Configurable impulse noise protection system and method based on impulse noise statistics

• US 8,261,149 B2
• Filed: 06/30/2011
• Issued: 09/04/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 01/03/2008
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Ikanos Communications Incorporated (Qualcomm, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Ikanos Communications Incorporated (Qualcomm, Inc.)
• Inventors: Pons, Julien D., Duvaut, Patrick, Sorbara, Massimo, Zheng, Yue-Peng
• Primary Examiner(s): ABRAHAM, ESAW T
• Application Number:
  US13/173,672
• Publication Number:
  US 20110264978A1
• Time in Patent Office: 432 Days
• Field of Search: 714/748, 714/751, 714/752, 714/776
• US Class Current: 714/748
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 1/0009 by adapting the channel coding H04L1/1812 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 1/0019 in which mode-switching is based on a statistical approach
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 1/0057 Block codes H04L1/0061, H04L1/0064 take precedence
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 1/0071 Use of interleaving interleaving per se H03M13/27
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 1/1812 Hybrid protocols; Hybrid automatic repeat request [HARQ]
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 1/1867 Arrangements specially adapted for the transmitter end
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 1/20 using signal quality detector
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 27/2601 Multicarrier modulation systems

Abstract

Impulse noise from nearby or intense electrical sources can disrupt communications over digital subscriber lines. There are many methods to deal with errors produced by impulse noise sources. Forward error correction (FEC) codes such as Reed Solomon coding along with scrambling and interleaving are used to correct small errors. However, for larger errors, retransmission is favored. Retransmission can be applied at the Discrete Multi-tone symbol level thus eliminating the need to insert sequence identification into data transmission units, furthermore retransmission can also be employed to exploit the error correcting capabilities of the FEC codes. Finally, an impulse noise protection system can exploit impulse noise statistics to configure the redundancy in the FEC codes and to enable the use of blanking. Exemplary embodiments of systems described can cooperatively use impulse noise statistics to utilize retransmission, FEC and blanking to mitigate the effects of impulse noise.

Claims

1. A method of communication comprising:

receiving from a transmitter a transmission packet encoded by a forward error correction (FEC) encoder having an error correction code (ECC);

determining whether the transmission packet is received in error; and

if the transmission packet is received in error, determining if the ECC can correct another transmission packet error; and

signaling a retransmission of the transmission packet to the transmitter, if the ECC cannot correct another transmission packet error.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

if the transmission packet is received in error, providing the transmission packet to an FEC decoder, if the ECC can correct another transmission packet error; and

if the transmission packet is not received in error providing the transmission packet to the FEC decoder.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein determining whether the transmission packet is received in error comprises:

receiving from an impulse noise monitoring/analysis module impulse noise information relating to the transmission packet; and

determining whether the transmission packet is corrupted based on the impulse noise information relating to said transmission packet.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the transmission packet is a Discrete Multi-tone (DMT) symbol.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

receiving impulse noise information from an impulse noise monitoring/analysis module;

determining whether there is a change in repetitive electrical impulse noise (REIN) sources based on the impulse noise information and whether the impulse noise information includes impulse length and inter-arrival-time (IAT) information; and

in response to determining there is a change, determining whether there is any detailed timing information in the impulse noise information for the change in REIN sources;

adjusting blanking timing information based on the detailed timing information and transmitting the blanking information to the transmitter, if detailed timing information is in the impulse noise information; and

determining a required ECC based on the change in REIN sources not accounted for by the blanking timing information, adjusting the FEC encoder and the FEC decoder if the ECC is different than the required ECC.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein, the FEC encoder is a Reed Solomon encoder and interleaver and the FEC decoder is a Reed Solomon decoder and de-interleaver, wherein the ECC is based on a Reed Solomon redundancy or an interleaving depth, and wherein adjusting the FEC encoder and the FEC decoder comprises:

changing the redundancy by initiating a seamless rate adjustment;

or

changing the interleaving depth by using an interleaving depth change message.

23. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining whether the packet is received in error based on the impulse noise statistics information and the determining if the ECC can correct another transmission packet error are performed by an impulse noise module configured to characterize impulse noise observed on a line.

7. A receiver comprising:

a forward error correction (FEC) decoder;

a processor; and

a program memory comprising instructions, said instructions causing the processor to;

receive from a transmitter a transmission packet encoded by a FEC encoder having an error correction code (ECC);

determine whether the transmission packet is received in error; and

if the transmission packet is received in error, determine if the ECC can correct another transmission packet error; and

signal a retransmission of the transmission packet to the transmitter, if the ECC cannot correct another transmission packet error.

