Panel diagnostic method and system
-
0Associated
Cases -
0Associated
Defendants -
0Accused
Products -
52Forward
Citations -
0
Petitions -
7
Assignments
First Claim
1. A computerized medical diagnostic system, the system comprising:
- a plurality of disease objects, each disease object to reference a list comprising one or more associated patient health items representative of at least candidate diseases applicable to the patient, and collectively provide an initial differential diagnosis;
a panel module in data communication with the disease objects, the panel module comprising a plurality of diagnostic strategy processes, each of which generates a corresponding strategy differential diagnosis based on the patient health items, wherein the panel module compares at least a portion of the strategy differential diagnoses to thereby generate a panel differential diagnosis;
a computing environment operative to execute the modules, the computing environment comprising at least one processor; and
wherein the initial differential diagnosis and the panel differential diagnosis are reconciled so as to recommend an action or provide a diagnosis via output to the patient or the healthcare professional.
7 Assignments
0 Petitions

Accused Products

Abstract
A method and system for computerized medical diagnostics is disclosed. Beginning with interacting with a patient or a healthcare professional via a diagnostic module to obtain patient health items, the system automatically obtains an initial differential diagnosis and multiple strategy differential diagnoses based on the patient health items. In one embodiment, each strategy differential diagnosis is obtained with different analysis criteria of the patient health items. At least a portion of the strategy differential diagnoses are compared and a panel differential diagnosis based on the compared differential diagnoses is determined. The initial diagnosis and the panel differential diagnosis are reconciled so as to recommend an action or provide a diagnosis to the patient or the healthcare professional.
379 Citations
SYSTEMS AND METHODS EMPLOYING REMOTE DATA GATHERING AND MONITORING FOR DIAGNOSING, STAGING, AND TREATMENT OF PARKINSONS DISEASE, MOVEMENT AND NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS, AND CHRONIC PAIN | ||
Patent #
US 20100169409A1
Filed 08/04/2009
|
Current Assignee
Galenagen LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Galenagen LLC
|
METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF SYMPTOMS OF PRION DISEASES | ||
Patent #
US 20100092447A1
Filed 10/05/2009
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF SYMPTOMS OF COMPLEX REGIONAL PAIN SYNDROME | ||
Patent #
US 20090324730A1
Filed 06/26/2009
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
METHODS OF TREATING AND DIAGNOSING PARKINSONS DISEASE AND RELATED DYSAUTONOMIC DISORDERS | ||
Patent #
US 20080152637A1
Filed 03/11/2008
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Pharmaceutical preparation for the treatment of the symptoms of addiction and method of diagnosing same | ||
Patent #
US 8,318,158 B2
Filed 10/12/2011
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Pharmaceutical preparation for the treatment of the symptoms of addiction and method of diagnosing same | ||
Patent #
US 8,486,390 B2
Filed 07/31/2012
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Methods for diagnosing pervasive development disorders, dysautonomia and other neurological conditions | ||
Patent #
US 8,580,522 B2
Filed 08/12/2011
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Method for treating pervasive development disorders | ||
Patent #
US 8,613,918 B2
Filed 05/25/2012
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Compositions and use thereof for treating symptoms of preeclampsia | ||
Patent #
US 8,658,163 B2
Filed 03/13/2008
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Use of lactulose in the treatment of autism | ||
Patent #
US 8,673,877 B2
Filed 08/08/2011
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Adaptive Medical Testing | ||
Patent #
US 20140107461A1
Filed 11/30/2012
|
Current Assignee
CLINICALBOX INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
CLINICALBOX INC.
|
Methods of treating and diagnosing Parkinson's disease and related dysautonomic disorders | ||
Patent #
US 8,778,335 B2
Filed 03/11/2008
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Method for treating pervasive development disorders | ||
Patent #
US 8,815,233 B2
Filed 04/16/2012
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Methods for diagnosing pervasive development disorders, dysautonomia and other neurological conditions | ||
Patent #
US 8,921,054 B2
Filed 09/26/2013
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Methods of treatment of schizophrenia | ||
Patent #
US 8,980,252 B2
Filed 04/20/2012
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Pharmaceutical preparation for the treatment of the symptoms of addiction and method of diagnosing same | ||
Patent #
US 9,017,665 B2
Filed 06/25/2013
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Method of treating toxemia | ||
Patent #
US 9,023,344 B2
Filed 09/26/2013
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Content suggestion engine | ||
Patent #
US 9,037,578 B2
Filed 02/21/2013
|
Current Assignee
WellClub LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
WellClub LLC
|
Enzyme delivery systems and methods of preparation and use | ||
Patent #
US 9,056,050 B2
Filed 04/13/2009
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Methods and compositions for the treatment of symptoms of prion diseases | ||
Patent #
US 9,061,033 B2
Filed 01/09/2013
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Compositions and methods for the treatment or the prevention of;infections and for the eradication or reduction of;surfaces | ||
Patent #
US 9,084,784 B2
Filed 01/06/2010
|
Current Assignee
Galenagen LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curelon LLC
|
Expert-based content and coaching platform | ||
Patent #
US 9,110,958 B2
Filed 03/13/2013
|
Current Assignee
WellClub LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
WellClub LLC
|
Compositions and methods for treatment or prevention of;infections and for the eradication or reduction of;on surfaces | ||
Patent #
US 9,107,419 B2
Filed 01/06/2010
|
Current Assignee
Galenagen LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curelon LLC
|
Systems and methods for surgical and interventional planning, support, post-operative follow-up, and, functional recovery tracking | ||
Patent #
US 9,129,054 B2
Filed 09/19/2013
|
Current Assignee
Depuy Synthes Products LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Depuy Synthes Products LLC
|
Goal-based content selection and delivery | ||
Patent #
US 9,171,048 B2
Filed 02/21/2013
|
Current Assignee
WellClub LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
WellClub LLC
|
Methodology for building and tagging relevant content | ||
Patent #
US 9,183,262 B2
Filed 03/13/2013
|
Current Assignee
WellClub LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
WellClub LLC
|
Method of treating and diagnosing Parkinson's disease and related dysautonomic disorders | ||
Patent #
US 9,233,146 B2
Filed 09/23/2014
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Methods and compositions for the treatment of symptoms of Williams Syndrome | ||
Patent #
US 9,320,780 B2
Filed 06/26/2009
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Use of lactulose in the treatment of autism | ||
Patent #
US 9,345,721 B2
Filed 11/22/2013
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Methods for diagnosing pervasive development disorders, dysautonomia and other neurological conditions | ||
Patent #
US 9,377,459 B2
Filed 10/30/2014
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Method of treating pregnancy-induced hypertension | ||
Patent #
US 9,408,895 B2
Filed 03/06/2015
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Enzyme delivery systems and methods of preparation and use | ||
Patent #
US 9,415,014 B2
Filed 07/28/2011
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Content suggestion engine | ||
Patent #
US 9,430,617 B2
Filed 05/15/2015
|
Current Assignee
WellClub LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
WellClub LLC
|
Method of treatment of schizophreniform disorder | ||
Patent #
US 9,492,515 B2
Filed 02/03/2015
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Methods and compositions for the treatment of influenza | ||
Patent #
US 9,511,125 B2
Filed 10/21/2010
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Method for treating pervasive development disorders | ||
Patent #
US 9,624,526 B2
Filed 12/07/2011
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Method for treating pervasive development disorders | ||
Patent #
US 9,624,525 B2
Filed 12/07/2011
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Expert-based content and coaching platform | ||
Patent #
US 9,679,112 B2
Filed 08/11/2015
|
Current Assignee
WellClub LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
WellClub LLC
|
Pharmaceutical preparation for the treatment of the symptoms of addiction and method of diagnosing same | ||
Patent #
US 9,687,534 B2
Filed 03/05/2015
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Methods and compositions for the treatment of symptoms of prion diseases | ||
Patent #
US 9,687,535 B2
Filed 05/15/2015
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Systems and methods for surgical and interventional planning, support, post-operative follow-up, and functional recovery tracking | ||
Patent #
US 9,700,292 B2
Filed 05/20/2015
|
Current Assignee
Depuy Synthes Products Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Depuy Synthes Products Incorporated
|
Compositions and methods for the treatment or the prevention of E. coli infections and for the eradication or reduction of E. coli surfaces | ||
Patent #
US 9,895,427 B2
Filed 05/15/2015
|
Current Assignee
Galenagen LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Galenagen LLC
|
Method of treating proteinuria in pregnancy | ||
Patent #
US 9,925,250 B2
Filed 06/17/2016
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Enzyme delivery systems and methods of preparation and use | ||
Patent #
US 9,931,302 B2
Filed 02/03/2015
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Enzyme delivery systems and methods of preparation and use | ||
Patent #
US 10,098,844 B2
Filed 10/23/2015
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Systems and methods for surgical and interventional planning, support, post-operative follow-up, and, functional recovery tracking | ||
Patent #
US 10,166,019 B2
Filed 06/09/2015
|
Current Assignee
Depuy Synthes Products LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Depuy Synthes Products LLC
|
Methods for diagnosing pervasive development disorders, dysautonomia and other neurological conditions | ||
Patent #
US 10,209,253 B2
Filed 05/25/2016
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Pharmaceutical preparation for the treatment of the symptoms of addiction and method of diagnosing same | ||
Patent #
US 10,272,141 B2
Filed 05/11/2017
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Method of treatment of schizophreniform disorder | ||
Patent #
US 10,279,016 B2
Filed 09/14/2016
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Use of lactulose in the treatment of autism | ||
Patent #
US 10,350,229 B2
Filed 04/04/2016
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Methods of treating Celiac disease | ||
Patent #
US 10,350,278 B2
Filed 03/15/2013
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Methods and compositions for the treatment of symptoms of prion diseases | ||
Patent #
US 10,413,601 B2
Filed 05/11/2017
|
Current Assignee
Curemark LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Curemark LLC
|
Disease management system and method | ||
Patent #
US 7,769,600 B2
Filed 10/31/2007
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Panel diagnostic method and system | ||
Patent #
US 7,780,595 B2
Filed 05/14/2004
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
ARBITER SYSTEM AND METHOD OF COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS AND ADVICE | ||
Patent #
US 20090007924A1
Filed 04/30/2008
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Networked system for interactive communication and remote monitoring of individuals | ||
Patent #
US 7,516,192 B2
Filed 07/14/2006
|
Current Assignee
Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Remote health monitoring apparatus using scripted communications | ||
Patent #
US 7,320,030 B2
Filed 03/28/2005
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
DYNAMIC MODELING AND SCORING RISK ASSESSMENT | ||
Patent #
US 20080004915A1
Filed 08/08/2007
|
Current Assignee
Stephen Brown
|
Sponsoring Entity
Stephen Brown
|
DISEASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD | ||
Patent #
US 20080052116A1
Filed 10/29/2007
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Healthways SC LLC
|
DISEASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD INCLUDING THERAPY OPTIMIZATION | ||
Patent #
US 20080052130A1
Filed 10/30/2007
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
DISEASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD INCLUDING PREVIEW MODE | ||
Patent #
US 20080052123A1
Filed 10/31/2007
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Healthways SC LLC
|
DYNAMIC MODELING AND SCORING RISK ASSESSMENT | ||
Patent #
US 20080046268A1
Filed 08/08/2007
|
Current Assignee
Stephen Brown
|
Sponsoring Entity
Stephen Brown
|
DISEASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD | ||
Patent #
US 20080052122A1
Filed 10/31/2007
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Healthways SC LLC
|
DISEASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD INCLUDING SIGNIFICANT SYMPTOM FILTERING | ||
Patent #
US 20080045811A1
Filed 10/31/2007
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Healthways SC LLC
|
COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM UTILIZING LIST-BASED PROCESSING | ||
Patent #
US 20080052318A1
Filed 10/31/2007
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC AND TREATMENT ADVICE SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20080052119A1
Filed 10/30/2007
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
DISEASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD INCLUDING PAIN CODE | ||
Patent #
US 20080051639A1
Filed 10/31/2007
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Healthways SC LLC
|
DISEASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OPERATING ON A NETWORK | ||
Patent #
US 20080052121A1
Filed 10/31/2007
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Healthways SC LLC
|
DISEASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM INCLUDING A NO RESPONSE METHOD | ||
Patent #
US 20080051641A1
Filed 10/31/2007
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Healthways SC LLC
|
DISEASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD INCLUDING PERMISSION DATABASE | ||
Patent #
US 20080052118A1
Filed 10/30/2007
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Healthways SC LLC
|
COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC AND TREATMENT ADVICE SYSTEM INCLUDING NETWORK ACCESS | ||
Patent #
US 20080051638A1
Filed 10/31/2007
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
DISEASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND HEALTH ASSESSMENT METHOD | ||
Patent #
US 20080052120A1
Filed 10/31/2007
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Healthways SC LLC
|
DISEASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD INCLUDING THERAPEUTIC ALTERATIONS PERMISSION LEVEL | ||
Patent #
US 20080052132A1
Filed 10/31/2007
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Healthways SC LLC
|
COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC AND TREATMENT ADVICE SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20080051640A1
Filed 10/31/2007
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Health related location awareness | ||
Patent #
US 20080059227A1
Filed 12/21/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MODIFYING DOCUMENTS SENT OVER A COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK | ||
Patent #
US 20080072147A1
Filed 10/25/2007
|
Current Assignee
Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems Inc.
