Self-describing re-usable software components

• US 8,359,572 B2
• Filed: 01/08/2008
• Issued: 01/22/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 01/08/2008
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC (Microsoft Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Microsoft Corporation
• Inventors: Mital, Vijay, Poozhiyil, Suraj T., McCormack, Michael J., Lindhorst, Gregory S., Miller, Andrew Robert
• Primary Examiner(s): Wong, Don
• Assistant Examiner(s): Rivera, Anibal
• Application Number:
  US11/971,200
• Publication Number:
  US 20090178026A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,841 Days
• Field of Search: None
• US Class Current: 717/120
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/36 Software reuse

Abstract

Technologies are presented herein for self-describing re-usable software components. Metadata is generated and published with a re-usable software component that identifies the capabilities of the software component, identifies other software components that the re-usable software component may be integrated with, and identifies mechanisms for integrating the re-usable software component with other software components. The metadata can then be used to discover re-usable software components and to integrate the re-usable software components with other software components.

Claims

1. A method for re-using a software component, the method comprising:

publishing metadata for use in conjunction with a re-usable software component, the metadata

identifying one or more capabilities of the re-usable software component;

identifying one or more other software components with which the re-usable software component can be integrated; and

identifying one or more mechanisms for integrating the re-usable software component with the one or more other software components; and

integrating the re-usable software component and the one or more other software components based upon the metadata,

wherein the metadata identifying one or more mechanisms for integrating the re-usable software component with the one or more other software components comprises metadata identifying one or more transformations for integrating the re-usable software component with the one or more other software components.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the metadata further identifies whether the one or more mechanisms for integrating the re-usable software component with the one or more other software components are scoped to one or more of the capabilities.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the metadata further identifies whether the one or more capabilities of the re-usable software component are scoped to the one or more other software components with which the re-usable software component can be integrated.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

receiving additional metadata from a user for use in conjunction with the re-usable software component, the additional metadata indicating whether the one or more mechanisms for integrating the re-usable software component with the one or more other software components were useful for an actual integration between the re-usable software component and the one or more other software components.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

receiving additional metadata from a user for use in conjunction with the re-usable software component, the additional metadata identifying a popularity value for the re-usable software component.

6. A method for re-using a software component, the method comprising:

specifying capability metadata for a re-usable software component, the capability metadata defining one or more capabilities of the re-usable software component;

specifying affinity metadata for the re-usable software component, the affinity metadata identifying one or more data entities that the re-usable software component operates upon;

specifying derivation metadata for the re-usable software component, the derivation metadata indicating whether the one or more data entities specified by the affinity metadata may be inherited from another data entity;

specifying transformation metadata for the re-usable software component, the transformation metadata identifying one or more mechanisms for integrating the re-usable software component with one or more other software components; and

utilizing the capability metadata, the affinity metadata, the derivation metadata, and the transformation metadata to integrate the re-usable software component and the one or more other software components.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the derivation metadata indicates whether the one or more data entities is the equivalent or replacement for another externally described data entity.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the derivation metadata further indicates whether a union operation is to be performed upon the one or more data entities and an externally described data entity for one or more of the capabilities.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the transformation metadata specifies one or more transformations for performing the union operation.

10. The method of claim 6, wherein the derivation metadata further indicates whether a merge operation is to be performed on the one or more data entities and an externally described data entity for one or more of the capabilities.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the transformation metadata specifies one or more transformations for performing the merge operation.

12. The method of claim 6, further comprising providing a mechanism for a user of the re-usable software component to further specify the capability metadata, the affinity metadata, the derivation metadata, and the transformation metadata.

13. The method of claim 6, further comprising providing a mechanism for a user of the re-usable software component to specify additional metadata for use in conjunction with the re-usable software component, the additional metadata indicating whether the one or more mechanisms for integrating the re-usable software component with one or more other software components were useful for an actual integration between the re-usable software component and the one or more other software components.

14. The method of claim 6, further comprising providing a mechanism for a user of the re-usable software component to specify additional metadata for use in conjunction with the re-usable software component, the additional metadata identifying a popularity value for the re-usable software component.

15. A computer-readable medium not being a signal and having a data structure stored thereon, the data structure comprising:

a first data field storing capability metadata for a re-usable software component, the capability metadata defining one or more capabilities of the re-usable software component;

a second data field storing affinity metadata for the re-usable software component, the affinity metadata identifying one or more data entities that the re-usable software component operates upon;

a third data field storing derivation metadata for the re-usable software component, the derivation metadata indicating whether the one or more data entities specified by the affinity metadata may be inherited from another data entity; and

a fourth data field storing transformation metadata for the re-usable software component, the transformation metadata identifying one or more mechanisms for integrating the re-usable software component with one or more other software components.

16. The computer-readable medium of claim 15, further comprising a fifth data field storing re-user metadata for the re-usable software component, the re-user metadata supplied by a user of the re-usable software component.

17. The computer-readable medium of claim 16, wherein the transformation metadata comprises data identifying one or more transformations for integrating the re-usable software component and the one or more other software components.

18. The computer-readable medium of claim 17, wherein the derivation metadata further indicates whether a merge operation is to be performed on the one or more data entities and an externally described data entity for one or more of the capabilities.

19. The computer-readable medium of claim 17, wherein the derivation metadata further indicates whether a union operation is to be performed upon the one or more data entities and an externally described data entity for one or more of the capabilities.