System for managing frequency resources in multiple radio access networks and method thereof

• US 7,764,967 B2
• Filed: 05/31/2006
• Issued: 07/27/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 05/31/2005
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
• Original Assignee: Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
• Inventors: Lee, Yeon-Woo, Yun, Sang-Boh, Kim, Hoon
• Primary Examiner(s): Ly; Nghi H
• Assistant Examiner(s): Gonzalez; Amancio
• Application Number:
  US11/444,108
• Publication Number:
  US 20060286986A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,518 Days
• Field of Search: 455/450, 455/447, 455/509
• US Class Current: 455/450
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 16/00 Network planning, e.g. coverage or traffic planning tools; Network deployment, e.g. resource partitioning or cells structures
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 16/04 Traffic adaptive resource partitioning

Abstract

Disclosed is a system and method for managing frequency resources, that is, a system and method for dynamically allocating and managing frequency resources in multiple radio access networks (RAN). In multiple radio access networks, the system and method manages frequency resources in consideration of the priorities of radio access networks and the priorities of service classes of each radio access network, and manages the frequency resources through negotiation and auction for frequency resources among the radio access networks.

Claims

1. A system for managing frequency resources in a communication environment including multiple radio access networks employing various radio access schemes, the system comprising:

a spectrum relay apparatus,

wherein the spectrum relay apparatus calculates each frequency bandwidth to be allocated to the networks in consideration of priorities of the networks and priorities of service classes of each network, when a sum of frequency bandwidths requested from spectrum managers managing frequency resources for the networks is larger than an entire remaining bandwidth of the spectrum relay apparatus, and reports results of the calculation to corresponding spectrum managers;

conducts negotiation among the spectrum managers for a portion of the entire remaining bandwidth when the spectrum managers request an auction for frequency bandwidth allocation in response to results of the calculation, and allocates the entire remaining bandwidth to the spectrum managers according to a result of the negotiation;

makes a portion of the entire remaining bandwidth available for auction to the spectrum managers when the negotiation does not result in an agreement, and allocates the entire remaining bandwidth to the spectrum managers according to a result of the auction; and

allocates the frequency bandwidth to the spectrum managers according to the result of the calculation when no spectrum manager requests the auction in response to the result of the calculation.

2. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the spectrum relay apparatus manages the entire remaining bandwidth by dividing the entire remaining bandwidth into a shared frequency bandwidth and an auction frequency bandwidth, and performs the negotiation and auction for the auction frequency bandwidth when an auction is requested.

3. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein frequency bandwidths to be allocated to the networks are calculated

$B_k=R_k$

∑

j = 1 C ⁢

α

kj ⁢

L kj ∑

k = 1 N ⁢

∑

j = 1 C ⁢

α

kj ⁢

L kj ⁢

B T

wherein, B_k represents a frequency bandwidth to be allocated to a spectrum manager ‘

k’

, R_k represents a priority of the spectrum manager ‘

k’

for frequency resource allocation, a_kj represents a priority of service class ‘

j’

of the spectrum manager ‘

k’

for frequency resource allocation, L_kj represents an estimated load value for service class ‘

j’

of the spectrum manager ‘

k’

, B_T represents the entire remaining bandwidth managed by the spectrum relay apparatus, N represents the number of spectrum managers, and C represents the number of service classes.

4. The system as claimed in claim 3, wherein the spectrum relay apparatus periodically updates the value of R_k.

5. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the spectrum relay apparatus allocates as many frequency bandwidths as requested by the spectrum managers to corresponding spectrum managers, when the sum of the requested frequency bandwidths is smaller than the entire remaining bandwidth.

6. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein a spectrum manager calculates an entire amount of frequency bandwidth required for a network managed by the spectrum manager by using load values according to service classes of the network, requests the spectrum relay apparatus to allocate the calculated entire amount of frequency bandwidth to the spectrum manager, and allocates a frequency bandwidth allocated from the spectrum relay apparatus according to the load values of service classes.

7. A system for managing frequency resources in a communication environment including multiple radio access networks employing various radio access schemes, the system comprising:

local resource managers for managing load values according to service classes by each network;

spectrum managers for receiving the load values according to service classes from the local resource managers of networks employing the same radio access scheme from among the networks, calculating a sum of frequency bandwidths corresponding to the received load values, and requesting a frequency bandwidth corresponding the sum to be allocated; and

a spectrum relay apparatus for calculating frequency bandwidths to be allocated to the spectrum managers for frequency bands requested from the spectrum managers in consideration of priorities of the networks and priorities of service classes of each network, and allocating frequency bandwidths to the spectrum managers through negotiation and auction among the spectrum managers according to a result of the calculation.

