Defining service funding for a service oriented architecture

• US 7,957,994 B2
• Filed: 02/01/2008
• Issued: 06/07/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 02/01/2008
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Holley, Kerrie L., Moore, Garrison A., Tegan, William J., Brown, William A.
• Primary Examiner(s): Colbert; Ella
• Assistant Examiner(s): Shaikh; Mohammad Z
• Application Number:
  US12/024,772
• Publication Number:
  US 20090198535A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,222 Days
• Field of Search: 705/7
• US Class Current: 705/7.11
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/063 Operations research, analysis or management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0637 Strategic management or analysis, e.g. setting a goal or target of an organisation; Planning actions based on goals; Analysis or evaluation of effectiveness of goals
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/067 Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0283 Price estimation or determination

Abstract

Methods and systems for defining service funding for a Service Oriented Architecture (‘SOA’) are described that include, in response to an event requiring a change in service funding, identifying a potential SOA funding model for a business'"'"'s SOA, the potential SOA funding model governing funding of services implemented in the business'"'"'s SOA; reviewing for approval the potential SOA funding model by relevant stakeholders of the business; and upon approval of the potential SOA funding model by relevant stakeholders of the business, implementing the approved SOA funding model.

Claims

1. A governed method of defining service funding for a Service Oriented Architecture (‘

SOA’

), the method carried out in response to an event requiring a change in service funding, the method comprising;

identifying, by an aggregation of computer hardware and software, a potential SOA funding model for a business'"'"'s SOA, the potential SOA funding model governing funding of services implemented in the business'"'"'s SOA;

reviewing for approval, with an aggregation of computer hardware and software, the potential SOA funding model by relevant stakeholders of the business, wherein reviewing the potential SOA funding model comprises a governance process that governs an SOA process of the business'"'"'s SOA for defining service funding, the governance process comprising a parameter of a governance model for the business'"'"'s SOA;

creating a cost allocation plan describing allocation of costs of operation of the particular service to one or more potential funding entities of the business in accordance with the approved SOA funding model; and

upon approval of the potential SOA funding model by relevant stakeholders of the business, implementing, with an aggregation of computer hardware and software, the approved SOA funding model.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein identifying a potential SOA funding model for a business'"'"'s SOA further comprises:

analyzing a currently existing funding model;

determining whether the currently existing funding model is supported by the business'"'"'s SOA strategy; and

defining a potential funding model.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein reviewing for approval the potential SOA funding model by relevant stakeholders of the business further comprises:

determining whether the potential funding model is supported by the business'"'"'s SOA strategy.

4. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

in response to an event requiring a change in a definition of funding for a particular service within the business'"'"'s SOA;

estimating the particular service'"'"'s total cost of ownership;

identifying users of the particular service;

reviewing the cost allocation plan for approval, by a plan review board, including analyzing the business'"'"'s current service funding portfolio.

5. The method of claim 4 further comprising:

upon approval of the cost allocation plan for the particular service;

communicating a description of the cost allocation plan for the particular service to relevant members of the business.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein communicating a description of the cost allocation plan for the particular service to relevant members of the business further comprises:

tailoring, for communication in dependence upon classifications of relevant members of the business, the description of the implementation of the defined service domain and the approved potential owner of the defined service domain.

7. The method of claim 4 wherein the event requiring a change in a definition of funding for a particular service comprises a first implementation of the particular service and the method further comprises:

identifying a service domain for the particular service;

if the identified service domain for the particular service is a new domain, identifying an owner for the new service domain; and

updating a service domain ownership model according to the identification of the service domain, the service domain ownership model comprising associations of service domains and owners of service domains.

8. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

gathering metrics describing effectiveness of one or more steps of method of defining service funding for an SOA; and

modifying, in dependence upon the gathered metrics, the method of defining service funding for an SOA.

9. A governance system for defining service funding for a Service Oriented Architecture (‘

SOA’

), the system comprising;

means for identifying, in response to an event requiring a change in service funding, a potential SOA funding model for a business'"'"'s SOA, the potential SOA funding model governing funding of services implemented in the business'"'"'s SOA;

means for reviewing for approval the potential SOA funding model by relevant stakeholders of the business, wherein reviewing the potential SOA funding model comprises a governance process that governs an SOA process of the business'"'"'s SOA for defining service funding, the governance process comprising a parameter of a governance model for the business'"'"'s SOA;

means for creating a cost allocation plan describing allocation of costs of operation of the particular service to one or more potential funding entities of the business in accordance with the approved SOA funding model; and

means for implementing, upon approval of the potential SOA funding model by relevant stakeholders of the business, the approved SOA funding model.

10. The system of claim 9 wherein means for identifying a potential SOA funding model for a business'"'"'s SOA further comprises means for:

analyzing a currently existing funding model;

determining whether the currently existing funding model is supported by the business'"'"'s SOA strategy; and

defining a potential funding model.

11. The system of claim 9 wherein means for reviewing for approval the potential SOA funding model by relevant stakeholders of the business further comprises means for:

determining whether the potential funding model is supported by the business'"'"'s SOA strategy.

12. The system of claim 9 further comprising:

means for estimating, in response to an event requiring a change in a definition of funding for a particular service within the business'"'"'s SOA, the particular service'"'"'s total cost of ownership;

means for identifying users of the particular service; and

means for reviewing the cost allocation plan for approval, by a plan review board, including analyzing the business'"'"'s current service funding portfolio.

13. The system of claim 12 further comprising:

means for communicating, upon approval of the cost allocation plan for the particular service, a description of the cost allocation plan for the particular service to relevant members of the business.

14. The system of claim 13 wherein means for communicating a description of the cost allocation plan for the particular service to relevant members of the business further comprises means for:

tailoring, for communication in dependence upon classifications of relevant members of the business, the description of the implementation of the defined service domain and the approved potential owner of the defined service domain.

15. The system of claim 12 wherein the event requiring a change in a definition of funding for a particular service comprises a first implementation of the particular service and the system further comprises:

means for identifying a service domain for the particular service;

means for identifying, if the identified service domain for the particular service is a new domain, an owner for the new service domain; and

means for updating a service domain ownership model according to the identification of the service domain, the service domain ownership model comprising associations of service domains and owners of service domains.

16. The system of claim 9 further comprising:

means for gathering metrics describing effectiveness of one or more steps of system of defining service funding for an SOA; and

means for modifying, in dependence upon the gathered metrics, the system of defining service funding for an SOA; and

means for modifying, in dependence upon the gathered metrics, the system of defining service funding for an SOA.