System and method for non-programmers to dynamically manage multiple sets of XML document data

• US 8,443,012 B2
• Filed: 06/03/2011
• Issued: 05/14/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 10/15/2001
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Intellectual Ventures I LLC (Intellectual Ventures LLC)
• Original Assignee: Yardley Benham And Rasch LLC (Intellectual Ventures LLC)
• Inventors: VanderDrift, Richard William
• Primary Examiner(s): Wu, Yicun
• Application Number:
  US13/152,810
• Publication Number:
  US 20110231751A1
• Time in Patent Office: 711 Days
• Field of Search: 707/702, 707/705, 707/713, 707/741, 707/759, 707/793, 707/781, 715/234
• US Class Current: 707/805
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/258 Data format conversion from or to a database
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/289 Object oriented databases
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/86 Mapping to a database
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/88 Mark-up to mark-up conversion conversion for visualization in web browsing G06F16/9577
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 40/103 Formatting, i.e. changing of presentation of documents automatic justification G06F40/189; automatic line break hyphenation G06F40/191
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 40/154 Tree transformation for tree-structured or markup documents, e.g. XSLT, XSL-FO or stylesheets
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 707/99931 Database or file accessing
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 707/99942 Manipulating data structure, e.g. compression, compaction, compilation
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 707/99943 Generating database or data structure, e.g. via user interface
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 707/99944 Object-oriented database structure
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 707/99945 Object-oriented database structure processing

Abstract

A system and method for dynamically retrieving, manipulating, updating, creating, and displaying data from sources of Extensible Markup Language (XML) documents. The program memory comprises system-user entered data definitions and business rules. The system imports XML document data into the system data definitions, processes the data using the business rules definitions and exports XML documents. The system can automatically create XML document formats from its data definitions and can automatically create its data definitions from XML document formats. The system-user can also define the mapping between XML document formats and the system data definitions. The system data definition is the combination of a Relational data model, an Object data model, and an XML data model.

Claims

1. A method for dynamically manipulating data from disparate sources of data including documents in an Extensible Markup Language (XML) format, documents in a primary record type (PRT) format, and documents in a management record type (MRT) format, wherein a management record type comprises a grouping of primary record types, the method comprising:

receiving a document in the XML format;

defining, in response to receiving the document, a first set of relationship rules mapping the XML format of the document to the PRT format of the document using at least a portion of a set of data definitions;

defining, in response to receiving the document, a second set of relationship rules mapping the XML format of the document and the MRT format of the document using at least a portion of the set of data definitions;

receiving an indication of a manipulation of the document in one of the XML format of the document, the MRT format of the document, or the PRT format of the document; and

modifying the document in accordance with the manipulation of the document;

wherein the modified document is available for inspection in each of the XML format of the document, the MRT format of the document, or the PRT format of the document.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of the first and second set of relationship rules includes a hierarchical structure of records.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the records are based on relationships between a set of format components in the XML format of the document.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of the first and second set of relationship rules includes at least one set from the group consisting of a set of business rules, a set of communication rules, and a set of document transaction rules.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of the first and second set of relationship rules comprises a relational database definition.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein at least one of the first and second set of relationship rules is not in a relational database structure.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

defining a dynamic document in response to defining at least one of the first and second set of relationship rules.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the dynamic document comprises an indication of a technique for generating a new document in the XML format, the new document including data from the dynamic document.

9. A memory comprising instructions for manipulating data from disparate sources of data including documents in Extensible Markup Language (XML) format, documents in primary records type (PRT) format and documents in management record type (MRT) format, wherein a management record type comprises a grouping of primary record types, the instructions comprising:

instructions to receive a document in the XML format;

instructions to define, in response to receiving the document, a first set of relationship rules mapping the XML format of the document to the PRT format of the document using at least a portion of a set of data definitions;

instructions to define, in response to receiving the document, a second set of relationship rules mapping the XML format of the document and the MRT format of the document using at least a portion of the set of data definitions;

instructions to receive an indication of a manipulation of the document in one of the XML format of the document, the MRT format of the document, or the PRT format of the document; and

instructions to modify the document in accordance with the manipulation of the document;

wherein the modified document is available for inspection in each of the XML format of the document, the MRT format of the document, or the PRT format of the document.

10. The memory of claim 9, wherein at least one of the first and second set of relationship rules includes a hierarchical structure of records.

11. The memory of claim 10, wherein the records are based on relationships between a set of format components in the XML format of the document.

12. The memory of claim 9, wherein at least one of the first and second set of relationship rules includes at least one set from the group consisting of a set of business rules, a set of communication rules, and a set of document transaction rules.

13. The memory of claim 9, wherein at least one of the first and second set of relationship rules comprises a relational database definition.

14. The memory of claim 13, wherein at least one of the first and second set of relationship rules is not in a relational database structure.

15. The memory of claim 9, wherein the instructions further comprise:

instructions to define a dynamic document in response to defining at least one of the first and second set of relationship rules.

16. The memory of claim 15, wherein the dynamic document comprises an indication of a technique for generating a new document in the XML format, the new document including data from the dynamic document.

17. A system for dynamically manipulating data from disparate sources of data including documents in an Extensible Markup Language (XML) format, documents in a primary record type (PRT) format and documents in a management record type (MRT) format, wherein wherein a management record type comprises a grouping of primary record types, the system comprising:

means for receiving a document in the XML format;

means for defining, in response to receiving the document, a first set of relationship rules mapping the XML format of the document to the PRT format of the document using at least a portion of a set of data definitions;

means for defining, in response to receiving the document, a second set of relationship rules mapping the XML format of the document and the MRT format of the document using at least a portion of the set of data definitions;

means for receiving an indication of a manipulation of the document in one of the XML format of the document, the MRT format of the document, or the PRT format of the document; and

means for modifying the document in accordance with the manipulation of the document;

wherein the modified document is available for inspection in each of the XML format of the document, the MRT format of the document, or the PRT format of the document.

18. The system of claim 17, wherein at least one of the first and second set of relationship rules includes a hierarchical structure of records.

19. The system of claim 18, wherein the records are based on relationships between a set of format components in the XML format of the document.

20. The system of claim 17, wherein at least one of the first and second set of relationship rules includes at least one set from the group consisting of a set of business rules, a set of communication rules, and a set of document transaction rules.

21. The system of claim 17, wherein at least one of the first and second set of relationship rules comprises a relational database definition.

22. The system of claim 21, wherein at least one of the first and second set of relationship rules is not in a relational database structure.

23. The system of claim 17, further comprising:

means for defining a dynamic document in response to defining at least one of the first and second set of relationship rules.

24. The system of claim 23, wherein the dynamic document comprises an indication of a technique for generating a new document in the XML format, the new document including data from the dynamic document.