System and method for selecting an optimal authoritative name server

• US 8,214,524 B2
• Filed: 05/15/2008
• Issued: 07/03/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 12/21/2007
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Hostway Corporation (Hosting.com, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Hostway Corporation (Hosting.com, Inc.)
• Inventors: Kim, JooYong, Oh, YoungBae, Kim, DongHyun
• Primary Examiner(s): Chan, Wing
• Assistant Examiner(s): KATSIKIS, KOSTAS J
• Application Number:
  US12/121,518
• Publication Number:
  US 20090164661A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,510 Days
• Field of Search: 709/238, 709/245
• US Class Current: 709/238
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 61/30 Managing network names, e.g. use of aliases or nicknames name-to-address mapping H04L61/45
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 61/3015 Name registration, generation or assignment
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 61/4511 using domain name system [DNS]
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/1001 for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/1021 based on client or server locations
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/1036 Load balancing of requests to servers for services different from user content provisioning, e.g. load balancing across domain name servers

Abstract

A system and method for selecting an optimal authoritative name server includes global authoritative name servers and regional authoritative name servers. The local name server receives a request for target objects from a client. The local name server inquires one of the global authoritative name servers about an IP address of a requested domain. The selected global authoritative name server initially responds to the local name server. For subsequent requests, the selected global authoritative name server guides the local name server to inquire one of the regional authoritative name servers by providing a new authoritative name server list including a group of regional authoritative name servers designated to serve a network location of the local name server. The system and method for selecting the optimal authoritative name server may have practical applications in a content delivery network system.

Claims

1. A method for selecting an optimal authoritative name server, comprising:

receiving a resolution request for a selected domain name of a predetermined zone from a local name server initially at a global authoritative name server publicly registered to respond to the resolution request for the selected domain name of the predetermined zone;

evaluating the resolution request to determine at least a network location of the local name server;

generating at the global authoritative name server an authoritative name server guide at least based on the network location of the local name server, the authoritative name server guide identifying a candidate regional authoritative name server which is internally designated to serve the network location of the local name server and the predetermined zone, wherein the authoritative name server guide refers the local name server to the candidate regional authoritative name server as an authoritative name server for the resolution request for the selected domain name of the predetermined zone; and

returning at the global authoritative name server both an internet protocol (IP) address (A record) of the selected domain name and the authoritative name server guide to the local name server and guiding the local name server to communicate with the candidate regional authoritative name server for a subsequent resolution request for the selected domain name of the predetermined zone;

arranging multiple global authoritative name servers registered with a top-level domain name server to manage the predetermined zone; and

arranging regional authoritative name servers recognized in each of the multiple global authoritative name servers for managing designated network locations in the predetermined zone;

associating a web server with one or more of the regional authoritative name servers wherein the web server responds to a request for a web object; and

returning information of the associated web server to the local name server.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

arranging a plurality of global authoritative name servers at distributed network locations where each of the plurality of global authoritative name servers is assigned with a different IP address and a different domain name.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

collecting and evaluating information of the regional authoritative name servers at each of the multiple global authoritative name servers wherein the information comprises a server load, an active status, physical locations, network locations, or a combination thereof.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

arranging sub-regional authoritative name servers that are network-proximate to the network location of the local name server;

generating at one or more of the regional authoritative name servers a sub-regional authoritative name server list identifying a candidate sub-regional authoritative name server designated to serve the network location of the local name server; and

providing the sub-regional authoritative name server list to the local name server.

5. The method of claim 4, further comprising:

associating a web server with one or more of the sub-regional authoritative name servers wherein the web server responds to a request for a web object; and

returning an IP address of the associated web server to the local name server.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

arranging a plurality of global authoritative name servers at distributed locations where each of the plurality of global authoritative name servers is assigned with a single IP address.

