Automated field development planning of well and drainage locations

• US 8,005,658 B2
• Filed: 05/31/2007
• Issued: 08/23/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 05/31/2007
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Schlumberger Technology Corporation (Schlumberger NV)
• Original Assignee: Schlumberger Technology Corporation (Schlumberger NV)
• Inventors: Bailey, William J., Crick, Martin, Tilke, Peter Gerhard, Prange, Michael, Couet, Benoit
• Primary Examiner(s): Proctor; Jason
• Assistant Examiner(s): Janakiraman; Nithya
• Application Number:
  US11/756,244
• Publication Number:
  US 20080300793A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,545 Days
• Field of Search: 703/1, 703/10, 702/5, 702/9, 702/13
• US Class Current: 703/10
• CPC Class Codes: E21B 41/00 Equipment or details not covered by groups E21B15/00 - E21B40/00
• CPC Class Codes: E21B 43/30 Specific pattern of wells, e.g. optimising the spacing of wells

Abstract

A hybrid evolutionary algorithm (“HEA”) technique is described for automatically calculating well and drainage locations in a field. The technique includes planning a set of wells on a static reservoir model using an automated well planner tool that designs realistic wells that satisfy drilling and construction constraints. A subset of these locations is then selected based on dynamic flow simulation using a cost function that maximizes recovery or economic benefit. In particular, a large population of candidate targets, drain holes and trajectories is initially created using fast calculation analysis tools of cost and value, and as the workflow proceeds, the population size is reduced in each successive operation, thereby facilitating use of increasingly sophisticated calculation analysis tools for economic valuation of the reservoir while reducing overall time required to obtain the result. In the final operation, only a small number of full reservoir simulations are required for the most promising FDPs.

Claims

1. A method of calculating a development plan for at least a portion of a field containing a subterranean resource, comprising the steps of:

identifying a population including a plurality of targets for draining a reservoir in the field from a geological model;

reducing the population of targets by selecting a first subset of the targets with a first analysis tool, wherein said first analysis tool utilizes a first set of algorithms for selection of a first subset of targets and wherein the first subset of the targets comprises a population of reservoir trajectory sets;

reducing the first subset of targets by selecting a second subset of the targets with a second analysis tool, the second tool utilizing a second set of algorithms as compared to the first analysis tool and wherein the second subset of the targets comprises a population of overburden trajectory sets;

calculating a Field Development Plan (FDP) from the second subset of targets; and

presenting the FDP in tangible form.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein each member of the population is a complete set of targets for draining a reservoir.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein each target is characterized by an associated stock tank oil initially in place (“

STOIIP”

) value.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein reducing the first subset includes the further step of generating a population of drain hole sets.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein each member of a drain hole set includes reservoir-level control points in a borehole trajectory.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein each drain hole set is characterized by at least one value selected from the group including STOIIP, initial flow rate, decline curve profile, and material balance profile.

7. The method of claim 4 including the further step of generating a population of reservoir trajectory sets from the drain hole set population.

8. The method of claim 7 including the further step of calculating an economic value for at least some of the reservoir trajectory sets.

9. The method of claim 8 including the further step of selecting a subset of the reservoir trajectory sets based at least in-part on economic value.

10. The method of claim 1 including the further step of selecting a subset of the overburden trajectory sets based at least in-part on economic value.

11. The method of claim 10 including the further step of performing reservoir simulations on the selected subset of the overburden trajectory sets.

12. The method of claim 10 including the further step of utilizing a geomechanical model to remove from consideration members of the selected subset of the overburden trajectory sets.

13. The method of claim 10 including the further step of utilizing a facilities model to remove from consideration members of the selected subset of the overburden trajectory sets.

14. The method of claim 1 wherein calculating the FDP includes generating an uncertain FDP based on uncertain models.

15. The method of claim 14 wherein at least one uncertain earth model is described through multiple realizations of certain earth models, and including the further step of generating the uncertain FDP through multiple realizations.

16. A non-transitory computer-readable medium encoded with a computer program for calculating a development plan for at least a portion of a field containing a subterranean resource, comprising:

a routine which identifies a population including a plurality of targets for draining a reservoir in the field from a geological model;

a routine which reduces the population of targets by selecting a first subset of the targets with a first analysis tool wherein said first analysis tool utilizes a first set of algorithms for selection of a first subset of targets and wherein the first subset of the targets comprises a population of reservoir trajectory sets;

a routine which reduces the first subset by selecting a second subset of the targets with a second analysis tool, the second tool utilizing a second set of algorithms as compared to the first analysis tool and wherein the second subset of the targets comprises a population of overburden trajectory sets;

a routine which calculates a Field Development Plan (FDP) from the second subset of targets; and

a routine which presents the FDP in tangible form.

17. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16 wherein each member of the population is a complete set of targets for draining a reservoir.

18. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 17 wherein each target is characterized by an associated stock tank oil initially in place (“

STOIIP”

) value.

19. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16 wherein the routine which reduces the first subset is operable to generate a population of drain hole sets.

20. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 19 wherein each member of a drain hole set includes reservoir-level control points in a borehole trajectory.

21. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 20 wherein each drain hole set is characterized by at least one value selected from the group including STOIIP, initial flow rate, decline curve profile, and material balance profile.

22. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 19 further including a routine which generates a population of reservoir trajectory sets from the drain hole set population.

23. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 22 wherein the routine which generates a population of reservoir trajectory sets is operable to calculate an economic value for at least some of the reservoir trajectory sets.

24. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 23 wherein the routine which generates a population of reservoir trajectory sets is operable to select a subset of the reservoir trajectory sets based at least in-part on economic value.

25. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16 wherein the routine which generates a population of overburden trajectory sets is operable to select a subset of the overburden trajectory sets based at least in-part on economic value.

26. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 25 further including reservoir simulations which are performed on the selected subset of the overburden trajectory sets.

27. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 25 further including a routine which utilizes a geomechanical model to remove from consideration members of the selected subset of the overburden trajectory sets.

28. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 25 including further including a routine which utilizes a facilities model to remove from consideration members of the selected subset of the overburden trajectory sets.

29. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16 wherein the routine that calculates the FDP generates an uncertain FDP based on uncertain models.

30. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 29 wherein at least one uncertain earth model is described through multiple realizations of certain earth models, and wherein the routine that calculates the FDP generates the uncertain FDP through multiple realizations.