8. The receiver of claim 7, wherein the instructions further cause the processor to:

if the transmission packet is received in error, provide the transmission packet to the FEC decoder, if the ECC can correct another transmission packet error; and

if the transmission packet is not received in error provide the transmission packet to the FEC decoder.

9. The receiver of claim 7, wherein the processor signals a retransmission by status information for each transmission packet, wherein the status information conveys a bad state if the transmission packet is corrupted and conveys a good state if the transmission packet is not corrupted.

10. The receiver of claim 7, wherein the instructions further cause the processor to:

receive a retransmission of a corrupt transmission packet; and

provide the retransmission to the FEC decoder, wherein the retransmission of the corrupt transmission packet is received a fixed time period after a retransmission request of a corrupt transmission packet is signaled.

11. The receiver of claim 7, wherein the processor determines whether the transmission packet is received in error by

receiving from an impulse noise monitoring/analysis module impulse noise information relating to the transmission packet;

and

determining whether the transmission packet is corrupted based on the impulse noise information relating to said transmission packet.

12. The receiver of claim 7, wherein the transmission packet is a Discrete Multi-tone (DMT) symbol.

13. The receiver of claim 7, wherein the instructions further cause the processor to ignore transmission packets during a blanking period.

14. The receiver of claim 7, wherein the instructions further cause the processor to:

receive impulse noise information from an impulse noise monitoring/analysis module;

determine whether there is a change in repetitive electrical impulse noise (REIN) sources based on the impulse noise information and whether the impulse noise information includes impulse length and inter-arrival-time (IAT) information; and

if there is a change,

determine whether there is any detailed timing information in the impulse noise information for the change in REIN sources;

adjust blanking timing information based on the detailed timing information and transmitting the blanking information to the transmitter, if detailed timing information is in the impulse noise information; and

determine a required ECC is based on the change in REIN sources not accounted for by the blanking timing information, adjusting the forward error correction encoder if the ECC is different than required ECC.

15. The receiver of claim 14, wherein determining the required ECC is further based on a margin to account for errors not caused by impulse noise.

16. The receiver of claim 15, wherein the ECC is adjusted to the margin.

17. The receiver of claim 14, wherein the FEC encoder is a Reed Solomon encoder and interleaver and the FEC decoder is a Reed Solomon decoder and de-interleaver, wherein the ECC is based on a Reed Solomon redundancy or an interleaving depth wherein adjusting the FEC encoder and the FEC decoder comprises:

changing the redundancy by initiating a seamless rate adjustment;

or

changing the interleaving depth by using an interleaving depth change message.

18. The receiver of claim 17, wherein the receiver comprises the impulse noise monitoring/analysis module.

24. The receiver of claim 7, wherein the processor further includes an impulse noise module configured to characterize impulse noise observed on a line, wherein the impulse noise module:

determines whether the packet is received in error based on the impulse noise statistics information; and

determines if the ECC can correct another transmission packet error.

19. A receiver comprising:

a forward error correction (FEC) decoder;

a processor; and

a program memory comprising instructions, said instructions causing the processor to;

receive a transmission packet encoded by a FEC encoder having an error correction code (ECC);

determine whether the transmission packet is received in error by receiving impulse noise information relating to the packet from an impulse noise monitoring and analysis module and determining whether the packet is corrupted based on the impulse noise information;

determine if the ECC can correct another transmission packet error when the transmission packet is received in error; and

signal a retransmission of the transmission packet to the transmitter when the ECC cannot correct another transmission packet error.

20. The receiver of claim 19, wherein the instructions further cause the processor to:

provide the transmission packet to the FEC decoder, if the ECC can correct another transmission packet error when the transmission packet is received in error; and

provide the transmission packet to the FEC decoder when the transmission packet is not received in error.

21. The receiver of claim 19, wherein the processor signals a retransmission by status information for each transmission packet, wherein the status information conveys a bad state when the transmission packet is corrupted and conveys a good state when the transmission packet is not corrupted.

22. The receiver of claim 19, wherein the instructions further cause the processor to:

receive a retransmission of a corrupt transmission packet; and

provide the retransmission to the FEC decoder, wherein the retransmission of the corrupt transmission packet is received a fixed time period after a retransmission request of a corrupt transmission packet is signaled.