Method and apparatus for correcting faults in a passive optical network

• US 8,090,258 B2
• Filed: 09/19/2008
• Issued: 01/03/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 09/19/2008
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Tellabs Petaluma, Inc. (Infinera Corp.)
• Original Assignee: Tellabs Petaluma, Inc. (Infinera Corp.)
• Inventors: DeLew, David A., O'Connor, Paul E., Larvenz, Robert S.
• Primary Examiner(s): Park, Kinam
• Application Number:
  US12/234,604
• Publication Number:
  US 20100074614A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,201 Days
• Field of Search: 398/22, 398/17, 398/16
• US Class Current: 398/22
• CPC Class Codes: H04B 10/073 using an out-of-service signal H04B10/071 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: H04B 10/272 Star-type networks or tree-type networks

Abstract

Component malfunctions in passive optical networks (PON) can increase bit error rates and decrease signal-to-noise ratio of communications signals. These faults may cause the receivers of the signals, either the optical line terminal (OLT) or optical network terminals (ONTs), to experience intermittent faults and/or may result in misinterpreted commands that disrupt other ONT'"'"'s communication, resulting in a rogue ONT condition. Existing PON protocol detection methods may not detect these types of malfunctions. An embodiment of the present invention identifies faults in a PON by transmitting a test series of data patterns via an optical communications path from a first optical network node to a second optical network node. The test series is compared to an expected series of data patterns. An error rate may be calculated as a function of the differences between the test series and expected series. The error rate may be reported to identify faults in the PON. Through use of the embodiment, network faults can be identified and optionally automatically corrected, saving a network service provider from expending technician time and maintaining an operating state of the network.

Claims

1. A method of correcting faults in a passive optical network (PON), comprising:

transmitting a communications signal including a bit error rate (BER) test data pattern via an optical communications path from a first optical network node to a second optical network node in a passive optical network;

acquiring from the second optical network node a status indicator representative of an operating state at the second optical network node responsive to the test pattern;

determining if a fault condition exists as a function of the status indicator; and

performing an action to correct the fault condition in an event a fault condition exists.

2. The method according to claim 1, further including determining whether the test data pattern received at the second optical network node was received in an error state and wherein performing the action includes performing the action as a function of the error state.

3. The method according to claim 2, further including causing the test data pattern to loop back from the second optical network node to the first optical network node via the optical communications path and wherein determining the error state occurs at the first optical network node or a third network node.

4. The method according to claim 2, further including monitoring a metric representative of one or more test data patterns received in an error state and wherein performing the action includes performing the action in an event the metric reaches or exceeds a count.

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the status indicator is selected from the group consisting of:

phase locked loop (PLL) status, state machine status, counter status, and checksum status.

6. The method according to claim 1, further including preparing a test data pattern at the first optical network node by at least one of the following:

reading the test data pattern from a storage location, generating the test data pattern, obtaining the test data pattern from a third network node, or causing the test data pattern to be transmitted from a third network node to the second optical network node.

7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the first optical network node is an optical line terminal (OLT) and the second optical network node is an optical network terminal (ONT).

8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the first optical network node is an optical network terminal (ONT) and the second optical network node is an optical line terminal (OLT).

9. The method according to claim 1, wherein transmitting the test data pattern includes continually transmitting the test data pattern.

10. The method according to claim 1, wherein the test data pattern is a Quasi Random Signal Source (QRSS) data pattern.

11. The method according to claim 1, wherein determining if a fault condition exists occurs at the first optical network node or a third network node.

12. The method according to claim 1 further including monitoring increases in fault conditions over a long period of time relative to the test data pattern to detect optical network degradation effects over the long period of time.

13. The method according to claim 12 further including adjusting parameters at the first or second optical network node to compensate for the degradation effects.

14. The method according to claim 1, wherein transmitting the test data pattern includes transmitting a series of test data patterns via respective communications signals or adding the series to existing network traffic communications signals.

15. The method according to claim 1, wherein performing the action is selected from a group consisting of:

resetting the first or second optical network node, resetting a subsystem in the first or second optical network node, reporting the fault condition, initiating a power cycle of the first or second optical network node, and issuing an alarm if the fault condition is determined to be an error condition.

16. The method according to claim 1 further including:

transmitting the test data pattern to multiple second optical network nodes via optical communications paths;

causing transmitter communications from at least one of the second optical network nodes to be disabled; and

monitoring a fault condition of a given one of the second optical network nodes to identify cross communications between or among multiple ones of the second optical network nodes.

