Matching service entities with candidate resources

• US 8,260,763 B2
• Filed: 01/15/2010
• Issued: 09/04/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 01/15/2010
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP (Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Company)
• Original Assignee: Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. (HP Inc.)
• Inventors: Souto, Farlon de Alencar, Da Silva, Leonardo Fagundes, Esperandio, Filipe Gomes
• Primary Examiner(s): Radtke, Mark Andrew X
• Application Number:
  US12/688,007
• Publication Number:
  US 20110179041A1
• Time in Patent Office: 963 Days
• Field of Search: 707/602, 707/707
• US Class Current: 707/707
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/5011 the resources being hardware resources other than CPUs, Servers and Terminals

Abstract

A method comprises using a processor to list candidate resources that may be matched with a plurality of service entities. The method also comprises eliminating at least one possible match between the candidate resources and the plurality of service entities. The method further comprises, for each of the plurality of service entities, rating the candidate resources. The method still further comprises ranking the plurality of service entities. The method still further comprises matching each of the plurality of service entities with at least one of the candidate resources.

Claims

1. A method, comprising:

determining, by a processor, a list of candidate resources that may be matched with a plurality of service entities;

eliminating, by said processor, at least one possible match between said candidate resources and said plurality of service entities;

for each of the plurality of service entities, rating said candidate resources by said processor, giving lower ratings to candidate resources that are present in one or more lists of matches of one or more other service entities;

ranking, by said processor, the plurality of service entities; and

matching, by said processor, each of the plurality of service entities with at least one of said candidate resources, wherein a rank of a service entity is proportional to how many of said candidate resource can match with the service entity.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein using a processor to determine said candidate resources comprises using said processor to scour a network to which said processor is connected to determine said candidate resources.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein said elimination comprises comparing candidate resource attributes to service entity attributes.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein comparing candidate resource attributes to service entity attributes comprises using service entity attribute information selected from the group consisting of:

locations of said service entities;

interconnections between said service entities;

interconnections between said service entities and other hardware or software;

capabilities of said service entities; and

environmental factors associated with said service entities.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein rating said candidate resources for each of the plurality of service entities comprises giving higher ratings to candidate resources that consume fewer other resources.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein ranking said plurality of service entities comprises ranking as highest those service entities that correspond to the fewest candidate resources after said eliminating step.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein said matching comprises using at least one of said candidate resource ratings and at least one of said service entity rankings.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising removing allocated candidate resources from the one or more lists of the one or more service entities.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising eliminating one or more allocations if at least one of the one or more lists is empty.

10. A computer-readable storage medium comprising executable code, which, when executed, causes a processor to:

determine, for each of a plurality of entities, a list of possible resources with which said entity could be matched;

refine one or more of said lists so as to eliminate, for at least one of the plurality of entities, one or more possible resources;

for each of the plurality of entities, rate said possible resources according to predetermined criteria including a frequency of appearances in one or more lists of other entities;

rank said plurality of entities; and

associate at least one of the plurality of entities with at least one of said possible resources, wherein a rank of an entity is proportional to how many resources can be associated with the service entity.

11. The storage medium of claim 10, wherein, if any one of the plurality of entities fails to be associated with a possible resource, then, as a result, the processor eliminates the association between said at least one of the plurality of entities and the at least one of said possible resources.

12. The storage medium of claim 10, wherein the processor searches a network to which the processor couples to locate said possible resources.

13. The storage medium of claim 10, wherein, to refine the one or more of said lists, the processor compares entity attributes to resource attributes.

14. The storage medium of claim 13, wherein said entity attributes are selected from the group consisting of:

locations of the entities;

interconnections between said entities and other hardware or software;

interconnections between said entities;

capabilities of said entities; and

environmental factors associated with said entities.

15. The storage medium of claim 10, wherein said predetermined criteria includes a degree of consumption of other resources.

16. The storage medium of claim 10, wherein the processor ranks the plurality of entities in accordance with lengths of said lists.

17. A system, comprising:

a processor;

a display coupled to the processor; and

an input device coupled to the processor;

wherein the display and input device are usable to generate a service template, said service template describing service entity attributes associated with electronic service entities;

wherein the processor uses candidate resource attributes, rules and said service entity attributes to determine one or more lists of which of a plurality of electronic candidate resources can match with said electronic service entities;

wherein the processor rates said plurality of electronic candidate resources, ranks said electronic service entities, and uses said ratings and rankings to associate at least one of the plurality of electronic candidate resources with at least one of said electronic service entities;

wherein rating said candidate resources for each of the plurality of service entities comprises, for each of the plurality of service entities, giving lower ratings to candidate resources that are present in the one or more lists of one or more other service entities; and

wherein a ranking of an electronic service entity is proportional to how many of said electronic candidate resources can match with the electronic service entity.

18. The system of claim 17, wherein, to rate the electronic candidate resources, the processor determines and uses a degree of resource consumption for at least one of the electronic candidate resources.

19. The system of claim 17, wherein the plurality of electronic candidate resources are selected from the group consisting of computers, servers, storage, electronic communication infrastructure, networks, software and virtual machines.