote network system evaluation.

18. A method as claimed in claim 17, performed off site using a data link, or from a central location on site.

19. A method of determining the state of a cable at least one electrical conductor, in which method a test signal is generated and applied to at least one conductor of the cable by a non-contact electrical coupling transmitter, propagating the resulting signal along the at least one conductor and using a non-contact electrical coupling receiver to pick up a reflected signal, and comparing the reflected signal to expected state signal values for the cable to determine its current state, wherein the propagating and comparing are performed using apparatus, which is permanently installed as part of a network system, and using remote network system evaluation;

and said method is performed off site using a data link, or from a central location on site; and

, wherein a calibration procedure is carried out to arrive at a set of expected state signal signatures representing the various cable states.