Method and device for checking the plausibility of measured values in a motor vehicle environment

• US 8,155,909 B2
• Filed: 07/05/2007
• Issued: 04/10/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 07/14/2006
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Lucas Automotive GmbH (Zeppelin - Stiftung der Stadt Friedrichshafen)
• Original Assignee: Lucas Automotive GmbH (Zeppelin - Stiftung der Stadt Friedrichshafen)
• Inventors: Schmitt, Hubert
• Primary Examiner(s): Jayne, Darnell
• Assistant Examiner(s): ROERSMA, ANDREW MARK
• Application Number:
  US12/373,598
• Publication Number:
  US 20100023205A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,741 Days
• Field of Search: 701/29, 701/33, 701/34, 702/93
• US Class Current: 702/93
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2556/20 Data confidence level
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 50/045 Monitoring control system parameters

Abstract

A method, a device and a computer program product, by means of which sensor values of redundant sensors in vehicles can be compared with each other to carry out a plausibility check, the measured values of said sensors not being synchronized with each other, are described. On the basis of a first measured value in time, and using the physical properties of the vehicle, a plausibility window, in which a second, subsequent measured value of a different sensor must be to count as plausible, is formed. The determined plausibility of the measured values is indicated by means of a plausibility signal.

Claims

1. A method of checking the plausibility of measured values of at least two sensors for a measured variable in a motor vehicle environment, each sensor supplying measured values of the variable continuously, the method comprising the following steps:

(a) assigning a time stamp to each measured value M_i;

(b) deriving a plausibility window P_i from physical properties of the motor vehicle;

(c) testing whether a first measured value M₁ supplied by a first sensor and a later second measured value M₂ supplied by a second sensor differ by more than is specified by the plausibility window P_i, the time interval between a first measured value M₁ and the second measured value M₂ entering the derivation of the plausibility window P_i; and

(d) depending on a result of the testing, generating a plausibility signal.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the measured variable is a yaw rate of the motor vehicle.

3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the physical properties of the motor vehicle include a maximum physically possible yaw rate for the motor vehicle and a maximum yaw rate which can be determined from a steering angle.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the testing includes comparing an absolute difference between the first measured value M₁ and the second measured value M₂ with the plausibility window P_i.

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the plausibility window P_i has an upper and a lower limit, and the two limits are determined independently of each other.

6. The method according to claim 5, wherein a rate of change of the measured values of at least one of the first sensor and the second sensor enters the derivation of the plausibility window P_i.

7. The method according to claim 6, wherein information about an operating state of the motor vehicle enters the derivation of the plausibility window P_i.

8. The method according to claim 7, wherein a history of at least one of the first and second measured values over a predetermined period is stored, and that this history enters the derivation of the plausibility window P_i.

9. The method according to claim 1, wherein the measured values of the at least two sensors are transmitted on a multiplexed bus.

10. The method according to claim 1, wherein if a measured value of at least one of the sensors is absent for a predetermined period, an absent measured value fault signal is output.

11. The method according to claim 1, wherein a measurement frequency of at least one of the first and second sensors depends on a difference of the measured values of this sensor from at least one reference value.

12. The method according to claim 11, wherein additionally measured values which are determined from the measured values the sensors, and are proportional to the measured variable, are determined and output.

13. The method according to claim 11, wherein the measurement frequency depends on a difference of the measured values of the at least one of the first and second sensors from reference values.

14. The method according to claim 1, wherein the measured values of one of the sensors are reference values and further wherein most recent measured values of another sensor, that differs least from the reference values are output.

15. The method according to claim 11, wherein the measured values of one of the sensors are taken as reference values.

16. A device for checking the plausibility of the measured values M_i of at least two sensors for a measured variable in a motor vehicle environment, each sensor supplying measured values of the variable continuously, the device comprising:

at least one input interface for receiving measured values of the at least two sensors, a time stamp being assigned to each measured value M_i;

a processing unit which is operable to test whether a first measured value M₁ of a first sensor differs from a later second measured value M₂ of a second sensor by more than a plausibility window P_i specifies, the plausibility window P_i being derived from a physical properties of a motor vehicle, and with a time interval between the first measured value M₁ and the second measured value M₂ entering the derivation of the plausibility window P_i, the processing unit being further operable, depending on a result of the test, to generate a plausibility signal; and

an output interface, via which a plausibility signal is output.

17. The device according to claim 16, wherein the sensors are yaw rate sensors.

18. The device according to claim 16, wherein for each sensor, one of a memory and a memory area is present.

19. The device according to claim 18, wherein the processing unit is a programmable computer.

20. The device according to claim 16, wherein an output signal which is determined from the measured values of the sensors, and which is proportional to the measured variable is also output from the output interface.

21. The device according to claim 20, wherein the measured values of at least two sensors are transmitted to the device via a multiplexed bus.

22. The device according to claim 21, wherein at least one of the output signal and the plausibility signal are transmitted on a multiplexed bus that also carries the measured values of at least one of the sensors.

23. The device according to claim 22, wherein the bus is a serial bus.

24. The device according to claim 16 wherein the processing unit includes a computer program product with program code for carrying out operations of the processing unit when the computer program product runs on the processing unit.