Method and system for validating differential computer system update

• US 8,255,361 B2
• Filed: 01/31/2003
• Issued: 08/28/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 01/31/2003
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Oracle America, Inc. (Oracle Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Oracle America, Inc. (Oracle Corporation)
• Inventors: Igouchkine, Vassili
• Primary Examiner(s): DANG, THANH HA T
• Application Number:
  US10/355,555
• Publication Number:
  US 20040153478A1
• Time in Patent Office: 3,497 Days
• Field of Search: 707/203, 707/204, 707/623, 707/624, 707/639, 707/644, 707/646
• US Class Current: 707/623
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/658 Incremental updates; Differential updates

Abstract

A method and system of validating a differential update to a computer system. One method includes comparing a list of files in a new computer system image with a list of files in a former computer system image to construct a manifest list of files comprising a subset of the new computer system images and the former computer system images. The method further includes associating information with the manifest list to facilitate determining whether a differential update comprising differences between the new computer system image and the former computer system image is valid. The method also includes comparing a list of files in a computer system to receive the differential update against the manifest list of files and using the associated information to determine if the differential update is valid for the computer system.

Claims

1. A method of updating a computer system, comprising:

comparing a list of files in a later master computer system image with a list of files in a prior master computer system image to construct a manifest list of files to be used in performing a differential system image update of a target computer system having the prior master computer system image installed thereon, wherein the later master computer system image represents a direct modification of the prior master computer system image, the manifest list of files defining modifications of the prior master computer system image necessary to arrive at the later master computer system image;

associating file state information with at least a portion of said manifest list of files corresponding to both said prior master computer system image and said later master computer system image; and

determining whether use of the manifest list of files to perform the differential system image update of the target computer system would be valid, wherein use of said manifest list of files is valid when said file state information associated with said portion of said manifest list of files concurs with file state information for corresponding files of said target computer system that is to receive said differential system update.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

comparing a list of files corresponding to said manifest list of files in the target computer system that is to receive said differential system image update against said manifest list and using said associated file state information to determine if said differential system image update is valid for said target computer system.

3. The method of claim 2, further comprising:

copying to said target computer system an archive of files that comprises a difference between said later master computer system image and said prior master computer system image if said differential system image update is determined to be valid.

4. The method of claim 3, further comprising constructing said archive.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein said comparing comprises:

adding a file name to said manifest list of files in response to determining that said file is in said later master computer system image and not in said prior master computer system image.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein said comparing comprises:

adding a file name to said manifest list of files in response to determining that said file is in both said later master computer system image and said prior master computer system image.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein said adding further comprises associating file state information with said file name in response to determining that said file is essentially identical in said prior master computer system image and said later master computer system image.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein said comparing comprises:

adding a file name to said manifest list of files in response to determining that said file is not in said later master computer system image but is in said prior master computer system image.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein said adding further comprises denoting that said file is not present in said later master computer system image.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein said prior master computer system image corresponds to an anticipated representation of a target computer system to be updated and said later master computer system image corresponds to an updated representation of a target computer system.

11. A method of validating a computer system update, comprising:

comparing a prior master computer system image to a later master computer system image to determine information related to differences between said prior master computer system image and said later master computer system image, wherein the later master computer system image represents a direct modification of the prior master computer system image, wherein the information related to differences defines modifications of the prior master computer system image necessary to arrive at the later master computer system image, and wherein said prior master computer system image corresponds to an anticipated representation of a target computer system to be updated and said later master computer system images corresponds to an updated representation of a target computer system; and

determining whether a differential system image update is valid for a target computer system based on files in said target computer system and said information related to differences between said prior master computer system image and said later master computer system, wherein said differential system image update comprises a difference between said later master computer system image and said prior master computer system image;

wherein said differential system image update is valid if file state information corresponding to said files in said target computer system correspond to file state information corresponding to files in said prior master computer system image.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein said determining further comprises determining, based on said information, that a modification to a file on said target computer system will not allow a valid differential system image update to said target computer system.

13. The method of claim 11, wherein said determining further comprises determining that said differential system image update is invalid due to deletion of a file on said target computer system, based on said information.

14. The method of claim 11, wherein said comparing comprises checking a flag to determine whether said differential system image update is valid if a file unexpectedly exists on said target computer system based on said information.

15. A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon instructions which, when executed on a general purpose processor, implement a method of validating a computer system update, said method comprising:

first comparing a list of files in a later master computer system image with a list of files in a prior master computer system image to construct a manifest list of files to be used in performing a differential system image update of a target computer system having the prior master computer system image installed thereon, wherein the later master computer system image represents a direct modification of the prior master computer system image, the manifest list of files defining modifications of the prior master computer system image necessary to arrive at the later master computer system image;

associating file state information with at least a portion of said manifest list of files occurring in both said prior master computer system image and said later master computer system image to facilitate determining whether use of the manifest list of files to perform the differential system image update of the target computer system would be valid; and

second comparing file state information for a list of files in the target computer system that is to receive said differential system image update against said file state information for said portion of said manifest list of files, wherein said differential system image update is valid for said target computer system when said file state information for said list of files in the target computer system concur with said file state information for said portion of said manifest list of files.

16. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15, wherein said method further comprises:

copying to said target computer system an archive of files that comprises a difference between said later master computer system image and said prior master computer system image if said differential system image update is determined to be valid.

17. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 16, wherein said method further comprises constructing said archive.

18. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15, wherein said second comparing of said method comprises determining that said differential system image update is invalid due to deletion of a file on said target computer system, based on said information.

19. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15, wherein said first comparing of said method comprises adding to said manifest list of files all files from said later master computer system image and files existing in said prior master computer system image but not said later master computer system image.

20. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15, wherein said associating of said method comprises assigning a state to a file in said manifest list of files if said file exists in both said later master computer system image and said prior master computer system image.

21. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15, wherein said second comparing of said method comprises checking a flag to determine whether said differential system image update is valid if a file exists on said target computer system but does not exist in said manifest list of files.

22. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15, wherein said associating of said method comprises determining, based on said information, that a modification to a file on said target computer system will not allow a valid differential system image update to said target computer system.

23. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15, wherein said associating of said method further comprises associating said file state information to said files based on whether a file has been deleted, modified, or added from said prior master computer system image to arrive at said later master computer system image.