Apparatus and method for automatic omni-directional visual motion-based collision avoidance

• US 8,108,147 B1
• Filed: 02/06/2009
• Issued: 01/31/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 02/06/2009
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: the united states of america as represented by the secretary of the navy
• Original Assignee: the united states of america as represented by the secretary of the navy
• Inventors: Blackburn, Michael
• Primary Examiner(s): Cheung, Mary
• Assistant Examiner(s): Malhotra, Sanjeev
• Application Number:
  US12/366,757
• Time in Patent Office: 1,089 Days
• Field of Search: 701/2, 701/21, 701/301, 702/92, 73/13.8, 382/103, 382/104, 382/106, 382/154, 345/419, 345/505, 340/990, 340/995.14, 324/310, 235/454, 250/214.1, 250/330, 348/36, 348/148, 348/218.1, 356/5.08, 375/295
• US Class Current: 701/301
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 1/166 for active traffic, e.g. moving vehicles, pedestrians, bikes

Abstract

A method of identifying and imaging a high risk collision object relative to a host vehicle includes arranging a plurality of N sensors for imaging a three-hundred and sixty degree horizontal field of view (hFOV) around the host vehicle. The sensors are mounted to a vehicle in a circular arrangement so that the sensors are radially equiangular from each other. For each sensor, contrast differences in the hFOV are used to identify a unique source of motion (hot spot) that is indicative of a remote object in the sensor hFOV. A first hot spot in one sensor hFOV is correlated to a second hot spot in another hFOV of at least one other N sensor to yield range, azimuth and trajectory data for said object. The processor then assesses a collision risk with the object according to the object'"'"'s trajectory data relative to the host vehicle.

Claims

1. A method of identifying and imaging a high risk collision object relative to a host vehicle comprising the steps of:

A) using N passive sensors to image a three-hundred and sixty degree view from said host vehicle, each of said N passive sensors having a corresponding horizontal field of view (hFOV), each said hFOV from one of said N passive sensors overlapping at least one of said hFOVs from another of said N passive sensors;

B) comparing contrast differences in the hFOVs to identify a unique source of motion (hotspot) that is indicative of said object;

C) correlating a first hot spot in said hFOV of one of said N passive sensors to a second hot spot in all other said N passive sensors that have overlapping said hFOVs with said one of said N passive sensors to yield a range, azimuth and trajectory data for said object;

D) sequentially repeating said steps B) and C) at predetermined time intervals to yield changes in said range and azimuth data of the detected hot spot; and

,

E) assessing collision risk of said host vehicle with said object according to said changes in said range and azimuth data from said step D).

2. The method of claim 1 wherein said step A) is accomplished using said N passive sensors that have a horizontal field of view (hFOV) of 360/N degrees, said step A) being further accomplished by placing said N passive sensors in a circular arrangement and radially equiangular from each other.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein said N passive sensors are visible light cameras.

4. The method of claim 2 wherein said N passive sensors are infrared (IR) cameras.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein said step A) is accomplished with said hFOV'"'"'s that overlap.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein said step A) is accomplished with said N passive sensors that have a vertical field of view (vFOV), and further wherein said vFOVs establish a minimum range detection for said object.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein said step C) is accomplished with one of said N passive sensors, wherein said step D) is accomplished with another of said N passive sensors that is adjacent to said one of said passive N sensors from said step C).

8. The method of claim 1 wherein said second sensor from said step D) is accomplished using at least two of said N passive sensors that are not adjacent to each other.

9. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of:

F) calculating a collision response for said host vehicle when said collision risk from said step E) is above a predetermined level.

10. A method of avoiding a collision with a object comprising the steps of:

A) arranging a plurality of N passive sensors on a host vehicle, each said N passive sensor having a horizontal field of view (hFOV), said plurality of N passive sensors collectively attaining a three hundred and sixty degree hFOV from said host vehicle;

B) detecting said object in a first hFOV from one of said N passive sensors;

C) sensing said object in a second hFOV from another of said N passive sensors;

said second hFOV cooperating with said first hFOV to establish an overlapping region, said object being located in said overlapping region;

D) correlating said first hFOV and said second hFOV with a central processor to calculate azimuth, range and trajectory data for said remote object relative to said vehicle; and

,

E) determining collision risk of said host vehicle with said remote object according to said data.

11. The method of claim 10 further comprising the step of:

F) determining a collision avoidance response when said collision risk is above a predetermined level.

12. An apparatus for automatic omni-directional collision avoidance comprising:

a plurality of N passive sensors mounted on a vehicle;

each of said N passive sensors having a horizontal field of view (hFOV), each said hFOV from one of said N passive sensors overlapping at least one of said hFOVs of another of said N passive sensors, said plurality of N passive sensors being mounted to said vehicle to establish a three-hundred and sixty degree horizontal field of view (hFOV);

said of said N passive sensors comparing contrast differences in its respective said hFOV to identify a unique sources of motion (hot spots) that are indicative of the presence of an object in said hFOV;

a means for processing said hot spots by to assess collision risk of said vehicle with said object according to said data; and

,

said processing means correlating a first said hot spot in said first hFOV of one said N passive sensors to at least one other said hot spot in at least other of said hFOVs of said another of said N passive sensors to yield a range, azimuth and trajectory data for said object.

13. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein said means for processing comprises:

a plurality of N image processors, each said image processor being operatively coupled to a respective said N passive sensor for determining said hot spots in said hFOVs; and

,

a central processor for receiving inputs from said N image processors to yield said data.