|
Computerized medical diagnostic system utilizing list-based processing | ||
Patent #
US 7,344,496 B2
Filed 09/04/2003
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC AND TREATMENT ADVICE SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20080059247A1
Filed 10/30/2007
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
DISEASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD INCLUDING QUESTION VERSION | ||
Patent #
US 20080059232A1
Filed 10/30/2007
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Healthways SC LLC
|
DIABETES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20080097181A1
Filed 10/26/2007
|
Current Assignee
Stephen Brown
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
DIABETES CARE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20080097180A1
Filed 10/26/2007
|
Current Assignee
Stephen Brown
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
DIABETES CARE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20080108888A1
Filed 10/29/2007
|
Current Assignee
Stephen Brown
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
SYSTEM FOR PERFORMING DIABETES SELF-CARE | ||
Patent #
US 20080103377A1
Filed 10/24/2007
|
Current Assignee
Stephen Brown
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Diabetes management system | ||
Patent #
US 20080109172A1
Filed 10/25/2007
|
Current Assignee
Stephen Brown
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Disease simulation system and method | ||
Patent #
US 7,392,167 B2
Filed 10/10/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC AND TREATMENT ADVICE SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20080162393A1
Filed 10/29/2007
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Remote health monitoring system | ||
Patent #
US 7,399,276 B1
Filed 05/07/2004
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
OBESITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20080262557A1
Filed 04/19/2007
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
REMOTE HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20080269571A1
Filed 06/12/2008
|
Current Assignee
Stephen J Brown, Gowthaman Gunabushanam
|
Sponsoring Entity
Stephen J Brown, Gowthaman Gunabushanam
|
Network media access control system for encouraging patient compliance with a treatment plan | ||
Patent #
US 20070016448A1
Filed 09/21/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Network media access control system for encouraging patient compliance with a treatment plan | ||
Patent #
US 20070016447A1
Filed 09/21/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Disease simulation system and method | ||
Patent #
US 7,167,818 B2
Filed 03/16/2001
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Network media access control system for encouraging patient compliance with a treatment plan | ||
Patent #
US 20070016446A1
Filed 09/21/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Interactive patient communication development system for reporting on patient healthcare management | ||
Patent #
US 20070021984A1
Filed 09/28/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Networked system for interactive communication and remote monitoring of individuals | ||
Patent #
US 20070016445A1
Filed 09/20/2006
|
Current Assignee
HEALTH HERO NETWORDK
|
Sponsoring Entity
HEALTH HERO NETWORDK
|
Remote health monitoring and maintenance system | ||
Patent #
US 20070061167A1
Filed 08/31/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
DISEASE SIMULATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | ||
Patent #
US 20070055486A1
Filed 10/31/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Research data collection and analysis | ||
Patent #
US 20070067251A1
Filed 11/14/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
System and method for monitoring a physiological condition | ||
Patent #
US 20070048691A1
Filed 10/19/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
DISEASE SIMULATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | ||
Patent #
US 20070078681A1
Filed 11/06/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR REMOTE HEALTH MONITORING AND PROVIDING HEALTH RELATED INFORMATION | ||
Patent #
US 20070094049A1
Filed 11/22/2006
|
Current Assignee
Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems Inc.
|
ON-LINE HEALTH EDUCATION AND FEEDBACK SYSTEM USING MOTIVATIONAL DRIVER PROFILE CODING AND AUTOMATED CONTENT FULFILLMENT | ||
Patent #
US 20070111176A1
Filed 12/21/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
System and method for monitoring blood pressure from a person | ||
Patent #
US 7,223,235 B2
Filed 09/09/2005
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Method and apparatus for remote health monitoring and providing health related information | ||
Patent #
US 20070118404A1
Filed 11/15/2006
|
Current Assignee
Robert Bosch LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch LLC
|
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR REMOTE HEALTH MONITORING AND PROVIDING HEALTH RELATED INFORMATION | ||
Patent #
US 20070118403A1
Filed 11/13/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Messaging to remote patients in a networked health-monitoring system | ||
Patent #
US 20070100665A1
Filed 02/27/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MODIFYING DOCUMENTS SENT OVER A COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK | ||
Patent #
US 20070100934A1
Filed 12/21/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
System and method for monitoring user-related data from a person | ||
Patent #
US 7,223,236 B2
Filed 09/09/2005
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Network media access control system for encouraging patient compliance with a treatment plan | ||
Patent #
US 20070124179A1
Filed 12/26/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
NETWORKED SYSTEM FOR INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION AND REMOTE MONITORING OF PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURER AND CLINICAL TRIALS | ||
Patent #
US 20070168242A1
Filed 12/20/2006
|
Current Assignee
Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems Inc.
|
PERSONALIZED BODY IMAGE | ||
Patent #
US 20070168226A1
Filed 12/13/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Networked system for interactive communication and remote monitoring of individuals | ||
Patent #
US 7,252,636 B2
Filed 06/13/2005
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
System and methods for monitoring a patient's heart condition | ||
Patent #
US 7,258,666 B2
Filed 11/05/2004
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
System and method of performing medical diagnosis in real time | ||
Patent #
US 7,259,681 B2
Filed 05/12/2005
|
Current Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
LG Electronics Inc.
|
System and method for monitoring air flow from a person | ||
Patent #
US 7,264,591 B2
Filed 10/07/2003
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR REMOTE HEALTH MONITORING AND PROVIDING HEALTH RELATED INFORMATION | ||
Patent #
US 20070213608A1
Filed 05/14/2007
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MONITORING A PHYSIOLOGICAL CONDITION | ||
Patent #
US 20070212671A1
Filed 05/14/2007
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Method and system for improving adherence with a diet program or other medical regimen | ||
Patent #
US 7,297,109 B2
Filed 12/12/2002
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Computerized medical diagnostic and treatment advice system | ||
Patent #
US 7,297,111 B2
Filed 03/09/2005
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Disease management system and method including analysis of disease specific changes | ||
Patent #
US 7,297,108 B2
Filed 10/01/2002
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Computerized medical diagnostic and treatment advice system | ||
Patent #
US 7,300,402 B2
Filed 02/20/2003
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Computerized medical diagnostic and treatment advice system including network access | ||
Patent #
US 7,306,560 B2
Filed 01/28/2005
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Remotely monitoring an individual using scripted communications | ||
Patent #
US 7,310,668 B2
Filed 03/28/2005
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Aggregating and pooling health related information in a communication system with feedback | ||
Patent #
US 7,305,348 B1
Filed 07/25/2000
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR REMOTE HEALTH MONITORING AND PROVIDING HEALTH RELATED INFORMATION | ||
Patent #
US 20070299321A1
Filed 09/10/2007
|
Current Assignee
Stephen Brown
|
Sponsoring Entity
Stephen Brown
|
Computerized medical diagnostic and treatment advice system including network access | ||
Patent #
US 6,206,829 B1
Filed 08/17/1999
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
First Opinion Corporation
|
Computerized medical diagnostic and treatment advice system including network access | ||
Patent #
US 6,482,156 B2
Filed 03/05/2001
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
First Opinion Corporation
|
Knowledge-based expert interactive system for pain | ||
Patent #
US 5,908,383 A
Filed 09/17/1997
|
Current Assignee
Ulf Brynjestad
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Method and apparatus for preventing wireless fraud | ||
Patent #
US 5,541,977 A
Filed 05/12/1995
|
Current Assignee
ATT Mobility II LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
ATT Inc.
|
Networked system for interactive communication and remote monitoring of individuals | ||
Patent #
US 6,968,375 B1
Filed 09/08/2000
|
Current Assignee
Robert Bosch LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Computerized medical diagnostic and treatment advice system | ||
Patent #
US 6,113,540 A
Filed 02/23/1999
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
First Opinion Corporation
|
Computerized medical diagnostic system utilizing list-based processing | ||
Patent #
US 6,270,456 B1
Filed 06/07/1999
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
First Opinion Corporation
|
Authoring tools for multimedia application development and network delivery | ||
Patent #
US 5,659,793 A
Filed 12/22/1994
|
Current Assignee
Florescere Assets LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
BELL ATLANTIC ENTERTAINMENT AND INFORMATION SERVICES GROUP INC.
|
Method using central epidemiological database | ||
Patent #
US 5,911,132 A
Filed 10/14/1997
|
Current Assignee
Lucent Technologies Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Lucent Technologies Inc.
|
Object oriented rule-based expert system framework mechanism | ||
Patent #
US 6,598,035 B2
Filed 10/15/2001
|
Current Assignee
International Business Machines Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
International Business Machines Corporation
|
Integrated emergency medical transportation database system | ||
Patent #
US 6,117,073 A
Filed 03/02/1998
|
Current Assignee
Golden Hour Data Systems Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Scott L. Jones, Kevin C. Hutton
|
Computerized medical diagnostic and treatment advice system | ||
Patent #
US 5,868,669 A
Filed 01/09/1997
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Medical record management system and process with improved workflow features | ||
Patent #
US 5,974,389 A
Filed 03/01/1996
|
Current Assignee
Glaxo Wellcome Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Glaxo Wellcome Incorporated
|
Computerized medical diagnostic and treatment advice system including list based processing | ||
Patent #
US 5,935,060 A
Filed 07/11/1997
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
System and method for managing patient medical records | ||
Patent #
US 5,772,585 A
Filed 08/30/1996
|
Current Assignee
EMC Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
EMC Incorporated
|
Computerized medical diagnostic and treatment advice system including network access | ||
Patent #
US 6,022,315 A
Filed 07/11/1997
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
First Opinion Corporation
|
Multi-user remote health monitoring system | ||
Patent #
US 6,381,577 B1
Filed 03/02/2000
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Computerized medical diagnostic and treatment advice system including network access | ||
Patent #
US 6,849,045 B2
Filed 11/19/2002
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
First Opinion Corporation
|
Delivery of medical services using electronic data communications | ||
Patent #
US 5,619,991 A
Filed 04/26/1995
|
Current Assignee
Lucent Technologies Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Lucent Technologies Inc.
|
Computerized medical diagnostic and treatment advice method | ||
Patent #
US 5,910,107 A
Filed 05/30/1997
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Knowledge-based moderator for electronic mail help lists | ||
Patent #
US 5,909,679 A
Filed 11/08/1996
|
Current Assignee
ATT Intellectual Property I LP
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Continuous monitoring using a predictive instrument | ||
Patent #
US 5,724,983 A
Filed 03/25/1996
|
Current Assignee
NEW ENGLAND MEDICAL CENTER HOSPITALS INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
NEW ENGLAND MEDICAL CENTER HOSPITALS INC.
|
Computerized medical diagnostic system utilizing list-based processing | ||
Patent #
US 6,641,532 B2
Filed 08/07/2001
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
First Opinion Corporation
|
Telemedicine system using voice video and data encapsulation and de-encapsulation for communicating medical information between central monitoring stations and remote patient monitoring stations | ||
Patent #
US 5,987,519 A
Filed 09/19/1997
|
Current Assignee
Georgia Tech Research Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Georgia Tech Research Corporation
|
Networked system for interactive communication and remote monitoring of individuals | ||
Patent #
US 5,997,476 A
Filed 10/07/1997
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Systems, methods and computer program products for guiding the selection of therapeutic treatment regimens | ||
Patent #
US 6,081,786 A
Filed 04/01/1999
|
Current Assignee
Advanced Biological Laboratories SA
|
Sponsoring Entity
INTELLIGENT THERAPEUTIC SOLUTIONS INC.
|
Process for consumer-directed diagnostic and health care information | ||
Patent #
US 7,076,437 B1
Filed 10/27/2000
|
Current Assignee
Levy Victor
|
Sponsoring Entity
Levy Victor
|
Remote health monitoring and maintenance system | ||
Patent #
US 20060010014A1
Filed 09/15/2005
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Remote health monitoring and maintenance system | ||
Patent #
US 20060004611A1
Filed 06/29/2005
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
System and method for modifying documents sent over a communications network | ||
Patent #
US 20060089969A1
Filed 12/13/2005
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Interactive video based remote health monitoring system | ||
Patent #
US 20060100910A1
Filed 12/21/2005
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Matrix interface for medical diagnostic and treatment advice system and method | ||
Patent #
US 20060135859A1
Filed 10/24/2005
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Healthways SC LLC
|
Remote health monitoring and maintenance system | ||
Patent #
US 20060178914A1
Filed 04/04/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Method and system for improving adherence with a diet program or other medical regimen | ||
Patent #
US 20060189853A1
Filed 02/14/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Networked system for interactive communication and remote monitoring of individuals | ||
Patent #
US 20060235722A1
Filed 06/12/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Multi-user remote health monitoring system with biometrics support | ||
Patent #
US 20060241975A1
Filed 06/23/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
System and method for monitoring a physiological condition | ||
Patent #
US 20060234202A1
Filed 06/12/2006
|
Current Assignee
Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems Inc.
