System and method for application failure detection

• US 8,006,118 B1
• Filed: 08/18/2010
• Issued: 08/23/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 04/24/2002
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: MicroPairing Technologies LLC (Micropairing Technologies Ltd.)
• Original Assignee: Eagle Harbor Holdings, L.L.C.
• Inventors: Lutter, Robert Pierce
• Primary Examiner(s): Le, Dieu-Minh
• Application Number:
  US12/859,075
• Time in Patent Office: 370 Days
• Field of Search: 714 1- 3, 714 10- 13, 717/118, 717/148, 718/100, 718101-108
• US Class Current: 714/1
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 19/37 Hardware or software details of the signal processing chain
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/468 Specific access rights for resources, e.g. using capability register
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/10 for controlling access to devices or network resources

Abstract

The present invention allows construction of a secure, real-time operating system from a portable language such as Java that appears to be a Java virtual machine from a top perspective but provides a secure operating system from a bottom perspective. This allows portable languages, such as Java, to be used for secure embedded multiprocessor environments.

Claims

1. A system, comprising:

multiple processors configured to operate as a distributed processing system, wherein the distributed processing system is configured to;

use a watchdog task configured to identify a failure, wherein the failure comprises at least one of;

a failed processor in the distributed processing system,

a failure in communications in the distributed processing system, or

a failure in a first application running on one of the processors in the distributed processing system;

monitor for a request, wherein the request comprises at least one of;

a request to add a new processor, or

a request to disconnect a currently connected one of the processors and replace the currently connected one of the processors with the new processor, wherein the new processor is a component within a new device not currently connected to the distributed processing system; and

in response to at least one of the failure identified by the watchdog task or the request, at least one of;

add the new device to the distributed processing system,

remove the currently connected one of the processors from the distributed processing system and add the new device to the distributed processing system, or

initiate a reconfiguration process configured to terminate a second application running in the distributed processing system, wherein the second application is configured to process data from the currently connected one of the processors or process data from one of the processors in the distributed processing system associated with the failure identified by the watchdog task.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the reconfiguration process is further configured to:

identify data codes in signaling from the new processor identifying at least one of an application running on the new processor, a data type used on the new processor, or a security attribute associated with at least one of the new processor, data stored in the new processor, or the application running on the new processor;

use the security attribute to prevent at least one of an unauthorized application or unauthorized data from being processed by the distributed processing system;

identify a stored application in memory accessible by the distributed processing system, wherein the stored application processes the same data type used by the new processor;

responsive to identifying the stored application, download the stored application from memory into the distributed processing system;

use the stored application to process data received from the new processor;

or

select an appropriate user interface to output the data.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein the reconfiguration process is configured to at least one of:

communicate with one of the processors in the distributed processing system associated with the failure identified by the watchdog task,

process data from one of the processors in the distributed processing system associated with the failure identified by the watchdog task, or

control operations on one of the processors in the distributed processing system associated with the failure identified by the watchdog task.

4. The system of claim 1, wherein the new processor is connected to the distributed processing system over a wired connection.

5. The system of claim 4, wherein the wired connection comprises a Universal Serial Bus.

6. The system of claim 1, wherein the new processor is connected to the distributed processing system over wireless Bluetooth, 802.11, satellite link, or cellular connection.

7. The system of claim 1, wherein the request is received via a user interface.

8. The system of claim 1, wherein the user interface comprises a visual user interface, touch screen user interface, or audio user interface.

9. The system of claim 8, wherein the visual user interface includes a display.

10. The system of claim 9, wherein the display is located in a dash board of a vehicle.

11. The system of claim 1, wherein the distributed processing system is at least one of a home entertainment system or home control system.

12. The system of claim 1, wherein the distributed processing system comprises a vehicle entertainment system.

13. The system of claim 12, wherein the at least one of the processors in the distributed processing system of the vehicle entertainment system operates in a cell phone or music storage device.

14. The system of claim 1, wherein the failure in communications comprises a loss of signal from a device connected to the distributed processing system.

15. The system of claim 1, wherein the new processor operates in a first cellular phone and the currently connected processor operates in a second cellular phone.

16. The system of claim 1, wherein the watchdog task operates in response to a timer.

17. The system of claim 1, wherein the reconfiguration process is initiated automatically in response to the failure or the request.

18. A method, comprising:

configuring multiple processors to operate together as a distributed processing system, wherein at least one of the multiple processors in the distributed processing system is configured to;

monitor for a communication failure in the distributed processing system;

monitor for a request, wherein the request comprises at least one of a request to add a first device to the distributed processing system that is not currently connected to the distributed processing system, or a request to replace a second device currently connected to the distributed processing system with the first device; and

responsive to at least one of the communication failure or the request;

add the first device to the distributed processing system, or remove the second device from the distributed processing system and add the first device to the distributed processing system, and

initiate a reconfiguration process configured to terminate a second application running in the distributed processing system.

19. The method of claim 18 wherein the second application is configured to process data from the second device or process data from one of the processors in the distributed processing system associated with the communication failure.

20. The method of claim 18, wherein the reconfiguration process further comprises:

identifying data codes in signaling received from the first device identifying at least one of an application running on the first device, a data type used on the first device, or a security attribute associated with at least one of the first device, data stored in the first device, or the application running on the first device;

use the security attribute to prevent at least one of an unauthorized application or unauthorized data from being processed by the distributed processing system;

identify a stored application in a memory accessible by the distributed processing system, wherein the stored application processes a same data type used by the first device;

responsive to identifying the stored application, download the stored application from memory into the distributed processing system;

use the stored application to process data received from the first device; and

select a user interface to output the data.

21. The method of claim 18, wherein the reconfiguration process further comprises communicating with one of the processors in the distributed processing system associated with the communication failure.

22. The method of claim 18, wherein the reconfiguration process further comprises processing data from one of the processors in the distributed processing system associated with the communication failure.

23. The method of claim 18, wherein the reconfiguration process further comprises controlling operation of one of the processors in the distributed processing system associated with the communication failure.

24. The method of claim 18, wherein the distributed processing system comprises a home entertainment system or a home control system.

25. The method of claim 18, wherein the distributed processing system comprises a vehicle entertainment system and the first and second devices comprise cellular phones or music storage devices.

26. The method of claim 25, wherein the first and second device are connected to the distributed processing system via a wireless Bluetooth connection, a wireless 802.11 connection, or a wired Universal Serial Bus connection.

27. The method of claim 18, wherein the communication failure comprises wirelessly disconnecting one of the processors from the distributed processing system.

28. The method of claim 18, wherein the communication failure comprises unplugging one of the processors from the distributed processing system.

29. The method of claim 18, wherein the request is generated in response to a selection on a user interface.

30. The method of claim 18, wherein the first device is a cellular phone and the second device is a cellular phone.

31. The method of claim 18, further comprising operating a watchdog timer to periodically monitor for the communication failure.

32. The method of claim 18, further comprising automatically initiating the reconfiguration process in response to identifying the communication failure or receiving the request.

33. An apparatus, comprising:

a multiprocessor system configured to;

monitor for a communication failure;

monitor for a request to either add a new device to the multiprocessor system or replace a connected device currently connected to the multiprocessor system with a new device, wherein the new device is currently not connected to the multiprocessor system; and

responsive to the communication failure or the request;

at least one of add the new device to the multiprocessor system, or remove the connected device from the multiprocessor system and add the new device to the multiprocessor system, and

initiate a reconfiguration process configured to terminate an application currently running in the multiprocessor system.

34. The apparatus of claim 33 wherein the application is configured to process data for one of the processors in the multiprocessor system associated with the communication failure.

35. The apparatus of claim 33, wherein the multiprocessor system is further configured to:

identify a security attribute associated with the new device;

identify the new device as an authorized new device or an unauthorized new device according to the security attribute; and

in response to identifying the new device as the unauthorized new device, prevent data from the new device from being processed by the multiprocessor system; and

in response to identifying the new device as the authorized new device;

identify a stored application in a memory accessible by the multiprocessor system, wherein the stored application processes a same data type used by the new device;

download the stored application from memory into the multiprocessor system; and

use the stored application to process data received from the new device.

36. The apparatus of claim 33, wherein the communication failure comprises wirelessly disconnecting the connected device from the multiprocessor system.

37. The apparatus of claim 33, wherein the communication failure comprises unplugging the connected device from the multiprocessor system.

38. The apparatus of claim 33, wherein the request is generated in response to detection of a selection on a user interface.

39. The apparatus of claim 33, wherein the new device is a cellular phone and the connected device is a cellular phone.