System and method providing quality based peer review and distribution of digital content
First Claim
1. A computer-implemented method of reviewing and distributing digital content comprising:
- identifying a plurality of authors of digital content via a registration process wherein the plurality of authors agree to review digital content in exchange for review of their own digital content;
receiving a submission from one of the plurality of authors including metadata for digital content to be reviewed where the metadata includes a target quality level for the digital content; and
effecting review of the digital content by at least one group of reviewers selected from others of the plurality of authors based on the metadata for the digital content and reviewer credentials for the others of the plurality of authors, wherein effecting review of the digital content includes selecting a group of reviewers from the others of the plurality of authors based on the target quality level and the reviewer credentials of the others of the plurality of authors andfeedback is provided to the one of the plurality of authors based on the review.
1 Assignment
0 Petitions
Accused Products
Abstract
A digital content review and distribution system and method are provided. In general, a number of authors of digital content register with a content review and distribution agent, which may be hosted by a central server. The authors agree to review digital content submitted by other authors in exchange for review and distribution of their own content. In operation, an author submits metadata associated with digital content to be reviewed and optionally the digital content to the content review and distribution agent. In response to the submission, the content review and distribution agent effects a review of the digital content by one or more groups of reviewers, where the groups of reviewers are selected from the other authors registered with the content review and distribution agent based on the metadata for the digital content and reviewer credentials of the other authors.
-
Citations
30 Claims
-
1. A computer-implemented method of reviewing and distributing digital content comprising:
-
identifying a plurality of authors of digital content via a registration process wherein the plurality of authors agree to review digital content in exchange for review of their own digital content; receiving a submission from one of the plurality of authors including metadata for digital content to be reviewed where the metadata includes a target quality level for the digital content; and effecting review of the digital content by at least one group of reviewers selected from others of the plurality of authors based on the metadata for the digital content and reviewer credentials for the others of the plurality of authors, wherein effecting review of the digital content includes selecting a group of reviewers from the others of the plurality of authors based on the target quality level and the reviewer credentials of the others of the plurality of authors and feedback is provided to the one of the plurality of authors based on the review. - View Dependent Claims (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15)
-
-
16. A central server for a digital content review and distribution system comprising:
-
a communication interface communicatively coupling the central server to user devices associated with a plurality of authors of digital content via a network; and a control system associated with the communication interface and configured to; identify the plurality of authors of digital content via a registration process wherein the plurality of authors agree to review digital content in exchange for review of their own digital content; receive a submission from one of the plurality of authors including metadata for digital content to be reviewed where the metadata includes a target quality level for the digital content; and effect review of the digital content by at least one group of reviewers selected from others of the plurality of authors based on the metadata for the digital content and reviewer credentials for the others of the plurality of authors, wherein effecting review of the digital content includes selecting a group of reviewers from the others of the plurality of authors based on the target quality level and the reviewer credentials of the others of the plurality of authors and feedback is provided to the one of the plurality of authors based on the review. - View Dependent Claims (17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30)
-
Specification