Determination of diesel particulate filter load under both transient and steady state drive cycles

• US 8,051,645 B2
• Filed: 04/03/2008
• Issued: 11/08/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 12/18/2007
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Ford Global Technologies, LLC (Ford Motor Company)
• Original Assignee: Ford Global Technologies, LLC (Ford Motor Company)
• Inventors: Krenz, Edwin Allen, Gresens, Bradley D., Chamarthi, Gopal K., Waskiewicz, David Chester, Opolsky, Norman Hiam, Van Nieuwstadt, Michiel J., Lyon, Peter Mitchell
• Primary Examiner(s): NGUYEN, TU MINH
• Application Number:
  US12/062,224
• Publication Number:
  US 20090151330A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,314 Days
• Field of Search: 602/74, 602/76, 602/77, 602/85, 602/95, 602/97, 603/11
• US Class Current: 60/295
• CPC Class Codes: F01N 9/002 of filter regeneration, e.g. detection of clogging
• CPC Class Codes: Y02T 10/40 Engine management systems

Abstract

Methods for updating the PF soot load of an engine are provided herein. In one example, a soot storage estimate is based on processing operations that occur at different timings. The method can improve soot estimation during some conditions.

Claims

1. A method for regenerating a particulate filter in an exhaust of a vehicle, the method comprising:

estimating soot via operating conditions independent of pressure indications of a sensor at a first time interval;

providing an accumulated soot from the estimated soot at a second time interval, the second time interval slower than the first time interval; and

performing a regeneration of the particulate filter responsive to flow restriction induced pressure indications of the sensor, where during inaccurate sensor reading conditions, the regeneration is further responsive to a previous reading of the sensor during accurate sensor reading conditions and the accumulated soot.

2. The method of claim 1, where an estimated soot loading is incrementally added to the previous reading until accurate sensor reading conditions occur.

3. The method of claim 1, where readings of the sensor are taken at a slower sampling rate than an estimated soot loading is determined.

4. The method of claim 1, where the sensor measures differential pressure across the particulate filter.

5. The method of claim 4, where the inaccurate sensor reading conditions include lower exhaust flow conditions.

6. The method of claim 5, where the accurate sensor reading conditions include higher exhaust flow conditions.

7. A method for regenerating a particulate filter in an exhaust of a vehicle, the method comprising:

estimating soot via operating conditions independent of pressure indications of a sensor at a first time interval;

providing an accumulated soot from the estimated soot at a second time interval, the second time interval slower than the first time interval;

performing a regeneration of the particulate filter responsive to flow restriction induced pressure indications of the sensor, where during lower flow and transient conditions, the regeneration is further responsive to a previous reading of the sensor and the accumulated soot; and

delaying adjustment of the accumulated soot after reading the sensor.

8. The method of claim 7, where the sensor measures differential pressure across the particulate filter.

9. The method of claim 7, where pressure indications of the sensor include a first pressure sensor reading upstream of the particulate filter and a second pressure sensor reading downstream of the particulate filter.

10. The method of claim 7 further comprising, during higher flow conditions, performing a regeneration of the particulate filter responsive to flow restriction induced pressure indications of the sensor independent from an estimated soot load.

11. The method of claim 10, further comprising regenerating the particulate filter by increasing exhaust heat of an engine via adjustment of engine operating conditions.

12. A method for regenerating a particulate filter in an exhaust of a vehicle, the method comprising:

determining a first soot loading responsive at least to differential pressure across the particulate filter and measured by at least a pressure sensor;

determining an incremental estimated soot loading of the particulate filter at a first time interval responsive to a plurality of operating conditions and independent from the pressure sensor;

during higher flow conditions, performing regeneration responsive to the first soot loading and independent of the incremental estimated soot loading;

during lower flow or transient conditions, performing regeneration responsive to a last first soot loading reading taken before entering the lower flow or transient conditions, and further based on accumulated soot at a second time interval, the second time interval slower than the first time interval, the accumulated soot based on the incremental estimated soot loading.

13. The method of claim 12, where during the lower flow or transient conditions, regeneration is responsive to the last first soot loading reading and a plurality of further incremental estimated soot loadings successively added to the last first soot loading reading, and where the first and second time intervals are based on independent timers.

14. The method of claim 13, further comprising clearing the incremental estimated soot loadings after a delay when entering the higher flow conditions.

15. The method of claim 14, further comprising adaptively updating the incremental estimated soot loadings based on a soot loading indicated by the sensor after exiting the lower flow conditions and entering the higher flow conditions.