System for policing junk e-mail messages

• US 8,219,627 B2
• Filed: 03/22/2010
• Issued: 07/10/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 07/15/1998
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Mind Fusion, LLC (Ascend Innovation Management, LLC)
• Original Assignee: Fortune Communications LLC (Intellectual Ventures LLC)
• Inventors: Pang, Stephen Y. F.
• Primary Examiner(s): NGUYEN, MINH CHAU
• Application Number:
  US12/729,186
• Publication Number:
  US 20100325728A1
• Time in Patent Office: 841 Days
• Field of Search: 709/206
• US Class Current: 709/206
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/107 Computer-aided management of electronic mailing [e-mailing]
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 51/212 using filtering or selective blocking

Abstract

A system for policing an unsolicited e-mail communication. The system has a plurality of clients, each coupled together using a wide area network of computers, such as the Internet or an interne. Each of the clients is adapted to send an indication of an unsolicited e-mail message through an e-mail device for a display. The system also has a policing server coupled to each of the plurality of clients through the wide area network of computers. The policing server is adapted to receive the indication from at least one of the clients. The e-mail device comprises a SPAM icon on the display. The SPAM icon is adapted to send the indication from the client to the policing server.

Claims

1. A memory device having instructions stored thereon that, in response to execution by a processing device, cause the processing device to perform operations comprising:

receiving an e-mail communication addressed to a recipient, wherein the e-mail communication is sent from an e-mail source;

comparing an identity of the e-mail source to a list of sources associated with sending unwanted e-mail communications;

identifying a previous request initiated by the recipient to remove the recipient from a distribution list of the e-mail source, wherein the previous request was transmitted to the e-mail source in response to receiving a first unwanted e-mail communication from the e-mail source; and

detecting the e-mail communication as a second unwanted e-mail communication associated with the e-mail source based, at least in part, on the identification of the previous request to remove the recipient from the distribution list.

2. The memory device of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise receiving a further request to remove the recipient from the distribution list, wherein the identity of the e-mail source is compared with the list of sources in response to receiving the further request.

3. The memory device of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise:

determining a number of violations associated with the e-mail source; and

reporting the e-mail source to be in violation of the further request to remove the recipient from the distribution list in response to determining that the number of violations exceeds a threshold number.

4. The memory device of claim 3, wherein the operations further comprise inhibiting a second e-mail communication associated with the e-mail source from being sent to a second recipient based, at least in part, on the determination that the number of violations exceeds the threshold number.

5. The memory device of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise:

receiving the first unwanted e-mail communication, wherein the first unwanted e-mail communication is addressed to the recipient; and

in response to receiving the first unwanted e-mail communication, transmitting the previous request to the e-mail source.

6. The memory device of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise:

transmitting the previous request to the e-mail source; and

storing the previous request in a database comprising other requests associated with the list of sources, wherein the identity of the e-mail source is compared to the list of sources based, at least in part, on a comparison of the previous request to the other requests stored in the database.

7. The memory device of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise inhibiting a second e-mail communication associated with the e-mail source from being sent to a second recipient based, at least in part, on the identification of the previous request.

8. A method, comprising:

receiving, with a processing device, an e-mail communication addressed to a recipient, wherein the e-mail communication is associated with an e-mail source;

comparing, with the processing device, an identity of the e-mail source to a list of sources associated with unwanted e-mail communications;

identifying, with the processing device, a previous request initiated by the recipient to remove the recipient from a distribution list of the e-mail source, wherein the previous request was transmitted to the e-mail source in response to receiving a first unwanted e-mail communication from the e-mail source; and

detecting, with the processing device, the e-mail communication as a second unwanted e-mail communication associated with the e-mail source based, at least in part, on the identification of the previous request to remove the recipient from the distribution list.

9. The method of claim 8, further comprising:

receiving, with the processing device, the first unwanted e-mail communication; and

in response to receiving the first unwanted e-mail communication, transmitting the previous request to the e-mail source.

10. The method of claim 8, further comprising:

receiving, with the processing device, the previous request to remove the recipient from the address list; and

in response to receiving the previous request, transmitting the previous request to the e-mail source.

11. The method of claim 8, further comprising inhibiting, with the processing device, the e-mail communication from being sent to the recipient based, at least in part, on the identification of the previous request to remove the recipient from the distribution list.

12. The method of claim 8, further comprising reporting, with the processing device, the e-mail source to be in violation of the previous request to remove the recipient from the address list.

13. The method of claim 8, further comprising receiving, with the processing device, a further request to remove the recipient from the distribution list, wherein the identity of the e-mail source is compared with the list of sources in response to receiving the further request.

14. The method of claim 8, further comprising:

receiving the previous request; and

in response to receiving the previous request, transmitting the previous request to the e-mail source.

15. The method of claim 8, further comprising:

generating the previous request; and

transmitting the previous request to the e-mail source.

16. A system, comprising:

a database configured to store a plurality of requests associated with a receipt of unwanted e-mail communications; and

a processing device configured to;

identify a first request initiated by one or more recipients, and transmitted to an e-mail source to remove the one or more recipients from a distribution list of the e-mail source, wherein the first request is associated with a first unwanted e-mail communication from the e-mail source;

store the first request in the database, wherein the first request identifies the e-mail source as being associated with the first unwanted e-mail communication;

identify a second request initiated by one or more recipients, and transmitted to the e-mail source to remove the one or more recipients from the distribution list of the e-mail source, wherein the second request is associated with a second unwanted e-mail communication from the e-mail source;

store the second request in the database, wherein the second request identifies the e-mail source as being associated with the second unwanted e-mail communication;

determine a number of violations associated with the e-mail source; and

report that the e-mail source is in violation of sending the unwanted e-mail communications in response to determining that the number of violations exceeds a threshold number.

17. The system of claim 16, wherein the processor is further configured to:

receive an e-mail communication associated with the e-mail source; and

delete the e-mail communication based, at least in part, on the determination that the number of violations exceeds the threshold number.

18. The system of claim 16, wherein the processor is further configured to:

receive an e-mail communication associated with the e-mail source; and

inhibit the e-mail communication from being transmitted to a recipient based, at least in part, on the determination that the number of violations exceeds the threshold number.

19. The system of claim 16, wherein the processor is further configured to:

receive the first request from a first recipient associated with the first unwanted e-mail communication; and

receive the second request from a second recipient associated with the second unwanted e-mail communication.

20. The system of claim 16, wherein the processor is further configured to:

receive the second request from a first recipient;

receive an e-mail communication addressed to a second recipient; and

inhibit the e-mail communication from being transmitted to the second recipient based, at least in part, on the determination that the number of violations exceeds the threshold number.