Device for and a method of designing a sensor arrangement for a safe automated system, an automated system, a program element and a computer-readable medium

• US 8,326,784 B2
• Filed: 11/22/2006
• Issued: 12/04/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 11/22/2005
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Faculte Polytechnique De Mons, Multitel Asbl
• Original Assignee: Multitel Asbl
• Inventors: Massar, Marc, Bilenne, Olivier, Druet, Emmanuel, Meers, Francois
• Primary Examiner(s): Chaki, Kakali
• Assistant Examiner(s): Gonzales, Vincent
• Application Number:
  US12/094,518
• Publication Number:
  US 20090222776A1
• Time in Patent Office: 2,204 Days
• Field of Search: 706/45, 706/62
• US Class Current: 706/45
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 17/02 electric
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 9/02 electric
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 30/39 Circuit design at the physical level physical level design for reconfigurable circuits G06F30/347

Abstract

A device for designing a sensor arrangement for an automated system, the device comprising a first input unit for receiving a specification of a plurality of sensor measurements to be carried out by the sensor arrangement, a second input unit for receiving a specification of a confidence region together with an associated confidence level for each of the specified sensor measurements, a third input unit for receiving a specification of a target confidence level for the automated system, and a configuration unit for configuring the plurality of sensor measurements and for configuring the combination of the sensor measurements in a manner to guarantee the target confidence level for the automated system.

Claims

1. A system for designing a sensor arrangement for an automated system, the system comprising

a configuration unit having a processor;

a first input unit coupled to the configuration unit for receiving a specification of a plurality of sensor measurements to be carried out by the sensor arrangement;

wherein the sensor measurements are indicative of a measurement of a parameter sensed by one or a plurality of sensors of the sensor arrangement;

wherein the parameter is adapted for monitoring or controlling the automated system;

a second input unit coupled to the configuration unit for receiving a specification of a confidence region together with an associated confidence level for each of the specified sensor measurements;

wherein the confidence region is indicative of an interval for a plausible physical value of the parameter;

wherein the confidence level is indicative of a probability that the value of a sensed parameter detected by a respective sensor measurement deviates from a true value of the sensed parameter by less than a value indicated by the confidence region; and

a third input unit coupled to the configuration unit for receiving a specification of a target confidence level for the automated system;

wherein the target confidence level is indicative of a probability that the automated system fails; and

wherein the configuration unit for configuring the plurality of sensor measurements and for configuring the combination of the sensor measurements in a manner to guarantee the target confidence level for the automated system generates a representation of a sensor arrangement.

2. The system according to claim 1, wherein the first input unit is adapted for receiving a specification of the plurality of sensors each adapted to perform at least one of the sensor measurements.

3. The system according to claim 1, wherein the first input unit is adapted for receiving a specification of exactly one sensor adapted to perform the plurality of sensor measurements.

4. The system according to claim 1, wherein the first input unit is adapted for receiving a specification of a plurality of sensor measurements to be carried out to detect at least one sensed parameter indicative of an operation state or an operation parameter of the automated system.

5. The system according to claim 1, wherein the second input unit is adapted for receiving the specification of the confidence region together with a lower bound on the confidence level associated to the confidence region.

6. The system according to claim 1, wherein the configuration unit is adapted for configuring the plurality of sensor measurements based on an evaluation whether and/or to which degree the plurality of sensor measurements are dependent or independent from one another.

7. The system according to claim 1, wherein the configuration unit is adapted for determining, based on the confidence levels, a number of sensor measurements necessary to guarantee the target confidence level.

8. The system according to claim 1, wherein the configuration unit is adapted for determining a chronology, particularly a time sequence or an acquisition rate, of the sensor measurements to guarantee the target confidence level.

9. The system according to claim 1, wherein the configuration unit is adapted for adjusting at least one working point of at least one sensor adapted for carrying out at least one of the sensor measurements.

10. The system according to claim 1, wherein the configuration unit is adapted for adjusting a combination technique of combining the results of the plurality of sensor measurements to guarantee the target confidence level.

11. The system according to claim 10, wherein the combination technique is indicative of a way of combining the plurality of sensor measurements and/or the confidence levels comprising at least one of the group consisting of calculating a union, an intersection, a K-in combination, and a K-best combination.

12. The system according to claim 1, wherein the configuration unit is adapted for reconfiguring the plurality of sensor measurements when a determined configuration of the plurality of sensor measurements yields an obtained confidence level which guarantees a safety of the automated system better than the specified target confidence level, wherein the reconfiguration is performed to obtain one or a plurality of the group consisting of an improved accuracy, a simpler sensor arrangement, and an obtained confidence level which is closer to the specified target confidence level.

13. The system according to claim 1, wherein the second input unit is adapted for receiving the specification of a confidence interval as the confidence region in a one-dimensional scenario.

14. The system according to claim 1, adapted for designing the sensor arrangement to provide at least one of the group consisting of control information for controlling an operation of the automated system, regulation information for regulating an operation of the automated system, and monitoring information for monitoring an operation of the automated system.

15. The system according to claim 1, comprising a determining unit adapted for determining the confidence level and the confidence region for at least a part of the specified sensor measurements based on a respective preknown sensor characteristic and is adapted to supply the confidence level and the confidence region to the second input unit.

16. The system according to claim 1, adapted for designing a sensor arrangement for an automated system comprising at least one of the group consisting of an emergency shut-down system, a fire and gas system, a turbine control system, a gas burner management system, a crane automatic safe-load indicator system, a guard interlocking and emergency stopping system for machinery, a medical device, a dynamic positioning system, a fly-by-wire operation of aircraft flight control surfaces system, a railway signaling system, a variable speed motor drive system, an automobile indicator lights system, an anti-lock braking and engine-management system, a remote monitoring system, an operation or programming system for a network-enabled process plant, an anti-collision traffic system, a nuclear plant, a chemical factory, a train, and an aircraft.

17. A method of designing a sensor arrangement for an automated system, the method comprising

receiving a specification of a plurality of sensor measurements to be carried out by the sensor arrangement at a first input of a configuration unit;

wherein the sensor measurements are indicative of a measurement of a parameter sensed by one or a plurality of sensors of the sensor arrangement;

wherein the parameter is adapted for monitoring or controlling the automated system;

receiving a specification of a confidence region together with an associated confidence level for each of the specified sensor measurements at a second input of the configuration unit;

wherein the confidence region is indicative of an interval for a plausible physical value of the parameter;

wherein the confidence level is indicative of a probability that the value of a sensed parameter detected by a respective sensor measurement deviates from a true value of the sensed parameter by less than a value indicated by the confidence region;

receiving a specification of a target confidence level for the automated system at a third input of the configuration unit;

wherein the target confidence level is indicative of a probability that the automated system fails; and

using the configuration unit to configure the plurality of sensor measurements and for configuring the combination of the sensor measurements in a manner to guarantee the target confidence level for the automated system.

18. The method of claim 17, further comprising:

generating a representation of a sensor arrangement.