Unified web-based system for the delivery, scoring, and reporting of on-line and paper-based assessments

• US 8,213,856 B2
• Filed: 07/28/2008
• Issued: 07/03/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 07/02/2004
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Vantage Technologies Knowledge Assessment LLC
• Original Assignee: Vantage Technologies Knowledge Assessment LLC
• Inventors: McGinley, Michael P., Maguire, Brian C., Elliott, Scott M., Patrylak, Robert, Allen, George T. III
• Primary Examiner(s): Hu, Kang
• Application Number:
  US12/181,104
• Publication Number:
  US 20090186327A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,436 Days
• Field of Search: 434/322, 434/350, 434/353, 434/358, 434/363
• US Class Current: 434/353
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 3/00 Manually or mechanically operated teaching appliances working with questions and answers electrically-operated G09B7/00; e.g. G09B7/063 advertising or displaying in general G09F

Abstract

A hardware and software implemented, standardize testing, scoring and reporting system has a network interface, being either LAN or the Internet. A test is selected from a library, assigned to a group of examinees, and a record is made of the assignment. The test is available on-line, or downloaded, or both. Downloaded tests are saved as PDF files and printed into booklets. Examinees record answers on bubble sheets, which are scanned at the customer site or shipped to a processing plant. Individual scanned answer sheets provided data for individual scanned records. Scanning software performs an initial auto-correct and then performs an initial check for errors in scanned records. Tests are batched for later inspection. Scanned records with errors are classified as invalid and the test papers are separated. Prompts are generated for a human test paper inspection and scanned record editing. Accepted batches of scanned records are sent to a scanned records server where a second scanned records error check is performed. Prompts are sent to the appropriate scanning station for further human editing of invalid scanned records. Once all records are valid they are scored and the test results stored in a database, which is accessed by a reporting subsystem associated with an on-line server.

Claims

1. A method for processing an answer sheet associated with an individual at a computing workstation, the method comprising:

receiving the answer sheet, wherein the answer sheet comprises answer sheet fields;

parsing the received answer sheet into a record, wherein the record comprises record fields corresponding to the answer sheet fields of the received answer sheet;

determining whether at least one field in the record fields associated with the record includes a correctable human error; and

performing, via a processor, an auto-correct function using customer site information when the at least one field includes the correctable human error, wherein the auto-correct function corrects the correctable human error in the at least one field.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein performing the auto-correct function corrects human errors such as an incorrect teacher name, date, group, control level, assignment code, gender code, test number, or school miss-identification.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising performing a first error-checking function, wherein the first error-checking function determines whether at least one field in the record fields associated with the record contains invalid information.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the invalid information comprises at least one of an incorrect name, examinee information, identification, timing mark, and answer format.

5. The method of claim 3, further comprising rendering a spreadsheet comprising an indication that the record is invalid if, based on the first error-checking function, at least one field contains invalid information.

6. The method of claim 5, further comprising providing an interface that allows an editor to view the spreadsheet, view the indication that the record is invalid, and correct the at least one field that contains invalid information.

7. The method of claim 3, further comprising performing a second error-checking function, wherein the second error-checking function determines whether at least one field in the record fields associated with the record contains a transmission error.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the transmission error comprises at least one of an unknown user error or a code not found error.

9. The method of claim 7, further comprising rendering a spreadsheet comprising an indication that the record is invalid if, based on the first error-checking function and/or the second error-checking function, at least one field contains invalid information and/or the transmission error.

10. The method of claim 9, further comprising providing an interface that allows an editor to view the spreadsheet, view the indication that the record is invalid, and correct the at least one field that contains invalid information and/or the transmission error.

11. A system for reducing the time required to process an answer sheet associated with an individual, the system comprising:

a processor for executing computer-executable instructions, the computer-executable instructions comprising instructions for;

receiving the answer sheet, wherein the answer sheet comprises answer sheet fields;

parsing the received answer sheet into a record, wherein the record comprises record fields corresponding to the answer sheet fields of the received answer sheet;

determining whether at least one field in the record fields associated with the record contains a correctable human error; and

performing an auto-correct function using customer site information when the at least one field includes the correctable human error, wherein the auto-correct function corrects the correctable human error in the at least one field.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein performing the auto-correct function corrects human errors such as an incorrect teacher name, date, group, control level, assignment code, gender code, test number, or school miss-identification.

13. The method of claim 11, further comprising performing a first error-checking function, wherein the first error-checking function determines whether at least one field in the record fields associated with the record contains invalid information.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the invalid information comprises at least one of an incorrect name, examinee information, identification, timing mark, and answer format.

15. The method of claim 13, further comprising rendering a spreadsheet comprising an indication that the record is invalid if, based on the first error-checking function, at least one field contains invalid information.

16. The method of claim 15, further comprising providing an interface that allows an editor to view the spreadsheet, view the indication that the record is invalid, and correct the at least one field that contains invalid information.

17. The method of claim 13, further comprising performing a second error-checking function, wherein the second error-checking function determines whether at least one field in the record fields associated with the record contains a transmission error.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein the transmission error comprises at least one of an unknown user error or a code not found error.

19. The method of claim 17, further comprising rendering a spreadsheet comprising an indication that the record is invalid if, based on the first error-checking function and/or the second error-checking function, at least one field contains invalid information and/or the transmission error.

20. The method of claim 19, further comprising providing an interface that allows an editor to view the spreadsheet, view the indication that the record is invalid, and correct the at least one field that contains invalid information and/or the transmission error.