Systems and methods for facilitating the display and use of displayed objects in content creation environments

• US 8,327,288 B1
• Filed: 08/20/2009
• Issued: 12/04/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 08/20/2009
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Adobe Inc.
• Original Assignee: Adobe Systems Incorporated (Adobe Inc.)
• Inventors: Herrmann, Eric
• Primary Examiner(s): BAUTISTA, XIOMARA L
• Application Number:
  US12/544,446
• Time in Patent Office: 1,202 Days
• Field of Search: 715/764, 715/765, 715/781, 715/788, 715/800, 715/801
• US Class Current: 715/788
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/0481 based on specific properties of the displayed interaction object or a metaphor-based environment, e.g. interaction with desktop elements like windows or icons, or assisted by a cursor's changing behaviour or appearance
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/04886 by partitioning the display area of the touch-screen or the surface of the digitising tablet into independently controllable areas, e.g. virtual keyboards or menus
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/451 Execution arrangements for user interfaces

Abstract

Systems and methods are disclosed for facilitating the display and use of objects in content creation environments, for example, by ensuring minimum object size properties for objects that would otherwise appear small or invisible. Various methods evaluate how to display objects in a collection or arrangement of objects while addressing potential conflicts and paradoxes that might otherwise exist based on the how size properties of the objects are defined in relation to one another. Certain embodiments facilitate improved display of nested containers including those whose size properties are defined as size to content. Certain embodiments also facilitate the improved display of containers whose children'"'"'s size properties depend upon container size properties.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method comprising:

providing a development environment on a computing device, the development environment displaying objects to be included in content being developed, wherein the development environment determines whether to prop open size properties of the objects by;

determining whether an object property of an object is defined;

if the object property is not defined, determining whether the object contains one or more child objects;

if the object contains one or more child objects, determining whether the one or more child objects require the object property to be propped-open; and

if any child object requires the object property to be propped-open, setting the object property to a propped-open value.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

if none of the child objects requires the object property to be propped-open, setting the object property based at least in part on the one or more child objects.

3. The method of claim 2, further comprising, if the object property is defined, determining whether the property of the parent needs to be propped-open.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein determining whether the one or more child objects require the object property to be propped-open comprises:

for each child object, determining whether the child object has a property that depends upon the object property; and

if any of the child objects has a property that does not depend upon the object property, determining that the object property is not required to be propped-open.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein determining whether the child object has a property that depends upon the object property comprises:

determining whether the child object is a container, wherein if the child object is not a container, the child object does not have a property that depends upon the object property;

if the child object is a container, determining whether the property of the child object is undefined;

if the property of the child object is undefined, determining whether the child object has any constraints with respect to the object property, wherein, if the child object does have constraints, the property of the child object is dependant upon the object property, and if the child object does not have constraints, the property of the child object is not dependent upon the object property; and

if the property of the child object is defined, determining whether the property of the child object is defined as dependent upon the object property, wherein, if the property of the child object is defined as dependent upon the object property, the property of the child object is dependant upon the object property and, if the property of the child object is defined as dependent upon the object property, the property of the child object is not dependant upon the object property.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein a child will not require its parent to be propped-open if the child itself has a fixed size that does not depend upon the parent.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein determining whether the object property is defined comprises determining that the object property is defined because the object property is set to a value or is set to a percentage of a property of a parent.

8. The method of claim 1 further comprising determining whether the object property was previously propped-open and, if so, resetting the object property.

9. The method of claim 1 further comprising determining whether there is any other requirement to prop open the object property and, if there is any other requirement to prop open the object property, setting the object property to the propped-open value.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein the propped-open value is a preset minimum value.

11. The method of claim 1 wherein the propped-open value is determined based on object type of the object.

12. An apparatus comprising:

a computing device configured to execute via a processor instructions stored on a computer readable medium to provide a development environment displaying objects to be included in content being developed, wherein the development environment determines whether size properties of the objects need to be propped-open by;

determining whether an object property of an object is defined;

if the object property is not defined, determining whether the object contains one or more child objects;

if the object contains one or more child objects, determining whether the one or more child objects require the object property to be propped-open; and

if any child object requires the object property to be propped-open, setting the object property to a propped-open value.

13. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein, if none of the child objects requires the object property to be propped-open, the development environment sets the object property based at least in part on the one or more child objects.

14. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein the development environment determining whether the one or more child objects require the object property to be propped-open comprises:

for each child object, determining whether the child object has a property that depends upon the object property; and

if any of the child objects has a property that does not depend upon the object property, determining that the object property is not required to be propped-open.

15. The apparatus of claim 14 wherein the development environment determining whether the one or more child objects require the object property to be propped-open comprises:

for each child object, determining whether the child object has a property that depends upon the object property; and

if any of the child objects has a property that does not depend upon the object property, determining that the object property is not required to be propped-open.

16. The apparatus of claim 15 wherein the development environment determining whether the child object has a property that depends upon the object property comprises:

determining whether the child object is a container, wherein if the child object is not a container, the child object does not have a property that depends upon the object property;

if the child object is a container, determining whether the property of the child object is undefined;

if the property of the child object is undefined, determining whether the child object has any constraints with respect to the object property, wherein, if the child object does have constraints, the property of the child object is dependent upon the object property, and if the child object does not have constraints, the property of the child object is not dependant upon the object property; and

if the property of the child object is defined, determining whether the property of the child object is defined as dependent upon the object property, wherein, if the property of the child object is defined as dependent upon the object property, the property of the child object is dependant upon the object property and, if the property of the child object is defined as dependent upon the object property, the property of the child object is not dependant upon the object property.

17. A non-transitory computer-readable medium on which is encoded program code, the program code comprising:

program code for providing a development environment on a computing device, the development environment displaying objects to be included in content being developed, wherein the development environment determines whether size properties of the objects need to be propped-open by;

program code for determining whether an object property of an object is defined;

program code for, if the object property is not defined, determining whether the object contains one or more child objects;

program code for, if the object contains one or more child objects, determining whether the one or more child objects require the object property to be propped-open; and

program code for, if any child object requires the object property to be propped-open, setting the object property to a propped-open value.

18. The computer-readable medium of claim 17, the program code further comprising:

program code for, if none of the child objects requires the object property to be propped-open, setting the object property based at least in part on the one or more child objects.

19. The computer-readable medium of claim 17, wherein determining whether the one or more child objects require the object property to be propped-open, comprises:

for each child object, determining whether the child object has a property that depends upon the object property; and

if any of the child objects has a property that does not depend upon the object property, determining that the object property is not required to be propped-open.

20. The computer-readable medium of claim 19, wherein determining whether the child object has a property that depends upon the object property comprises:

determining whether the child object is a container, wherein if the child object is not a container, the child object does not have a property that depends upon the object property;

if the child object is a container, determining whether the property of the child object is undefined;

if the property of the child object is undefined, determining whether the child object has any constraints with respect to the object property, wherein, if the child object does have constraints, the property of the child object is dependant upon the object property, and if the child object does not have constraints, the property of the child object is not dependant upon the object property; and

if the property of the child object is defined, determining whether the property of the child object is defined as dependent upon the object property, wherein, if the property of the child object is defined as dependent upon the object property, the property of the child object is dependant upon the object property and, if the property of the child object is defined as dependent upon the object property, the property of the child object is not dependant upon the object property.