7. A method for selecting an optimal authoritative name server, comprising:

receiving a first request of a domain name resolution request of a predetermined zone at one of global authoritative name servers publicly registered to respond to the domain name resolution request of the predetermined zone;

evaluating the domain name resolution request and locating regional authoritative name servers designated to respond to the domain name resolution request of the predetermined zone, wherein the regional authoritative name servers are registered with at least the one of global authoritative name servers;

generating an authoritative name server guide that identifies a selected group of the regional authoritative name servers, the authoritative name server guide referring to the regional authoritative name server as an authoritative name server for the domain name resolution request of the predetermined zone;

returning to a local name server both an IP address (A record) resolving the first request of the domain name resolution request and the authoritative name server guide; and

receiving a subsequent request of the domain name resolution request of the predetermined zone at one of the selected group of the regional authoritative name servers in accordance with the authoritative name server guide;

arranging multiple global authoritative name servers registered with a top-level domain name server to manage the predetermined zone; and

arranging regional authoritative name servers recognized in each of the multiple global authoritative name servers for managing designated network locations in the predetermined zone;

associating a web server with one or more of the regional authoritative name servers wherein the web server responds to a request for a web object; and

returning information of the associated web server to the local name server.

8. The method of claim 7, further comprising:

associating a plurality of web servers with one or more of the selected group of the regional authoritative name servers wherein the plurality of web servers responds to a web object request; and

returning IP addresses of the associated web servers to the local name server.

9. The method of claim 8, further comprising:

receiving a sub-domain name resolution request relevant to a sub-domain at one of the global authoritative name servers where the sub-domain comprises third-level or lower domains;

returning to the local name server IP addresses of a global sub-domain authoritative name server;

generating at the global sub-domain authoritative name server a sub-domain regional authoritative name server list identifying a candidate sub-domain regional authoritative name server designated to serve the network location of the local name server; and

providing the sub-domain regional authoritative name server list to the local name server.

10. An optimal authoritative server selection system, comprising:

a plurality of global authoritative name servers publicly known to serve a predetermined domain zone and communicating with a local name server; and

a plurality of regional authoritative name servers registered with the plurality of global authoritative name servers to serve multiple designated network locations of the predetermined domain zone, the plurality of regional authoritative name servers grouped into a first group and a second group;

wherein a global authoritative name server comprises;

an agent operable to generate and configure a regional authoritative name server list which identifies the first group and the second group of the regional authoritative name servers and refers the local name server to the regional authoritative name servers as an authoritative name server;

a database configured to store;

regional authoritative name server definition data including information of the first group and the second group; and

an A records database table that contains domain names and corresponding IP addresses;

wherein a selected global authoritative name server initially receives a first request of a domain name resolution request from the local name server and provides both an IP address (A record) from the A records database table resolving the first request of the domain name resolution request and the regional authoritative name server list to the local name server,

wherein one of the regional authoritative name servers identified in the regional authoritative name server list receives a subsequent request of the domain name resolution request from the local name server; and

wherein each of the plurality of global authoritative name servers is assigned with a different IP address and a different domain name.

11. The system of claim 10, wherein the selected global authoritative name server extracts a first IP address responsive to the first request of the domain name resolution request from the A records database table, and the agent retrieves the regional authoritative name server definition data from the database and generates the regional authoritative name server list.

12. The system of claim 10, wherein a selected regional authoritative name server comprises:

an regional agent operable to generate and configure a sub-regional authoritative name server list which identifies a group of sub-regional authoritative name servers; and

a regional database configured to store;

sub-regional authoritative name server definition data including information of a first group of sub-regional authoritative name servers and a second group of the sub-regional authoritative name servers; and

regional A records database table that contain the domain names and the corresponding IP addresses.

13. The system of claim 12, wherein the regional database further comprises:

associated web servers data including information of a web server associated with the selected regional authoritative name server.

14. The system of claim 10, wherein the predetermined domain zone covers a second level domain, or a sub-domain of the second level domain.

15. The system of claim 10, wherein the plurality of regional authoritative name server shares a single IP address which comprises an anycast IP address.

16. The system of claim 10, wherein the first group of the regional authoritative name servers shares a first single IP address and the second group of the regional authoritative name servers shares a second single IP address, wherein the first group uses a first autonomous system of a first upstream provider and the second group uses a second autonomous system of a second upstream provider.

17. The system of claim 10, wherein the regional authoritative name server definition data comprises optimal regional authoritative name server selection criteria definition data including network speed information to the regional authoritative name servers from the local name server, geographical distance information, a routing hop count, availability, network usage cost, or a combination thereof.

18. The system of claim 10, wherein a reply to the first request of the domain name resolution request comprises an authority section that contains the regional authoritative name server list.