Network-based system and method for accessing and processing emails and other electronic legal documents that may include duplicate information

• US 7,730,113 B1
• Filed: 09/16/2005
• Issued: 06/01/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 03/07/2000
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: DTI of Washington LLC
• Original Assignee: Applied Discovery, Inc. (EPIQ Systems, Inc.)
• Inventors: Weaver, Michael C., Pernsteiner, William P., Bodell, Barton W., Price, James Marik, Payette, Vincent, Corbett, Richard J., Desmarais, Richard Roger
• Primary Examiner(s): Ali; Mohammad
• Assistant Examiner(s): Ruiz; Angelica
• Application Number:
  US11/229,342
• Time in Patent Office: 1,719 Days
• Field of Search: 707/10
• US Class Current: 707/821
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/00 Administration; Management

Abstract

A network-based system and method processes and analyzes email messages that have been communicated by parties involved in a legal proceeding. The email messages (or other electronic files) of the parties are delivered to a plurality of server units: metadata of the email messages (such as conversational thread information, directory path information, and other properties information) are directed a first server unit, contents of the email messages are directed to a second server unit, and read-only copies of the email messages are provided in a third server unit. If the email messages (or other electronic files) contain duplicate information, the duplicative email message is linked to an email message that has already been delivered to the server units. Once in the server units, users (such as legal professionals) at terminals on a network communicatively coupled to the server units can formulate and direct queries to the server unit(s) to review copies of the email messages (or other electronic files) that are responsive to the queries.

Claims

1. A method in a network for analyzing data produced for legal purposes, the method comprising:

receiving, from a source that is external to the network for analyzing data produced for legal purposes, a plurality of electronic files, including email of which some have duplicative information, that are arranged according to a directory structure, that are subject to a legal proceeding, and that are produced by at least one party involved in the legal proceeding;

at a first server unit in the network at a back-end, providing the received electronic files in a searchable format;

at a second server unit in the network at the back-end, providing metadata associated with the received electronic files while preserving directory structure information of the directory structure;

identifying duplicative electronic files that are duplicative of each other or that contain information that is at least partially duplicative of other electronic files; and

under control of a network server at the back-end,

receiving at the back-end a request for electronic files having a specified characteristic;

processing either or both the metadata in the second server unit and the electronic files in the searchable format to determine and communicate a set of electronic files having the specified characteristic that are responsive to the request, thereby facilitating processing of the determined set of electronic files for legal purposes; and

first applying a legal annotation to a particular electronic file having the specified characteristic and that is responsive to the request, and then applying in bulk same said legal annotation to each of a group of identified duplicative electronic files stored at the back-end and that each contain information that is at least partially duplicative of information contained in said particular electronic file, to eliminate having to separately apply said legal annotation to each of the group of duplicative electronic files.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein providing the received electronic files in the searchable format includes indexing text content of the received electronic files.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the legal proceeding is a discovery proceeding that is part of a lawsuit, a mergers and acquisitions proceeding, or a due diligence effort.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein receiving the plurality of electronic files that are subject to the legal proceeding, the electronic files produced by at least one party involved in the legal proceeding, comprises:

receiving, from the source that is external to the network for analyzing data for legal purposes, at least some emails that have been previously communicated between the at least one party and another party prior to the legal proceeding, the external source belonging to the at least one party of the legal proceeding and having these electronic files, wherein the plurality of electronic files are received at the network during the legal proceeding, the network not belonging to any party of the legal proceeding.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein providing the metadata associated with the received electronic files at the second server unit includes providing threading information associated with the emails.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein receiving the plurality of electronic files that are subject to the legal proceeding from the external source includes receiving an electronic calendar, electronic schedule, spreadsheet, word-processing file, application files arranged in the directory structure, textual data, or graphical data.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein at least some of the received emails have attachments, the method further comprising:

providing the emails in a read-only format in a third server unit and in the searchable format in the first server unit;

separately providing the attachments in a read-only format in the third server unit and in the searchable format in the first server unit; and

providing metadata associated with the attachments in the second server unit.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising providing a user interface to display said particular electronic file having the specified characteristic and that is responsive to the request, and wherein the user interface is adapted to apply said legal annotation to the electronic file having the specified characteristic and that is responsive to the request and further adapted to apply said bulk same said legal annotation to said group of electronic files that contain information that is duplicative of information contained in said particular electronic file.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein the legal annotations include at least one of reviewed, privileged, hot, responsive, or witness preparation annotations.

10. The method of claim 1, further comprising providing summary information indicative of electronic files that are available to be processed to determine the set of electronic files having the specified characteristic.