|
Multiple patient monitoring system for proactive health management | ||
Patent #
US 20060253303A1
Filed 07/11/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Networked system for interactive communication and remote monitoring of individuals | ||
Patent #
US 20060271404A1
Filed 08/07/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Networked system for interactive communication and remote monitoring of individuals | ||
Patent #
US 20060253576A1
Filed 07/14/2006
|
Current Assignee
Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems Inc.
|
Networked system for interactive communication and remote monitoring of individuals | ||
Patent #
US 20060252089A1
Filed 07/10/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Networked system for interactive communication and remote monitoring of individuals | ||
Patent #
US 20060247979A1
Filed 06/12/2006
|
Current Assignee
Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems Inc.
|
Networked system for interactive communication and remote monitoring of individuals | ||
Patent #
US 20060253574A1
Filed 07/10/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Universal serial bus (USB) based remote health monitoring | ||
Patent #
US 20060247951A1
Filed 06/26/2006
|
Current Assignee
Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems Inc.
|
Multi-user remote health monitoring system with biometrics support | ||
Patent #
US 20060285736A1
Filed 08/29/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Multi-user remote health monitoring system with biometrics support | ||
Patent #
US 20060287889A1
Filed 08/25/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Networked system for interactive communication and remote monitoring of individuals | ||
Patent #
US 20060294233A1
Filed 08/29/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Networked system for interactive communication and remote monitoring of individuals | ||
Patent #
US 20060287931A1
Filed 08/29/2006
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Panel diagnostic method and system | ||
Patent #
US 20050010088A1
Filed 05/14/2004
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Healthways SC LLC
|
System and method for assisting medical diagnosis using an anatomic system and cause matrix | ||
Patent #
US 20050010444A1
Filed 06/04/2004
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Personalized display of health information | ||
Patent #
US 20050027562A1
Filed 01/09/2004
|
Current Assignee
Stephen J Brown
|
Sponsoring Entity
Stephen J Brown
|
Method and system for monitoring health of an individual | ||
Patent #
US 20050060194A1
Filed 04/05/2004
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
User monitoring | ||
Patent #
US 20050086083A1
Filed 12/03/2004
|
Current Assignee
Robert Bosch LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch LLC
|
User-based health monitoring | ||
Patent #
US 20050080652A1
Filed 12/03/2004
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
System for generating charts in a knowledge management tool | ||
Patent #
US 6,900,807 B1
Filed 03/08/2000
|
Current Assignee
Accenture Global Services Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
Accenture LLP
|
System and method of performing medical diagnosis in real time | ||
Patent #
US 6,903,657 B2
Filed 04/09/2002
|
Current Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
LG Electronics Inc.
|
Health management system and health management program | ||
Patent #
US 20050177391A1
Filed 10/22/2002
|
Current Assignee
Citizen Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Citizen Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
Method and system for detecting and analyzing clinical pictures and the causes thereof and for determining proposals for appropriate therapy | ||
Patent #
US 20050234306A1
Filed 06/14/2003
|
Current Assignee
Merck Patent GmbH
|
Sponsoring Entity
Merck Patent GmbH
|
Networked system for interactive communication and remote monitoring of individuals | ||
Patent #
US 20050228883A1
Filed 06/13/2005
|
Current Assignee
Robert Bosch LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Robert Bosch LLC
|
Radio frequency based remote health monitoring | ||
Patent #
US 20050256739A1
Filed 04/28/2005
|
Current Assignee
Stephen J Brown
|
Sponsoring Entity
Stephen J Brown
|
System and method of evaluating preoperative medical care and determining recommended tests based on patient health history and medical condition and nature of surgical procedure | ||
Patent #
US 20050273359A1
Filed 06/03/2004
|
Current Assignee
PMP ACQUISITION LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Prompte LLC
|
Networked system for interactive communication and remote monitoring of individuals | ||
Patent #
US 20050273509A1
Filed 05/19/2005
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Remote monitoring and data management platform | ||
Patent #
US 20040019259A1
Filed 05/08/2003
|
Current Assignee
Stephen J Brown, Julie C. Cherry, Geoffrey Clapp
|
Sponsoring Entity
Stephen J Brown, Julie C. Cherry, Geoffrey Clapp
|
Apparatus and method for computerized multi-media data organization and transmission | ||
Patent #
US 20040017475A1
Filed 02/19/2003
|
Current Assignee
William Rex Akers
|
Sponsoring Entity
William Rex Akers
|
Automated medical decision making utilizing bayesian network knowledge domain modeling | ||
Patent #
US 6,687,685 B1
Filed 04/07/2000
|
Current Assignee
DR. RED DUKE INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
DR. RED DUKE INC.
|
Computerized medical diagnostic system utilizing list-based processing | ||
Patent #
US 20040059200A1
Filed 09/04/2003
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Healthways SC LLC
|
Computerized medical diagnostic and treatment advice system and method including mental status examination | ||
Patent #
US 6,725,209 B1
Filed 06/06/2000
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
First Opinion Corporation
|
Automated diagnostic system and method including multiple diagnostic modes | ||
Patent #
US 6,730,027 B2
Filed 02/24/2003
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
First Opinion Corporation
|
PATIENT CONTROL OF HEALTH-RELATED DATA IN A REMOTE PATIENT MONITORING SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20040117209A1
Filed 09/16/2003
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
MESSAGING TO REMOTE PATIENTS IN A NETWORKED HEALTH-MONITORING SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20040117208A1
Filed 09/16/2003
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
NETWORKED REMOTE PATIENT MONITORING WITH HANDHELD DEVICES | ||
Patent #
US 20040117210A1
Filed 09/16/2003
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
REPORT GENERATION IN A NETWORKED HEALTH-MONITORING SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20040117207A1
Filed 09/16/2003
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Authoring language translator | ||
Patent #
US 6,748,353 B1
Filed 03/08/1999
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
First Opinion Corporation
|
Method and system for improving adherence with a diet program or other medical regimen | ||
Patent #
US 20040116780A1
Filed 12/12/2002
|
Current Assignee
Stephen J Brown
|
Sponsoring Entity
Stephen J Brown
|
NETWORKED HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR MONITORING FOOD INTAKE | ||
Patent #
US 20040107116A1
Filed 10/07/2003
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Automated diagnostic system and method including encoding patient data | ||
Patent #
US 6,746,399 B2
Filed 11/05/2002
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
First Opinion Corporation
|
Automated diagnostic system and method including alternative symptoms | ||
Patent #
US 6,764,447 B2
Filed 03/04/2003
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
First Opinion Corporation
|
Automated diagnostic system and method including synergies | ||
Patent #
US 6,767,325 B2
Filed 10/22/2002
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
First Opinion Corporation
|
Disease management system and method including correlation assessment | ||
Patent #
US 6,770,029 B2
Filed 02/13/2003
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
First Opinion Corporation
|
Research data collection and analysis | ||
Patent #
US 20040193377A1
Filed 12/18/2003
|
Current Assignee
Stephen J Brown
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Automated diagnostic system and method | ||
Patent #
US 20040199332A1
Filed 04/20/2004
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Healthways SC LLC
|
Remote health monitoring and maintenance system | ||
Patent #
US 20040199409A1
Filed 04/16/2004
|
Current Assignee
Stephen J Brown
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Automated diagnostic system and method including disease timeline | ||
Patent #
US 6,817,980 B2
Filed 05/27/2003
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
First Opinion Corporation
|
System and method for remote education using a memory card | ||
Patent #
US 20040219500A1
Filed 09/26/2003
|
Current Assignee
Stephen J Brown, Roger J. Quy
|
Sponsoring Entity
Roger J. Quy
|
Computerized medical diagnostic and treatment advice system and method including mental status examination | ||
Patent #
US 20040249778A1
Filed 04/16/2004
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Automated diagnostic system and method including multiple diagnostic modes | ||
Patent #
US 6,524,241 B2
Filed 02/14/2001
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
First Opinion Corporation
|
Disease management system and method including analysis of disease specific changes | ||
Patent #
US 20030036686A1
Filed 10/01/2002
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Healthways SC LLC
|
Automated diagnostic system and method including alternative symptoms | ||
Patent #
US 6,527,713 B2
Filed 02/14/2001
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
First Opinion Corporation
|
Multi-user remote health monitoring system with biometrics support | ||
Patent #
US 20030069753A1
Filed 08/30/2002
|
Current Assignee
Stephen J Brown
|
Sponsoring Entity
Stephen J Brown
|
Automated diagnostic system and method including disease timeline | ||
Patent #
US 6,569,093 B2
Filed 02/14/2001
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
First Opinion Corporation
|
Explanation generation system for a diagnosis support tool employing an inference system | ||
Patent #
US 6,601,055 B1
Filed 08/02/1999
|
Current Assignee
Linda M. Roberts
|
Sponsoring Entity
Linda M. Roberts
|
Apparatus and method for computerized multi-media data organization and transmission | ||
Patent #
US 6,597,392 B1
Filed 10/13/1998
|
Current Assignee
William Rex Akers
|
Sponsoring Entity
HEALTHCARE VISION INC.
|
Disease management system and method including correlation assessment | ||
Patent #
US 20030153819A1
Filed 02/13/2003
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Healthways SC LLC
|
Computerized medical diagnostic and treatment advice system | ||
Patent #
US 20030163299A1
Filed 02/20/2003
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Methods and apparatus for facilitated, hierarchical medical diagnosis and symptom coding and definition | ||
Patent #
US 20030181790A1
Filed 11/18/2002
|
Current Assignee
COMMWELL INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Automated diagnostic system and method including disease timeline | ||
Patent #
US 20030199740A1
Filed 05/27/2003
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Remote psychological diagnosis and monitoring system | ||
Patent #
US 6,334,778 B1
Filed 03/17/1999
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Patient - controlled automated medical record, diagnosis, and treatment system and method | ||
Patent #
US 20020029157A1
Filed 07/19/2001
|
Current Assignee
MARFLY 1 LP
|
Sponsoring Entity
MARFLY 1 LP
|
Networked system for interactive communication and remote monitoring of individuals | ||
Patent #
US 6,368,273 B1
Filed 04/28/1999
|
Current Assignee
Robert Bosch LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Diabetes management system and method for controlling blood glucose | ||
Patent #
US 6,379,301 B1
Filed 09/30/1998
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Online system and method for providing composite entertainment and health information | ||
Patent #
US 6,375,469 B1
Filed 09/13/1999
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Automated diagnostic system and method including reuse of diagnostic objects | ||
Patent #
US 20020068857A1
Filed 02/14/2001
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Automated diagnostic system and method including synergies | ||
Patent #
US 6,468,210 B2
Filed 02/14/2001
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
First Opinion Corporation
|
System and method of performing medical diagnosis in real time | ||
Patent #
US 20020148477A1
Filed 04/09/2002
|
Current Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
LG Electronics Inc.
|
Automated diagnostic system and method including encoding patient data | ||
Patent #
US 6,475,143 B2
Filed 02/14/2001
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
First Opinion Corporation
|
System and method for building and manipulating a centralized measurement value database | ||
Patent #
US 20020186818A1
Filed 02/27/2002
|
Current Assignee
OSTEONET INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Imaging Therapeutics Inc.
|
Remote health monitoring and maintenance system | ||
Patent #
US 6,168,563 B1
Filed 03/17/1999
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Outcomes profile management system for evaluating treatment effectiveness | ||
Patent #
US 6,177,940 B1
Filed 09/20/1995
|
Current Assignee
CEDARON MEDICAL INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
CEDARON MEDICAL INC.
|
Method for diagnosis and treatment of psychological and emotional conditions using a microprocessor-based virtual reality simulator | ||
Patent #
US 6,186,145 B1
Filed 06/21/1999
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Web survey tool builder and result compiler | ||
Patent #
US 6,189,029 B1
Filed 09/20/1996
|
Current Assignee
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Silicon Graphics Incorporated
|
Research data collection and analysis | ||
Patent #
US 6,196,970 B1
Filed 03/22/1999
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Disease simulation system and method | ||
Patent #
US 6,233,539 B1
Filed 09/20/1999
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Disease management system and method | ||
Patent #
US 6,234,964 B1
Filed 03/13/1998
|
Current Assignee
Healthways SC LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
First Opinion Corporation
|
Aggregating and pooling weight loss information in a communication system with feedback | ||
Patent #
US 6,240,393 B1
Filed 09/25/1998
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Health care data manipulation and analysis system | ||
Patent #
US 6,230,142 B1
Filed 08/25/1998
|
Current Assignee
HOMEOPT LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
HOMEOPT LLC
|
Multiple patient monitoring system for proactive health management | ||
Patent #
US 6,246,992 B1
Filed 09/14/1998
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Computer assisted methods for diagnosing diseases | ||
Patent #
US 6,248,063 B1
Filed 12/22/1997
|
Current Assignee
Horus Therapeutics Inc. Hilton Head SC, Horus Therapeutics Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Horus Therapeutics Inc. Hilton Head SC, Horus Therapeutics Inc.
