Expert system reliability assistance for electronics

• US 8,447,553 B1
• Filed: 07/22/2010
• Issued: 05/21/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 07/22/2010
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Kevin Roe
• Original Assignee: Kevin Roe
• Inventors: Roe, Kevin
• Primary Examiner(s): Desta, Elias
• Application Number:
  US12/841,552
• Time in Patent Office: 1,034 Days
• Field of Search: 714/25, 714/27, 714/48, 702/57, 702/108, 702/117, 702/189, 422/83, 340/500, 340/573.1, 340/632
• US Class Current: 702/108
• CPC Class Codes: G01R 31/003 Environmental or reliability tests of individual semiconductors G01R31/2642; of PCB's G01R31/2817; of IC's G01R31/2855; of other circuits G01R31/2849
• CPC Class Codes: G01R 31/2846 using hard- or software simulation or using knowledge-based systems, e.g. expert systems, artificial intelligence or interactive algorithms

Abstract

Methods and systems using one or more expert systems to increase electronic device reliability. One embodiment is a method to screen an electronic device by one or more expert systems to detect a potential failure of the electronic device, selectively testing the electronic device when the screening indicates a potential failure, and providing one or more outputs if the selective testing of the electronic device indicates a failure. A second embodiment is a system to screen an electronic device by one or more expert systems to detect a potential failure, selectively testing the electronic device when the screening indicates a potential failure and providing one or more outputs if the selective testing of the electronic device indicates the failure.

Claims

1. A method to increase electronic device reliability, comprising:

screening an electronic device by one or more expert systems without requiring human interaction to detect a potential failure, wherein said screening includes measuring at least one characteristic of said electronic device;

selectively testing said electronic device without requiring human interaction when said screening indicates a potential failure; and

providing one or more output(s) if said selective testing of said electronic device indicates said failure.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein said screening of said electronic device includes utilization of information derived from one or more existing modules coupled to said electronic device.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

allowing a person to activate a screening for failure of said electronic device by one or more expert systems.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising measuring at least one characteristic of said electronic device.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein said selective testing of said electronic device includes utilization of information derived from one or more existing modules.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein said output(s) include providing one or more responses selected from the group of responses consisting of:

outputting an error flag regarding said electronic device, outputting a correct output, advising a person of the safest evacuation route or a safer evacuation route from a location, advising said person of a second location having less failure or having emergency supplies, shielding said person from harm, changing a posture of said person, supplying medical drugs or other medical aid to said person, performing medical treatment on the impaired person, increasing or decreasing air temperature in proximity to said person, increasing or decreasing a supply of appropriate gases in proximity to said person, sending a warning message to summon medical assistance, contacting other entities, activating a radio beacon, assuring said person of one or more remedial actions, speaking to said person in response to panic, terror or anxiety of said person, disabling equipment at said location, shutting off power to said equipment at said location, limiting operation of said equipment at said location to a lower speed of operation, autonomously moving said equipment at said location to a second location, activating an alarm, sending a warning message to another entity for assistance, rerouting communications or signals, and issuing a warning message to said person.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein said selective testing utilizes one or more other factors selected from the group of factors consisting of:

air temperature, oxygen level, carbon dioxide level, carbon monoxide levels, combustion by-product levels, nitrous oxide levels, ozone levels, hydrocarbon vapor levels, the presence of gas associated with electronic device failure, air humidity, air pressure, collisions, explosions, environmental decompression or compression, fires, sound loudness levels in proximity to a module, radiation, and a history of said electronic device.

8. A method to increase the reliability of an electronic device, comprising:

screening an electronic device by one or more expert systems without requiring human interaction to detect a potential failure, wherein said screening includes measuring at least one characteristic of said electronic device;

selectively testing said electronic device without requiring human interaction when said screening of said electronic device detects a potential failure; and

providing a correct output to replace an incorrect output from said electronic device if said selective testing of said electronic device indicates said failure.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein said screening of said electronic device includes utilization of at least a portion of one or more existing modules.