8. The system as claimed in claim 7, wherein the spectrum relay apparatus calculates each frequency bandwidth to be allocated to the networks in consideration of priorities of the networks and priorities of service classes of each network, when a sum of frequency bandwidths requested from the spectrum managers is larger than an entire remaining bandwidth of the spectrum relay apparatus, and reports results of the calculation to corresponding spectrum managers, respectively;

conducts negotiation among the spectrum managers for a portion of the entire remaining bandwidth when the spectrum managers request an auction for frequency bandwidth allocation in response to results of the calculation, and allocates the entire remaining bandwidth to the spectrum managers according to a result of the negotiation;

makes a portion of the entire remaining bandwidth available for auction to the spectrum managers when the negotiation does not result in an agreement, and allocates the entire remaining bandwidth to the spectrum managers according to a result of the auction; and

allocates the frequency bandwidth to the spectrum managers according to the result of the calculation when no spectrum manager requests the auction in response to the result of the calculation.

9. The system as claimed in claim 8, wherein the spectrum relay apparatus manages the entire remaining bandwidth by dividing the entire remaining bandwidth into a shared frequency bandwidth and an auction frequency bandwidth, and performs the negotiation and auction for the auction frequency bandwidth when an auction is requested.

10. The system as claimed in claim 8, wherein the spectrum relay apparatus allocates as many frequency bandwidths as requested by the spectrum managers to corresponding spectrum managers, when the sum of the requested frequency bandwidths is smaller than the entire remaining bandwidth.

11. The system as claimed in claim 7, wherein frequency bandwidths to be allocated to the networks are calculated by

$B_k=R_k$

∑

j = 1 C ⁢

α

kj ⁢

L kj ∑

k = 1 N ⁢

∑

j = 1 C ⁢

α

kj ⁢

L kj ⁢

B T

wherein, B_k represents a frequency bandwidth to be allocated to a spectrum manager ‘

k’

, R_k represents a priority of the spectrum manager ‘

k’

for frequency resource allocation, a_kj represents a priority of service class ‘

j’

of the spectrum manager ‘

k’

for frequency resource allocation, L_kj represents an estimated load value for service class ‘

j’

of the spectrum manager ‘

k’

, B_T represents the entire remaining bandwidth managed by the spectrum relay apparatus, N represents the number of spectrum managers, and C represents the number of service classes.

12. The system as claimed in claim 11, wherein the spectrum relay apparatus periodically updates the value of R_k.

13. A method for managing frequency resources in a frequency resource management system in a communication environment including multiple radio access networks employing various radio access schemes, the method comprising the steps of:

calculating each frequency bandwidth to be allocated to the networks in consideration of priorities of the networks and priorities of service classes of each network when a sum of frequency bandwidths requested from managers of corresponding networks is larger than an entire remaining bandwidth of the system, and reporting results of the calculation to corresponding managers;

conducting negotiation among the managers for a portion of the entire remaining bandwidth when the managers request an auction for frequency bandwidth allocation in response to results of the calculation, and allocating the entire remaining bandwidth to the managers according to a result of the negotiation;

making a portion of the entire remaining bandwidth available for auction to the managers when the negotiation does not result in an agreement, and allocating the entire remaining bandwidth to the managers according to a result of the auction; and

allocating the frequency bandwidth to the managers according to the result of the calculation when no manager requests the auction in response to the result of the calculation.

14. The method as claimed in claim 13, wherein the entire remaining bandwidth is divided and managed into a shared frequency bandwidth and an auction frequency bandwidth, and the negotiation and auction for the auction frequency bandwidth are performed when an auction is requested.

15. The method as claimed in claim 13, wherein frequency bandwidths to be allocated to the networks are calculated by

$B_k=R_k$

∑

j = 1 C ⁢

α

kj ⁢

L kj ∑

k = 1 N ⁢

∑

j = 1 C ⁢

α

kj ⁢

L kj ⁢

B T

wherein, B_k represents a frequency bandwidth to be allocated to a manager ‘

k’

, R_k represents a priority of the manager ‘

k’

for frequency resource allocation, a_kj represents a priority of service class ‘

j’

of the manager ‘

k’

for frequency resource allocation, L_kj represents an estimated load value for service class ‘

j’

of the manager ‘

k’

, B_T represents the entire remaining bandwidth, N represents the number of managers, and C represents the number of service classes.

16. The method as claimed in claim 15, wherein the value of R_k is periodically updated.

17. The method as claimed in claim 13, further comprising a step of allocating as many frequency bandwidths as requested by the managers to corresponding managers when the sum of the frequency bandwidths requested from the managers is smaller than the entire remaining bandwidth.