Fueling system vapor recovery and containment performance monitor and method of operation thereof

• US 8,327,689 B2
• Filed: 02/08/2010
• Issued: 12/11/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 11/30/1999
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Veeder-Root Co (Vontier Corp.)
• Original Assignee: Veeder-Root Co (Vontier Corp.)
• Inventors: Hart, Robert P.
• Primary Examiner(s): Williams, Hezron E
• Assistant Examiner(s): NGUYEN, HOANG T
• Application Number:
  US12/702,059
• Publication Number:
  US 20100139371A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,037 Days
• Field of Search: 73/40, 73/405.R, 141/6, 141/7, 141/8, 141/59
• US Class Current: 73/40
• CPC Class Codes: B67D 7/0486 Pumps driven in response to electric signals indicative of pressure, temperature or liquid flow
• CPC Class Codes: B67D 7/0496 Performance test devices therefor
• CPC Class Codes: F02M 25/0809 Judging failure of purge control system
• CPC Class Codes: F02M 25/0872 Details of the fuel vapour pipes or conduits
• CPC Class Codes: G01M 3/02 by using fluid or vacuum
• CPC Class Codes: G01M 3/26 by measuring rate of loss or gain of fluid, e.g. by pressure-responsive devices, by flow detectors

Abstract

A method and apparatus for monitoring and determining fuel vapor recovery performance is disclosed. The dispensing of liquid fuel into a tank by a conventional gas pump nozzle naturally displaces a mixture of air and fuel ullage vapor in the tank. These displaced vapors may be recovered at the dispensing point nozzle by a vapor recovery system. A properly functioning vapor recovery system recovers approximately one unit volume of vapor for every unit volume of dispensed liquid fuel. The ratio of recovered vapor to dispensed fuel is termed the A/L ratio, which should ideally be approximately equal to one (1). The A/L ratio, and thus the proper functioning of the vapor recovery system, may be determined by measuring liquid fuel flow and return vapor flow (using a vapor flow sensor) on a nozzle-by-nozzle basis. The disclosed methods and apparatus provide for the determination of A/L ratios for individual nozzles using a reduced number of vapor flow sensors. The disclosed methods and apparatus also provide for the determination of fuel dispensing system vapor containment integrity, and the differentiation of true vapor recovery failures as opposed to false failures resulting from the refueling of vehicles provided with onboard vapor recovery systems.

Claims

1. A method of monitoring vapor containment in a liquid fuel dispensing facility having a fuel storage system with a fuel tank that provides fuel for dispensing by at least one fuel dispensing unit, comprising the steps of:

measuring a pressure level in the fuel storage system using a pressure sensor operatively connected to the fuel storage system;

detecting if all of the at least one fuel dispensing units are idle, and if all of the at least one fuel dispensing units are idle,

monitoring the pressure level in the fuel storage system over a period of time to detect if the fuel storage system contains a leak;

determining a model to estimate a rate of change of pressure times ullage volume of the fuel storage tank in the fuel storage system for a given test pressure by;

calculating a plurality of pressure rate and ullage volume measurement pairs each comprising an average pressure rate in the fuel storage tank using the pressure sensor, and ullage volume of the fuel storage tank, for a plurality of intervals;

calculating pressure mid points from the measurement pairs; and

using the measurement pairs and pressure mid points with linear regression to create a model of the rate of change of pressure times ullage volume at selected test pressures,

wherein the monitoring of the pressure level in the fuel storage system is aborted at any time that any of the at least one fuel dispensing units are not idle before the period of time expires.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining if the fuel storage system is adequately tight by monitoring the decay of the pressure level over the period of time.

3. The method of claim 2, further comprising detecting if the decay of the pressure level over the period of time exceeds a threshold level.

4. The method of claim 3, further comprising indicating a fail condition if the decay of the pressure level over the period of time exceeds the threshold level.

5. The method of claim 3, further comprising indicating a pass condition if the decay of the pressure level over the period of time does not exceed the threshold level.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising measuring air flow from the fuel storage system using an air flow sensor coupled to the fuel storage system and detecting if the fuel storage system contains a leak based on measurements from the air flow sensor.

7. The method of claim 1 further comprising detecting if all of the at least one fuel dispensing units are idle by detecting a static level condition in liquid fuel levels of the fuel storage system.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

receiving start and stop events communicated to the at least one fuel dispensing unit; and

detecting if all of the at least one fuel dispensing units are idle based on the start and stop events.

9. The method of claim 8, further comprising receiving the start and stop events from a meter in the at least one fuel dispensing unit, a dispenser controller coupled to the at least one fuel dispensing unit, or a dispenser current loop wiring coupled to the at least one fuel dispensing unit to receive the start and stop events.

10. The method of claim 1, further comprising reporting the pressure level to a dispenser controller which is communicatively coupled to the at least one fuel dispensing unit.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising calculating a leak rate for a selected test pressure by dividing the rate of change of pressure times ullage volume from the model at the selected test pressure by the selected test pressure.

12. The method of claim 11, further comprising detecting if a leak exists in the fuel storage tank by determining if the leak rate is greater than a threshold leak rate.