|
Computer architecture and process of patient generation, evolution, and simulation for computer based testing system | ||
Patent #
US 6,246,975 B1
Filed 10/30/1997
|
Current Assignee
AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY PRACTICE INC.
|
Method and apparatus for extracting features characterizing objects, and use thereof | ||
Patent #
US 6,247,002 B1
Filed 08/07/1998
|
Current Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Sony Corporation
|
Monitoring system for remotely querying individuals | ||
Patent #
US 6,248,065 B1
Filed 01/19/1999
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Modular microprocessor-based diagnostic measurement apparatus and method for psychological conditions | ||
Patent #
US 6,260,022 B1
Filed 01/26/1999
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Disease management system and method including correlation assessment | ||
Patent #
US 20010012913A1
Filed 03/26/2001
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Networked system for interactive communications and remote monitoring of drug delivery | ||
Patent #
US 6,270,455 B1
Filed 11/30/1998
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Method and system for managing chronic disease and wellness online | ||
Patent #
US 20010039503A1
Filed 04/26/2001
|
Current Assignee
Bryan K. Chan, Lawrence F. Chu
|
Sponsoring Entity
Bryan K. Chan, Lawrence F. Chu
|
Computerized medical diagnostic system utilizing list-based processing | ||
Patent #
US 20010053875A1
Filed 08/07/2001
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
System and method for remote education using a memory card | ||
Patent #
US 6,330,426 B2
Filed 07/20/1998
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Personalized display of health information | ||
Patent #
US 6,032,119 A
Filed 01/16/1997
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Adjunct to diagnostic imaging systems for analysis of images of an object or a body part or organ | ||
Patent #
US 6,032,678 A
Filed 03/13/1998
|
Current Assignee
Shraga Rottem
|
Sponsoring Entity
Shraga Rottem
|
Method of determining mental health status in a computerized medical diagnostic system | ||
Patent #
US 6,071,236 A
Filed 06/02/1998
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
First Opinion Corporation
|
Multi-user remote health monitoring system | ||
Patent #
US 6,101,478 A
Filed 11/21/1997
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Method and system for the entry protocol of an emergency medical dispatch system | ||
Patent #
US 6,106,459 A
Filed 03/28/1997
|
Current Assignee
Jeffrey J. Clawson
|
Sponsoring Entity
Jeffrey J. Clawson
|
Computerized reward system for encouraging participation in a health management program | ||
Patent #
US 6,151,586 A
Filed 11/21/1997
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Method and apparatus for interactively monitoring a physiological condition and for interactively providing health-related information | ||
Patent #
US 6,144,837 A
Filed 12/03/1996
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Diagnostic enhancement method and apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 6,149,585 A
Filed 10/28/1998
|
Current Assignee
SAGE HEALTH MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
SAGE HEALTH MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS INC.
|
Motivational tool for adherence to medical regimen | ||
Patent #
US 6,167,362 A
Filed 03/09/1999
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Treatment regimen compliance and efficacy with feedback | ||
Patent #
US 6,161,095 A
Filed 12/16/1998
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Method for predicting the future occurrence of clinically occult or non-existent medical conditions | ||
Patent #
US 5,862,304 A
Filed 10/31/1990
|
Current Assignee
Board of Regents of the University of Texas System
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
System and method for modifying documents sent over a communications network | ||
Patent #
US 5,887,133 A
Filed 01/15/1997
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
On-line health education and feedback system using motivational driver profile coding and automated content fulfillment | ||
Patent #
US 5,879,163 A
Filed 06/24/1996
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Monitoring system for remotely querying individuals | ||
Patent #
US 5,897,493 A
Filed 04/30/1997
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Modular microprocessor-based health monitoring system | ||
Patent #
US 5,899,855 A
Filed 06/07/1995
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Method for treating medical conditions using a microprocessor-based video game | ||
Patent #
US 5,918,603 A
Filed 05/15/1997
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Modular microprocessor-based diagnostic measurement apparatus and method for psychological conditions | ||
Patent #
US 5,940,801 A
Filed 07/31/1998
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Network media access control system for encouraging patient compliance with a treatment plan | ||
Patent #
US 5,933,136 A
Filed 12/23/1996
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Online system and method for providing composite entertainment and health information | ||
Patent #
US 5,951,300 A
Filed 03/10/1997
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Health management process control system | ||
Patent #
US 5,960,403 A
Filed 08/19/1998
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Disease simulation system and method | ||
Patent #
US 5,956,501 A
Filed 01/10/1997
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Health care management system for comparing user-proposed and recommended resources required for treatment | ||
Patent #
US 5,953,704 A
Filed 01/15/1997
|
Current Assignee
MCKESSON HEALTH SOLUTION LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Method for identifying at risk patients diagnosed with congestive heart failure | ||
Patent #
US 5,976,082 A
Filed 01/29/1997
|
Current Assignee
Smithkline Beecham Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Smithkline Beecham Corporation
|
Video data representation of physiological data | ||
Patent #
US 6,001,060 A
Filed 05/30/1997
|
Current Assignee
Regents of the University of California
|
Sponsoring Entity
Regents of the University of California
|
Computerized medical advice system and method including meta function | ||
Patent #
US 5,711,297 A
Filed 01/30/1996
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
First Opinion Corporation
|
Automated decision-making arrangement | ||
Patent #
US 5,732,397 A
Filed 03/16/1992
|
Current Assignee
Swiss Reinsurance Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
Lincoln National RISK Management Incorporated
|
Method for mediating social and behavioral processes in medicine and business through an interactive telecommunications guidance system | ||
Patent #
US 5,722,418 A
Filed 09/30/1994
|
Current Assignee
Bro L. William
|
Sponsoring Entity
Bro L. William
|
Computerized medical diagnostic system including meta function | ||
Patent #
US 5,724,968 A
Filed 12/29/1993
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
First Opinion Corporation
|
Disease indicator analysis system | ||
Patent #
US 5,746,204 A
Filed 12/07/1995
|
Current Assignee
CARBON BASED CORPORATION
|
Sponsoring Entity
CARBON BASED CORPORATION
|
Computer assisted methods for diagnosing diseases | ||
Patent #
US 5,769,074 A
Filed 05/03/1996
|
Current Assignee
HORUS THERAPEUTICS INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
HORUS THERAPEUTICS INC.
|
Health monitoring system | ||
Patent #
US 5,778,882 A
Filed 02/24/1995
|
Current Assignee
Brigham and Womens Hospital Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Brigham and Womens Hospital Incorporated
|
Creating and using protocols to create and review a patient chart | ||
Patent #
US 5,794,208 A
Filed 03/01/1996
|
Current Assignee
Peter S. Goltra
|
Sponsoring Entity
Peter S. Goltra
|
System and method for performing fuzzy cluster classification of stress tests | ||
Patent #
US 5,788,640 A
Filed 10/26/1995
|
Current Assignee
Robert Mitchell Peters
|
Sponsoring Entity
Robert Mitchell Peters
|
Phrasing structure for the narrative display of findings | ||
Patent #
US 5,802,495 A
Filed 03/01/1996
|
Current Assignee
Peter Goltra
|
Sponsoring Entity
Peter Goltra
|
ROC method for early detection of disease | ||
Patent #
US 5,800,347 A
Filed 11/03/1995
|
Current Assignee
Queen Mary And Westfield College
|
Sponsoring Entity
General Hospital Corporation
|
Method for entering information into an electronic patient chart, and protocol auto-negative capabilities | ||
Patent #
US 5,812,984 A
Filed 05/13/1996
|
Current Assignee
Peter S. Goltra
|
Sponsoring Entity
Peter S. Goltra
|
Intelligent prompting | ||
Patent #
US 5,823,949 A
Filed 08/11/1997
|
Current Assignee
Peter S. Goltra
|
Sponsoring Entity
Peter S. Goltra
|
Modular microprocessor-based diagnostic measurement apparatus and method for psychological conditions | ||
Patent #
US 5,828,943 A
Filed 04/16/1997
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Diabetes management system and method for controlling blood glucose | ||
Patent #
US 5,822,715 A
Filed 04/18/1997
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Computer-implemented decision management system with dynamically generated questions and answer choices | ||
Patent #
US 5,835,900 A
Filed 10/07/1997
|
Current Assignee
Expert Systems Publishing Co. Lake Oswego OR, Expert Systems Publishing Co.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Expert Systems Publishing Co. Lake Oswego OR, Expert Systems Publishing Co.
|
Multiple patient monitoring system for proactive health management | ||
Patent #
US 5,832,448 A
Filed 10/16/1996
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Combination inhaler and peak flow rate meter | ||
Patent #
US 5,839,430 A
Filed 01/13/1997
|
Current Assignee
Joseph Cama
|
Sponsoring Entity
Joseph Cama
|
Automated and interactive behavioral and medical guidance system | ||
Patent #
US 5,596,994 A
Filed 05/02/1994
|
Current Assignee
William L. Bro
|
Sponsoring Entity
William L. Bro
|
Computerized medical diagnostic system including re-enter function and sensitivity factors | ||
Patent #
US 5,594,638 A
Filed 12/29/1993
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
First Opinion Corporation
|
Method and apparatus for interactively monitoring a physiological condition and for interactively providing health related information | ||
Patent #
US 5,601,435 A
Filed 11/04/1994
|
Current Assignee
RAYA SYSTEMS INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
RAYA SYSTEMS INC.
|
Method and system for differential diagnosis based on clinical and radiological information using artificial neural networks | ||
Patent #
US 5,622,171 A
Filed 04/14/1995
|
Current Assignee
ARCH Development Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
ARCH Development Corporation
|
Outpatient monitoring system | ||
Patent #
US 5,633,910 A
Filed 09/13/1994
|
Current Assignee
Kopel H. Cohen
|
Sponsoring Entity
Kopel H. Cohen
|
Methods for identifying human hereditary disease patterns | ||
Patent #
US 5,642,936 A
Filed 01/29/1996
|
Current Assignee
ONCORMED
|
Sponsoring Entity
ONCORMED
|
Method of and apparatus for monitoring the management of disease | ||
Patent #
US 5,642,731 A
Filed 12/02/1994
|
Current Assignee
MADRIGAL HEALTH LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
INFORMDEIX INC.
|
Computerized medical diagnostic and treatment advice system | ||
Patent #
US 5,660,176 A
Filed 12/29/1993
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Decision Support LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
First Opinion Corporation
|
Method and apparatus for controlled individualized medication | ||
Patent #
US 5,672,154 A
Filed 02/27/1995
|
Current Assignee
MINIDOC I UPPSALA AB
|
Sponsoring Entity
MINIDOC I UPPSALA AB
|
Apparatus and method for displaying normalized clinical test data | ||
Patent #
US 5,675,760 A
Filed 09/08/1994
|
Current Assignee
Toa Medical Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Toa Medical Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
Ambulatory physiological monitor with removable disk cartridge and wireless modem | ||
Patent #
US 5,678,562 A
Filed 11/09/1995
|
Current Assignee
BURDICK INC
|
Sponsoring Entity
BURDICK INC
|
Decision support system and method for diagnosis consultation in laboratory hematopathology | ||
Patent #
US 5,692,220 A
Filed 09/02/1993
|
Current Assignee
Coulter International Corp.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Coulter International Corp.
|
Autogenic-feedback training exercise (AFTE) method and system | ||
Patent #
US 5,694,939 A
Filed 10/03/1995
|
Current Assignee
ADMINISTRATOR OF THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THE AS REPRESENTED BY
|
Sponsoring Entity
ADMINISTRATOR OF THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THE AS REPRESENTED BY
|
Scientific wellness personal/clinical/laboratory assessments, profile and health risk managment system with insurability rankings on cross-correlated 10-point optical health/fitness/wellness scales | ||
Patent #
US 5,692,501 A
Filed 06/06/1995
|
Current Assignee
Paul Minturn
|
Sponsoring Entity
Paul Minturn
|
Medication dispensing and timing system utilizing time reference message | ||
Patent #
US 5,703,786 A
Filed 08/14/1995
|
Current Assignee
Profile Systems LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Profile Systems LLC
|
User adaptable expert system | ||
Patent #
US 5,481,647 A
Filed 09/21/1993
|
Current Assignee
Raff Enterprises Inc. Dallas TX, Raff Enterprises Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Raff Enterprises Inc. Dallas TX, Raff Enterprises Inc.
|
Apparatus and method for categorizing health care utilization | ||
Patent #
US 5,486,999 A
Filed 04/20/1994
|
Current Assignee
Andrew H. Mebane
|
Sponsoring Entity
Andrew H. Mebane
|
Expert system for providing interactive assistance in solving problems such as health care management | ||
Patent #
US 5,517,405 A
Filed 10/14/1993
|
Current Assignee
AETNA LIFE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
|
Sponsoring Entity
AETNA LIFE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
|
Interactive television security through transaction time stamping | ||
Patent #
US 5,519,433 A
Filed 11/30/1993
|
Current Assignee
OpenTV Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Thomson Multimedia Incorporated
|
Method of and arrangement for optimizing disease diagnosis | ||
Patent #
US 5,533,522 A
Filed 01/04/1993
|
Current Assignee
Genquan Feng
|
Sponsoring Entity
Genquan Feng
|
Ambulatory patient health monitoring techniques utilizing interactive visual communication | ||
Patent #
US 5,544,649 A
Filed 03/15/1995
|
Current Assignee
Cardiomedix Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Cardiomedix Incorporated
|
Intelligent remote visual monitoring system for home health care service | ||
Patent #
US 5,553,609 A
Filed 02/09/1995
|
Current Assignee
Indiana University Research Technology Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
INDIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
|
Computer system and method for converting a conversational statement to computer command language | ||
Patent #
US 5,555,169 A
Filed 05/14/1993
|
Current Assignee
Hitachi Ltd.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Hitachi Ltd.
|
Portable medical questionnaire presentation device | ||
Patent #
US 5,572,421 A
Filed 06/02/1994
|
Current Assignee
William E. Turcotte II, Louis Altman, David Summerell
|
Sponsoring Entity
William E. Turcotte II, Louis Altman, David Summerell
|
Health care management system for managing medical treatments and comparing user-proposed and recommended resources required for treatment | ||
Patent #
US 5,583,758 A
Filed 06/07/1995
|
Current Assignee
MCKESSON HEALTH SOLUTION LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Health Risk Management Inc.
|
Health support system | ||
Patent #
US 5,390,238 A
Filed 06/15/1992
|
Current Assignee
General Dynamics C4 Systems Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Motorola Inc.
|
Data processing system and method for automatically performing prioritized nursing diagnoses from patient assessment data | ||
Patent #
US 5,404,292 A
Filed 04/13/1994
|
Current Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
|
Sponsoring Entity
HP Inc.
|
Medical system and associated method for automatic diagnosis and treatment | ||
Patent #
US 5,415,167 A
Filed 09/08/1992
|
Current Assignee
PETETHOM PATENT LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Peter J. Wilk
|
System for revelance criteria management of actions and values in a rete network | ||
Patent #
US 5,418,888 A
Filed 06/04/1992
|
Current Assignee
John L. Alden
|
Sponsoring Entity
John L. Alden
|
Computer network EEMPI system | ||
Patent #
US 5,421,343 A
Filed 05/17/1993
|
Current Assignee
Genquan Feng
|
Sponsoring Entity
Genquan Feng
|
Apparatus for measuring psychotherapy outcomes | ||
Patent #
US 5,435,324 A
Filed 05/25/1994
|
Current Assignee
TWIN PONDS III INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
COMPASS INFORMATION SERVICES INC.
|
Ambulatory patient health monitoring techniques utilizing interactive visual communication | ||
Patent #
US 5,441,047 A
Filed 05/25/1993
|
Current Assignee
Zipora David, Daniel David
|
Sponsoring Entity
Zipora David, Daniel David
|
Interactive patient assistance device for storing and dispensing a testing device | ||
Patent #
US 5,442,728 A
Filed 09/22/1993
|
Current Assignee
HealthTech Services Corp. Northbrook IL, HealthTech Services Corp.
|
Sponsoring Entity
HealthTech Services Corp. Northbrook IL, HealthTech Services Corp.
|
Medical diagnosis system and method | ||
Patent #
US 5,437,278 A
Filed 01/10/1992
|
Current Assignee
PETETHOM PATENT LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Peter J. Wilk
|
Method and system for differential diagnosis based on clinical and radiological information using artificial neural networks | ||
Patent #
US 5,463,548 A
Filed 04/28/1993
|
Current Assignee
ARCH Development Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
ARCH Development Corporation
|
Medical network management system and process | ||
Patent #
US 5,471,382 A
Filed 01/10/1994
|
Current Assignee
IMCKESSON LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
NEALON DENNIS T., NEALON JOAN L.
|
Method for evaluating and reviewing a patient's condition | ||
Patent #
US 5,473,537 A
Filed 04/12/1995
|
Current Assignee
BEHAVIORAL ALGORITHMS INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
BEHAVIORAL ALGORITHMS INC.
|
Non-prescription drug medication screening system | ||
Patent #
US 5,299,121 A
Filed 06/04/1992
|
Current Assignee
MEDSCREEN INC. A CORP. OF CA
|
Sponsoring Entity
MEDSCREEN INC. A CORP. OF CA
|
Modular microprocessor-based health monitoring system | ||
Patent #
US 5,307,263 A
Filed 11/17/1992
|
Current Assignee
Health Hero Network Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
RAYA SYSTEMS INC.
|
System for simultaneously producing and synchronizing spectral patterns of heart sounds and an ECG signal | ||
Patent #
US 5,337,752 A
Filed 05/21/1992
|
Current Assignee
MCG INTERNATIONAL INC
|
Sponsoring Entity
MCG INTERNATIONAL INC
|
Reception system for an interactive computer network and method of operation | ||
Patent #
US 5,347,632 A
Filed 07/28/1989
|
Current Assignee
International Business Machines Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Priodgy Services Company A NY Partnership, International Business Machines Corporation
|
Remote monitoring of high-risk patients using artificial intelligence | ||
Patent #
US 5,357,427 A
Filed 03/15/1993
|
Current Assignee
Hewlett-Packard Development Company L.P.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Digital Equipment Corporation
|
Method and apparatus for an automated and interactive behavioral guidance system | ||
Patent #
US 5,377,258 A
Filed 08/30/1993
|
Current Assignee
National Medical Research Council
|
Sponsoring Entity
National Medical Research Council
|
Infrared optical card having an opaque case for hiding internal components | ||
Patent #
US 5,196,682 A
Filed 05/31/1989
|
Current Assignee
Wang Laboratories Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Wang Laboratories Incorporated
|
Health examination method and system using plural self-test stations and a magnetic card | ||
Patent #
US 5,193,541 A
Filed 11/28/1990
|
Current Assignee
Ryotaro Hatsuwi
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ryotaro Hatsuwi
|
System and method for detecting out-of-hospital cardiac emergencies and summoning emergency assistance | ||
Patent #
US 5,228,449 A
Filed 01/22/1991
|
Current Assignee
Athanasios G. Christ
|
Sponsoring Entity
Athanasios G. Christ
|
Management issue recognition and resolution knowledge processor | ||
Patent #
US 5,241,621 A
Filed 06/26/1991
|
Current Assignee
Hewlett-Packard Development Company L.P.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Digital Equipment Corporation
|
Computer-aided diagnosis system for medical use | ||
Patent #
US 5,235,510 A
Filed 11/22/1991
|
Current Assignee
Toshiba Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Toshiba Corporation
|
Computer aided medical diagnostic method and apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 5,255,187 A
Filed 04/03/1990
|
Current Assignee
Mark C. Sorensen
|
Sponsoring Entity
Mark C. Sorensen
|
Portable non-invasive testing apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 5,257,627 A
Filed 11/14/1991
|
Current Assignee
TELMED INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
TELMED INC.
|
Fuzzy backward reasoning system and expert system utilizing the same | ||
Patent #
US 5,263,123 A
Filed 03/11/1991
|
Current Assignee
HIACHI ENGINEERING CO. LTD.
|
Sponsoring Entity
HIACHI ENGINEERING CO. LTD.
|
Portable non-invasive testing apparatus with logarithmic amplification | ||
Patent #
US 5,265,613 A
Filed 04/03/1992
|
Current Assignee
TELEPHONIC MEDICAL CARE INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
TELEPHONIC MEDICAL CARE INC.
|
Data collection, analysis, and response system and method | ||
Patent #
US 5,084,819 A
Filed 10/03/1990
|
Current Assignee
Response Technologies Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Response Technologies Inc.
|
Model user application system for clinical data processing that tracks and monitors a simulated out-patient medical practice using data base management software | ||
Patent #
US 5,099,424 A
Filed 07/20/1989
|
Current Assignee
Barry Schneiderman
|
Sponsoring Entity
Barry Schneiderman
|
Implantable ambulatory electrocardiogram monitor | ||
Patent #
US 5,113,869 A
Filed 08/21/1990
|
Current Assignee
Pacesetter Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Telectronics Pacing Systems Inc
|
Apparatus for monitoring, storing and transmitting detected physiological information | ||
Patent #
US 5,012,411 A
Filed 07/23/1985
|
Current Assignee
Charles J. Policastro
|
Sponsoring Entity
Charles J. Policastro
|
Dynamic spectral phonocardiograph | ||
Patent #
US 5,012,815 A
Filed 06/05/1990
|
Current Assignee
Yale University
|
Sponsoring Entity
Yale University
|
Hematology - diagnosis apparatus employing expert system technology | ||
Patent #
US 5,023,785 A
Filed 11/16/1987
|
Current Assignee
Stephen C. Wardlaw
|
Sponsoring Entity
BECTON AND DICKINSON COMPANY FRANKLIN LAKES NEW JERSEY 07417
|
Multiple characteristic sensitive addressing schema for a multiple receiver data processing network | ||
Patent #
US 5,030,948 A
Filed 01/25/1990
|
Current Assignee
Charles T. Rush
|
Sponsoring Entity
Charles T. Rush
|
Method for diagnosing, monitoring and treating hypertension | ||
Patent #
US 5,054,493 A
Filed 02/05/1991
|
Current Assignee
Regents of The University of Minnesota
|
Sponsoring Entity
Regents of The University of Minnesota
|
Interactive patient assistance device | ||
Patent #
US 4,933,873 A
Filed 06/02/1988
|
Current Assignee
HEALTHTECH SERVICES CORPORATION
|
Sponsoring Entity
HEALTHTECH SERVICES CORPORATION
|
Interactive system and method for creating and editing a knowledge base for use as a computerized aid to the cognitive process of diagnosis | ||
Patent #
US 4,945,476 A
Filed 02/26/1988
|
Current Assignee
Elsevier Science Publishing Company Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Elsevier Science Publishing Company Inc.
|
Medicament dispenser and medical information storage apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 4,962,491 A
Filed 02/12/1990
|
Current Assignee
Theodore S. Schaeffer
|
Sponsoring Entity
Theodore S. Schaeffer
|
Method and apparatus for evaluating a potentially insurable risk | ||
Patent #
US 4,975,840 A
Filed 06/17/1988
|
Current Assignee
Swiss Reinsurance Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
Lincoln National RISK Management Incorporated
|
System for centralized management of medical data | ||
Patent #
US 4,974,607 A
Filed 04/21/1988
|
Current Assignee
Yozo Tsuruta
|
Sponsoring Entity
Miwa Satoru
|
Personal health monitor | ||
Patent #
US 4,803,625 A
Filed 06/30/1986
|
Current Assignee
INSTROMEDIX INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
BUDDY SYSTEMS INC.
|
System for automatically performing a clinical assessment of an implanted pacer based on information that is telemetrically received | ||
Patent #
US 4,825,869 A
Filed 09/28/1987
|
Current Assignee
Pacesetter Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
TELECTRONICS N.V.
|
Computer system and method for suggesting treatments for physical trauma | ||
Patent #
US 4,839,822 A
Filed 08/13/1987
|
Current Assignee
Synthes USA LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
SYNTHES U.S.A. A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
|
Home medical surveillance system | ||
Patent #
US 4,838,275 A
Filed 07/20/1987
|
Current Assignee
Arnold St. J. Lee
|
Sponsoring Entity
Arnold St. J. Lee
|
Medical payment system | ||
Patent #
US 4,858,121 A
Filed 12/12/1986
|
Current Assignee
MEDICAL PAYMENT SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
|
Sponsoring Entity
MEDICAL PAYMENT SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
|
Knowledge-based system having plural processors | ||
Patent #
US 4,868,763 A
Filed 02/17/1987
|
Current Assignee
Hitachi Ltd.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Hitachi Ltd.
