Systems and methods for resolving conflicts and managing system resources in multimedia delivery systems

• US 7,765,235 B2
• Filed: 12/29/2005
• Issued: 07/27/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 12/29/2005
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Rovi Guides, Inc. (Adeia Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Rovi Guides, Inc. (Adeia Inc.)
• Inventors: Day, Thomas, Craner, Michael L
• Primary Examiner(s): Alam; Hosain T
• Assistant Examiner(s): Tang; Jieying
• Application Number:
  US11/323,984
• Publication Number:
  US 20070174336A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,671 Days
• Field of Search: 707/101, 707/104.1, 725/55, 725/86, 386/46
• US Class Current: 707/795
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 21/4334 Recording operations recording of a television signal H04N5/76; arrangements for recording or accumulating broadcast information or broadcast-related information H04H60/27
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 21/4583 Automatically resolving scheduling conflicts, e.g. when a recording by reservation has been programmed for two programs in the same time slot
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 21/47202 for requesting content on demand, e.g. video on demand
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 21/8545 for generating interactive applications
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 7/17318 Direct or substantially direct transmission and handling of requests
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 707/913 Multimedia

Abstract

The invention manages resources and resolve conflicts when locally recording multimedia assets from a variety of sources in multimedia delivery systems. Local and system resources such as storage, tuners, and bandwidth are considered when alternative sources for assets are available (e.g., VOD). Rather than record assets locally, if equivalent assets are available via alternative sources, the recordings are deferred and a pointer to the equivalent asset is stored in lieu of the asset itself. When a user selects a multimedia asset for playback, an “on demand” or alternative source session is started for the asset associated with the pointer. Before the expiration date of the alternative source equivalent of the multimedia asset, it may be downloaded and recorded locally. The system may automatically determine based on various factors, such as transmission bandwidth, latency, and DRM, whether to store assets or pointers.

Claims

1. A method for managing resources in a multimedia delivery network, the method comprising:

scheduling on a personal video recorder (PVR) a local recording of a multimedia asset that is available during a first window of time from a first source;

gathering information related to resources of the PVR and the multimedia delivery network;

determining whether an equivalent multimedia asset with a same title and the same program content as the multimedia asset is available outside the first window of time from at least one alternative source, wherein the equivalent multimedia asset is stored remotely and the at least one alternative source is other than a broadcast source; and

deciding, based upon the determining and applying other system and/or user-specified criteria, whether or not to record the multimedia asset locally, wherein when it is decided not to record the multimedia asset locally, the method further comprises;

deferring the local recording of the multimedia asset beyond the first window of time; and

storing a first multimedia asset pointer that allows access to the equivalent multimedia asset locally.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein gathering information comprises checking an amount of local storage space that is available on the PVR, and wherein applying the other criteria includes determining whether the local storage space is sufficient to record the multimedia asset.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein gathering information comprises determining a number of tuners that are available during the first window of time and applying the other criteria includes determining that tuners are available when recording will be performed.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one alternative source comprises a video-on-demand (VOD) server.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one alternative source comprises a pay-per-view (PPV) channel.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one alternative source comprises an Internet server.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein gathering information includes determining an expiration time of the equivalent multimedia asset from the at least one alternative source.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein, when the expiration time of the equivalent multimedia asset from the at least one alternative source is imminent, the method further comprises recording on the PVR the equivalent multimedia asset from the at least one alternative source.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising presenting a user interface to a user of the PVR wherein a multimedia asset that is stored locally is represented to the user in the same way as the equivalent multimedia asset for which only a pointer is stored.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein gathering information includes determining a digital rights restriction associated with the equivalent multimedia asset from the at least one alternative source and applying the other criteria includes determining whether accessing or recording the equivalent multimedia asset violates at least one digital right.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

comparing locally stored multimedia assets with equivalent assets available from the at least one alternative source;

deleting at least one of the locally stored multimedia assets; and

storing a second multimedia asset pointer to a multimedia asset that is equivalent to and has the same program content as the at least one deleted multimedia asset.

12. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

scheduling on the PVR a local recording of a second multimedia asset during a second window of time, the second multimedia asset different from the multimedia asset; and

determining that a tuner resource conflict exists due to an overlap between the first and the second windows of time, wherein the deciding is a function of the determining that the tuner resource conflict exists.

13. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

capturing a desired future viewing time from the PVR user, the viewing time being later than the first window of time; and

presenting to the user a list of multimedia assets that are viewable during that future viewing time wherein the list includes the equivalent multimedia asset.

14. The method of claim 13, further comprising:

allowing the user to select the equivalent multimedia asset from the list for future viewing, wherein the gathering information includes determining whether the user selected the equivalent multimedia asset from the list and the applying the criteria is a function of whether or not the user selected the equivalent multimedia asset from the list.

