Flexible rule-based infrastructure for discussion board maintenance

• US 7,840,576 B1
• Filed: 04/07/2010
• Issued: 11/23/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 12/19/2006
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: IMDb.com, Inc. (Amazon.com, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: IMDb.com, Inc. (Amazon.com, Inc.)
• Inventors: Needham, Colin J., Siegel, Hilliard B.
• Primary Examiner(s): Trujillo; James
• Assistant Examiner(s): Spieler; William
• Application Number:
  US12/756,112
• Time in Patent Office: 230 Days
• Field of Search: 707/755, 705/319
• US Class Current: 707/755
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/01 Social networking
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 12/1822 Conducting the conference, e.g. admission, detection, selection or grouping of participants, correlating users to one or more conference sessions, prioritising transmission
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 51/212 using filtering or selective blocking

Abstract

Generally described, a method and system for providing a flexible rule-based infrastructure for a self-policing discussion board is provided. More specifically, a method and system is provided for processing reports for messages posted in a discussion board and determining whether each report is accurate based on predetermined criteria. The predetermined criteria are defined by a set of report handling rules which evolve over time by learning from previously processed activity reports. The set of report handling rules also defines an appropriate action to take with regards to an accused message as response to the report when the predetermined criteria are satisfied.

Claims

1. A discussion forum management system for enabling users to report undesirable messages, the discussion forum management system comprising:

a user interface component configured to use one or more computing devices to cause one or more messages posted within a discussion forum to be displayed and to receive an activity report from one or more users via user interactions, the activity report identifying an undesirable message and an abuse category of the undesirable message;

a processing component configured to use one or more computing devices to aggregate the received activity report into a current list of activity reports; and

a report handling component configured to use one or more computing devices to apply a set of report handling rules to the current list of activity reports at a predetermined time of day, the set of report handling rules specifying criteria specific to a category that is assigned to the activity report.

2. The discussion forum management system of claim 1, wherein the category assigned to the activity report is one of a trusted report, an ignored report, an indecisive report, or a logged report.

3. The discussion forum management system of claim 2, wherein if the activity report matches criteria of a trusted report, the report handling component is configured to perform an action specified in the set of report handing rules.

4. The discussion forum management system of claim 3, wherein the action is at least one of deleting from the discussion forum the undesirable message, editing the undesirable message, sending to a user who posted the undesirable message a warning about the undesirable message, or canceling an account of the user who posted the undesirable message within the discussion forum.

5. The discussion forum management system of claim 2, wherein if the activity report matches criteria of an ignored report, the activity report is deleted from the list of the activity reports.

6. The discussion forum management system of claim 2, wherein if the activity report matches criteria of an indecisive report, the activity report is marked for evaluation by a human administrator.

7. The discussion forum management system of claim 2, wherein the report handling component is further configured to generate an activity report history after applying the set of report handling rules to an activity report from the current list of activity reports.

8. The discussion forum management system of claim 1, wherein the processing component is further configured to sample a set of activity reports which have been processed by the report handing component and reevaluate the sampled set of activity reports.

9. The discussion forum management system of claim 8, wherein the processing component is configured to identify a problem in the set of report handling rules.

10. The discussion forum management system of claim 9, wherein the processing component is configured to identify one or more new rules to address the identified problem.

11. The discussion forum management system of claim 10, wherein the processing component is configured to modify the set of report handling rules in accordance with the one or more new rules.

12. The discussion forum management system of claim 1, further comprising a storage component configured to use one or more computing devices to store the current list of activity reports and the set of report handling rules.

13. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having computer-executable components stored thereon that are configured to enable one or more processors of a computer system to process an activity report to determine an accuracy of the activity report, the computer-executable components comprising:

an evaluating component configured to process an activity report at a predetermined time of day to determine whether the activity report is trusted with respect to an accused message; and

a rule management component configured to define a set of report handling rules and update the set of report handling rules based on an accuracy of the processed activity report;

wherein the evaluating component is configured to apply the set of report handling rules to the activity report as it processes the activity report.

14. The computer-readable medium of claim 13, wherein the evaluating component is configured to identify an action from a report handling rule and to execute the identified action with respect to an activity report.

15. The computer-readable medium of claim 14, wherein the evaluating component is configured to generate log information relating to each processed activity report.

16. The computer-readable medium of claim 14, wherein the log information relating to each processed activity report includes reputation factors of a user who submitted the activity report.

17. The computer-readable medium of claim 16, wherein the reputation factors include an accuracy rate that is determined by the rule management component and a trust level that is received from a human administrator.

18. The computer-readable medium of claim 16, wherein the reputation factors include a longevity of an account of the user who submitted the activity report.

19. The computer-readable medium of claim 13, wherein the evaluating component is configured to determine whether the activity report is trusted with respect to the accused message based on reputation factors of a user who posted the accused message.

20. The computer-readable medium of claim 19, wherein the reputation factors include a longevity of an account of the user who posted the accused message.