10. The method of claim 8, wherein said screening of said electronic device includes a time-sharing allocation of at least one processor executing at least one expert system.

11. The method of claim 8, further comprising:

allowing one or more people to activate a screening for failure of said electronic device by one or more expert systems.

12. The method of claim 8, further comprising measuring at least one characteristic of said electronic device.

13. The method of claim 8, wherein said selective testing of said electronic device includes utilization of at least a portion of one or more existing modules selected from the group of existing modules consisting of:

an operations module, an audio module, an information module, a security module, and a climate control module.

14. The method of claim 8, wherein said one or more correct output(s) also include one or more responses selected from the group of responses consisting of:

advising a person of the safest evacuation route or a safer evacuation route from a location, advising said person of a second location having less failure or having emergency supplies, shielding said person from harm, changing a posture of said person, supplying medical drugs or other medical aid to said person, performing medical treatment on said impaired person, increasing or decreasing air temperature in proximity to said person, increasing or decreasing the supply of appropriate gases in proximity to said person, sending a warning message to summon medical assistance, contacting other entities, activating a radio beacon, assuring said person of one or more remedial actions, speaking to said person in response to panic, terror or anxiety of said person, disabling equipment at said location, shutting off power to said equipment at said location, limiting operation of said equipment at said location to a lower speed of operation, autonomously moving said equipment at said location to a second location, activating an alarm, sending a warning message to another entity for assistance, rerouting communications or signals, and issuing a warning message to said person.

15. The method of claim 8, wherein said selective testing of said electronic device includes a time-sharing allocation of one or more processors of one or more existing modules executing one or more expert systems.

16. The method of claim 8, wherein said selective testing selectively changes according to one or more other factors selected from the group of factors consisting of:

air temperature, oxygen level, carbon dioxide level, carbon monoxide levels, combustion by-product levels, nitrous oxide levels, ozone levels, hydrocarbon vapor levels, the presence of any gas associated with electronic device failure, air humidity, air pressure, collisions, explosions, environmental decompression or compression, fires, sound loudness levels, radiation, and an operational history of said electronic device.

17. A system to increase the reliability of an electronic device, comprising:

a screening module to detect potential failure of an electronic device without requiring human interaction and selectively test said electronic device without requiring human interaction when said screening detects a potential failure, wherein said screening module includes at least one module to measure at least one characteristic of said electronic device, wherein said screening module utilizes one or more expert system modules in screening said electronic device; and

a response module to provide an output if said selective test of said electronic device indicates said failure.

18. The system of claim 17, wherein said screening module includes one or more expert system modules that utilize at least a portion of one or more modules selected from the group of modules consisting of:

an operations module, an audio module, an information module, a security module, and a climate control module.

19. The system of claim 17, wherein said response module also provides one or more responses selected from the group of responses consisting of:

outputting a correct output, advising a person of the safest evacuation route or a safer evacuation route from a location, advising said person of a second location having less failure or having emergency supplies, shielding said person from additional harm, changing a posture of said person, supplying medical drugs or other medical aid to said person, performing medical treatment on said person, increasing or decreasing air temperature in proximity to said person, increasing or decreasing the supply of appropriate gases in proximity to said person, assuring said person of one or more remedial actions, speaking to said person in response to panic, terror or anxiety of said person, disabling equipment at said location, shutting off power to said equipment at said location, limiting operation of said equipment at said location to a lower speed of operation, activating an alarm, sending a warning message to another entity for assistance, rerouting communications or signals, and issuing a warning message to said person.

20. The system of claim 17, wherein said screening module includes at least one module to measure at least one characteristic of said electronic device selected from the group of characteristics consisting of:

at least one chemical in proximity to said electronic device, temperature in proximity to said electronic device, delay in response by said electronic device to a prompt, a speed of operation of said electronic device in performing at least one task, and a consistency of operation of said electronic device in performing at least one task.