|
Method and apparatus for automated medical diagnosis using decision tree analysis | ||
Patent #
US 4,733,354 A
Filed 11/23/1984
|
Current Assignee
POTTER BRIAN 3305 POTTAWATTAMIE TRAIL MICIGAN CITY IN 46360
|
Sponsoring Entity
POTTER BRIAN 3305 POTTAWATTAMIE TRAIL MICIGAN CITY IN 46360
|
Patient-operated glucose monitor and diabetes management system | ||
Patent #
US 4,731,726 A
Filed 05/19/1986
|
Current Assignee
Roche Diabetes Care Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
HealthWare Corporation
|
Real time multitask electronic stethoscopy system | ||
Patent #
US 4,770,189 A
Filed 09/02/1986
|
Current Assignee
Industrial Technology Research Institute
|
Sponsoring Entity
Industrial Technology Research Institute
|
Outpatient monitoring systems | ||
Patent #
US 4,712,562 A
Filed 10/01/1986
|
Current Assignee
Jacques J. Ohayon
|
Sponsoring Entity
Jacques J. Ohayon
|
Personal electrocardiogram monitor | ||
Patent #
US 4,606,352 A
Filed 07/13/1984
|
Current Assignee
Purdue Research Foundation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Purdue Research Foundation
|
Ambulatory monitoring system with real time analysis and telephone transmission | ||
Patent #
US 4,531,527 A
Filed 07/09/1982
|
Current Assignee
Brunswick Biomedical Corp
|
Sponsoring Entity
Survival Technology Inc.
|
Monitoring device | ||
Patent #
US 4,428,381 A
Filed 03/13/1981
|
Current Assignee
Medtronic Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Medtronic Incorporated
|
Monitoring system | ||
Patent #
US 4,458,693 A
Filed 03/13/1981
|
Current Assignee
Medtronic Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Apparatus and method of determining fertility status | ||
Patent #
US 4,465,077 A
Filed 11/12/1981
|
Current Assignee
Howard Schneider
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Integrated medical test data storage and retrieval system | ||
Patent #
US 4,315,309 A
Filed 06/25/1979
|
Current Assignee
Robert D. Coli
|
Sponsoring Entity
Robert D. Coli
|
Biologic apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 4,337,377 A
Filed 01/10/1980
|
Current Assignee
Virgil R. Laul, Wilbur E Van Riper
|
Sponsoring Entity
Virgil R. Laul, Wilbur E Van Riper
|
Medical diagnostic computer | ||
Patent #
US 4,290,114 A
Filed 07/01/1976
|
Current Assignee
Hanon S. Sinay
|
Sponsoring Entity
Hanon S. Sinay
|
Method and apparatus for discrimination and detection of heart sounds | ||
Patent #
US 4,220,160 A
Filed 07/05/1978
|
Current Assignee
Clinical Systems Associates Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Clinical Systems Associates Inc.
|
Patient monitoring system | ||
Patent #
US 4,051,522 A
Filed 05/05/1975
|
Current Assignee
Wilson Sporting Goods Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
Jonathan Systems
|
Apparatus for collecting medical data | ||
Patent #
US 3,970,996 A
Filed 01/07/1974
|
Current Assignee
Perfect Liberty
|
Sponsoring Entity
Perfect Liberty
|
26 Claims
- 1. A computerized medical diagnostic system, the system comprising:
a plurality of disease objects, each disease object to reference a list comprising one or more associated patient health items representative of at least candidate diseases applicable to the patient, and collectively provide an initial differential diagnosis; a panel module in data communication with the disease objects, the panel module comprising a plurality of diagnostic strategy processes, each of which generates a corresponding strategy differential diagnosis based on the patient health items, wherein the panel module compares at least a portion of the strategy differential diagnoses to thereby generate a panel differential diagnosis; a computing environment operative to execute the modules, the computing environment comprising at least one processor; and wherein the initial differential diagnosis and the panel differential diagnosis are reconciled so as to recommend an action or provide a diagnosis via output to the patient or the healthcare professional. - View Dependent Claims (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15)
- 16. A computerized medical diagnostic method, comprising:
obtaining a list of patient health items from at least one disease object; automatically obtaining an initial differential diagnosis based on the patient health items; automatically obtaining a plurality of strategy differential diagnoses based on the patient health items, each strategy differential diagnosis being obtained with different analysis criteria of the patient health items; comparing at least a portion of the strategy differential diagnoses; determining a panel differential diagnosis based on the compared differential diagnoses; reconciling the initial diagnosis and the panel differential diagnosis so as to recommend an action or provide a diagnosis to the patient or the healthcare professional and wherein the method is performed by one or more computing devices. - View Dependent Claims (17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22)
- 23. A computerized medical diagnostic system, comprising:
means for interacting with a patient or a healthcare professional via a plurality of disease objects to obtain associated patient health items representative of the health of the patient; means for automatically obtaining an initial differential diagnosis based on the patient health items provided by the plurality of disease objects associated with candidate diseases applicable to the patient; means for automatically obtaining a plurality of strategy differential diagnoses based on the patient health items, each strategy differential diagnosis being obtained with different analysis criteria of the patient health items; means for comparing at least a portion of the strategy differential diagnoses; means for determining a panel differential diagnosis based on the compared differential diagnoses; and means for reconciling the initial diagnosis and the panel differential diagnosis so as to recommend an action or provide a diagnosis to the patient or the healthcare professional. - View Dependent Claims (24, 25, 26)
1 Specification
This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 10/846,165, filed May 14, 2004, entitled “PANEL DIAGNOSTIC METHOD AND SYSTEM” and which issued on Aug. 24, 2010 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,780,595, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/471,487, filed May 15, 2003, entitled “PANEL DIAGNOSTIC METHOD AND SYSTEM”, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
1. Field of the Invention
The field of the invention relates to computerized medical diagnostic systems. More particularly, embodiments of the present invention relate to a computerized system for time-based diagnosis of a patient'"'"'s medical complaint by use of multiple diagnostic processes operating in parallel.
2. Description of the Related Art
A computerized method and system, including an embodiment called MDATA (Medical Diagnosis And Treatment Advice), has been described in Applicant'"'"'s patents, such as Applicant'"'"'s U.S. Pat. No. 5,660,176, entitled “Computerized Medical Diagnostic And Treatment Advice System”, U.S. Pat. No. 5,594,638, entitled “Computerized Medical Diagnostic System Including Re-enter Function and Sensitivity Factors, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,724,968, entitled “Computerized Medical Diagnostic System Including Meta Function,” each of which is incorporated by reference. The automated diagnostic system is utilized in an automated system capable of conducting a consultation with a human user who is (or represents) the patient. In a typical consultation, the user asks the automated diagnostic system to diagnose a specific medical problem. The automated diagnostic system then asks the user questions about the patient'"'"'s health and ultimately generates a differential diagnosis, i.e., a list of diseases or disorders that match the case, ranked in probability order. The automated diagnostic system is fully automated: other than the online user, no other human is involved in the consultation.
The automated diagnostic system has used several different diagnostic methods (methodologies) each having their own inherent strengths and weaknesses. What is desired are enhancements to the automated diagnostic system to add one or more automated processes, each of which is capable of performing an automated medical diagnosis by itself, so that a computer runs several processes to their conclusion at the same time, with each process working on the same case.
In one embodiment there is a computerized medical diagnostic system, comprising a diagnostic module configured to interact with a patient or a healthcare professional and provide an initial differential diagnosis; a panel module in data communication with the diagnostic module, the panel module comprising a plurality of diagnostic strategy processes, each of which generates a strategy differential diagnosis, where the panel module compares at least a portion of the strategy differential diagnoses to thereby generate a panel differential diagnosis; and where the initial differential diagnosis and the panel differential diagnosis are reconciled so as to recommend an action or provide a diagnosis to the patient or the healthcare professional.
The panel module may additionally include a moderator in data communication with the one or more diagnostic strategy processes and the diagnostic module, where the moderator evaluates the results of each diagnostic strategy process and generates the panel differential diagnosis by comparing the strategy differential diagnoses and reordering the panel differential diagnosis accordingly. Each diagnostic strategy process may be assigned a weight for each one of a diagnosis associated with a selected chief complaint. Each diagnostic strategy process may be assigned a weight for each diagnosis in its differential diagnosis. The panel differential diagnosis may be reordered in decreasing levels of probability after the assigned weight is applied. The weight may be dynamic and change dependent on a position in a disease timeline for the patient, and the weight may be dynamic and change dependent on a position in a consultation timeline for the patient.
The diagnostic module may repetitively select a patient health item to be evaluated, evaluate the patient health item, and provide the results of the evaluation to the diagnostic strategy processes. The influence of at least one of the diagnostic strategy processes on the moderator may change after each patient health item is evaluated. The influence may comprise weighting. At least one strategy process may update its respective strategy differential diagnosis after each patient health item is evaluated. The diagnostic module may establish a synergy weight based on the evaluated patient health item, and provide the synergy weight to the diagnostic strategy processes so as to affect the prioritization within the strategy differential diagnoses, and the influence of at least one of the diagnostic strategy processes on the moderator may change after the synergy weight is established. Selected ones of the diagnostic strategy processes may operate in an active mode, where the selected diagnostic strategy processes are configured to select a patient health item to be evaluated by the diagnostic module, and the moderator may rank each selected patient health item based on the influence of each diagnostic strategy process operating in the active mode.
The panel module may additionally comprise a judge module in data communication with the moderator and the diagnostic module, where the judge module reconciles the initial differential diagnosis and a differing differential diagnosis of the panel. The judge module may reconcile by determining the more probable differential diagnosis based on previous performance of the panel diagnostic strategy processes, by blending the initial differential diagnosis and the differing differential diagnosis of the panel into a combined differential diagnosis, or by allowing more time to elapse so that a particular diagnosis declares itself.
The system may additionally comprise a judge module in data communication with the panel module and the diagnostic module, where the judge module may reconcile the initial differential diagnosis and a differing differential diagnosis of the panel. The judge module may reconcile by determining the more probable differential diagnosis based on previous performance of the panel diagnostic strategy processes, or by blending the initial differential diagnosis and the differing differential diagnosis of the panel into a combined differential diagnosis.
The system may store and access electronic medical records which are organized for each patient in a patient case, and where each of the diagnostic strategy processes may interface with a copy of the patient case. At least one of the diagnostic strategy processes may be concurrently executed with the diagnostic module. Convergence of the differential diagnoses among the diagnostic strategy processes and the initial differential diagnosis may add a convergence weight to a score so as to generate the diagnosis. The panel module may additionally comprise a registration interface for adding a new diagnostic strategy process to the panel module. The patient may utilize a patient proxy, and the patient proxy may not be a healthcare professional.
The action may comprise recommending that the patient consult with the diagnostic system at a future time, or the action may comprise requesting that the patient have a particular test or study performed. The test or study may be performed by a laboratory, and the test or study may include one or more types of imaging.
One diagnostic strategy process may comprise identifying a sequence of an onset of symptoms of a disease. The system may additionally comprise a data structure having weights for the diagnostic strategy processes corresponding to each one of a diagnosis associated with a selected chief complaint, where the weights are applied to a score for each of the diagnoses.
In another embodiment there is a computerized medical diagnostic method, comprising interacting with a patient or a healthcare professional via a diagnostic module to obtain patient health items; automatically obtaining an initial differential diagnosis based on the patient health items; automatically obtaining a plurality of strategy differential diagnoses based on the patient health items, each strategy differential diagnosis being obtained with different analysis criteria of the patient health items; comparing at least a portion of the strategy differential diagnoses; determining a panel differential diagnosis based on the compared differential diagnoses; and reconciling the initial diagnosis and the panel differential diagnosis so as to recommend an action or provide a diagnosis to the patient or the healthcare professional.
Comparing the differential diagnoses may comprise compiling the strategy differential diagnoses into a panel differential diagnosis list, and reordering the panel differential diagnosis list according to a predetermined criterion. The method may additionally comprise selecting the patient health item to be evaluated, evaluating the patient health item, and providing the results of the evaluation to the obtaining of differential diagnoses. The influence of at least one of the diagnostic strategy processes on the panel differential diagnosis may change after each patient health item is evaluated. The method may additionally comprise establishing a synergy weight based on the evaluated patient health item, and providing the synergy weight to the obtaining of differential diagnoses. The influence of at least one of the diagnostic strategy processes on the panel differential diagnosis may change after the synergy weight is established.
Interacting with the patient may include identifying a set of candidate diseases, and interacting with the patient may further include developing a list of patient health items to be evaluated based on the set of candidate diseases. The method may additionally comprise registering a new strategy differential diagnosis. Automatically obtaining at least one of the strategy differential diagnoses may include operating in an active mode, where one or more patient health items to be evaluated are selected, and may additionally comprise merging the selected patient health items, and ranking the merged patient health items according to the influence of each strategy differential diagnosis.
The method may additionally comprise identifying a patient proxy for the patient. Recommending the action may comprise recommending that the patient consult with the diagnostic method at a future time, and may comprise requesting that the patient have a particular test or study performed. The obtaining of strategy differential diagnoses may be concurrent with the obtaining of the initial differential diagnosis. The obtaining of a selected one of the strategy differential diagnoses may comprise identifying a sequence of an onset of symptoms of a disease.
