Methods for GPS to milepost mapping

• US 8,209,145 B2
• Filed: 06/30/2009
• Issued: 06/26/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 06/30/2004
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Loram Technologies Incorporated (Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Georgetown Rail Equipment Company (Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc.)
• Inventors: Pagliuco, David, Villar, Christopher M., Nagle, John Anthony II, Orrell, Steven C.
• Primary Examiner(s): COSIMANO, EDWARD R
• Application Number:
  US12/494,400
• Publication Number:
  US 20100007551A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,092 Days
• Field of Search: 332/27, 332/86, 332/87, 337/00, 337/72, 337/73, 731/46, 734/321, 738/658, 104/2, 104/7.1, 104/7.2, 250/306, 356/2, 356/3, 356/4.01, 356/237.1, 356/445, 356/600, 356/601, 356/602, 356/603, 356/604, 356/605, 356/606, 356/607, 382/100, 382/108, 701/300, 702/1, 702/33, 702/34, 702/35, 702/85, 702/127, 702/150, 702/152, 702/155, 702/158, 702/166, 702/187, 702/189, 702/36, 708/100, 708/105, 708/131, 708/160, 708/200, 708/290
• US Class Current: 702/158
• CPC Class Codes: B61K 9/08 Measuring installations for surveying permanent way applications of measuring apparatus or devices for track building purposes E01B35/00; measuring techniques G01
• CPC Class Codes: B61L 2205/04 Satellite based navigation systems, e.g. global positioning system [GPS]
• CPC Class Codes: B61L 23/045 Rail wear
• CPC Class Codes: G01C 3/08 Use of electric radiation detectors

Abstract

A method to increase the accuracy of the interpolation of railroad mileposts is disclosed. Based upon image data and data provided in customer track charts, reference points are selected along the track, and their location is verified using GPS data. Once verified, the locations of various points between the reference points are determined using mathematical interpolation.

Claims

1. A method for determining a location of features along a rail road track, the method comprising the steps of:

(a) determining at least two reference points, the reference points being features of the rail road track;

(b) verifying a GPS location of the reference points, the verification being accomplished by comparing imaging data of the reference points to satellite images of GPS signatures of the reference points;

(c) marking the location of the reference points;

(d) performing mathematical interpolation for at least one feature between the reference points; and

(e) determining the location of the feature between the reference points.

2. A method as defined in claim 1, wherein step (d) comprises the steps of:

determining a distance between two reference points in feet and miles;

determining a ratio of feet per mile using the distance between the two reference points; and

determining a milepost value for the feature between the two reference points.

3. A method as defined in claim 1, wherein the features are at least one of a crosstie or rail base.

4. A method as defined in claim 1, wherein the imaging data is received from a system for inspecting a rail road track, the system being mounted on a vehicle for movement along the rail road track.

5. A method as defined in claim 3, wherein an encoder is utilized to determine the distance between the two reference points in feet and miles.

6. A method as defined in claim 1, wherein a customer track chart is utilized to determine the reference points in step (a).

7. A method for determining a location of features along a rail road track, the method comprising the steps of:

(a) determining two reference points, the reference points being features of the rail road track;

(b) verifying a location of the reference points;

(c) performing mathematical interpolation for at least one feature between the reference points; and

(d) determining the location of the feature between the reference points.

8. A method as defined in claim 7, wherein a customer track chart is utilized to determine the reference points in step (a).

9. A method as defined in claim 7, wherein step (c) comprises the steps of:

determining a distance between the reference points in feet and miles;

determining a ratio of feet per mile using the distance between the reference points; and

determining a milepost value for the feature between the reference points.

10. A method as defined in claim 9, wherein an encoder is utilized to determine the distance between the two reference points in feet and miles.

11. A method as defined by claim 7, wherein the verification of step (b) is accomplished by comparing imaging data of the reference points to satellite images of GPS signatures of the reference points.

12. A method as defined in claim 11, wherein the imaging data is received from a system for inspecting a rail road track, the system being mounted on a vehicle for movement along the rail road track.