Scoring local search results based on location prominence

• US 8,046,371 B2
• Filed: 09/29/2010
• Issued: 10/25/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 05/27/2005
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Google LLC (Alphabet Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Google Inc. (Alphabet Inc.)
• Inventors: Greenfield, Lawrence E, O'Clair, Brian, Egnor, Daniel
• Primary Examiner(s): Chbouki; Tarek
• Application Number:
  US12/893,646
• Publication Number:
  US 20110022604A1
• Time in Patent Office: 391 Days
• Field of Search: None
• US Class Current: 707/748
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/9537 Spatial or temporal dependent retrieval, e.g. spatiotemporal queries
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0205 Location or geographical consideration

Abstract

A system may identify a first document associated with a geographic location within a geographical area and identify a second document associated with a geographic location outside the geographical area. The system may also assign a first score to the first document based on a first scoring function and assign a second score to the second document based on a second scoring function.

Claims

1. A method performed by one or more server devices, comprising:

receiving, by a processor associated with the one or more server devices, a search query;

identifying, using a processor associated with the one or more server devices, a geographical area and a location within the geographical area;

identifying, using a processor associated with the one or more server devices, a first document that is associated with a first geographic location and that is related to the search query, where the first geographic location is located within the geographical area;

identifying, using a processor associated with the one or more server devices, a second document that is associated with a second geographic location and that is related to the search query, where the second geographic location is located outside of the geographical area;

assigning, using a processor associated with the one or more server devices, a first score to the first document using a location prominence factor, where the location prominence factor does not include a measure of distance or a measure of relevancy of the first document to the search query;

assigning, using a processor associated with the one or more server devices, a second score to the second document using a measure of distance between the second geographic location and the location within the geographical area, and not using the location prominence factor; and

presenting, by a processor associated with the one or more server devices, information associated with the first and second documents based on the first and second scores, respectively.

2. The method of claim 1, where identifying the geographical area includes:

identifying the geographical area from information included in the search query.

3. The method of claim 1, where identifying the geographical area includes:

determining that a map is being accessed via a map window on a client device from which the search query is received, and

using a visible area within the map window as the geographical area.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining the location prominence factor based on a score associated with a document that is identified as authoritative for a business associated with the first document.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining the location prominence factor based on a total number of documents referring to a business associated with the first document.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining the location prominence factor based on a score of a document referring to a business associated with the first document.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining the location prominence factor based on a total number of documents with reviews of a business associated with the first document.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining the location prominence factor based on a quantity of documents that mention a business associated with the first document.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining the location prominence factor based on a combination of two or more factors of;

a score associated with a document that is identified as authoritative for a business associated with the first document,

a total number of documents referring to the business,

a score of a document referring to the business, or

a total number of documents with reviews of the business.

10. The method of claim 9, where determining the location prominence factor includes:

assigning a first weight to a first factor, of the two or more factors, to form a weighted first factor,

assigning a second weight to a second factor, of the two or more factors, to form a weighted second factor, and

determining the location prominence factor based on a combination of the weighted first factor and the weighted second factor.

11. The method of claim 1, where assigning the first score to the first document includes:

determining a measure of distance between the first geographic location and the location within the geographical area, and

using a combination of the measure of distance, between the first geographic location and the location within the geographical area, and the location prominence factor to generate the first score.

12. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

receiving a plurality of user-selected factors to use for the location prominence factor; and

using the plurality of user-selected factors to generate the first score assigned to the first document.

13. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

providing an option to turn off the location prominence factor;

receiving selection of the option; and

assigning, in response to receiving the selection of the option, the first score to the first document using a measure of distance between the first geographic location and the location within the geographical area, and not using the location prominence factor.

14. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining the location prominence factor based on a combination of two or more factors of;

a score associated with a document that is identified as authoritative for a business associated with the first document,

a total number of documents referring to the business,

a score of a document referring to the business,

a total number of documents with reviews of the business,

a numeric score of a review of the business,

a function of a plurality of scores of reviews of the business,

a type of document containing a review of the business,

a type of language used in a review of the business,

user logs relating to user interactions with the document,

financial data associated with the business, or

a number of years that the business has been operational.

