Delegating authority to evaluate content

• US 8,069,175 B2
• Filed: 03/24/2010
• Issued: 11/29/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 04/10/2002
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Google LLC (Alphabet Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Google Inc. (Alphabet Inc.)
• Inventors: Hillis, W. Daniel, Ferren, Bran
• Primary Examiner(s): Timblin; Robert
• Assistant Examiner(s): Reyes; Mariela D
• Application Number:
  US12/731,011
• Publication Number:
  US 20100185626A1
• Time in Patent Office: 615 Days
• Field of Search: 707/740, 707/748
• US Class Current: 707/740
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/00 Commerce

Abstract

The invention provides an evaluation system for reliably evaluating large amounts of content. The evaluation system is managed by a primary authority that designates one or more contributing authorities by delegating to each a specific quantity of authority. Each contributing authority may in turn designate and delegate authority to one or more additional contributing authorities, subject to the restriction that the total quantity of authority delegated does not exceed the quantity of authority the contributing authority was itself delegated. Each contributing authority, and optionally the primary authority itself, may evaluate one or more portions of content by associating a rating with each evaluated portion of content. A composite rating for a particular portion of content may then be determined based upon the ratings associated with the portion of content. Preferably, the ratings are combined in a manner that affords a higher priority to the ratings provided by contributing authorities to which a greater quantity of authority was delegated.

Claims

1. A data processing system comprising one or more computers and one or more storage devices, the one or more computers configured to perform operations comprising:

receiving information identifying a primary authority from among a plurality of rating authorities;

assigning the primary authority complete authority to rate content;

receiving information originating from the primary authority delegating at least a portion of the complete authority to one or more contributing authorities;

receiving information specifying content ratings for a first content item by two or more authorities;

determining a composite rating for the first content item based on the content ratings, wherein the composite rating is determined by combining the content ratings according to the portion of the complete authority that is held by each of the two or more authorities that rated the first content item;

receiving information from a particular user that indicates that an evaluation system using the primary authority should be used to rate the first content item; and

transmitting the composite rating for the first content item for presentation to the particular user in association with the first content item.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein at least a portion of the complete authority is specified numerically.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein content ratings are specified numerically as numeric ratings selected from among a group of numeric ratings consisting of:

numbers between −

1 and +1, inclusively;

or

numbers between 0 and +1, inclusively.

4. The system of claim 3, wherein the composite rating comprises a combination of numeric ratings selected from among a group of composite ratings selected from among:

an additive combination of the numeric ratings;

a mean of the numeric ratings;

a mode of the numeric ratings; and

a median of the numeric ratings.

5. The system of claim 3, wherein the composite rating comprises a weighted average of the numeric ratings, wherein each of the numeric ratings are weighted in proportion to a respective quantity of authority held by the authority.

6. The system of claim 1, wherein the content ratings indicate one or more qualities of the first content item selected from among a list of qualities consisting of:

reliability;

trustworthiness;

accuracy;

impartiality; and

quality.

7. The system of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise receiving instructions from the primary authority limiting evaluation of content to content of a particular form.

8. The system of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise:

receiving information originating from an existing authority adding one or more new contributing authorities by delegating authority to the one or more new contributing authorities.

9. The system of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise:

receiving information originating from a delegating authority removing one or more of the contributing authorities by removing authority previously delegated to one or more contributing authorities by the delegating authority.

10. The system of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise:

adjusting a relative authority of any of the one or more contributing authorities in response to any of;

information originating from the primary authority delegating additional authority to at least one additional contributing authority;

or

information originating from the primary authority withdrawing authority from at least one of the one or more contributing authorities.

11. The system of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise:

adding one or more new contributing authorities in response to information identifying that one or more contributing authorities have delegated authority to the one or more new contributing authorities.

12. The system of claim 11, wherein the operations further comprise:

removing a contributing authority by withdrawing authority previously delegated to the one or more new contributing authorities.

13. The system of claim 11, wherein the operations further comprise:

adjusting relative authority of the one or more new contributing authorities by any of;

delegating additional authority to at least one additional new contributing authority;

or

withdrawing authority from at least one of the one or more new contributing authorities.

