Fall detection system

• US 8,408,041 B2
• Filed: 04/15/2008
• Issued: 04/02/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 04/19/2007
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Koninklijke Philips N.V.
• Original Assignee: Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. (Koninklijke Philips N.V.)
• Inventors: Ten Kate, Warner, Flinsenberg, Ingrid Christina Maria, Chen, Ningjiang, Kim, Sheng, Schlumbohm, Stephan, Schonenberg, Rudie Bernardus Maria
• Primary Examiner(s): Caputo, Lisa
• Assistant Examiner(s): HERNANDEZ-PREWIT, ROGER
• Application Number:
  US12/596,449
• Publication Number:
  US 20100121226A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,813 Days
• Field of Search: 73/120.1, 73/120.4, 73/120.6, 701/141, 701/150, 701/151, 600/595
• US Class Current: 73/12.06
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 2562/0219 Inertial sensors, e.g. accelerometers, gyroscopes, tilt switches
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/1117 Fall detection
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 21/0446 worn on the body to detect changes of posture, e.g. a fall, inclination, acceleration, gait

Abstract

The invention relates to a fall detection system, for detecting human fall incidents. The detection system comprises a sensor module to be worn by a user, for collecting motion data of his body, for instance acceleration data; first evaluation logic for identifying a potential fall incident on the basis of an impact observed in the acceleration data; and second evaluation logic for verifying that the sensor module is actually worn by the user, at least around the time of said impact, to prevent the system from raising an alarm if only the sensor module has fallen. The second evaluation logic may comprise free fall detection means for evaluating the acceleration data on characteristics which are typical for a free falling object, such as one or more full rotation and/or a free falling phase, during which the magnitude of the acceleration data is relatively stable and small. Additionally or alternatively the second evaluation logic may comprise body proximity detection means for detecting whether the sensor module is in close proximity to the human body.

Claims

1. A fall detection system, comprising:

a sensor module to be worn by a user in an arbitrary orientation, for collecting motion data based on the user'"'"'s motion;

first evaluation logic for identifying a potential fall incident on a basis of an impact observed in said motion data;

second evaluation logic for verifying that the sensor module is actually worn by the user, at least around the time of said impact, the second evaluation logic comprising;

free fall detection logic for evaluating the motion data on characteristics which are typical for a free falling object and arranged to derive whether the potential fall incident corresponds to a fall of the user or a fall of the sensor module independent of the user.

2. The fall detection system according to claim 1, wherein the free fall detection logic is arranged to identify the absence or presence of a free fall phase, wherein during a predetermined time interval preceding the impact, a magnitude of acceleration data is substantially stable and smaller than a preset threshold value.

3. The fall detection system according to claim 2, wherein the preset threshold value is selected as a fraction of the magnitude of the acceleration at the onset of the potential fall incident.

4. The fall detection system according to claim 1, wherein the free fall detection logic is arranged to identify an absence or presence of at least one full rotation.

5. The fall detection system according to claim 1, wherein the free fall detection logic is arranged to identify an absence or presence of at least one full rotation on a basis of linear acceleration data.

6. The fall detection system according to claim 1, wherein the free fall detection logic comprises an angular sensor, for measuring angular motions, in particular angular accelerations.

7. The fall detection system according to claim 1, wherein the second evaluation logic farther comprises body proximity detection logic for detecting whether the sensor module is in close proximity to the user'"'"'s body.

8. The fall detection system according to claim 7, wherein the body proximity detection logic comprises at least a sender unit and a receiver unit, one being securely attached to the user'"'"'s body, the other being accommodated in the sensor module, wherein said sender unit and receiver unit only communicate with each other when at a mutual distance which corresponds to or is less than approximately half the user'"'"'s height.

9. The fail detection system according to claim 7, wherein the body proximity detection logic comprises a sender unit and a receiver unit, which are arranged to communicate to each other through body-coupled communication, wherein the user'"'"'s body is used for data transmission.

10. The fall detection system according to claim 1, arranged to detect relative changes in orientation of the sensor module.

11. The fall detection system according to claim 10, wherein at least one of the first or second evaluation logics comprises an averaging circuit, for averaging acceleration data obtained from the sensor module, a memory for storing the averaged acceleration data from the averaging circuit, and a comparator for comparing a current direction of the averaged acceleration data with an earlier, stored direction of the averaged acceleration data.

12. The fall detection system according to claim 11, wherein the averaging circuit comprises a low-pass filter, an integrator and/or autocorrelation computation logic.

13. The fall detection system according to claim 12, wherein a time interval over which the averaging circuit averages the acceleration data is adjustable, in accordance with whether or not a potential fall incident has been detected.

14. The fall detection system according to claim 13, wherein the tune interval is adjusted to be relatively long, as long as no potential fall incident has been detected.

15. The fall detection system according to claim 12, wherein the comparator computes a vector product of the current and earlier averaged acceleration data, and computes whether a magnitude of said vector product exceeds a predetermined threshold value.

16. The fall detection system according to claim 7, wherein the body proximity detection logic comprises an electrical field sensor, arranged to measure a distortion of an electrical field, when in close proximity to a user'"'"'s body.

17. A fall detection system, comprising:

a sensor module configured to be worn by a user for collecting motion data based on motion of the user; and

an evaluation unit, including logic to;

identify the sensor module falling on a basis of said motion data,

differentiate between the user falling while wearing the sensor module and the sensor module falling independent of the user in a free fall based on the motion data, and

generate an alarm in response to the sensor module falling while being worn by the user and generate no alarm in response to the sensor module free falling.

18. The fall detection system according to claim 17, wherein the differentiation between the user failing while wearing the sensor module and the sensor module failing in a free is based upon a full rotation of the sensor module while falling.

19. A fall detection system, comprising:

a sensor module to be worn by a user for collecting motion data based on the user'"'"'s motion;

evaluation logic identifying a potential fall incident on a basis of an impact observed in said motion data, verifying that the sensor module is currently worn by the user, at least around the time of said impact, and deriving whether the potential fall incident corresponds to a fall of the user or a fall of the sensor module independent of the user, the evaluation logic further including;

an averaging circuit which averages acceleration data obtained from the sensor module over a time interval, the time interval being decreased in response to at least one of detecting a potential fall incident and a change in an orientation of the sensor module.

20. The fall detection system according to claim 19, wherein the sensor module is to be worn by the user at an arbitrary orientation, the evaluation logic further configured to:

estimate an initial relative orientation of the user; and

increase or decrease the time interval over which the averaging circuit averages the acceleration data m response to a strength of a change in the relative orientation of the sensor module.

21. The fall detection system according to claim 20, wherein the time interval is increased in response to a relatively long duration without detecting a potential fall incident, and decreased in response to detecting a potential fall incident.