Display system for an agricultural harvesting machine

• US 7,872,587 B2
• Filed: 09/17/2009
• Issued: 01/18/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 09/19/2008
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Blue Leaf IP Incorporated (CNH Industrial N.V.)
• Original Assignee: CNH America Llc (CNH Industrial N.V.)
• Inventors: Hindryckx, Kris, Depreitere, Dries M. J., Missotten, Bart M. A.
• Primary Examiner(s): FABIAN-KOVACS, ARPAD
• Application Number:
  US12/586,095
• Publication Number:
  US 20100071329A1
• Time in Patent Office: 488 Days
• Field of Search: 701/50, 701/1, 701/36, 701/212, 701/207, 340/601, 340/988, 340/684, 460/4, 460/6, 702/129, 702/5, 56/102.R
• US Class Current: 340/684
• CPC Class Codes: A01D 41/127 Control or measuring arrangements specially adapted for combines

Abstract

A control system for a combine harvester having a crop processing system with a control panel for enabling an operator of the combine harvester to set a plurality of operating parameters of the crop processing system that affect the harvesting performance, and a plurality of sensors for determining prevailing values of crop quality parameters. The control system includes a data processor having a display for communicating information visually to the operator and acts to determine when a crop quality parameter exceeds an unacceptability threshold. Following such determination, the control system displays to the operator an operating parameter of which adjustment is recommended in order to restore the crop quality parameter to an acceptable value. The recommended operating parameter is derived from data stored in a look-up table within the data processor.

Claims

1. A control system for an agricultural harvesting machine having a crop processing system, a control panel for enabling an operator of the harvesting machine to set a plurality of operating parameters of the crop processing system that affect the harvesting performance, and a plurality of sensors for determining prevailing values of crop quality parameters, wherein the control system comprises a data processor having a display for communicating information visually to the operator, the control system being operative to determine when a crop quality parameter exceeds an unacceptability threshold, and, following such determination of the crop quality parameter, to display to the operator an operating parameter of which adjustment is recommended in order to restore the crop quality parameter to an acceptable value, the recommended operating parameter being derived from data stored in a look-up table within the data processor, wherein the look-up table includes for each crop quality parameter default settings of a group of operating parameters by which the crop quality parameter is affected, when an acceptability threshold is exceeded, the prevailing values of the different operating parameters associated with the determined crop quality parameter, are compared by the data processor with the default settings thereby resulting in a plurality of difference values, the plurality of difference values are compared with one another, wherein the data processor selects the operating parameter from the group of operating parameters having the largest difference value and displays the operating parameter with a recommended corrective action.

2. A control system as claimed in claim 1, wherein implementation of the recommended correction acts to reduce the difference between the prevailing setting and the default setting of the modified operating parameter by a predetermined proportion.

3. A control system as claimed in claim 2, wherein the predetermined proportion is equal to 50%.

4. A control system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the stored default settings are selectable by an operator.

5. A control system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the stored unacceptability thresholds are selectable by an operator.

6. A control system as claimed in claim 1, having a manual operating mode in which recommendations for improving the harvesting performance are provided to the operator only upon request, the recommendations, if approved, being manually implemented by the operator.

7. A control system as claimed in claim 1, having an assisted operating mode in which the operator is warned by an alarm when one of the thresholds is exceeded, and, upon receiving a request for assistance from the operator, the control system displays a recommended action which is implemented by the control system only after receiving a consent signal from the operator.

8. A control system as claimed in claim 1, having an automatic operating mode for warning the operator when a threshold is exceeded, indicating to the operator a recommended course of action and automatically implementing the recommended course of action each time a threshold is exceeded, unless an overriding command is received from the operator.

9. A control system as claimed in claim 1, wherein after a time period of at least 60 seconds, the data processor evaluates if the acceptability threshold is still exceeded, wherein if the acceptability threshold is still exceeded then the prevailing values of the different operating parameters associated with the identified crop quality parameter, are compared again by the data processor with the default settings resulting in a plurality of difference values, the data processor again compares the plurality of difference values with one another, wherein the data processor selects the operating parameter from the group of operating parameters having the largest difference value and displays the operating parameter with a recommended corrective action.