17. The method according to claim 1 further including employing the method during a ranging process, and, in an event a fault condition is determined, terminating the ranging process and preventing a given second optical network node from accessing the passive optical network.

18. An apparatus for correcting faults in a network node in a passive optical network (PON), comprising:

a transceiver configured to transmit a communications signal including a bit error rate (BER) test data pattern via an optical communications path from a first optical network node to a second optical network node in a passive optical network;

an acquisition unit configured to acquire from the second optical network node a status indicator representative of an operating state at the second optical network node responsive to the test pattern;

a determination unit configured to determine a fault condition as a function of the status indicator; and

a correction unit configured to perform an action to correct the fault condition in an event a fault condition is determined.

19. The apparatus according to claim 18, wherein the determination unit is configured to detect whether the test data pattern received at the second optical network node was received in an error state and wherein the correction unit performs the action as a function of the error state.

20. The apparatus according to claim 19, further including a processing unit configured to cause the test data pattern to loop back from the second optical network node to the first optical network node via the optical communications path and wherein the processing unit is located at the first optical network node or a third network node.

21. The apparatus according to claim 19, further including a receive error counter configured to be set an event an error is detected and wherein the correction unit performs the action in an event the receive error counter reaches or exceeds a count.

22. The apparatus according to claim 18, wherein the status indicator is selected from the group consisting of:

phase locked loop (PLL) status, state machine status, counter status, and checksum status.

23. The apparatus according to claim 18, further including a pattern preparation unit configured to prepare a test data pattern at the first optical network node wherein the preparation unit is configured to employ at least one of the following:

read the test data pattern from a storage location, generate the test data pattern, obtain the test data pattern from a third network node, or cause the test data pattern to be transmitted from a third network node to the second optical network node.

24. The apparatus according to claim 18, wherein the first optical network node is an optical line terminal (OLT) and the second optical network node is an optical network terminal (ONT).

25. The apparatus according to claim 18, wherein the first optical network node is an optical network terminal (ONT) and the second optical network node is an optical line terminal (OLT).

26. The apparatus according to claim 18, wherein the transmission unit is configured to continually transmit the test data pattern.

27. The apparatus according to claim 18, wherein the test data pattern is a Quasi Random Signal Source (QRSS) data pattern.

28. The apparatus according to claim 18, wherein the determination unit is located at the first optical network node or a third network node.

29. The apparatus according to claim 18 wherein the determination unit is configured to monitor increases in fault conditions over a long period of time relative to the test data pattern to detect optical network degradation effects over the long period of time.

30. The apparatus according to claim 29 wherein the correction unit configured to adjust parameters at the first or second optical network node to compensate for the degradation effects.

31. The apparatus according to claim 18, wherein the transmission unit is configured to transmit the test data pattern as a series of test data patterns via respective communications signals or add the test data pattern to existing network traffic communications signals.

32. The apparatus according to claim 18, wherein the action is selected from a group consisting of:

reset the first or second optical network node, reset a subsystem in the first or second optical network node, report the fault condition, initiate a power cycle of the first second optical network node, and issue an alarm if the fault condition is determined to be an error condition.

33. The apparatus according to claim 18 wherein the transceiver unit is configured to transmit the communications signal to multiple second optical network nodes and to cause transmitter communications from at least one of the second optical network nodes to be disabled wherein the multiple second optical network nodes further include a determination unit configured to monitor a fault condition to identify cross communications between or among multiple ones of the second optical network nodes.

34. The apparatus according to claim 18 wherein, during a ranging process, the correction unit is configured to terminate the ranging process and prevent a given second optical network node from accessing the passive optical network in an event in fault condition is determined.

35. A computer program product for identifying and correcting faults in an network node in a passive optical network (PON), the computer program product comprising a computer readable medium having computer readable instructions stored thereon, which, when loaded and executed by a processor, causes the processor to:

transmit a communications signal including a bit error rate (BER) test data pattern via an optical communications path from a first optical network node to a second optical network node in a passive optical network;

obtain from the second optical network node a status indicator representative of an operating state at the second optical network node responsive to the test pattern;

determine if a fault condition exists as a function of the status indicator; and

perform an action to correct the fault condition in an event a fault condition exists.