System for controlling a physical task

• US 8,370,170 B2
• Filed: 12/02/2002
• Issued: 02/05/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 12/03/2001
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Jenny Legge
• Original Assignee: Jenny Legge
• Inventors: Legge, Jenny
• Primary Examiner(s): Lubin, Valerie
• Application Number:
  US10/497,366
• Publication Number:
  US 20050108087A1
• Time in Patent Office: 3,718 Days
• Field of Search: 600/300, 707/104.1, 705/38
• US Class Current: 705/2
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 2503/20 Workers
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/1116 Determining posture transitions
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/224 Measuring muscular strength
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 2024/0009 Computerised real time comparison with previous movements or motion sequences of the user
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 2024/0065 Evaluating the fitness, e.g. fitness level or fitness index
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 2024/0068 Comparison to target or threshold, previous performance or not real time comparison to other individuals
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 2225/30 Maintenance
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 24/0006 Computerised comparison for qualitative assessment of motion sequences or the course of a movement
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 24/0062 Monitoring athletic performances, e.g. for determining the work of a user on an exercise apparatus, the completed jogging or cycling distance
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 24/0075 Means for generating exercise programs or schemes, e.g. computerized virtual trainer, e.g. using expert databases
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 10/60 for patient-specific data, e.g. for electronic patient records
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 20/30 relating to physical therapies or activities, e.g. physiotherapy, acupressure or exercising

Abstract

A system for controlling physical activity for a person, including the steps of providing a task database having a plurality of task files which each have data relating to physical task requirements for a person and a plurality of frequency requirements which indicate a frequency for performing a physical task for the particular type of task of the task file, providing a personal data file for a person including data relating to allowable physical tasks and allowable frequency limits for the person when performing the physical task, comparing one personal data file having a selected persons allowable physical task and allowable frequency limits data with a task file having data relating to physical task requirements and frequency requirements of the task type of the task file and from the comparison outputting an indication of whether the selected person is able to safely perform one or more physical tasks in the task file.

Claims

1. A method of assessing suitability of any of a number of persons for performing any of a number of task types which each require performance of a plurality of physical tasks utilising a computing system, including the steps of:

the computing system providing a task-type database having a plurality of task files which each relate to a task type which comprises a number of specific, repeatable physical tasks, and which each have data relating to physical task requirements required of a person performing that task type, and a plurality of frequency requirements which indicate a required frequency of performance for performing at least one physical task required in performance of said task type to which the task file relates;

the computing system providing a personal data file for each of a number of persons, each personal data file including data relating to allowable physical tasks which can be performed with an acceptable degree of safety by the person to whom the personal data file relates and to allowable frequency limits for the person when performing the at least one physical task;

the computing system providing a first interface to allow a user to select a personal data file, which relates to a person whose suitability it is desired to assess;

utilising the computing system to compare a selected personal data file, having a selected person'"'"'s allowable physical tasks and allowable frequency limits data, with at least one task file having data relating to the physical task requirements and the frequency requirements of a corresponding task type; and

from the comparison, generating by the computing system a first number representing a suitable number of work postures and a second number representing an unsuitable number of work postures for each task type for the selected person; and

the computing system further providing a second interface concurrently displaying the first number and the second number for each task type for the selected person.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the step of utilising the computing system to compare comprises a further step of performing a plurality of comparison procedures including comparing each physical task requirement with each allowable physical task.

3. The method as claimed in claim 2 wherein the comparison compares each allowable frequency limit data for each physical task, as set out in the selected personal data file with the frequency requirement data of each physical task required for the task type in the task file.

4. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein each personal data file comprises a patient file having particulars about a patient.

5. The method as claimed in claim 4 including the step of providing a patient database having a plurality of patient files.

6. The method as claimed in claim 5 wherein each task file includes a plurality of required physical tasks and a plurality of frequency options which indicate the required frequency of performance for performing each required physical task, and each personal data file includes a plurality of allowable tasks and a plurality of frequency options which indicate an allowed frequency of performance of each allowable task, and at least some of the required tasks correspond exactly to at least some of the allowable tasks.

7. The method as claimed in claim 6 wherein each plurality of the frequency options includes options designated never, rarely, occasionally, frequently and continuously.

8. The method as claimed in claim 7 wherein a physical task analysis is displayed within a third interface in a table format with physical tasks arranged in rows and frequency options in columns.