15. A system, comprising:

one or more computer devices to;

receive a search query;

identify an area for the search query;

identify a first document that is related to the search query and that is associated with a first geographic location located within the area;

identify a second document that is related to the search query and that is associated with a second geographic location located outside of the area;

assign a first score to the first document using a plurality of first factors, where none of the plurality of first factors corresponds to a measure of distance or a measure of relevancy of the first document to the search query;

assign a second score to the second document using a measure of distance, between the second geographic location and a location within the area, and not using any of the plurality of first factors;

rank the first document and the second document based on the first score and the second score, respectively; and

present information regarding the ranked first and second documents.

16. The system of claim 15, where the plurality of first factors includes a combination of two or more of:

a score associated with a document that is identified as authoritative for a business associated with the first document,

a total number of documents referring to the business,

a score of a document referring to the business, or

a total number of documents with reviews of the business.

17. The system of claim 15, where, when assigning the first score to the first document, the one or more computer devices are to:

assign a first weight to a first factor, of the plurality of first factors, to form a weighted first factor,

assign a second weight to a second factor, of the plurality of first factors, to form a weighted second factor, and

generate the first score based on a combination of the weighted first factor and the weighted second factor.

18. The system of claim 15, where, when assigning the first score to the first document, the one or more computer devices are to:

determine a measure of distance between the first geographic location and a location within the area, and

use a combination of the measure of distance, between the first geographic location and the location within the area, and the plurality of first factors to generate the first score.

19. The system of claim 15, where the one or more computer devices are further to:

receive a plurality of user-selected factors to use as the plurality of first factors; and

use the plurality of user-selected factors to generate the first score assigned to the first document.

20. The system of claim 15, where the one or more computer devices are to:

provide an option to turn off use of the plurality of first factors;

receive selection of the option; and

assign, in response to receiving the selection of the option, the first score to the first document using a measure of distance between the first geographic location and a location within the area, and not using the plurality of first factors.

21. The system of claim 15, where the plurality of first factors include a combination of two or more of:

a score associated with a document that is identified as authoritative for a business associated with the first document,

a total number of documents referring to the business,

a score of a document referring to the business,

a total number of documents with reviews of the business,

a numeric score of a review of the business,

a function of a plurality of scores of reviews of the business,

a type of document containing a review of the business,

a type of language used in a review of the business,

user logs relating to user interactions with the document,

financial data associated with the business, or

a number of years that the business has been operational.

22. A computer-readable memory device that stores instructions executable by at least one processor, the computer-readable memory device comprising:

one or more instructions to identify a first document and a second document;

one or more instructions to determine that the first document is associated with a first geographic location that is located within a particular geographical area;

one or more instructions to determine that the second document is associated with a second geographic location that is located outside of the particular geographical area;

one or more instructions to generate a first score for the first document using a combination of two or more of the following factors;

a score associated with a particular document that is identified as authoritative for a business associated with the document,

a total number of documents referring to the business,

a score of a particular document referring to the business,

a total number of documents with reviews of the business,

a numeric score of a review of the business,

a function of a plurality of scores of reviews of the business,

a type of document containing a review of the business,

a type of language used in a review of the business,

user logs relating to user interactions with the document,

financial data associated with the business, or

a number of years that the business has been operational;

one or more instructions to generate a second score for the second document using a measure of distance, between the second geographic location and a location within the particular geographical area, and not using any of the two or more factors; and

one or more instructions to rank the first document and the second document based on the first score and the second score, respectively.

23. The computer-readable memory device of claim 22, where the one or more instructions to generate the first score for the first document include:

one or more instructions to assign a first weight to a first factor, of the two or more factors, to form a weighted first factor,

one or more instructions to assign a second weight to a second factor, of the two or more factors, to form a weighted second factor, and

one or more instructions to determine the first score, for the first document, based on a combination of the weighted first factor and the weighted second factor.

24. The computer-readable memory device of claim 22, where the one or more instructions to generate the first score for the first document include:

one or more instructions to determine a measure of distance between the first geographic location and a location within the particular geographical area, and

one or more instructions to determine the first score for the first document as a function of the measure of distance and the two or more factors.

25. The computer-readable memory device of claim 22, further comprising:

one or more instructions to receive a plurality of user-selected factors as the two or more factors; and

one or more instructions to use the plurality of user-selected factors to generate the first score for the first document.

26. The computer-readable memory device of claim 22, further comprising:

one or more instructions to provide an option to turn off use of the two or more factors in generating the first score for the first document;

one or more instructions to receive selection of the option; and

one or more instructions to assign, in response to receiving the selection of the option, the first score to the first document using a measure of distance between the first geographic location and a location within the particular geographical area, and not using the two or more factors.