Audio device utilizing a defect detection method on a microphone array

• US 8,379,876 B2
• Filed: 05/27/2008
• Issued: 02/19/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 05/27/2008
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Fortemedia, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Fortemedia, Inc.
• Inventors: Zhang, Ming
• Primary Examiner(s): Weiss, Howard
• Application Number:
  US12/127,087
• Publication Number:
  US 20090296946A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,729 Days
• Field of Search: 381/58, 381/92
• US Class Current: 381/92
• CPC Class Codes: H04R 29/005 Microphone arrays

Abstract

An audio device is provided, employing a defect detection method to detect defectiveness within a microphone array. The microphone array comprising a first microphone and a second microphone, respectively, generates a first audio signal and a second audio signal from ambient audio signals. An error detector is provided to detect functions of the first and second microphones based on the first and second audio signals to generate a status signal. A digital signal processor (DSP) processes the first and second audio signals based on the status signal. If the status signal indicates that only the first microphone or the second microphone is defective, the DSP switches to a single microphone mode in which only the remaining normal microphone is enabled. If the status signal indicates that both the first and second microphones are defective, the DSP generates an error indication signal and stops processing the first and second audio signals.

Claims

1. An audio device, comprising:

a microphone array for receiving ambient audio signals, comprising at least a first microphone and a second microphone, wherein the first and second microphones respectively generate a first audio signal and a second audio signal from the ambient signals;

an error detector, coupled to the first and second microphones, detecting functions of the first and second microphones based on the first and second audio signals to generate a status signal;

a digital signal processor (DSP), coupled to the first microphone, second microphone and the error detector, processing the first and second audio signals based on the status signal, wherein,

if the status signal indicates that both the first microphone and the second microphone are normal, the DSP switches to a normal mode in which both the first and second audio signals are processed, and

if the status signal indicates that only the first microphone or the second microphone is defective, the DSP switches to a single microphone mode in which only audio signals from the remaining normal microphone is processed, and

if the status signal indicates that both the first and second microphones are defective, the DSP generates an error indication signal and stops processing the first and second audio signals;

wherein the error detector comprises;

a first activity detector, comparing the first audio signal with a local activity threshold to generate a first activity flag for indicating voice activity of the first audio signal;

a second activity detector, comparing the second audio signal with the local activity threshold to generate a second activity flag for indicating voice activity of the second audio signal;

a power difference detector, comparing the first and second audio signals to generate a power difference flag for indicating whether the differences between the first and second audio signals exceed a predetermined ratio; and

a correlation detector, determining correlation of the first and second audio signals to generate a correlation flag for indicating whether the first and second audio signals are correlated.

2. The audio device as claimed in claim 1, wherein the error detector further comprises:

a statistic unit, coupled to the first activity detector, second activity detector, power difference detector and correlation detector to gather statistics on the first activity flag, second activity flag, power difference flag and correlation flag over a predetermined time period to generate corresponding statistical results; and

a decision unit, coupled to the statistic unit to generate the status signal based on the statistical results.

3. The audio device as claimed in claim 2, wherein:

if the first audio signal exceeds the local activity threshold, the first activity detector sets the first activity flag to a positive value, otherwise to a zero value;

the statistic unit averages a plurality of first activity flags observed within a time period, and if an average of the first activity flags exceeds a first threshold, the statistic unit generates a first error flag of a positive value, otherwise of a zero value; and

the statistic unit averages a plurality of first error flags observed within the predetermined time period, and if an average of the first error flags exceeds a first failure threshold, the statistic unit generates a first failure flag of a positive value, otherwise of a zero value.

4. The audio device as claimed in claim 3, wherein:

if the second audio signal exceeds the a end activity threshold, the second activity detector sets the second activity flag to a positive value, otherwise to a zero value;

the statistic unit averages a plurality of second activity flags observed within a time period, and if an average of the second activity flags exceeds a second threshold, the statistic unit generates a second error flag of a positive value, otherwise of a zero value;

the statistic unit averages a plurality of second error flags observed within the predetermined time period, and if an average of the second error flags exceeds a second failure threshold, the statistic unit generates a second failure flag of a positive value, otherwise of a zero value.

5. The audio device as claimed in claim 4, wherein:

if the first audio signal exceeds the second audio signal multiplied by the predetermined ratio, or the second audio signal exceeds the first audio signal multiplied by the determined ratio, the power difference detector sets the power difference flag to a zero value, otherwise a positive value; and

the statistic unit averages a plurality of power difference flags observed within the predetermined time period, and if an average of the power difference flags exceeds a difference threshold, the statistic unit generates a third error flag of a positive value, otherwise of a zero value.

6. The audio device as claimed in claim 5, wherein:

if correlation between the first and second audio signals exceeds a correlation threshold, the correlation detector sets the correlation flag to a positive value, otherwise to a zero value; and

the statistic unit averages a plurality of correlation flags observed within the predetermined time period, and if an average of the correlation flags exceeds a correlation criterion, the statistic unit generates a fourth error flag of a positive value, otherwise of a zero value.

7. The audio device as claimed in claim 6, wherein the error detector is enabled only when the first and second microphones are not muted, and is disabled when the first and second microphones are muted.

8. The audio device as claimed in claim 7, wherein:

if the first error flag, second error flag, third error flag and fourth error flag are positive, the decision unit sets the status signal to a first value, to indicate that both the first and second microphones are good;

if the first error flag, third error flag and fourth error flag are zero while the second error flag is positive, the decision unit sets the status signal to a second value, to indicate that the first microphone is defective; and

if the second error flag, third error flag and fourth error flag are zero while the first error flag is positive, the decision unit sets the status signal to a third value, to indicate that the second microphone is defective.

9. The audio device as claimed in claim 8, wherein:

the audio device receives a line in signal while in a communication mode, and

the error detector further comprises a far end activity detector, comparing the line in signal with a far end activity threshold to generate a far end activity flag for indicating voice activity of the line in signal.

10. The audio device as claimed in claim 9, wherein:

if the line in signal exceeds the far end activity threshold, the far end activity detector sets the far end activity flag to a positive value, otherwise to a zero value; and

the statistic unit averages a plurality of far end activity flags observed within the predetermined time period, and if an average of the far end activity flag exceeds a far end activity criterion, the statistic unit generates a fifth error flag of a positive value, otherwise of a zero value.

11. The audio device as claimed in claim 10, wherein if the audio device is in the communication mode, and the first error flag, second error flag, first failure flag, second failure flag and fifth error flag are all zero, the decision unit sets the status signal to a fourth value, to indicate that both the first and second microphones are defective.

12. The audio device as claimed in claim 1, further comprising:

a first ADC, coupled to the first microphone, digitizing the first audio signal before the error detector and the DSP processes the first audio signal; and

a second ADC, coupled to the second microphone, digitizing the second audio signal before the error detector and the DSP processes the second audio signal.

13. The audio device as claimed in claim 1, wherein the microphone array can be easily extended to a device with more than two microphones.