Variably manned aircraft

• US 8,255,098 B2
• Filed: 10/17/2007
• Issued: 08/28/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 10/17/2007
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: The Boeing Co.
• Original Assignee: The Boeing Co.
• Inventors: Whelan, David A., Wenberg, Lynne L., Jones, Richard D
• Primary Examiner(s): Algahaim, Helal A
• Application Number:
  US11/874,082
• Publication Number:
  US 20090105891A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,777 Days
• Field of Search: 701/1, 701/2, 701/11, 701 14- 16, 701/23, 701/24, 701/36, 701/200, 701/207, 701/213, 701/300, 701/301, 340/945, 340/947, 340/961, 340/963, 340/971, 244/3.15, 244/3.21, 244/75.1, 244/76.R, 244/175, 244/183, 244/189, 244/190, 244/194, 244/196
• US Class Current: 701/11
• CPC Class Codes: B64C 13/18 using automatic pilot
• CPC Class Codes: B64D 45/0031 means for overriding or restricting access to flight controls

Abstract

In accordance with an embodiment, a system includes a plurality of subsystems cooperatively configured to control an aircraft in accordance with a plurality of manning modes, the system configured to perform fully automated control of the aircraft while operating in any of the plurality of manning modes, wherein the plurality of manning modes include: two onboard operators; one onboard operator; and no onboard operator, wherein the system receives input from a remotely located operator by way of wireless signals.

Claims

1. A flight control system, comprising:

a plurality of subsystems cooperatively configured to;

monitor operations of an aircraft that is controlled by at least one onboard pilot, the monitored operations including at least one of health of the aircraft, activity of the at least one onboard pilot, and progress of a mission objective;

determine an event based on an anomaly of one of the monitored operations, the event to initiate a subsequent fully automated control of the aircraft;

receive an input from the at least one onboard pilot of the aircraft, the input in response to the event and used by the flight control system when implementing the subsequent fully automated control of the aircraft, wherein the input is a selection of one of a plurality landing sites for the aircraft; and

engage in control of the aircraft by performing fully automated control of the aircraft based at least in part on the input, the fully automated control to occur with an omission of additional inputs from the at least one onboard pilot.

2. The flight control system of claim 1, wherein the fully automated control of the aircraft includes:

fully automated landing, and

fully automated cruising flight.

3. The flight control system of claim 1, wherein the mission objective is completed by having the plurality of subsystems cooperatively land the aircraft at a predetermined destination.

4. The flight control system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of subsystems are further configured to:

calculate at least two contingency response controls in response to the anomaly of one of the monitored operations; and

provide the at least two contingency response controls to the at least one onboard pilot for selection as the input.

5. The flight control system of claim 4, wherein the at least two contingency responses include at least one of:

landing the aircraft at a location different than a predetermined destination, communicating the anomaly of one of the monitored operations to a remote entity by way of wireless signals, and

rerouting the aircraft along a flight path different than a predetermined flight path.

6. The flight control system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of subsystems includes at least one of an onboard operator interface, a collision sensing subsystem, an automated navigation subsystem, a communications subsystem, a path planning subsystem, an auto flight control subsystem, an upset recovery subsystem, a vehicle health management subsystem, a flight anomaly management subsystem, an auto landing subsystem, an auto taxi subsystem, an auto throttle subsystem, an auto takeoff subsystem, and an auto braking subsystem.

7. The flight control system of claim 6, wherein the onboard operator interface includes at least one of a wheel, a yoke, rudder pedals, a joystick, and a heads-up display.

8. A method, comprising:

monitoring flight control operations of an aircraft that is controlled by at least one onboard pilot;

switching control of the aircraft to fully automated control of the aircraft by a flight control system during one or more phases of travel when an anomaly is detected during the monitoring of the flight control operations;

providing, in response to the switching control, a list of selections for user input to the at least one onboard pilot; and

receiving an input from the list of selections from the at least one onboard pilot subsequent the occurrence of the anomaly, the input being used at least in part by the flight control system to execute the fully automated control of the aircraft.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the one or more phases of travel includes at least one of:

fully automated takeoff, fully automated landing, and fully automated cruising flight.

10. The method of claim 8, wherein the input is a selection of one of a plurality landing sites of the aircraft.

11. The method of claim 8, further comprising:

calculating at least two contingency responses to the anomaly; and

provide the at least two contingency responses to the at least one onboard pilot for selection as the input.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the at least two contingency responses include at least one of:

landing the aircraft at a location different than a predetermined destination, communicating the anomaly to a remote entity by way of wireless signals, and rerouting the aircraft along a flight path different than a predetermined flight path.