15. The method of claim 13, wherein the gathering information includes determining an expiration time for the equivalent multimedia asset and the method further comprises updating the list to remove the listing of the equivalent multimedia asset if the expiration time is earlier than the viewing time.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein when it is decided not to record the multimedia asset locally, the method further comprising storing a beginning portion of the equivalent multimedia asset locally as part of a quick-start feature for the multimedia asset.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein gathering information comprises checking a remaining storage capacity of the PVR, wherein, if the remaining storage capacity is insufficient for recording the multimedia asset, applying a deletion criterion to identify a stored multimedia asset to be deleted from the PVR.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein the deletion criterion comprises a date/time when a stored multimedia asset was last watched, a frequency with which a stored multimedia asset was accessed, a designation as “

archived program,”

a rental conditions for the stored multimedia asset, a current availability of a stored multimedia asset from a server, a user'"'"'s permission for deletion, or a combination thereof.

19. The method of claim 18, further comprising notifying a user if the remaining storage capacity remains insufficient after applying the deletion criterion.

20. The method of claim 1, further comprising locally recording the multimedia asset, if on-demand session capacity is insufficient for real-time transmission of the equivalent multimedia asset from the at least one alternative source.

21. The method of claim 20, wherein the on-demand session capacity includes at least one of a transmission bandwidth from the at least one alternative source and a latency from the at least one alternative source.

35. The method of claim 1 wherein determining whether an equivalent multimedia asset is available from the at least one alternative source comprises:

searching assets available from a VOD server or VOD service; and

searching assets available from at least one other source selected from the group consisting of a pay-per-view (PPV) channel and an Internet server.

36. The method of claim 1 wherein the first source is different than the at least one alternative source.

22. A system to manage resources in a multimedia delivery network, the system comprising a personal video recorder (PVR) with control circuitry configured to:

schedule on the PVR a local recording of a multimedia asset that is available during a first window of time from a first source;

gather information related to resources of the PVR and the multimedia delivery network;

determine whether an equivalent multimedia asset with a same title and the same program content as the multimedia asset is available from at least one alternative source outside the first window of time, wherein the equivalent multimedia asset is stored remotely and the at least one alternative source is other than a broadcast source; and

decide, based upon the determining and applying other system and/or user-specified criteria, whether or not to record the multimedia asset locally, wherein when it is decided not to record the multimedia asset locally, the control circuitry is further configured to;

defer the local recording of the multimedia asset beyond the first window of time; and

store a first multimedia asset pointer h that allows access to the equivalent multimedia asset locally.

23. The system of claim 22, the control circuitry further configured to check an amount of local storage space that is available on the PVR, and to determine whether the local storage space is sufficient to record the multimedia asset.

24. The system of claim 22, wherein the at least one alternative source comprises a video-on-demand (VOD) server.

25. The system of claim 22, wherein the at least one alternative source additionally comprises a pay-per-view (PPV) channel.

26. The system of claim 22, wherein the at least one alternative source additionally comprises an Internet server.

27. The system of claim 22, the control circuitry further configured to determine if an expiration time of the equivalent multimedia asset from the at least one alternative source is imminent, and if the expiration time is imminent, to cause the PVR to record the equivalent multimedia asset from the at least one alternative source.

28. The system of claim 22, the control circuitry further configured to:

compare multimedia assets stored on the PVR with equivalent assets available from the at least one alternative source;

delete at least one of the multimedia assets stored on the PVR; and

store a second multimedia asset pointer to a multimedia asset that is equivalent to and has the same program content as the at least one deleted multimedia asset.

29. The system of claim 22, the control circuitry further configured to:

schedule on the PVR a local recording of a second multimedia asset during a second window of time, the second multimedia asset different from the multimedia asset;

determine that a tuner resource conflict exists due to an overlap between the first and the second window of time; and

decide, based upon the determination of a conflict and by applying other system and/or user-specified criteria, whether or not to record the multimedia asset locally.

30. The system of claim 22, the control circuitry further configured to:

check a remaining storage capacity of the PVR; and

if the remaining storage capacity is insufficient to record the multimedia asset, apply a deletion criterion to identify a stored multimedia asset to be deleted from the PVR.

31. The system of claim 30, wherein the deletion criterion comprises a date/time when a stored multimedia asset was last watched, a frequency with which a stored multimedia asset was accessed, a designation as “

archived program,”

a rental conditions for the stored multimedia asset, a current availability of a stored multimedia asset from a server, a user'"'"'s permission for deletion, or a combination thereof.

32. The system of claim 30, the control circuitry further configured to notify a user if the remaining storage capacity remains insufficient after applying the deletion criterion.

33. The system of claim 22, the control circuitry further configured to cause the PVR to record the multimedia asset, if VOD session capacity is insufficient for real-time transmission of the equivalent multimedia asset from the at least one alternative source.

34. The system of claim 33, wherein the VOD session capacity includes at least one of a transmission bandwidth from the at least one alternative source and a latency from the at least one alternative source.

37. The system of claim 22 wherein the control circuitry is configured to determine whether an equivalent multimedia asset is available from the at least one alternative source by:

searching assets available from a VOD server or VOD service; and

searching assets available from at least one other source selected from the group consisting of a pay-per-view (PPV) channel and an Internet server.

38. The system of claim 22 wherein the first source is different than the at least one alternative source.