Enforcing universal access control in an information management system

• US 8,464,314 B2
• Filed: 01/11/2011
• Issued: 06/11/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 12/29/2005
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Nextlabs
• Original Assignee: Nextlabs
• Inventors: Lim, Keng
• Primary Examiner(s): Zee, Edward
• Assistant Examiner(s): To, Baotran N
• Application Number:
  US13/004,687
• Publication Number:
  US 20120017261A1
• Time in Patent Office: 882 Days
• Field of Search: 726/1, 726/2, 726/27, 707/999.009, 707/783, 713/165, 709/223, 709/229
• US Class Current: 726/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/62 Protecting access to data via a platform, e.g. using keys or access control rules
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/10 for controlling access to devices or network resources
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/104 Grouping of entities
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/107 wherein the security policies are location-dependent, e.g. entities privileges depend on current location or allowing specific operations only from locally connected terminals
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/20 for managing network security; network security policies in general filtering policies H04L63/0227

Abstract

A method and apparatus for controlling document access and application usage using centrally managed rules. The rules are stored and manipulated in a central rule database via a rule server. Policy enforcers are installed on client systems and/or on servers and perform document access and application usage control for both direct user document accesses and application usage, and application program document accesses by evaluating the rules sent to the policy enforcer. The rule server decides which rules are required by each policy enforcer. A policy enforcer can also perform obligation and remediation operations as a part of rule evaluation. Policy enforcers on client systems and servers can operate autonomously, evaluating policies that have been received, when communications have been discontinued with the rule server.

Claims

1. A method of controlling document access using managed rules, the method comprising:

distributing a first plurality of rules to a client system from a rule database, wherein rules of the rule database comprises a conditional statement having a policy abstraction and a corresponding action that will be performed when the conditional statement is satisfied, and each policy abstraction has a corresponding definition statement stored separately from the rule,

wherein the first plurality of rules distributed to the client system contain at least one expression used by the client system to perform access control for documents accessed by the client system and the at least one expression results in an allow, deny, or delegate consequence, and

wherein the client system rule distributing step dynamically selects the first plurality of rules for the client system, wherein the dynamically selecting the first plurality of rules is based on a document accessible at the client system; and

distributing a second plurality of rules to a server from the rule database,

wherein the second plurality of rules distributed to the server contain at least one expression used by the server to perform access control for documents stored on the server,

wherein the server rule distributing step dynamically selects the second plurality of rules for the server, and

wherein rules in the rule database are maintained by a rule server.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

at the client system, accessing the document managed by the managed rules;

selecting a first rule of the first plurality of rules by the client system;

evaluating at least one expression of the first rule based on the document;

determining that the evaluating the at least one expression of the first rule results in a delegate consequence;

after the determining that the evaluating the at least one expression of the first rule results in a delegate consequence, selecting a second rule of the second plurality of rules at the server; and

evaluating at least one expression of the second rule based on the document comprising;

if the at least one expression of the second rule evaluates to a Boolean true, allowing access at the client system to the document; and

if the at least one expression of the second rule evaluates to a Boolean false, denying access at the client system to the document.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the evaluating at least one expression of the first rule comprises:

invoking a classification engine, wherein the rules database is accessible by the classification engine;

at the classification engine, receiving information on the document accessible by the client system; and

using the classification engine, extracting at least one attribute value of the document, wherein the at least one attribute value is used in evaluating the first rule.

4. The method of claim 2 wherein the evaluating at least one expression of the second rule comprises:

invoking a classification engine, wherein the rules database is accessible by the classification engine;

at the classification engine, receiving information on the document accessible by the client system; and

using the classification engine, extracting at least one attribute value of the document, wherein the at least one attribute value is used in evaluating the second rule.

5. The method of claim 2 wherein the evaluating at least one expression of the first rule comprises:

determining that an attribute value of the document is needed to evaluate the first rule; and

extracting from a table the attribute value of the document.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the second plurality of rules distributed to the server containing at least one expression used by the server to perform access control for documents stored on the server evaluates to an allow, deny, or delegate consequence.

