Multi-threat detection system

• US 8,171,810 B1
• Filed: 08/25/2011
• Issued: 05/08/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 08/25/2011
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Qylur Intelligent Systems, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Qylur Security Systems, Inc.
• Inventors: Sagi-Dolev, Alysia M.
• Primary Examiner(s): Williams, Hezron E
• Assistant Examiner(s): Shah, Samir M
• Application Number:
  US13/218,182
• Time in Patent Office: 257 Days
• Field of Search: 738/658, 738/656, 738/659, 340/521, 340/573.1
• US Class Current: 73/865.8
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 2001/022 sampling for security purposes, e.g. contraband, warfare agents
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 2015/019 Biological contaminants; Fouling
• CPC Class Codes: G01V 5/20 Detecting prohibited goods, e.g. weapons, explosives, hazardous substances, contraband or smuggled objects

Abstract

A method and system for efficiently screening for threatening items are presented. The system includes a test unit configured to subject the object to a combination of two or more different types of tests, sensors configured to receive test outcome from the object and generate corresponding output signals, and a computation unit receiving and processing the output signals to generate parameter values. The computation unit combines the parameter values from the different types of tests to determine a set of risk factors that indicate a likelihood that the threatening item is present in the object, wherein the parameter values include visualization data obtained from different measurement angles.

Claims

1. A system for screening an object for a threatening item, the system comprising:

a test unit configured to subject the object to a combination of two or more different types of tests;

sensors configured to receive test outcome from the object and generate corresponding output signals;

a computation unit receiving the output signals and processing the output signals to generate parameter values, the computation unit combining the parameter values from the different types of tests to determine a set of risk factors indicating a likelihood that the threatening item is present in the object, wherein the parameter values include visualization data obtained from different measurement angles.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the two or more tests are performed simultaneously.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein the two or more tests are performed sequentially.

4. The system of claim 1, wherein the computation unit processes the output signals from different sensors simultaneously.

5. The system of claim 1, wherein the tests are selected from ionizing radiation test, chemical analysis, and non-ionizing test.

6. The system of claim 1, wherein the sensors are in the form of a fused sensor array.

7. The system of claim 1, wherein the computation unit determines a set of parameters that include one or more of texture, density, electrical conductivity, molecular class, location, visual classification, radioactive potential, biological class, and biometric class of the object based on the output signals from the sensors.

8. The system of claim 7, wherein an output signal from one of the sensors is used to determine values for multiple parameters.

9. The system of claim 1, wherein the computation unit has a threat determination fraction that includes conditions that determine the set of risk factors, the system further comprising an interface unit for generating an alert if one or more risk factors of the set of risk factors is determined.

10. The system of claim 1 further comprising a moving mechanism in the object unit for moving the object to a desired location in the object unit.

11. The system of claim 1 further comprising a rotating mechanism configured to hold the object and rotate it to adjust the object'"'"'s angle for testing.

12. The system of claim 1 further comprising a first object unit designed to hold the object, which is a first object, and a second object unit designed to hold a second object, wherein the test unit tests the first object and the second object.

13. The system of claim 12, wherein the second object unit is a modular unit that is detachable from the test unit.

14. The system of claim 12, wherein the test unit has a mechanism that allows the test unit to test the first object and the second object sequentially.

15. The system of claim 12, wherein the test unit tests the first object and the second object simultaneously.

16. The system of claim 1, wherein the test unit comprises subunits, each of the subunits containing a unique test equipment and being independently replaceable with a different subunit.

17. The system of claim 1 further comprising a camera configured to obtain an image of the object.

18. The system of claim 1 further comprising an automated receiver that identifies an owner of the object and provides information about the owner.

19. The system of claim 1, wherein the object is in an object unit that has a physically separate compartment from the test unit.

20. The system of claim 1, wherein the object is a first object and is placed in a first object unit that is designed to hold the first object, further comprising a second object unit designed to hold a second object, wherein the test unit subjects each of the first object unit and the second object unit to the combination of two or more tests and the computation unit receives output signals from the first object unit and the second object unit to calculate risk factors for the first and second objects.

21. A method of screening an object for a threatening item, the method comprising:

subjecting the object to a combination of different types of tests for identifying properties of the object;

reading output signals from sensors positioned to receive test outcome from the object;

processing the output signals individually to generate parameter values; and

combining the parameter values from the different types of tests and using visualization data obtained from different measurement angles to determine a risk factor that indicates a likelihood that the threatening item is present in the object.

22. The method of claim 21 further comprising subjecting the object to the combination of tests simultaneously.

23. The method of claim 21 further comprising subjecting the object to the combination of tests sequentially.

24. The method of claim 21, wherein processing different output signals comprises processing the output signals simultaneously.

25. The method of claim 21 further comprising selecting the combination of tests from ionizing radiation test, chemical analysis, and non-ionizing test.

26. The method of claim 21 further comprising determining values for a set of parameters based on the output signals, wherein the set of parameters includes one or more of texture, density, electrical conductivity, visual classification, molecular class, location, radioactive potential, biological class, and biometric class.

27. The method of claim 26 further comprising determining values for multiple parameters by using one output signal of the output signals.

28. The method of claim 26 further comprising determining the risk factor by combining values for the set of parameters according to pre-existing threat determination function.

29. The method of claim 21 further comprising generating an alert based on the risk factor.

30. The method of claim 21 further comprising moving the object to properly position the object for different tests.

31. The method of claim 21, wherein the object is a first object, further comprising a first object unit designed to hold the first object and a second object unit designed to hold a second object, further comprising testing a second object testing the first object.

32. The method of claim 21, wherein the object is a first object in a first object unit that is designed to hold the first object, further comprising testing a second object in a second object unit while the first object is being tested.

33. The method of claim 21 further comprising obtaining an image of the object.

34. The method of claim 21, wherein the object is a first object in a first object unit, further comprising:

identifying a second object in a second object unit and subjecting the second object to the combination of tests; and

determining risk factors for the first object and the second object separately.