9. The method as claimed in claim 8 wherein each physical task has the same possible frequency options.

10. The method as claimed in claim 9 wherein the physical tasks include tasks performed by different parts of a body.

11. The system as claimed in claim 9 wherein the physical tasks include different work postures.

12. The method as claimed in claim 9 wherein the physical tasks include different material handling options.

13. The method as claimed in claim 12 wherein each task file includes physical tasks and frequency options displayed with markings indicating frequency with which each physical task is required for the task type of that file.

14. The method as claimed in claim 13 wherein the different material handling options include different weights to be handled in different physical actions.

15. The method as claimed in claim 14 wherein the patient file includes a physical task analysis including a display of each allowable physical task versus frequency options for that task and an indication of any physical task which can be performed safely.

16. The method as claimed in claim 15 wherein the allowable physical tasks include allowable work posture and material handling tasks.

17. The method as claimed in claim 16 including the step of using a materials handling calculator for calculating a materials handling value for each material handling option performed at a particular frequency, the value being indicative of a required amount of physical activity for the material handling option.

18. The method as claimed in claim 2 wherein the comparison includes a comparison display having a list of tasks and a suitability indicator which indicates whether a patient is suitable for each task.

19. The method as claimed in claim 18 wherein the comparison display includes a work postures count value for each task type, the count value being indicative of usage of a pertinent work posture.

20. The method as claimed in claim 18 wherein the comparison display includes a materials handling count value for each task type which count value is indicative of a degree of usage of the material handling option.

22. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein at least one task type is a vocational job or an action which is part of the vocational job and the method includes assessing the suitability of the person to whom the selected personal data file relates for performance of the job or part thereof.

23. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein:

task files of the task-type database are created with at least some of the data relating to a corresponding task type'"'"'s physical task requirements, and at least some of the data relating to the corresponding task type'"'"'s frequency requirements, arranged in a predetermined format; and

personal data files are created with at least some of the data relating to a corresponding person'"'"'s allowable physical tasks and at least some of the data relating to the corresponding person'"'"'s allowable frequency limits data, arranged in a predetermined format;

wherein a format of at least some of the physical task requirements of the task files is the same as a format of data relating to corresponding allowable physical tasks of the personal files, in order to facilitate the comparison.

24. The method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

creating at least some of the task files of the task-type database by entry of data relating to said physical task requirements and of data relating to said frequency requirements, of the task type for a corresponding task file, into at least one task-type data entry form which provides predetermined fields for entry of said task type data in a predetermined format; and

creating at least some of the personal data files by entry of data relating to a corresponding person'"'"'s allowable physical tasks and allowable frequency limits data, into at least one personal data entry form which provides predetermined fields for entry of said personal data in a predetermined format;

wherein the predetermined fields of the task type data entry form for at least some of the physical task requirements of the task files correspond directly to the predetermined fields of the personal data entry form relating to allowable physical tasks of the personal files.

25. The method as claimed in claim 24, wherein the predetermined fields of the task type data entry form for the frequency requirements of at least some of the physical task requirements of the task files correspond directly to the predetermined fields of the personal data entry form relating to allowable frequency limits of corresponding allowable physical tasks of the personal files, in order to facilitate the comparison.

21. A computer readable medium including computer program code, which when executed on a computing system, causes the computing system to assess suitability of any of a number of persons for any of a number of task types which each require performance of a plurality of physical tasks, the assessment comprising the steps of:

the computing system providing a task-type database having a plurality of task files which each relate to a task type which comprises a number of specific, repeatable physical tasks, and which each have data relating to physical task requirements required of a person performing that task type and a plurality of frequency requirements which indicate a frequency for performing at least one of the physical tasks required in performance of said task type;

the computing system providing a personal data file for a selected person including data relating to allowable physical tasks and allowable frequency limits for the selected person when performing each task type;

the computing system arranged to operate a comparison operation for comparing a file having a selected person'"'"'s allowable physical tasks and allowable frequency limits data with a task file having data relating to the physical task requirements and the frequency requirements of each task type;

the computing system arranged to generate, from the comparison operation, a first number representing a suitable number of work postures and a second number representing an unsuitable number of work postures for each task type for the selected person; and

the computing system arranged to provide an interface concurrently displaying the first number and the second number for each task type for the selected person.