System and method providing quality based peer review and distribution of digital content

• US 8,060,574 B2
• Filed: 01/31/2011
• Issued: 11/15/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 09/28/2006
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Qurio Holdings Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Qurio Holdings Incorporated
• Inventors: Evans, Gregory Morgan, Roberts, Thomas A.
• Primary Examiner(s): Harrell; Robert B
• Application Number:
  US13/017,877
• Publication Number:
  US 20110125861A1
• Time in Patent Office: 288 Days
• Field of Search: 709/206
• US Class Current: 709/206
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/1072 Discovery involving ranked list compilation of candidate peers

Abstract

A digital content review and distribution system and method are provided. In general, a number of authors of digital content register with a content review and distribution agent, which may be hosted by a central server. The authors agree to review digital content submitted by other authors in exchange for review and distribution of their own content. In operation, an author submits metadata associated with digital content to be reviewed and optionally the digital content to the content review and distribution agent. In response to the submission, the content review and distribution agent effects a review of the digital content by one or more groups of reviewers, where the groups of reviewers are selected from the other authors registered with the content review and distribution agent based on the metadata for the digital content and reviewer credentials of the other authors.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method of reviewing and distributing digital content comprising:

identifying a plurality of authors of digital content via a registration process wherein the plurality of authors agree to review digital content in exchange for review of their own digital content;

receiving a submission from one of the plurality of authors including metadata for digital content to be reviewed; and

effecting review of the digital content by at least one group of reviewers selected from others of the plurality of authors based on the metadata for the digital content and reviewer credentials for the others of the plurality of authors, wherein effecting review of the digital content includes selecting a group of reviewers from the others of the plurality of authors based on a default target quality level for the submission and the reviewer credentials of the others of the plurality of authors and feedback is provided to the one of the plurality of authors based on the review.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the metadata for the digital content comprises the default target quality level for the digital content, and effecting review of the digital content comprises:

a) selecting a group of reviewers from the others of the plurality of authors for a review at a first quality level that is less than the default target quality level based on the reviewer credentials;

b) effecting transfer of the digital content to user devices associated with the group of reviewers;

c) receiving feedback from the group of reviewers;

d) determining whether the digital content is to be reviewed at a next quality level based on the feedback and the default target quality level; and

e) if the digital content is to be reviewed at the next quality level, repeating steps a)-e) for the next quality level.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 wherein determining whether the digital content is to be reviewed at the next quality level comprises determining whether the digital content is rated at or above a current quality level based on the feedback from the group of reviewers and whether the current quality level is less than the default target quality level.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 wherein determining whether the digital content is to be reviewed at the next quality level comprises:

providing feedback to the one of the plurality of authors based on the feedback from the group of reviewers; and

receiving information indicating whether the digital content is to be reviewed at the next quality level from the one of the plurality of authors, wherein the one of the plurality of authors decides whether the digital content is to be reviewed at the next quality level based on the feedback.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 further comprising providing the feedback to the one of the plurality of authors based on the feedback from each of the groups of reviewers if the digital content is not to be reviewed at the next quality level.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein effecting review of the digital content comprises:

effecting transfer of the digital content to user devices associated with the group of reviewers,

wherein feedback from the group of reviewers is provided to the one of the plurality of authors.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 wherein the metadata for the digital content includes information describing the digital content, and selecting the group of reviewers comprises selecting the group of reviewers from the others of the plurality of authors based on the information describing the digital content and the reviewer credentials of the others of the plurality of authors.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 wherein the metadata for the digital content includes a target quality level for the digital content and information describing the digital content, and selecting the group of reviewers comprises selecting the group of reviewers from the others of the plurality of authors based on the target quality level, the information describing the digital content, and the reviewer credentials of the others of the plurality of authors.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising generating the reviewer credentials for the plurality of authors based on digital content previously submitted by each of the plurality of authors for review and digital content previously reviewed by each of the plurality of authors.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising:

receiving feedback regarding the digital content from the at least one group of reviewers; and

providing feedback to the one of the plurality of authors based on the feedback from the at least one group of reviewers.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the feedback provided to the one of the plurality of authors comprises information identifying a rated quality level of the digital content.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the feedback provided to the one of the plurality of authors comprises at least one of a group consisting of:

information identifying errors in the metadata for the digital content, information correcting errors in the metadata for the digital content, and comments regarding the digital content.

13. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising:

receiving information identifying whether the one of the plurality of authors desires to distribute the digital content based on the feedback; and

effecting transfer of the digital content to at least one distribution entity if the one of the plurality of authors desires to distribute the digital content.

14. A central server for a digital content review and distribution system comprising:

a communication interface communicatively coupling the central server to user devices associated with a plurality of authors of digital content via a network; and

a control system associated with the communication interface and configured to;

identify the plurality of authors of digital content via a registration process wherein the plurality of authors agree to review digital content in exchange for review of their own digital content;

receive a submission from one of the plurality of authors including metadata for digital content to be reviewed; and

effect review of the digital content by at least one group of reviewers selected from others of the plurality of authors based on the metadata for the digital content and reviewer credentials for the others of the plurality of authors, wherein effecting review of the digital content includes selecting a group of reviewers from the others of the plurality of authors based on a default target quality level for the submission and the reviewer credentials of the others of the plurality of authors and feedback is provided to the one of the plurality of authors based on the review.

15. The central server of claim 14 wherein the metadata for the digital content comprises the default target quality level for the digital content, and in order to effect review of the digital content, the control system is further configured to:

a) select a group of reviewers from the others of the plurality of authors for a review at a first quality level that is less than the default target quality level based on the reviewer credentials;

b) effect transfer of the digital content to user devices associated with the group of reviewers;

c) receive feedback from the group of reviewers;

d) determine whether the digital content is to be reviewed at a next quality level based on the feedback and the default target quality level; and

e) if the digital content is to be reviewed at the next quality level, repeat a)-e) for the next quality level.

16. The central server of claim 15 wherein in order to determine whether the digital content is to be reviewed at the next quality level, the control system is further configured to determine whether the digital content is rated at or above a current quality level based on the feedback from the group of reviewers and whether the current quality level is less than the default target quality level.

17. The central server of claim 15 wherein in order to determine whether the digital content is to be reviewed at the next quality level, the control system is further configured to:

provide feedback to the one of the plurality of authors based on the feedback from the group of reviewers; and

receive information indicating whether the digital content is to be reviewed at the next quality level from the one of the plurality of authors, wherein the one of the plurality of authors decides whether the digital content is to be reviewed at the next quality level based on the feedback.

18. The central server of claim 15 wherein the control system is further configured to provide the feedback to the one of the plurality of authors based on the feedback from each of the groups of reviewers if the digital content is not to be reviewed at the next quality level.

19. The central server of claim 14 wherein in order to effect review of the digital content, the control system is further configured to:

effect transfer of the digital content to user devices associated with the group of reviewers,

wherein feedback from the group of reviewers is provided to the one of the plurality of authors.

20. The central server of claim 19 wherein the metadata for the digital content includes information describing the digital content, and the control system is further configured to select the group of reviewers from the others of the plurality of authors based on the information describing the digital content and the reviewer credentials of the others of the plurality of authors.

21. The central server of claim 19 wherein the control system is further configured to select the group of reviewers from the others of the plurality of authors based on the target quality level, information describing the digital content, and the reviewer credentials of the others of the plurality of authors.

22. The central server of claim 19 wherein the control system is further configured to generate the reviewer credentials for the plurality of authors based on digital content previously submitted by each of the plurality of authors for review and digital content previously reviewed by each of the plurality of authors.

23. The central server of claim 14 wherein the control system is further configured to:

receive feedback regarding the digital content from the at least one group of reviewers; and

provide the feedback to the one of the plurality of authors based on the feedback from the at least one group of reviewers.

24. The central server of claim 14 wherein the feedback provided to the one of the plurality of authors comprises information identifying a rated quality level of the digital content.

25. The central server of claim 14 wherein the feedback provided to the one of the plurality of authors comprises at least one of a group consisting of:

information identifying errors in the metadata for the digital content, information correcting errors in the metadata for the digital content, and comments regarding the digital content.

26. The central server of claim 14 wherein the control system is further configured to:

receive information identifying whether the one of the plurality of authors desires to distribute the digital content based on the feedback; and

effect transfer of the digital content to at least one distribution entity if the one of the plurality of authors desires to distribute the digital content.