Methods and apparatus for using black box data to analyze vehicular accidents

• US 7,716,002 B1
• Filed: 02/12/2008
• Issued: 05/11/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 06/11/2002
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: CCC Information Services, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Injury Sciences, LLC (CCC Information Services Group Incorporated)
• Inventors: Smith, Darrin A., Palmer, Scott
• Primary Examiner(s): Lau; Tung S
• Application Number:
  US12/069,603
• Time in Patent Office: 819 Days
• Field of Search: 702/113
• US Class Current: 702/113
• CPC Class Codes: G01L 5/0052 measuring forces due to impact G01L5/0061, G01L5/14 take precedence; impact testing of structures G01M7/08; impact testing of material G01N3/00
• CPC Class Codes: G07C 5/002 Analysing tachograph charts arrangements for graph-reading in general G06K11/00

Abstract

Disclosed are methods and apparatus for using black box data to analyze vehicular accidents. The methods include obtaining information from an event data recorder associated with a vehicle and using the data obtained therefrom in determining and analyzing the vehicular accident. Attributes to be analyzed include impact severity, change in velocity, and other desired parameters. Further disclosed are methods to securely communicate the downloaded black box information to a secure location for later analysis and processing.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method comprising:

receiving black box information obtained from an event data recorder of a first vehicle involved in a collision, at a computer system remote from the first vehicle, the black box information including first information regarding a first collision involving the first vehicle and a second vehicle or other object and second information regarding a second collision involving the first vehicle and a third vehicle or other object;

determining a sequence of events between the first and second collisions in the computer system using the first information and the second information;

reporting the sequence of events from the computer system;

determining in the computer system whether human factors played a role in the first collision, including determining a distance from when brakes of the first vehicle were applied until the first collision occurred using the first information that includes an indication of when the brakes were applied and a velocity of the first vehicle at such time; and

generating a report on the human factors in the computer system based on the determined distance and information obtained independently of the event data recorder regarding a scene of the first collision, wherein the human factors include delayed action.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining an impact severity of the first and second vehicles in the computer system, by modeling the impact severity in the computer system using the first information.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising checking for inconsistencies within the first information using third information obtained independently of the event data recorder.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining the sequence of events further based on third information received in the computer system, the third information independent of the event data recorder.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining from a first field of the first information whether a passive restraint system was in use, applying a preselected set of rules to said first field to determine a probability of interior interaction and occupant movement, and reporting said probability of interior interaction and said occupant movement from the computer system.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining a date and time the collision occurred based on the black box information.

7. The method of claim 3, further comprising reporting the inconsistencies, and wherein reporting the sequence of events includes information on timing of the sequence of events.

8. The method claim 5, further comprising:

comparing said first field to a user input relating to said passive restraint system use to determine whether a discrepancy exists; and

permitting a user to resolve said discrepancy.

9. The method of claim 5, further comprising comparing said probability of interior interaction and said occupant movement to user input information, said user input information relating to claimed occupant injury.

10. A computer program product encoded in a computer readable medium, the computer program product comprising instructions to enable a computer system to:

receive black box information obtained from an event data recorder of a first vehicle involved in a collision, at the computer system remote from the first vehicle, the black box information including first information regarding a first collision involving the first vehicle and a second vehicle or other object and second information regarding a second collision involving the first vehicle and a third vehicle or other object;

determine a sequence of events between the first and second collisions using the first information and the second information;

report the sequence of events from the computer system;

determine whether human factors played a role in the first collision, including determining a distance from when brakes of the first vehicle were applied until the first collision occurred using the first information that includes an indication of when the brakes were applied and a velocity of the first vehicle at such time; and

report on the human factors based on the determined distance and information obtained independently of the event data recorder regarding a scene of the first collision, wherein the human factors include delayed action.

11. The computer program product of claim 10, further comprising instructions that enable the computer system to check for inconsistencies within the first information using third information obtained independently of the event data recorder.

12. The computer program product of claim 10, further comprising instructions that enable the computer system to report the inconsistencies, and wherein the report of the sequence of events includes information on timing of the sequence of events.

13. The computer program product of claim 10, further comprising instructions that enable the computer system to determine from a first field of the first information whether a passive restraint system was in use, apply a preselected set of rules to said first field to determine a probability of interior interaction and occupant movement, and report said probability of interior interaction and said occupant movement.

14. The computer program product of claim 13, further comprising instructions that enable the computer system to:

compare said first field to a user input relating to said passive restraint system use to determine whether a discrepancy exists; and

permit a user to resolve said discrepancy.