7. The method of claim 2 wherein the document is stored at the server.

8. The method of claim 2 wherein the document is stored at the client.

9. A method of controlling document access comprising:

providing a first server comprising a plurality of rules stored in a server rule database, wherein each rule comprises a logical expression having a rule element and a corresponding action that will be performed when the logical expression is satisfied;

distributing a first subset of the plurality of rules to a first client from the server rule database,

wherein the first subset of the plurality of rules distributed to the first client contain at least one logical expression having a rule element and a corresponding action used by the first client to perform access control for documents accessed by the first client;

distributing a second subset of the plurality of rules to a second client from the server rule database,

wherein the second subset is different from the first subset, and

the second subset of the plurality of rules distributed to the second client contain at least one logical expression having a rule element and a corresponding action used by the second client to perform access control for documents accessed by the second client;

receiving an indication that a policy enforcer program is not active on the second client;

detecting an attempt by an application program on the second client to access a first document;

based on the received indication that the policy enforcer program is not active on the second client, at the first server, evaluating at least one rule from the second subset of the plurality of rules distributed to the second client to determine whether or not to allow the access attempt of a first document;

when the at least one rule from the second subset is satisfied, allowing the access attempt;

when the at least one rule from the second subset is not satisfied, disallowing the access attempt;

receiving an indication from the first client that a policy enforcer program is active on the first client;

detecting an attempt by an application program on the first client to access a second document; and

based on the received indication from the first client that the policy enforcer program is active on the first client, at the first client, evaluating at least one rule from the first subset of the plurality of rules distributed to the first client to determine whether or not to allow the access attempt of the second document;

when the at least one rule from the first subset is satisfied, allowing the access attempt; and

when the at least one rule from the first subset is not satisfied, disallowing the access attempt.

10. The method of claim 9 comprising:

providing a second server that stores the documents which are accessible to the first and second clients.

11. The method of claim 9 wherein the first subset of rules stored at the first client is dynamically updated from the server rule database.

12. The method of claim 9 comprising:

altering at least one rule at the server rule database;

after the altering the at least one rule at the server rule database, distributing a third subset of rules to the first client.

13. The method of claim 9 comprising:

altering at least one rule at the server rule database;

after the altering the at least one rule at the server rule database, removing at least one rule from the first subset of rules at the first client.

14. The method of claim 9 comprising:

altering at least one rule at the server rule database;

after the altering the at least one rule at the server rule database, adding at least one rule to the first subset of rules at the first client.

15. A method of controlling document access comprising:

providing a first server comprising a plurality of rules stored in a server rule database, wherein each rule comprises a logical expression having a rule element and a corresponding action that will be performed when the logical expression is satisfied;

distributing a first subset of the plurality of rules to a first client from the server rule database,

wherein the first subset of the plurality of rules distributed to the first client contain at least one logical expression having a rule element and a corresponding action used by the first client to perform access control for documents accessed by the first client;

distributing a second subset of the plurality of rules to a second client from the server rule database,

wherein the second subset of the plurality of rules distributed to the second client contain at least one logical expression having a rule element and a corresponding action used by the second client to perform access control for documents accessed by the second client;

receiving an indication from the second client that a policy enforcer program is not active on the second client;

detecting an attempt by an application program on the second client to access a first document;

based on the received indication from the second client that the policy enforcer program is not active on the second client, disallowing the access attempt;

receiving an indication from the first client that a policy enforcer program is active on the first client;

detecting an attempt by an application program on the first client to access a second document; and

based on the received indication from the first client that the policy enforcer program is active on the first client, at the first client, evaluating at least one rule from the first subset of the plurality of rules distributed to the first client to determine whether or not to allow the access attempt of the second document;

when the at least one rule from the first subset is satisfied, allowing the access attempt; and

when the at least one rule from the first subset is not satisfied, disallowing the access attempt.

16. The method of claim 15 comprising:

providing a second server that stores the documents which are accessible to the first and second clients.

17. The method of claim 15 wherein the first subset of rules stored at the first client is dynamically updated from the server rule database.

18. The method of claim 15 comprising:

altering at least one rule at the server rule database;

after the altering the at least one rule at the server rule database, distributing a third subset of rules to the first client.

19. The method of claim 15 comprising:

altering at least one rule at the server rule database;

after the altering the at least one rule at the server rule database, removing at least one rule from the first subset of rules at the first client.

20. The method of claim 15 comprising:

altering at least one rule at the server rule database;

after the altering the at least one rule at the server rule database, adding at least one rule to the first subset of rules at the first client.