14. The system of claim 1, wherein a delegating authority cannot delegate more authority than the delegating authority has.

15. The system of claim 1, wherein a delegating authority cannot delegate more authority than the delegating authority has, reduced by an attenuation factor.

16. The system of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise:

preventing each of the one or more contributing authorities from designating another of the one or more contributing authorities, to avoid creating a loop of designated authorities.

17. The system of claim 1, wherein the information that indicates that an evaluation system using the primary authority should be used to rate the first content item comprises an indication on an evaluation profile of the particular user that the evaluation system using the primary authority should be used to rate the first content item.

18. A method comprising:

receiving information identifying a primary authority from among a plurality of rating authorities;

assigning the primary authority complete authority to rate content;

receiving information originating from the primary authority delegating at least a portion of the complete authority to one or more contributing authorities;

receiving information specifying content ratings for a first content item by two or more authorities;

determining, using one or more computers, a composite rating for the first content item based on the content ratings, wherein the composite rating is determined by combining the content ratings according to the portion of the complete authority that is held by each of the two or more authorities that rated the first content item;

receiving information from a particular user that indicates that an evaluation system using the primary authority should be used to rate the first content item; and

transmitting the composite rating for the first content item for presentation to the particular user in association with the first content item.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein at least a portion of the complete authority is specified numerically.

20. The method of claim 18, wherein content ratings are specified numerically as numeric ratings selected from among a group of numeric ratings consisting of:

numbers between −

1 and +1, inclusively;

or

numbers between 0 and +1, inclusively.

21. The method of claim 18, wherein the composite rating comprises a combination of numeric ratings selected from among a group of composite ratings selected from among:

an additive combination of the numeric ratings;

a mean of the numeric ratings;

a mode of the numeric ratings; and

a median of the numeric ratings.

22. The method of claim 20, wherein the composite rating comprises a weighted average of the numeric ratings, wherein each of the numeric ratings are weighted in proportion to a respective quantity of authority held by the authority.

23. The method of claim 18, wherein the content ratings indicate one or more qualities of the first content item selected from among a list of qualities consisting of:

reliability;

trustworthiness;

accuracy;

impartiality; and

quality.

24. The method of claim 18, further comprising:

receiving instructions from the primary authority limiting evaluation of content to content of a particular form.

25. The method of claim 18, further comprising:

receiving information originating from an existing authority adding one or more new contributing authorities by delegating authority to the one or more new contributing authorities.

26. The method of claim 18, further comprising:

receiving information originating from a delegating authority removing one or more of the contributing authorities by removing authority previously delegated to one or more contributing authorities by the delegating authority.

27. The method of claim 18, further comprising:

adjusting a relative authority of any of the one or more contributing authorities in response to any of;

information originating from the primary authority delegating additional authority to at least one additional contributing authority;

or

information originating from the primary authority withdrawing authority from at least one of the one or more contributing authorities.

28. The method of claim 18, further comprising:

adding one or more new contributing authorities in response to information identifying that one or more contributing authorities have delegated authority to the one or more new contributing authorities.

29. The method of claim 28, further comprising:

removing a contributing authority by withdrawing authority previously delegated to the one or more new contributing authorities.

30. The method of claim 28, further comprising:

adjusting relative authority of the one or more new contributing authorities by any of;

delegating additional authority to at least one additional new contributing authority;

or withdrawing authority from at least one of the one or more new contributing authorities.

31. The method of claim 18, wherein a delegating authority cannot delegate more authority than the delegating authority has.

32. The method of claim 18, wherein a delegating authority cannot delegate more authority than the delegating authority has, reduced by an attenuation factor.

33. The method of claim 18, further comprising:

preventing each of the one or more contributing authorities from designating another of the one or more contributing authorities, to avoid creating a loop of designated authorities.

34. The method of claim 18, wherein the information that indicates that an evaluation system using the primary authority should be used to rate the first content item comprises an indication on an evaluation profile of the particular user that the evaluation system using the primary authority should be used to rate the first content item.