In yet another embodiment there is a computerized medical diagnostic system, comprising means for interacting with a patient or a healthcare professional via a diagnostic module to obtain patient health items, means for automatically obtaining an initial differential diagnosis based on the patient health items, means for automatically obtaining a plurality of strategy differential diagnoses based on the patient health items, each strategy differential diagnosis being obtained with different analysis criteria of the patient health items, means for comparing at least a portion of the strategy differential diagnoses, means for determining a panel differential diagnosis based on the compared differential diagnoses, and means for reconciling the initial diagnosis and the panel differential diagnosis so as to recommend an action or provide a diagnosis to the patient or the healthcare professional.
The means for comparing the strategy differential diagnoses may comprise means for compiling the strategy differential diagnoses into a panel differential diagnosis list, and means for reordering the panel differential diagnosis list according to a predetermined criterion. The means for interacting with the patient may include means for identifying a set of candidate diseases. The means for interacting with the patient may further includes means for developing a list of patient health items to be evaluated based on the set of candidate diseases.
The system may additionally comprise means for registering a new strategy differential diagnosis. The means for automatically obtaining the plurality of strategy differential diagnoses may include means for operating in an active mode, where one or more patient health items to be evaluated are selected. The system may additionally comprise means for merging the selected patient health items, and means for ranking the merged patient health items according to the influence of each strategy differential diagnosis. Recommending the action may comprise means for recommending that the patient consult with the diagnostic method at a future time. Recommending the action may comprise means for requesting that the patient have a particular test or study performed. The means for automatically obtaining the plurality of strategy differential diagnoses may operate concurrently with the means for obtaining the initial differential diagnosis. The means for automatically obtaining the plurality of strategy differential diagnoses may comprise identifying a sequence of an onset of symptoms of a disease.
The following description presents certain specific embodiments of the present invention. However, the present invention may be embodied in a multitude of different ways as defined and covered by the claims. In this description, reference is made to the drawings wherein like parts are designated with like numerals throughout.
The automated diagnostic system has been enhanced to add one or more automated processes, each of which is capable of performing an automated medical diagnosis by itself, so that a computer runs several processes to their conclusion at the same time, with each process working on the same case. A Panel module in data communication with the automated diagnostic system provides these enhancements. The purpose of the additional diagnostic processes is to apply alternative diagnostic strategies to a patient'"'"'s case, for several possible reasons:
- to observe the automated diagnostic system'"'"'s analysis of the case at a detail level,
- to copy the case data and apply them to their own model of the case,
- to comment on the automated diagnostic system'"'"'s analysis, questions, and question sequence,
- to suggest alternative questions to be asked,
- to comment on the automated diagnostic system'"'"'s conclusions,
- to offer alternative conclusions,
- to indicate a degree of consent with the automated diagnostic system'"'"'s conclusions,
- to generate a consensus diagnosis of their own,
- to permit comparison of diagnostic techniques for research purposes,
- to permit comparison of techniques for testing and quality assurance purposes.
Strategies
The additional diagnostic processes are called “strategies” or strategy processes (or to anthropomorphize, “panelists” or “strategists”) to distinguish them from the main automated diagnostic process. Each strategy is embodied as a software object that continuously observes, accumulates information, and formulates diagnoses as the automated diagnostic system conducts a consultation. A strategy can be similar to the diagnostic loop or module described in Applicant'"'"'s U.S. Pat. No. 5,935,060, entitled “Computerized Medical Diagnostic And Treatment Advice System Including List Based Processing,” which is incorporated herein by reference. Each strategy process typically uses a diagnostic technique that emphasizes a different technique or mix of techniques. For example, the first strategy might simply count the number of patient symptoms that match a candidate; a second strategy might also count the number of symptoms that do not match; a third strategy might consider the time of onset of symptoms in the patient; a fourth strategy might combine counting and onset time; a fifth might allow the candidate diseases objects to dynamically select the strategy that the disease objects recommend.
The Panel Module
Referring to
If the main method developed by the Engine 110 and the Moderator 130 of the Panel module 120 disagree, a software object called the Judge 160 or Adjudicator is invoked to settle the issue. In
Active and Passive Strategies
Strategies 140 (
Strategy Processes
In order to qualify as such, every Panel Strategy process 140 (
- compatible with the platform used by the automated diagnostic system and the Panel,
- runs without external help during a consultation,
- runs completely automatically, without human intervention,
- adheres to the run time limits and other parameters set for all strategies,
- supplies its own database and infrastructure,
- may not expect any other strategy to be present,
- communicates with the Moderator, not with the online user,
- understands the meaning and format of the automated diagnostic system patient health items (PHIs) and their values,
- generates a differential diagnosis from a given case,
- ranks the diseases of the differential diagnosis (DDx) by their probability,
- tracks incremental case changes and utilizes them in its diagnosis,
- does not have to match the DDx generated by any other strategy,
- reports its diagnosis on demand to the Moderator,
- proposes PHIs to be evaluated (active strategies only),
- explains and records its decision-making in a log.
Automated Diagnostic System/Panel Interface
In one embodiment, the diagnostic module 110 (e.g., automated diagnostic system) interfaces with the Panel module 120 at four time points during a consultation (see
- (1) Initialization 122. When the automated diagnostic system first initializes the consultation, it calls the Moderator process 130, which initializes itself and all of the strategy processes 140 it wants to run. Initialization includes such chores as requesting computer resources, setting options, retrieving static data structures, and preparing working tables.
- (2) Evaluation 124. Before the automated diagnostic system, in its Diagnostic Loop, decides which PHI to evaluate next, it calls the Moderator 130 which gives active strategies a chance to suggest PHIs they would like to be evaluated.
- (3) Updating 126. When the automated diagnostic system, later in the Diagnostic Loop, obtains a new PHI value for the current patient, it passes the value to the Moderator 130, which incorporates it into its own copy of the case and also passes it on to all running strategies to let them update their own view of the case as well as their dynamic diagnosis. The Moderator'"'"'s differential diagnosis is determined from a weighted blend of the Panel strategies in either decreasing or increasing levels of probability.
- (4) Termination 128. When the automated diagnostic system is about to terminate the consultation, it calls the Moderator process 130 to give it, as well as all running strategies, a chance to terminate itself as well as any running strategies.
Moderator
In one embodiment, the Panel strategy processes 140 (
If true parallel computation is available on the platform on which the automated diagnostic system is running, then all strategies 140 execute simultaneously, while the Moderator 130 waits for all of them to complete their work. If true parallelism is not available, it can be serially simulated, with the Moderator 130 looping to give each strategy process (e.g., 142, 144) control in turn to do its work.
In one embodiment, the diagnostic module 110 (
Referring to
After the pre-DxLoop actions at state 202, process 200 proceeds to state 212 to ask disease objects associated with candidate diseases applicable to the patient for a list of Patient health items (PHIs) to be evaluated. PHIs are used to denote any piece or item of information that could be useful for diagnosis. For example, a PHI may be a symptom, sign, results of a laboratory test, results of a special study (like EEG), the result of an imaging modality, or the results of a particular treatment plan.
Proceeding to a decision state 214, process 200 determines if the system 100 is running with the Panel module enabled. If the system 100 is running without the use of the Panel module 120, process 200 continues at a state 216 and selects one PHI to evaluate. Without use of the Panel module 120 (
Proceeding to state 220, process 200 updates the patient case and also updates the candidate diseases at state 222. The patient case refers to the patient medical history, consultation data, and other patient files, tables and databases for a particular patient. PHIs are stored in an electronic medical record (EMR) organized for each patient in the patient case. A medical record is created for each session and is stored in the patient'"'"'s electronic medical record. In one embodiment, the patient'"'"'s EMR is securely stored, such as via encryption. Transmission of the patient'"'"'s EMR (or portions thereof) is performed via a secure mechanism, such as via an encrypted channel, if the EMR or portions thereof are transmitted between components of the system, e.g., between a server and patient client device. There are also certain variables that once “configured” are stored in the patient'"'"'s more immediate electronic medical record—like the diagnoses he or she is carrying. Note that the system can freeze the session, so the patient may come back later to finish. A re-enter function can also be invoked to trend symptoms or to allow time to pass to see the change (evolution) of the patient'"'"'s symptoms over time. Each strategy may have their own copy of the patient case as a working patient case as shown in
Proceeding to a decision state 224, process 200 again determines if the system 100 is running with the Panel module enabled. If the system 100 is running without the use of the Panel module 120, process 200 continues at a state 226 to determine if goals and/or limits for a diagnosis or otherwise have been reached. As previously mentioned, the test for goals/limits reached is described in at least the '"'"'210 patent. Similarly, post-DxLoop actions 250 are also described in at least the '"'"'210 patent.
Proceeding to a decision state 252, process 200 again determines if the system 100 is running with the Panel module enabled. If the system 100 is running without the use of the Panel module 120, process 200 continues at a state 254 to perform actions specified for running without the Panel module. The actions specified for “running without Panel” can include reporting the diagnosis or conclusions without benefit of the Panel module. The system may operate without the Panel module notwithstanding that it is available.
The main automated diagnostic system reports the final diagnosis and/or the final differential diagnosis along with the date and time stamped record of every question, the lab test of choice, the special study of choice, the imaging modality of choice and the treatment of choice for the top n diagnoses, where n is three to five, in one embodiment. These results are reported to the physician and/or the patient (or patient proxy).
Returning to decision state 214, process 200 determines if the system 100 is running with the Panel module enabled. If the system 100 is running with the use of the Panel module 120, process 200 continues at a decision state 230 to determine if there any “active” mode strategies. If not, that is all the strategies 140 (
Returning to decision state 224, process 200 determines if the system 100 is running with the Panel module enabled. If the system 100 is running with the use of the Panel module 120, process 200 continues at state 240 and requests every strategy 140 (
Returning to decision state 252, process 200 determines if the system 100 is running with the Panel module enabled. If the system 100 is running with the use of the Panel module 120, process 200 continues at a decision state 260 where a Judge object 160 (
At state 262, process 200 performs actions specified for the situation when the Panel module agrees with the diagnostic module. This can include the differential diagnosis being sent to a physician or other healthcare professional, in one embodiment. Alternatively, at state 264, process 200 performs actions specified for the situation when the Panel module disagrees with the diagnostic module. This can include the system scheduling a re-enter time for the patient or patient proxy to consult the system at a later time. At the conclusion of state 264, process 200 advances to state 266 where the Judge reconciles the results of the Panel module and the diagnostic module. The Judge 160 (
In one embodiment, a general rule used by the Judge 160 (
At the conclusion of either state 254, 262 or 266, process 200 performs one or more termination actions and then terminates the patient consultation at state 256. The termination actions can be as follows. The physician can review the differential diagnosis and any other records, as necessary, and provide a diagnosis to the patient. The physician may optionally also provide a prescription if necessary. In another embodiment, the results are provided directly to the patient. If a disease is diagnosed that is a chronic disease and is covered by the disease management (DM) module, the results are sent to the DM module. The DM module is described in Applicant'"'"'s U.S. Pat. No. 6,234,964, which is incorporated herein by reference. In one embodiment, a report is sent to the patient and physician. A treatment in the treatment table is also determined, and a treatment report and a list of what tests to order are also sent to the physician. Process 200 completes at an end state 258.
Referring to
Proceeding to a decision state 320, the diagnostic module or engine 110 (
At the conclusion of either state 322 or 324, process 300 performs one or more termination actions and then terminates the patient consultation at state 326. The termination actions can be as follows. The physician can review the differential diagnosis and any other records, as necessary, and provide a diagnosis to the patient. The physician may optionally also provide a prescription if necessary. In another embodiment, the results are provided directly to the patient. If a disease is diagnosed that is a chronic disease and is covered by the disease management (DM) module, the results are sent to the DM module. In one embodiment, a report is sent to the patient and physician. A treatment in the treatment table is also determined, and a treatment report and a list of what tests to order are also sent to the physician. Process 300 completes at an end state 328.
Moderator and Passive Mode
If all the strategies are operating In the passive mode, the strategies just “listen” to the questions asked by the diagnostic module and answered by the patient, and use the answers (that are meaningful to each strategy) to change their differential diagnosis. The flow of information from the diagnostic module (e.g., the main automated diagnostic system) 110 (
If the information does not go through the Moderator 130 (but uses path 134), each strategist has a mechanism to take the structure of the question from the diagnostic module (list-based engine) and transform it to a format that each strategy can utilize. This can be done at the disease object level in the diagnostic module 110 such as using the list-based engine. For example, every question that is a sequence can be so tagged. Alternatively, the Moderator 130 can take each question and “transform” it to a format for each strategist.
