Methods and systems for monitoring characteristics in a fluid flow path having a filter for filtering fluid in the path

• US 7,922,914 B1
• Filed: 08/23/2007
• Issued: 04/12/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 08/23/2007
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Cummins Filtration IP Inc. (Cummins Incorporated)
• Original Assignee: Cummins Filtration IP Inc. (Cummins Incorporated)
• Inventors: Zuroski, Michael T., Genter, David P., Verdegan, Barry M.
• Primary Examiner(s): Drodge; Joseph W
• Application Number:
  US11/844,018
• Time in Patent Office: 1,328 Days
• Field of Search: 210/85, 210/87, 210/90, 210/93, 210/96.1, 210/96.2, 210/108, 210/138, 210/143, 210/335, 210/741, 210/791, 964/21, 964/22, 73/38, 73/40, 700/29, 700/30, 700/273, 703/7, 703/9, 702/47, 702/50, 702/98, 702/100
• US Class Current: 210/741
• CPC Class Codes: B01D 37/046 by pressure measuring
• CPC Class Codes: B01D 46/0086 Filter condition indicators
• CPC Class Codes: B01D 46/446 by pressure measuring

Abstract

Methods and systems are provided for measuring pressure drop through a filter in the flow path and then using the measured pressure drop, possibly at a normalized state and in conjunction with time and/or other data from the system, to estimate characteristics of the fluid, the filter, and/or a working component supplied with the filtered fluid. Such characteristics could include an operating condition of the filter, the remaining useful life of the filter, the relative contaminant concentration in the fluid, and/or the remaining useful life of a working component supplied with the filtered fluid.

Claims

1. A method of monitoring characteristics in a fluid flow path having a filter that is actively filtering fluid in the path, the method comprising the steps of:

measuring Δ

P (pressure drop) in the fluid as it flows through the active filter;

normalizing the measured Δ

P to a state having predetermined reference conditions;

comparing the measured Δ

P at the normalized state to a Δ

P of a hypothetical reference filter for which there exists a known correlation between Δ

P and contaminant removal from fluid under the predetermined reference conditions as a function of at least one of time, contaminant load and volume of fluid filtered;

wherein the contaminant removal from fluid is defined by the time-weighted ratio of the number concentration of particles larger than a certain size upstream of the hypothetical reference filter to the number concentration of particles larger than the same size downstream of the hypothetical reference filter under a standardized laboratory filter test; and

estimating contaminant removal from fluid filtered by the active filter as a function of at least one of time and contaminant load and volume of fluid filtered for the active filter wherein contaminant removal from fluid filtered by the active filter is estimated based on the known correlation between Δ

P and contaminant removal from fluid under the predetermined reference conditions for the hypothetical reference filter.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the reference conditions comprise fluid viscosity and fluid flow rate.

3. The method of claim 1, comprising the step of displaying the estimated contaminant removal.

4. The method of claim 1, comprising the step of providing an indication when the estimated contaminant removal is less than a predetermined value.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the fluid comprises at least one of a fuel, a lubricant, a hydraulic fluid, water, and air.

6. A method of monitoring characteristics in a fluid flow path having a filter that is actively filtering fluid in the path, the method comprising the steps of:

measuring Δ

P (pressure drop) in the fluid as it flows through the active filter;

normalizing the measured Δ

P to a state having predetermined reference conditions;

comparing the measured Δ

P at the normalized state to a Δ

P of a hypothetical reference filter for which there exists a known correlation between Δ

P and contaminant removal from fluid under the predetermined reference conditions as a function of at least one of time, contaminant load and volume of fluid filtered;

wherein the contaminant removal from fluid is defined by the time-weighted ratio of the number concentration of particles larger than a certain size upstream of the hypothetical reference filter to the number concentration of particles larger than the same size downstream of the hypothetical reference filter under a standardized laboratory filter test; and

determining an operational condition of the active filter wherein the operational condition is determined based on the known correlation between Δ

P and contaminant removal from fluid under the predetermined reference conditions for the hypothetical reference filter.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the operational condition comprises compromised filter integrity when the measured Δ

P at the normalized state is less than a predetermined level compared to the known correlation between Δ

P and contaminant removal.

