Gateway balancing

• US 8,131,584 B2
• Filed: 08/02/2007
• Issued: 03/06/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 08/02/2007
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Target Brands Inc. (Target Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Target Brands Inc. (Target Corporation)
• Inventors: Gabrielson, Richard S.
• Primary Examiner(s): Nguyen, Nga B.
• Application Number:
  US11/833,121
• Publication Number:
  US 20090037245A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,678 Days
• Field of Search: 705/7, 705/8, 705/28, 705/9, 705/10
• US Class Current: 705/8
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06312 Adjustment or analysis of established resource schedule, e.g. resource or task levelling, or dynamic rescheduling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06315 Needs-based resource requirements planning or analysis
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/08 Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/087 Inventory or stock management, e.g. order filling, procurement or balancing against orders

Abstract

A gateway balancing module for balancing shipments of a plurality of containers between a plurality of associated gateways includes a determine demand subcomponent, a calculate containers subcomponent, a determine capacity subcomponent, and a generate balance recommendations subcomponent. The determine capacity subcomponent is adapted to determine available de-consolidation capacity for each of the plurality of associated gateways. The generate balance recommendations subcomponent is adapted to provide a user with a gateway balancing recommendation based upon a comparison of the handicapped gateway demand and the de-consolidation capacities of each of the plurality of associated gateways.

Claims

1. A computer readable medium storing a computer program executed by a computer processor to effect a gateway balancing module for balancing shipments of a plurality of containers between a plurality of associated gateways, the module comprising:

a determine demand subcomponent adapted to determine de-consolidation demand on each of the plurality of associated gateways based upon a total number of containers associated with each of the gateways;

a calculate containers subcomponent adapted to determine a handicapped de-consolidation demand on each of the plurality of associated gateways based upon de-consolidation complexity using computer software, one or more algorithms, or networking capabilities as part of the programming executed by the computer processor;

a determine capacity subcomponent adapted to determine available de-consolidation capacity for each of the plurality of associated gateways using computer algorithms as part of the programming executed by the computer processor; and

a generate balance recommendations subcomponent adapted to provide a user with a gateway balancing recommendation based upon a comparison of the handicapped gateway demand and the de-consolidation capacities of each of the plurality of associated gateways using computer algorithms and communications as part of the programming executed by the computer processor.

2. The computer readable medium of claim 1, wherein the de-consolidation complexity includes a carton complexity factor determined by a ratio of shipping cartons in a container to cubic volume of the container.

3. The computer readable medium of claim 1, wherein the de-consolidation complexity includes an item complexity factor determined by a total number of different items types per container.

4. The computer readable medium of claim 1, wherein the de-consolidation complexity includes a distribution center complexity factor determined by a total number of distribution centers to which contents of a container are allocated.

5. The computer readable medium of claim 1, wherein the de-consolidation complexity includes an item handling complexity factor determined by a handling mode associated with contents of a container.

6. The computer readable medium of claim 5, wherein the handling mode relates to at least one of whether the contents are conveyable and require more than one person to carry.

7. The computer readable medium of claim 1, wherein a plurality of complexity factors are averaged to obtain an overall complexity value for each of the plurality of containers.

8. The computer readable medium of claim 1, further comprising a determine confirmed demand subcomponent adapted to identify and designate confirmed container shipments as ineligible for gateway balancing.

9. The computer readable medium of claim 1, further comprising an apply gateway business rules subcomponent adapted to determine which of the plurality of associated gateways are eligible alternative gateways for gateway balancing.

10. The computer readable medium of claim 1, further comprising:

a balancing recommendation component adapted to generate a gateway balancing recommendation for a shipment assigned to an importation gateway based upon forecasted gateway capacity and handicapped gateway demand;

a manual overrides component adapted to generate at least one of manual assignments and manual exclusions of purchase order shipments from generation of the gateway balancing recommendation.

11. The computer readable medium of claim 1, further comprising:

a profile maintenance component adapted to maintain a gateway capacity profile and a container complexity profile;

wherein the balancing recommendation component accesses the profile maintenance component to determine gateway capacity and handicapped gateway demand.

12. A method executed by a computer processor of a computer programmed to carry out balancing of a container shipment between a plurality of gateways, the method comprising:

determining container de-consolidation demand on each of a plurality of gateways based upon a total number of containers associated with each of the gateways;

determining by the computer processor an adjusted container de-consolidation demand on each of the gateways based upon container de-consolidation complexity;

determining by the computer processor available container de-consolidation capacity for each of the gateways;

providing a system user with a recommended gateway for delivery of a container shipment based upon a comparison by the computer processor of the adjusted gateway demand and the container de-consolidation capacities of each of the plurality of gateways;

assigning a ship to deliver the container shipment to the recommended gateway;

delivering the container shipment to the recommended gateway with the ship; and

unloading the container shipment from the ship at the recommended gateway.

13. The method of claim 12, further comprising deconsolidating the container shipment at a gateway de-consolidator.

14. A method executed by a computer processor of a computer programmed to carry out balancing of shipments of containers between gateways comprising:

determining by the computer processor de-consolidation demand on each of a plurality of associated gateways based upon a number of containers assigned to each of the associated gateways;

determining by the computer processor a container complexity factor for each of the containers assigned to each of the associated gateways;

adjusting by the computer processor the container de-consolidation demand on each of the gateways by the container complexity factor;

determining by the computer processor available container de-consolidation capacity for each of the associated gateways; and

the computer processor providing a system user with a gateway balancing recommendation based upon the adjusted container de-consolidation demand and the container de-consolidation capacity of each of the associated gateways.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein determining the container complexity factor includes averaging a plurality of complexity factors to obtain an overall container complexity factor for each of the containers.

16. The method of claim 15, further comprising ranking the associated gateways based upon eligibility for balancing shipments of containers between the associated gateways.

17. The method of claim 15, wherein determining available container de-consolidation capacity for each of the associated gateways comprises determining a maximum de-consolidation quantity for each of the associated gateways.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein determining a maximum de-consolidation quantity for each of the associated gateways includes pre-establishing allocated de-consolidation capacities with each of the associated gateways.

19. The method of claim 17, further comprising generating at least one of manual assignments and manual exclusions of shipments of containers from gateway balancing.

20. The method of claim 17, further comprising identifying and designating confirmed shipments of containers as ineligible for gateway balancing.