System and method for an on-line jurisdiction manager

• US 7,813,827 B2
• Filed: 01/19/2007
• Issued: 10/12/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 09/07/2000
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: TriTech Software Systems (CentralSquare Technologies, LLC)
• Original Assignee: Praeses Corporation
• Inventors: Key, Jeffery Manuel
• Primary Examiner(s): VON BUHR, MARIA N
• Application Number:
  US11/624,939
• Publication Number:
  US 20070179911A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,362 Days
• Field of Search: 700 99-101, 705/1, 705/4, 705 7- 11, 705/1.1, 707 8- 10, 707/104.1, 707/201
• US Class Current: 700/100
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/08 Insurance

Abstract

The jurisdiction online manager manages required jurisdictional inspections mandated by a plurality of different jurisdictions performed by non-governmental entities. A central computer system receives object data for an object and most other information via a global computer network, typically the Internet. Based upon the provided object data, the jurisdiction online manage can determine the controlling jurisdiction for the object. The controlling jurisdiction is the jurisdiction in which the object is located. After determining the controlling jurisdiction, the jurisdiction'"'"'s inspection form or a similar inspection template can be provided to the inspectors, who will perform the actual physical inspections of the objects. After receiving inspection result data from the non-governmental inspection, the inspection result data is stored the system database. The inspection result data is then provided to the controlling jurisdiction. The controlling jurisdiction reviews the result data online and result data is provided to the inspection entity.

Claims

1. A method for sharing information regarding a particular object of a type of regulated objects that are inspectable, between a jurisdictional entity having a jurisdiction over that type of regulated objects and a nonjurisdictional entity, comprising the steps of:

storing, in a computer database, information required by the juridictional entity relating to compliance requirements of the jurisdictional entity for regulation of regulated objects of that particular type of object;

storing, in the computer database, initial object information relating to the particular object applicable to the object as one of the regulated objects of that particular type of object, as stored object information;

providing remote access to the stored initial object information by a person associated with the jurisdictional entity and by a person associated with the nonjurisdictional entity;

receiving and storing, in the computer database, additional object information input by a person associated with the nonjurisdictional entity applicable to the particular object relating to inspection of the particular object by a person;

allowing online review and approval of the initial object information and the additional object information by a person associated with the jurisdictional entity, based on the stored information relating to compliance requirements of the jurisdictional entity;

receiving and storing, in the computer database, approval information generated from approval of the initial object information and additional object information as complying with the compliance requirements of the jurisdictional entity, by the person associated with the jurisdictional entity; and

in response to receipt of the approval information, issuing a certificate of compliance for the particular object.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the additional object information comprises inspection data resulting from inspection of the particular object.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

arranging for inspection of the particular object by the nonjurisdictional entity; and

storing inspection data resulting from the inspection as additional object information.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of:

scheduling an inspection for the particular object.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the jurisdictional entity is a governmental regulatory agency.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the nonjurisdictional entity is selected from the group comprising an inspection entity, an insurance company, and/or the owner of the object.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein information required by the jurisdictional entity for regulation of regulated objects of that particular type of object is expressed in a template associated with the jurisdictional entity.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the remote access to the stored object information is effected via the Internet.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the remote access to the stored object information is allowed only to an authorized person associated with the jurisdictional entity and an authorized person associated with the nonjurisdictional entity.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the authorized person is a commissioned inspector.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the regulated objects are physically inspectable objects.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the physically inspectable objects are selected from the group:

pressure vessels, boilers, elevators, and amusement park rides.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the method is effected on a computer system that manages online review and approval of object information for a plurality of different jurisdictional entities.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the jurisdictional entity is a governmental inspection entity.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein the nonjurisdictional entity is a non-governmental inspection entity.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein the method is carried out for plurality of regulated objects involving a plurality of jurisdictional entities.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein the information regarding the particular regulated object is shared between the jurisdictional entity and a plurality of nonjurisdictional entities.

18. The system of claim 1, wherein the person inspecting the particular object is associated with the nonjurisdictional entity.

19. The system of claim 1, wherein the person inspecting the particular object is associated with the jurisdictional entity.

20. A system for sharing information regarding a particular object of a type of regulated objects that are inspectable, between a jurisdictional entity having a jurisdiction over regulated objects of that type of objects and a nonjurisdictional entity, comprising:

a data network component for coupling to a global communication network for communicating on-line with a computer system of a jurisdictional entity and at least one nonjurisdictional entity;

a server computer coupled to the data network component including a database and operative for running application programs that contain application program logic for;

storing regulation information required by the jurisdictional entity relating to compliance requirements of the jurisdictional entity for regulation of regulated objects of that particular type of object;

storing initial object information relating to the particular object applicable to the object as one of the regulated objects of that particular type of object, as stored object information;

providing remote access to the stored initial object information by a person associated with the jurisdictional entity and by a person associated with a nonjurisdictional entity;

receiving and storing additional object information input by a person associated with the nonjurisdictional entity applicable to the particular object relating to inspection of the particular object by a person; and

allowing online review and approval of the initial object information and the additional object information by a person associated with the jurisdictional entity based on the stored regulation information;

relating to compliance requirements of the jurisdictional entity; and

in response to receipt of approval indication information resulting from approval of the initial object information and additional object information as complying with the compliance requirements of the jurisdictional entity, by the person associated with the jurisdictional entity, issuing a certificate of compliance for the particular object; and

a data storage system coupled to the server computer for storing application program data, regulation information, stored object information, initial object information and additional object information, and approval indication information.

21. The system of claim 20, wherein the server computer further comprises application programming logic for scheduling inspection for the particular object by a person.

22. The system of claim 20, wherein the jurisdictional entity is a governmental regulatory agency.

23. The system of claim 20, wherein the nonjurisdictional entity is selected from the group comprising an inspection entity, an insurance company, and/or the owner of the object.

24. The system of claim 20, wherein information required by the jurisdictional entity for regulation of regulated objects of that particular type of object is expressed in a template associated with the jurisdictional entity.

25. The system of claim 20, wherein the remote access to the stored object information is effected via the Internet.

26. The system of claim 20, wherein the remote access to the stored object information is allowed only to an authorized person associated with the jurisdictional entity and an authorized person associated with the nonjurisdictional entity.

27. The system of claim 26, wherein the authorized person is a commissioned inspector.

28. The system of claim 20, wherein the regulated objects are physically inspectable objects.

29. The system of claim 28, wherein the physically inspectable objects are selected from the group:

pressure vessels, boilers, elevators, and amusement park rides.

30. The system of claim 20, wherein the system manages online review and approval of object information for a plurality of different jurisdictional entities.

31. The system of claim 20, wherein the jurisdictional entity is a governmental inspection entity.

32. The system of claim 20, wherein the nonjurisdictional entity is a non-governmental inspection entity.

33. The system of claim 20, wherein the system is operative in connection with a plurality of regulated objects involving a plurality of jurisdictional entities.

34. The system of claim 20, wherein the information regarding the particular regulated object is shared between the jurisdictional entity and a plurality of nonjurisdictional entities.

35. The system of claim 20, wherein the person inspecting the particular object is associated with the nonjurisdictional entity.

36. The system of claim 20, wherein the person inspecting the particular object is associated with the jurisdictional entity.