8. The method of claim 6, wherein the operational condition comprises proper filter operation when the measured Δ

P at the normalized state is within a predetermined range compared to the known correlation between Δ

P and contaminant removal.

9. The method of claim 6, wherein the operational condition comprises degraded filter performance when the measured Δ

P at the normalized state is within a predetermined range compared to the known correlation between Δ

P and contaminant removal.

10. The method of claim 6, wherein the operational condition comprises plugged filter operation when the measured Δ

P at the normalized state is greater than a predetermined level compared to the known correlation between Δ

P and contaminant removal.

11. The method of claim 6, wherein the reference conditions comprise fluid viscosity and fluid flow rate.

12. The method of claim 6, wherein the fluid comprises at least one of a fuel, a lubricant, a hydraulic fluid, water, and air.

13. A fluid filtration system comprising:

a fluid flow path having at least one filter actively filtering fluid that flows along the flow path;

a sensor measuring Δ

P (pressure drop) in the fluid as it flows through the active filter; and

a controller programmed to (1) normalize the measured Δ

P to a state having predetermined reference conditions, (2) compare the measured Δ

P at the normalized state to a Δ

P of a hypothetical reference filter for which there exists a known correlation between Δ

P and contaminant removal from fluid under the predetermined reference conditions as a function of at least one of time, contaminant load and volume of fluid filtered, (3) analyze the contaminant removal from the fluid, and (4) define contaminant removal from fluid by the time-weighted ratio of the number concentration of particles larger than a certain size upstream of the hypothetical reference filter to the number concentration of particles larger than the same size downstream of the hypothetical reference filter under a standardized laboratory filter test; and

wherein the controller is programmed to estimate contaminant removal from fluid filtered by the active filter as a function of at least one of time, contaminant load and volume of fluid filtered for the active filter, and the controller estimates contaminant removal from fluid filtered by the active filter based on the known correlation between Δ

P and contaminant removal from fluid under the predetermined reference conditions for the hypothetical reference filter.

14. The system of claim 13, comprising a display for displaying the estimated contaminant removal.

15. The system of claim 13, comprising means for providing an indication to a user when the estimated contaminant removal is less than a predetermined value.

16. The system of claim 13, wherein the fluid comprises at least one of a fuel, a lubricant, a hydraulic fluid, water, and air.

17. A fluid filtration system comprising:

a fluid flow path having at least one filter actively filtering fluid that flows along the flow path;

a sensor measuring Δ

P (pressure drop) in the fluid as it flows through the active filter; and

a controller programmed to (1) normalize the measured Δ

P to a state having predetermined reference conditions, (2) compare the measured Δ

P at the normalized state to a Δ

P of a hypothetical reference filter for which there exists a known correlation between Δ

P and contaminant removal from fluid under the predetermined reference conditions as a function of at least one of time, contaminant load and volume of fluid filtered, (3) analyze the contaminant removal from the fluid, and (4) define contaminant removal from fluid by the time-weighted ratio of the number concentration of particles larger than a certain size upstream of the hypothetical reference filter to the number concentration of particles larger than the same size downstream of the hypothetical reference filter under a standardized laboratory filter test; and

wherein the controller is programmed to determine an operational condition of the active filter, and the programmed controller determines the operational condition based on the known correlation between Δ

P and contaminant removal from fluid under the predetermined reference conditions for the hypothetical reference filter.

18. The system of claim 17, wherein the operational condition comprises compromised filter integrity when the measured Δ

P at the normalized state is less than a predetermined level compared to the known correlation between Δ

P and contaminant removal.

19. The system of claim 17, wherein the operational condition comprises proper operation when the measured Δ

P at the normalized state is within a predetermined range compared to the known correlation between Δ

P and contaminant removal.

20. The system of claim 17, wherein the operational condition comprises degraded filter performance when the measured Δ

P at the normalized state is within a predetermined range compared to the known correlation between Δ

P and contaminant removal.

21. The system of claim 17, wherein the operational condition comprises plugged filter operation when the measured Δ

P at the normalized state is greater than a predetermined level compared to the known correlation between Δ

P and contaminant removal.

22. The system of claim 17, wherein the fluid comprises at least one of a fuel, a lubricant, a hydraulic fluid, water, and air.