System for autonomic monitoring for web high availability

• US 7,996,529 B2
• Filed: 03/24/2010
• Issued: 08/09/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 09/26/2003
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Kyndryl Incorporated
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Ahmed, Imran, Auvenshine, John J., Blackburn, Justin
• Primary Examiner(s): Strange; Aaron
• Application Number:
  US12/730,280
• Publication Number:
  US 20100180002A1
• Time in Patent Office: 503 Days
• Field of Search: 702/188, 709/223, 709/224
• US Class Current: 709/224
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/0811 by checking connectivity
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/1001 for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/10015 Access to distributed or replicated servers, e.g. using brokers
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/101 based on network conditions
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/1029 using data related to the state of servers by a load balancer
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/1034 Reaction to server failures by a load balancer
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 69/10 Streamlined, light-weight or high-speed protocols, e.g. express transfer protocol [XTP] or byte stream
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 69/12 Protocol engines
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 9/40 Network security protocols

Abstract

A system for maintaining a high availability data transmission and processing environment. The system includes a network of clusters and a control server. Each cluster of the network includes at least two identical servers. Each cluster of the network is directly connected to at least one other cluster of the network. Each pair of clusters directly connected to each other is characterized by each server in a first cluster of the pair of clusters being directly connected to at least one server in a second cluster of the pair of clusters via a communication link. The control server is configured to monitor an operational status of the communication link (i.e., the communication link is operational or non-operational). The control server is directly linked to at least one server in each cluster via a communication channel between the control server and the at least one server.

Claims

1. A system for maintaining a high availability processing environment, said system comprising:

a network having a plurality of clusters, each cluster of the network comprising a plurality of identical servers, each cluster of the network being directly connected to at least one other cluster of the network, wherein each pair of clusters directly connected to each other is characterized by each server in a first cluster of the pair of clusters being directly connected to at least one server in a second cluster of the pair of clusters via a communication link; and

a control server configured to monitor an operational status of said communication link, said operational status of the communication link being that said communication link is operational or non-operational, said control server being directly linked to each server of at least two servers in each cluster via a separate communication channel between the control server and each server of the at least two servers in each cluster, wherein there is no coinciding path segment among the separate communication channels between the control server and each server of the at least two servers in each cluster.

2. The system of claim 1, said system further comprising:

a global dataset that includes an identification of each communication link in the network, said global dataset being accessible to the control server; and

a local dataset specific to each cluster of the plurality of clusters, said local dataset including an identification of each communication link in the network to which the servers of said each cluster is coupled for flow of data out of the cluster, said local dataset being accessible to the servers of said each cluster.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein the control server is configured to monitor an operational status of a first communication link between a first server of the first cluster and a second server of the second cluster by sending a query signal to the first server, said query signal requesting the first server to send a response signal to the control server indicating the operational status of the first communication link, said operational status of the first communication link being that said first communication link is operational or non-operational.

4. The system of claim 3, wherein the first server is configured to respond to the query signal by sending a prompt signal over the first communication link to the second server, said prompt signal prompting the second server to send a return signal to the first server over the first communication link, said return signal or absence thereof being indicative of the operational status of the first communication link.

5. The system of claim 3, wherein the first cluster has a load balancer configured to distribute data traffic uniformly among the servers comprised by the first cluster, and wherein upon receiving the response signal from the first server such that the response signal indicates that the first communication link is non-operational, the control server is configured to notify the load balancer that the first communication link is non-operational.

6. The system of claim 3, wherein upon the control server receiving the response signal from the first server such that the response signal indicates that the first communication link is non-operational, the control server is configured to inform a service node in the first cluster that the first communication link is non-operational.

7. The system of claim 3, wherein the first cluster has a load balancer configured to distribute data traffic uniformly among the servers comprised by the first cluster, and wherein upon not receiving the response signal from the first server within a predetermined period of time after sending the query signal to the first server, the control server is configured make a determination that the first server is non-operational and to notify the load balancer that the first server is non-operational.

8. The system of claim 7, wherein upon the load balancer being notified that the first server is non-operational, the load balancer is configured to fail over the first server.

9. The system of claim 3, wherein each cluster has an associated load balancer configured to distribute data traffic uniformly among the servers comprised by each cluster, wherein the control server is linked to each load balancer via a separate link path between the control server and each load balancer, wherein all said separate link paths concurrently exist.

10. The system of claim 9, wherein the plurality of clusters consist of N clusters such that N is at least 3, wherein the N clusters are denoted as clusters C₁, C₂, . . . , C_N having the associated load balancers L₁, L₂, . . . , L_N, respectively, and wherein the N clusters and associated load balancers are serially linked together in a serial order of:

L₁-C₁-L₂-C₂- . . . -L_N-C_N.

11. The system of claim 10, wherein the control server is denoted as C and is linked to the clusters C₁, C₂, . . . , C_N by links L_C1, L_C2, . . . , L_N, respectively, and to the associated load balancers L₁, L₂, . . . , L_N by links L_L1, L_L2, . . . , L_LN, respectively, as follows:

12. The system of claim 1, wherein each cluster of the plurality of clusters has a load balancer that is specific to each cluster and is independent of the load balancer of each other cluster, and wherein the load balancer of each cluster is configured to distribute data traffic uniformly among the servers comprised by each cluster.

13. The system of claim 1, wherein the control server is configured to receive a message from a first server of the first cluster or from a load balancer of the first cluster, said message indicating that an entity is non-operational, said entity being selected from the group consisting of a server of the first cluster and a communication link between the first server of the first cluster and a second server of the second cluster.

14. The system of claim 1, wherein the control server is directly linked to a first server of the first cluster and is not directly linked to a second server of the first cluster, wherein the first server is directly connected to the second server, and wherein the control server is configured to monitor an operational status of the second server via direct communication with the first server coupled with direct communication between the first server and the second server, said operational status of the second server being that said second server is operational or non-operational.

15. The system of claim 1, wherein at least one cluster of the plurality of clusters does not have a load balancer configured to distribute data traffic uniformly among the servers comprised by the first cluster.

16. The system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of clusters includes a web cluster of web servers, an application cluster of application servers, and a database cluster of database servers, the web cluster being directly connected to the application cluster, the application cluster being directly connected to the database cluster, the web cluster configured to communicate with the database cluster by way of the application cluster functioning as an intermediary cluster between the web cluster and the database cluster.

17. The system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of clusters includes a web cluster of web servers and a database cluster of database servers, the web cluster being directly connected to the database cluster, the web cluster configured to directly communicate with the database cluster.

18. The system of claim 1, wherein each cluster has an associated load balancer configured to distribute data traffic uniformly among the servers comprised by each cluster, wherein the control server is linked to each load balancer via a separate link path between the control server and each load balancer, wherein all said separate link paths concurrently exist.

19. The system of claim 18, wherein the plurality of clusters consist of N clusters such that N is at least 3, wherein the N clusters are denoted as clusters C₁, C₂, . . . , C_N having the associated load balancers L₁, L₂, . . . , L_N, respectively, and wherein the N clusters and associated load balancers are serially linked together in a serial order of:

L₁-C₁-L₂-C₂- . . . -L_N-C_N.

20. The system of claim 19, wherein the control server is denoted as C and is linked to the clusters C₁, C₂, . . . , C_N by links L_C1, L_C2, . . . , L_CN, respectively, and to the associated load balancers L₁, L₂, . . . , L_N by links L_L1, L_L2, . . . , L_LN, respectively, as follows: