Method and system for producing item comparisons

• US 8,019,650 B2
• Filed: 02/13/2006
• Issued: 09/13/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 01/21/2005
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Amazon Technologies, Inc. (Amazon.com, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Amazon Technologies, Inc. (Amazon.com, Inc.)
• Inventors: Holden, Jeffrey Alan, Henne, Randal M., Brownell, Jeffrey T., Donsbach, Aaron M., Rodgers, John D.
• Primary Examiner(s): Airapetian; Mila
• Application Number:
  US11/353,246
• Publication Number:
  US 20060212362A1
• Time in Patent Office: 2,038 Days
• Field of Search: 705/26, 705/27, 705/26.1, 705/26.7, 705/27.1
• US Class Current: 705/26.1
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/06 Buying, selling or leasing transactions
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0601 Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0603 Catalogue ordering
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0629 for generating comparisons
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0643 Graphical representation of items or shoppers

Abstract

A method and system for producing an item comparison may initially include obtaining data based on user activity that is indicative of an item and other items likely to be comparable to the item, and recording the data for later access. An item comparison may thereafter present an item of interest to the user along with other items identified based on the recorded data. Prior to producing the item comparison, the user may be provided at least one list of potentially comparable items that can be selected for the item comparison, the list including items in the recorded data that are likely to be comparable to the item of interest. The recorded data may be specific to the user or may include data obtained from other users. Data reflecting user activity with an item comparison may be recorded as additional data indicative of comparable items.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method for producing an item comparison, comprising:

recording data reflecting items that previously have been presented to a user as being comparable items;

receiving a request from the user for an item comparison for an item of interest selected by the user;

determining, based on the recorded data, one or more items that previously have been presented to the user that are comparable to the item of interest; and

producing an item comparison that compares a plurality of items, including the item of interest and at least some of the determined one or more comparable items that previously have been presented to the user, said item comparison comprising a comparison table in which each of a plurality of rows or columns corresponds to a respective attribute shared by the plurality of items, said comparison table providing an attribute-by-attribute comparison of the plurality of items;

said method performed by a computing system that comprises one or more computers.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

receiving a selection from the user of the one or more comparable items that previously have been presented to the user to be included in the item comparison.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein each of the one or more comparable items that previously have been presented to the user is automatically included in the item comparison.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the recorded data is specific to the user and only includes items that previously have been presented to the user.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the recorded data includes items that previously have been presented to other users as being comparable items.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the other users are users in a defined group.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the one or more comparable items that previously have been presented to the user comprises comparing the attributes of the items in the recorded data to shared attributes of the item of interest.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the shared attributes include an item type.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising identifying an item not in the recorded data, wherein the item not in the recorded data is identified based on a temporal attribute and is included in the item comparison.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the temporal attribute is an initial date when the item not in the recorded data became available.

11. A computer-implemented method for producing an item comparison, comprising:

obtaining data based on prior user activity that is indicative of an item and other items likely to be comparable to the item;

recording said data for later access;

presenting an item of interest to a user;

receiving a request for a comparison of one or more items to the item of interest;

searching the recorded data to identify one or more items that are comparable to the item of interest that have previously been presented to the user; and

producing an item comparison for the user that presents the item of interest to the user and the one or more comparable items for comparison to the item of interest, said item comparison comprising a comparison table in which each of a plurality of rows or columns corresponds to a respective attribute shared by a plurality of items included in the item comparison, said comparison table providing an attribute-by-attribute comparison of the plurality of items;

said method performed by a computing system.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the recorded data is obtained from search results produced in a search conducted by the user.

13. The method of claim 11, wherein the recorded data is obtained from a product review presented to the user.

14. The method of claim 11, wherein the recorded data is obtained from a list of items.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the list of items is a theme list that includes items relating to a defined theme.

16. The method of claim 14, wherein the list of items is a wish list that includes items based on a user'"'"'s desire to receive the items.

17. The method of claim 14, wherein the list of items is a tagged list that includes items having similar tag information assigned thereto.

18. The method of claim 11, further comprising recording additional data based on user activity with the item comparison for later access when producing another item comparison.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the user activity with the item comparison includes a user instruction to exclude an item from the item comparison, the method further comprising recording data indicating that the excluded item is less likely to be comparable to the item of interest.

20. The method of claim 18, wherein the user activity with the item comparison includes a user instruction to show additional comparable items, the method further comprising providing a list of items to the user, enabling the user to select one or more items from the list, and recording data indicating the selected items as more likely to be comparable to the item of interest.

21. The method of claim 11, further comprising bundling together two or more of the items in the item comparison for purchase at a price.

22. The method of claim 11, wherein the recorded data includes data indicative of items viewed by a user in association with a single session identifier.

23. The method of claim 11, wherein the recorded data includes data indicative of items viewed by a user in association with a single session identifier in which the user purchased one of the items.

24. The method of claim 11, wherein the recorded data includes data indicative of items viewed by a user in association with multiple session identifiers.

25. The method of claim 11, wherein the recorded data includes data indicative of items viewed by a user in a prior item comparison.

26. The method of claim 11, wherein the items indicated in the recorded data include one or more attributes, the method further comprising identifying the one or more other items for comparison based on an attribute that the one or more other items share with the item of interest.

27. The method of claim 11, further comprising identifying an item not in the recorded data, wherein the item is identified based on a temporal attribute and included in the item comparison.

28. The method of claim 27, wherein the temporal attribute is an initial date when the item became available.

29. The method of claim 11, further comprising presenting the item comparison to the user, wherein prior to presenting the item comparison, the user is provided at least one list of potentially comparable items that can be selected for the item comparison, the list automatically including items in the recorded data that are likely to be comparable to the item of interest.

30. The method of claim 29, wherein the items indicated in the recorded data include one or more attributes, and wherein the list of potentially comparable items share an attribute, the method further comprising identifying the attribute to the user when providing the list of potentially comparable items to the user.

31. The method of claim 11, wherein the recorded data is specific to the user and only includes data obtained from the activity of the user.

32. The method of claim 11, wherein the recorded data includes data obtained from other users that are indicative of comparable items.

33. The method of claim 32, wherein the other users are users in a defined group.

34. The method of claim 11, wherein the item of interest is selected by the user from a group of items that was presented to the user in a previously presented item comparison and one or more other items are added to the previously presented item comparison based on the selection of the item of interest.

35. The method of claim 11, wherein the item of interest is an item having attributes derived from a group of items.

36. The method of claim 35, wherein the items in the group have been previously presented to the user in an item comparison and one or more other items are added to the item comparison.

37. The method of claim 35, wherein the attributes of the item are derived from predominant attributes that are shared by the items in the group.

38. A computing system configured to prepare item comparisons, comprising:

data storage having data recorded therein based on user activity with items, wherein said data is indicative of items that are comparable;

an item selector in communication with the data storage, wherein the item selector is configured to identify, from the data in the data storage, for comparison to an item of interest to a user, at least one comparable item that has previously been presented to the user; and

an item comparison manager in communication with the data storage and the item selector, wherein the item comparison manager is configured to prepare an item comparison that compares a plurality of items, including the item of interest and the at least one comparable item previously presented to the user, said item comparison comprising a comparison table in which each of a plurality of rows or columns corresponds to a respective attribute shared by the plurality of items, said comparison table providing an attribute-by-attribute comparison of the plurality of items.

39. The computing system of claim 38, wherein the item comparison manager is further configured to record additional data in the data storage based on user activity with the item comparison.

40. The computing system of claim 39, wherein the user activity with the item comparison includes a user instruction to exclude an item from the item comparison, the item comparison manager being further configured to record data in the data storage indicating that the excluded item is less likely to be comparable to the item of interest.

41. The computing system of claim 39, wherein the user activity with the item comparison includes a user instruction to show additional comparable items, the item comparison manager being further configured to provide a list of items to the user, enable the user to select one or more items from the list, and record data in the data storage indicating the selected items as more likely to be comparable to the item of interest.

42. The computing system of claim 38, wherein the item of interest is in a group of items presented to the user in a previously presented item comparison and one or more other items are added to the previously presented item comparison.

43. The computing system of claim 38, wherein the item comparison manager is further configured to present an item to the user having attributes derived from a group of items, and the presented item is used as the item of interest to the user.

44. The computing system of claim 43, wherein the group of items has been previously presented to the user in an item comparison and one or more other items are added to the item comparison.

45. The computing system of claim 43, wherein the item comparison manager is configured to derive the attributes of the item to be presented from predominant attributes that are shared by the items in the group.

46. A non-transitory computer-accessible medium having instructions recorded thereon that when executed by a computer system cause the computer system to:

obtain data based on user activity that is indicative of an item and other items likely to be comparable to the item;

record said data for later access;

present an item of interest to a user;

identify one or more items in the recorded data that are comparable to the item of interest that have previously been presented to the user; and

produce an item comparison for the user that compares a plurality of items, including the item of interest and the one or more previously presented items identified from the recorded data, said item comparison comprising a comparison table in which each of a plurality of rows or columns corresponds to a respective attribute shared by the plurality of items, said comparison table providing an attribute-by-attribute comparison of the plurality of items.

47. The computer-accessible medium of claim 46, wherein the items in the recorded data include one or more attributes, and the instructions further cause the computer system to identify the one or more other comparable items for comparison based on an attribute that the one or more other items share with the item of interest.

48. The computer-accessible medium of claim 46, wherein the instructions further cause the computer system to, identify an item not in the recorded data, wherein the item not in the recorded data is identified based on a temporal attribute and is included in the item comparison.

49. The computer-accessible medium of claim 48, wherein the temporal attribute is an initial date when the item became available.

50. The computer-accessible medium of claim 46, wherein the instructions further cause the computer system to, prior to presenting the item comparison, provide to the user a list of potentially comparable items that can be selected for the item comparison, the list automatically including items in the recorded data that are likely to be comparable to the item of interest.

51. The computer-accessible medium of claim 50, wherein the items indicated in the recorded data include one or more attributes, and wherein the list of potentially comparable items share an attribute, and wherein the instructions further cause the computer system to identify the shared attribute to the user when providing the list of potentially comparable items to the user.

52. A computer-implemented method for producing an item comparison, comprising:

recording data reflecting items that previously have been presented to a user as being comparable items;

receiving a request from the user for an item comparison that includes at least one item in the recorded data, wherein the at least one item is a first item;

producing the item comparison in which a second item in the recorded data is identified and included in the item comparison for being comparable to the first item; and

identifying a third item not in the recorded data, wherein the third item is identified based on a temporal attribute and is included in the item comparison;

said method performed by a computing system.

53. The method of claim 52, wherein the temporal attribute is an initial date when the third item became available.

54. A computer-implemented method for producing an item comparison, comprising:

obtaining data based on user activity that is indicative of an item and other items likely to be comparable to the item;

recording said data for later access;

producing an item comparison for a user that presents an item of interest to the user and other items for comparison to the item of interest, said item comparison including at least one item that, based on the recorded data, has previously been presented to the user; and

identifying an item not in the recorded data, wherein the item is identified based on a temporal attribute and is included in the item comparison;

said method performed by a computing system that comprises one or more servers.

55. The method of claim 54, wherein the temporal attribute is an initial date when the item not in the recorded data became available.