11. The method of claim 1 wherein receiving the request for electronic files having a specified characteristic includes receiving a request that specifies at least one of the following:

a word in an electronic file, a sender of an email, a recipient of an email, a subject of an email, a date associated with an electronic file, properties information associated with the electronic file, an annotation to an electronic file, attachment information, a case identifier, or a collection name.

12. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining whether any of the received electronic files have duplicative information, and if determined to have duplicative information, associating such electronic files to existing electronic files that have their searchable format in the first server unit and read-only copies in a third server unit, without separately providing another searchable format and other read-only copies of the electronic files having duplicative information in the first and third server units, respectively.

13. A system to analyze data produced for legal purposes, including email that has been previously communicated over a network, the system comprising:

at least a first recursive engine configured to receive over the network, from a source that is external to the system to analyze data produced for legal purposes, a plurality of electronic files that are subject to a legal proceeding and at least some of which have duplicative information, the electronic files produced by and belonging to at least one party involved in the legal proceeding and present on a medium, and to extract the plurality of electronic files from the medium and to identify duplicative electronic files that are duplicative of each other or that contain information that is at least partially duplicative of other electronic files;

a network server that includes;

a first server unit coupled to the first recursive engine configured to provide the received electronic files in a searchable format;

a second server unit coupled to the first recursive engine configured to provide metadata associated with the received electronic files; and

a second engine in communication with the first and second server units configured, when executed using instructions stored in a computer-readable medium, to receive a request communicated via the network for electronic files having a specified characteristic and to process either or both the metadata in the second server unit and the electronic files in the searchable format in the first server unit to determine a set of electronic files having the specified characteristic that are responsive to the request; and

a user interface to present a particular electronic file from the determined set having the specified characteristic and that is responsive to the request, the user interface being adapted to first apply a legal annotation to the electronic file having the specified characteristic and that is responsive to the request and further adapted to then apply in bulk same said legal annotation to each of a group of identified duplicative electronic files stored at said server back-end and that each contain information that is at least partially duplicative of information contained in said particular electronic file to eliminate having to separately apply said legal annotation to each of the group of duplicative electronic files.

14. The system of claim 13, further comprising at least one application adapted to read a format of the received electronic files.

15. The system of claim 14 wherein the received electronic files include emails that have attachments, the system further including:

at least one controller coupled to the first recursive engine to determine a server unit which to send the extracted electronic files; and

a third server unit coupled to the controller to provide the emails in a displayable format and to separately provide the attachments in the displayable format, wherein the first server unit provides the attachment in a searchable format and wherein the second server unit provides metadata associated with the attachments and threading information associated with the emails.

16. The system of claim 14, further comprising a first administration program to generate a directory structure in the first server unit that indexes text data stored therein.

17. The system of claim 16, further comprising a second administration program to generate catalog and directory parameters that reference the directory structure in the first server unit and the text data therein.

18. The system of claim 14, further comprising at least one administration program to generate catalog and database parameters that reference the second server unit and the metadata therein.

19. The system of claim 14, further comprising another server unit, coupled between a client terminal and the second engine, to receive the request from the client terminal and to pass the request to the second engine to enable the second engine to apply the specified characteristic in the request to either or both the first and second server units, the second engine being configured to return responsive results of the request to the another server unit.

20. The system of claim 19 wherein the another server unit includes a virtual directory to reference data provided by the first and second server units.

21. The system of claim 14, further comprising:

a user authentication unit communicatively coupled to the server to control access to the server;

a user information unit communicatively coupled to the server to store information associated with users authenticated by and provided with access by the user authentication unit; and

an administration unit to support services between the server and the user authentication and user information units.

22. The system of claim 21 wherein the server supports legal annotation tools on said user interface, said legal annotation tools being adapted to apply said legal annotation and other legal annotations.

23. The system of claim 14, further comprising:

at least one hashing unit coupled to the first recursive engine to generate hashes for at least a portion of each of the extracted electronic files;

a decision unit coupled to the hashing unit to compare the generated hashes, similar hashes being indicative of electronic files having duplicative information; and

at least one controller coupled to the decision unit to process electronic files having duplicative information, as identified by said similar hashes, differently than other electronic files.

24. The system of claim 23 wherein the controller processes electronic files having duplicative information differently by maintaining restricted access to such electronic files.

25. The system of claim 23 wherein the controller processes electronic files having duplicative information differently by associating such electronic files to existing electronic files that have their searchable format in the first server unit and read-only copies in a third server unit, without separately providing a searchable format and read-only copies of the electronic files having duplicative information in the first and second server units, respectively.

26. The system of claim 23 wherein the hashing unit is further coupled to the first recursive engine to generate a media hash that is based at least in part on hashes generated for electronic files extracted from the medium, and wherein the decision unit is further coupled to compare generated media hashes to determine duplicate media.