Application state aware mediating server

• US 8,244,855 B1
• Filed: 06/21/2006
• Issued: 08/14/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 06/21/2006
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Qurio Holdings Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Qurio Holdings Incorporated
• Inventors: Walsh, Richard J., Evans, James, Issa, Alfredo C.
• Primary Examiner(s): NICKERSON, JEFFREY L
• Application Number:
  US11/471,751
• Time in Patent Office: 2,246 Days
• Field of Search: 709/224, 709/223
• US Class Current: 709/224
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3006 where the computing system is distributed, e.g. networked systems, clusters, multiprocessor systems multiprogramming arrangements G06F9/46; allocation of resources G06F9/50
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3055 Monitoring arrangements for monitoring the status of the computing system or of the computing system component, e.g. monitoring if the computing system is on, off, available, not available error or fault processing without redundancy G06F11/0703; error detection or correction by redundancy in data representation G06F11/08; error detection or correction by redundancy in operation G06F11/14; error detection or correction by redundancy in hardware G06F11/16
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3096 wherein the means or processing minimize the use of computing system or of computing system component resources, e.g. non-intrusive monitoring which minimizes the probe effect: sniffing, intercepting, indirectly deriving the monitored data from other directly available data
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/028 by filtering
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/0227 Filtering policies mail message filtering H04L51/212
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/0281 Proxies
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/142 Managing session states for stateless protocols; Signalling session states; State transitions; Keeping-state mechanisms

Abstract

An application state aware mediating server or proxy. In general, the mediating server includes a packet inspection engine, a state inspector, and optionally a state classifier. The packet inspection engine examines packets passing through the mediating server to identify packets satisfying packet identification criteria of the state inspector. The identified packets are provided to the state inspector. Based on one or more of the identified packets, the state inspector determines an application state, or partial application state, for the application. Optionally, the state classifier may map the application state into one of a number of predefined state classifications.

Claims

1. A hardware mediating server comprising:

a) a communication interface;

b) memory; and

c) a control system associated with the communication interface and comprising;

i) a packet inspection engine adapted to;

inspect packets received by the mediating server to identify packets associated with a desired application based on at least one packet identification criterion;

forward at least one of the identified packets; and

ii) a state inspector adapted to;

receive the at least one of the identified packets;

determine an application state of the desired application based on the at least one of the identified packets;

for each of a plurality of clients associated with the mediating server, determine a capability of a client;

receive a query comprising a desired criterion and a desired application state from a requesting network node for ones of the plurality of clients having capabilities satisfying the desired criterion and having the desired application state;

identify the ones of the plurality of clients satisfying both the desired criterion and the desired application state; and

provide information identifying the ones of the plurality of clients to the requesting network node where the requesting network node establishes an initial communication session with one of the plurality of clients using the provided information, and

wherein the control system is further adapted to pre-fetch data from an associated server based on anticipating a future application state of the desired application based on the determined application state.

2. The hardware mediating server of claim 1 wherein the state inspector is further adapted to:

extract information relating to the application state from the at least one of the identified packets; and

determine the application state based on the extracted information.

3. The hardware mediating server of claim 1 wherein the control system further comprises a state classifier adapted to classify the application state as one of a plurality of predefined state classifications.

4. The hardware mediating server of claim 3 wherein the state classifier is further adapted to classify the application state based on a predefined ontology for the desired application.

5. The hardware mediating server of claim 1 wherein the control system further comprises a plurality of state classifiers each adapted to classify the desired application state as one of a corresponding plurality of predefined state classifications.

6. The hardware mediating server of claim 1 wherein the control system further comprises a plurality of state inspectors including the state inspector each associated with a corresponding one of a plurality of desired applications including the desired application, and the packet inspection engine is further adapted to inspect the packets received by the mediating server to identify packets for each of the plurality of state inspectors based on corresponding packet identification criteria.

7. The hardware mediating server of claim 6 wherein each one of the plurality of state inspectors is adapted to determine an application state of the corresponding one of the plurality of desired applications based on the at least one of the identified packets for the one of the plurality of state inspectors.

8. The hardware mediating server of claim 1 wherein the at least one packet identification criterion comprises a source Internet Protocol (IP) address.

9. The hardware mediating server of claim 1 wherein the at least one packet identification criterion comprises a destination Internet Protocol (IP) address.

10. The hardware mediating server of claim 1 wherein the at least one packet identification criterion comprises a port.

11. The hardware mediating server of claim 1 wherein the at least one packet identification criterion comprises a source Media Access Control (MAC) address.

12. The hardware mediating server of claim 1 wherein the at least one packet identification criterion comprises a destination Media Access Control (MAC) address.

13. The hardware mediating server of claim 1 wherein the control system is further adapted to pool outbound requests based on the application state.

14. The hardware mediating server of claim 1 wherein the control system is further adapted to cache data based on the application state.

15. The hardware mediating server of claim 1 wherein the control system is further adapted to:

classify the application state as one of a plurality of predefined state classifications; and

cache data based on the application state classification.

16. The hardware mediating server of claim 1 wherein a first communication device sends the packets to a second communication device and the control system is further adapted to provide the application state to a service.

17. The hardware mediating server of claim 16 wherein a third-party device may access the application state and communicate with the first communication device based on the application state.

18. A method executed on a processing device comprising:

receiving packets at the processing device;

inspecting, at the processing device, the packets to identify packets associated with a desired application based on at least one packet identification criterion;

determining, at the processing device, a status of the desired application based on at least one of the identified packets;

for each of a plurality of clients associated with the mediating server, determining, at the processing device, a capability of a client based on the identified packets;

receiving, at the processing device, a query comprising a desired criterion and a desired status from a requesting network node for ones of the plurality of clients having capabilities satisfying the desired criterion and having the desired status;

identifying, at the processing device, the ones of the plurality of clients having capabilities satisfying both the desired criterion and the desired status;

providing, at the processing device, information identifying the ones of the plurality of clients to the requesting network node, wherein the requesting network node establishes an initial communication session with one of the plurality of clients using the provided information; and

pre-fetching, at the processing device, data from an associated server based on anticipating a future application state of the desired application based on the application state, where the pre-fetched data is associated with the future application.

19. The method of claim 18 wherein determining the status of the desired application comprises:

extracting information relating to the status from the at least one of the identified packets; and

determining the status based on the extracted information.

20. The method of claim 18 wherein the at least one of the identified packets includes an application state identifier and determining the status comprises:

providing the application state identifier to an external node in a request for the status; and

receiving the application state identifier from the external node.

21. The method of claim 18 further comprising classifying the status as one of a plurality of predefined state classifications.

22. The method of claim 21 wherein classifying the status comprises classifying the status based on a predefined ontology for the desired application.