In one embodiment, each strategist (panel member) 140 has the same differential diagnosis, but their disease objects are structured or formatted into the way their methodology works or their own appropriate form. In one embodiment, each of the strategies has its own differential diagnosis in the format that goes with its method. In one embodiment, each strategist has the same list of diseases in the differential diagnosis as the other strategists in the Panel and the diagnostic module list is also the same. But each strategist has each of its disease “objects” in a format that it can use. For example, a sequence strategist has all of the PHIs of the disease as a series of sequences of the appearance of the PHIs. The sequence strategist for appendicitis sees its disease as:
- Anorexia>nausea>epigastric pain>right lower quadrant (rlq) pain>rlq tenderness,
and has a weight for each sequence. In one embodiment, the appendicitis sequence strategist only scores its disease when a question is asked that is related to the sequence of onset of the symptoms or if it knows the starting times of the symptoms.
- Anorexia>nausea>epigastric pain>right lower quadrant (rlq) pain>rlq tenderness,
The following is an example how the appendicitis sequence strategist can configure the sequence of the onset of the symptoms (where “>” means “is followed by”):
Anorexia>nausea and vomiting=2 points
Anorexia>epigastric pain=3 points
Anorexia>nausea/vomiting>epigastric pain=4 points
Epigastric pain>right lower quadrant pain=5 points
Right lower quadrant pain>right lower quadrant tenderness=5 points
The sequence strategist has every disease in the differential diagnosis just as a sequence of symptoms (PHIs, symptoms, signs, imaging, lab tests, etc.). It does not have the time between the onset (inter-symptom onset intervals) but just the sequence. So when the appendicitis sequence strategist learns that anorexia is followed by nausea and vomiting, it gives its disease two points.
Moderator and Active Mode
Now consider use of the Panel 120 (
Each PHI also receives weight from four sources or factors. The effects of these factors depend upon the chief complaint being evaluated, the location in the consultation timeline, the inherent “weight” that a strategy has in diagnosing a chief complaint, and the disease under consideration and a position in the disease timeline for the patient. Therefore, there are several sets of weights utilized: chief complaint-based, disease-based, consultation timeline based, disease timeline based.
For example, each active mode strategy looks to see what piece of information it wants (in the example above, it would want to know if epigastric pain was followed by right lower quadrant pain) and forwards this to the Moderator 130. The Moderator 130 looks at the disease objects the main diagnostic module 110 is running and determines whether there are any questions relating to right lower quadrant pain following epigastric pain. If there are, the Moderator 130 then puts this aside and looks at the next request from a strategist. At the end of this step, the Moderator 130 has all of the proposed questions of the Panel 120 and throws out all the requests that do not match a possible question of the main module disease objects.
Next, the Moderator 130 decides which question to ask based on a series of rules that it keeps. The rules could include one as follows:
- “If there is a Panel request that deals with a critical disease, (reaches or exceeds a score of how critical the disease is (0 to 10 or 0 to 100)) then ask this question.”
See further rules discussion below.
Moderator and Weighting of the Strategies
- “If there is a Panel request that deals with a critical disease, (reaches or exceeds a score of how critical the disease is (0 to 10 or 0 to 100)) then ask this question.”
Just like not all PHIs are weighted the same in different diseases, the strategies 140 (
When a new strategy is conceived, it will be added to the Panel in a test mode. The test mode starts with the new strategy being in passive mode in one embodiment. At the end of each diagnostic session, the actual diagnosis (by the automated diagnostic system list-based engine) is compared with the diagnosis (actually differential diagnosis) of the new strategy to see how well it did. After suitable testing, it is added to the Panel officially and it is assigned a base weight for influence over the Moderator 130 in requesting PHIs (in active mode) and its weight in influencing the blended differential 132 of the Moderator. One weight depends upon what the chief complaint is, e.g., abdominal pain, and is considered to be chief complaint-based. Another weight of influence depends upon how well the strategy process has performed in the past in diagnosing the disease that is furnishing the current PHI to the Moderator and is considered to be disease-based. The weights of the strategy processes 140 in creating a blended differential are dependent upon how well each strategy process has performed in diagnosing each disease using a particular chief complaint. That is, there is a weight that applies to how well the strategy process has performed in the past in diagnosing each disease on the differential diagnosis. For example, if the new strategy is sequence, the Panel mode is active, the chief complaint is abdominal pain, it is late in the consultation timeline, and the disease is appendicitis, a weight of ten may be assigned for influencing requesting PHIs and the blended differential.
Moderator and Rules
A first set of rules includes what the Moderator 130 (
- If PHI is from an urgent disease, give it a weight to be “asked” as follows
- If urgency is greater than 90/100 give 5 points
- If urgency is between 80 and 90 give 4 points
- If urgency is between 79 and 80 give 3 points
Take the urgency rating and multiply it by the “strength” of this diagnostic method for this chief complaint under consideration.
Take the urgency rating and multiply it by the “strength” of each disease in the differential diagnosis (i.e., how effective the method is in each disease) as derived from a table (see below).
Referring to
chief complaint=abdominal pain,
diseases (420)=appendicitis (422), small bowel obstruction (424), pancreatitis (426), and
numbers=the importance of each particular strategy of the group of strategies (410).
The term “base” means that the value from the table 400 pertains to the entire disease timeline for the applicable disease, without taking time into consideration. The importance of each method also changes depending upon where the patient is in on the consultation timeline and the time on the disease timeline for the disease associated with the PHI. For example, if it is later in the timeline of the consultation, the more the sequence strategy is weighted. As another example, if the appendicitis disease object is later in its timeline, a question about the presence of right lower quadrant abdominal pain is weighted much more than a question about anorexia or nausea (since these occur earlier in the disease timeline). Timelines are discussed in Applicant'"'"'s U.S. Pat. No. 6,569,093, entitled “Automated Diagnostic System and Method Including Disease Timeline,” which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Thus, a strategy has an overall or “base” weight on how much influence the strategy has on the Moderator 130 based upon the chief complaint being diagnosed, which, in one embodiment, is static throughout the evaluation. In addition, each disease in a strategy has a base weight of influence on the Moderator 130 based on how well that strategy has diagnosed that disease(s). Therefore, when the sequence strategist, for example, comes to appendicitis, it has more influence on the Moderator 130 to select its PHI because it has performed well in the past. Additionally, where the patient is in the consultation and where the patient is in a disease timeline (e.g., appendicitis) modify the above factors.
A second set of rules controls how much “weight” each strategist Influences the “blended” differential diagnosis 132. For example, in appendicitis, the sequence of the onset of the symptoms is very important. When the Moderator 130 comes to weighting appendicitis, it will pay more attention to the sequence strategist than another strategist. Note that, in one embodiment, the “diagnostic convergence”, i.e., the extent to which the majority of strategists have one diagnosis rising on each of their differentials, is an important rule.
Because the system 100 deals with the same chief complaint and the same diseases in the differential diagnosis, the same weightings that are used in the PHI selection are used in determining the blended differential. However, one criterion that decides where each disease goes in the blended differential is how many strategists picked disease A as number one, disease B as number two, and so forth.
Moderator Actions
The Moderator 130 (
Task: Rank Diagnoses
The Moderator 130 asks each participating Strategy (panelist) 140 to generate a Differential Diagnosis (DDx) (e.g., 153). Each Strategy reviews the current case and uses its own special logic to generate (or update) a list of diseases in descending order of probability of being the correct diagnosis for the case. Each Strategy may have its DDx in its own appropriate form. The Strategy makes the DDx available to the Moderator 130. The Moderator 130 usually also generates or updates its own “master” DDx, and use it to make further decisions.
Task: Cross Check Rankings
The Moderator 130 uses the rankings provided by the strategies 140 as a “cross check” on the automated diagnostic process.
Task: Analyze Rankings
The Moderator 130 analyzes and compares the several DDx lists and notes:
- changes in relative position of each candidate disease,
- the degree of consensus that has been reached,
- the degree of diagnostic convergence,
- what additional information would be useful.
Task: Adjust Strategy Influence
The Moderator 130 adjusts how much “attention” it pays to each strategy. This depends on parameters such as:
- What stage the consultation is in
- What disease is being considered
- What phase the disease is in
During each iteration, the “influence” or effect of each Strategy 140 is dynamically adjusted based on the “success” of that strategy. Success depends mostly on the degree of convergence, i.e., on the extent to which the Strategy advances the same disease(s) as other strategies. Thus, strategies that agree with each other will gain influence as the consultation progresses.
Task: Reward Convergence
The panel methodology uses any mix of fixed or dynamic methods, such as convergence, momentum, rate of ascent, variance, majority, weighted voting strength. The Moderator 130 may add weights to reward those strategies that are converging on a similar diagnosis or diagnostic pattern.
Task: Request Additional Data
The Moderator 130 asks each Active Strategy to propose one or more PHIs to be evaluated. Each Active Strategy looks at the current case and uses some private strategy to come up with one or more PHIs it wants to evaluate next, which it forwards as a set to the Moderator 130.
Task: Select PHIs for Evaluation
The Moderator 130 considers all of the PHIs requested by the Active Strategies, and uses some decision process to decide which PHI(s) to suggest for evaluation next, and in what order. PHIs that do not involve the online user can be evaluated at once; but PHIs that ask the online user a question need to be selected more carefully and need to be sequenced into a rational sequence.
The Moderator 130 can be impartial here, perhaps choosing the most requested PHIs, or choosing those that will statistically advance all diagnoses most effectively. Or the Moderator 130 can blatantly favor the requests of some Strategies over those of others, based perhaps on the Panel'"'"'s knowledge of offline tests, or on the track records of strategies, or offline test results. For example, if a particular Strategy has proven particularly accurate when evaluating a particular chief complaint (or chief complaint syndrome) or diagnosing a particular disease, it may influence the Moderator 130 to ask the question it recommends (if in active mode) or receive more “weight” in the Moderator'"'"'s blended differential diagnostic list in both active and passive modes.
Task: Synchronize Activities
Depending on the specific embodiment, the Panel module 120 may have to synchronize the activities of the various Strategies at this point. It may have to coordinate independent parallel processes, wait for the responses of the slowest Strategy, wait for the response of the online user, and handle save/recover problems on a stateless platform such as the Internet.
Task: Indicate Convergence
The Moderator 130 can indicate the extent to which the various strategy processes agree on the same diagnoses. The more rapidly the strategies have isolated one diagnosis, the more extra weight is given to that diagnosis. This diagnosis (really a differential diagnosis) is passed on to the automated diagnostic system 110 for further analysis. Note that this may not necessarily occur.
Task: Update Information
When the automated diagnostic system 110 calls the Moderator 130 with an updated item, the Moderator in turn notifies all strategies 140 to update themselves with the new PHI values. This may update:
- the Case Object (which tracks the current PHIs),
- the Consult Object (which tracks the online consultation context),
- the Patient Object (which represents the patient medical record),
- all Candidate Disease Objects (which update their scores and statuses), (usually not updated)
- all Strategy Modules (which update their separate Differential Diagnoses). Each Strategy has its diseases in the format that it uses. For example, a simple sequence Strategy has all diseases as a sequence of what PHIs usually follow each other.
- various working lists and
- tables of PHI values
- various logs such as the Consult, Backup, and Playback Log.
In one embodiment, the system 100 includes a computer program that lets a Patient log on, conducts a question/answer consultation with the patient, accumulates a Case of patient health items (PHIs), confers with diagnostic Strategists, resolves disputes with a Moderator or Judge, and iteratively builds a list of disease Candidates, ranked in the order of probability that they are the patient'"'"'s disease.
Advantages of Certain Implementations
New diagnostic strategies can be introduced to the system. These can be checked against the main automated diagnostic system 110. A table is kept of what methodologies (diagnostic methods and/or strategies) are best for each diagnosis, thus giving more weight to their diagnosis. One or more diagnostic strategy objects can be integrated into the main system 110 after sufficient data has accumulated on their performance. Therefore, new strategy objects are tested before integration.
A few aspects to note include the diagnostic convergence and determining which strategies are best for which chief complaints and diseases, and at what part of a disease timeline each strategy is most useful. Weights are developed for influencing the Moderator 130 in requesting PHIs (in active mode) and for influencing the blended differential diagnosis of the Moderator.
Certain embodiments of the Panel method and system allow the strengths of different diagnostic methods to be used while significantly decreasing their weaknesses. These embodiments save time if another consultation would be necessary and lead to a higher probability of the certainty of diagnosis when the Panel diagnosis agrees with the other methodology.
Specific blocks, sections, devices, functions, processes and modules may have been set forth. However, a skilled technologist will realize that there are many ways to partition the system, and that there are many parts, components, processes, modules or functions that may be substituted for those listed above.
While the above detailed description has shown, described and pointed out the fundamental novel features of the invention as applied to various embodiments, it will be understood that various omissions and substitutions and changes in the form and details of the system illustrated may be made by those skilled in the art, without departing from the intent of the invention. The foregoing description details certain embodiments of the invention. It will be appreciated, however, that no matter how detailed the foregoing appears, the invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiment is to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive and the scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.