Fast collision detection technique for connected autonomous and manual vehicles

• US 8,466,807 B2
• Filed: 06/01/2011
• Issued: 06/18/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 06/01/2011
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: GM Global Technology Operations LLC (General Motors Company)
• Original Assignee: GM Global Technology Operations LLC (General Motors Company)
• Inventors: Mudalige, Upali Priyantha
• Primary Examiner(s): Lau, Hoi
• Application Number:
  US13/150,465
• Publication Number:
  US 20120306663A1
• Time in Patent Office: 748 Days
• Field of Search: 340/903, 340/435, 340/901, 340/932.2, 340/935, 340/438, 701/1, 701/70, 701/301, 701/300, 455/456.3
• US Class Current: 340/903
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2556/50 of positioning data, e.g. GPS [Global Positioning System] data
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2556/65 Data transmitted between vehicles
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2720/10 Longitudinal speed
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 30/09 Taking automatic action to avoid collision, e.g. braking and steering
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 30/095 Predicting travel path or likelihood of collision
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 1/163 involving continuous checking

Abstract

A method is provided for rapidly identifying potential collision threats between communicating vehicles in a vehicle communication network for actuating a vehicle control action to mitigate potential collisions between the communicating vehicles. Vehicle boundaries and trajectory path boundaries are constructed for the communicating vehicles for efficiently identifying a potential collision. Prioritized assessments are performed to determine which respective boundaries intersect one another. Based on whether respective boundaries that intersect one another will determine if a control vehicle control action is initiated and which control action is imitated. Once the intersecting boundaries are identified, a location of the potential collision can be rapidly identified by a technique that subdivides and regenerates the intersecting trajectory path boundaries of the vehicles. A distance to the potential collision may be determined that is used to further enhance the control action taken for mitigating the potential collision.

Claims

1. A method of rapidly identifying potential collision threats between communicating vehicles of a vehicle communication network for actuating a vehicle control action to mitigate potential collisions between the communicating vehicles, the method comprising the steps of:

determining a vehicle position and trajectory path of a host vehicle;

constructing a trajectory path boundary around the trajectory path and a vehicle boundary around the vehicle position;

receiving a vehicle position and trajectory path of a remote vehicle via the wireless communication network;

identifying a trajectory path boundary around the trajectory path of the remote vehicle and a vehicle boundary around the vehicle position of the remote vehicle;

assessing in a first priority test whether an intersection is present between the vehicle boundary of the host vehicle and the vehicle boundary of the remote vehicle, and actuating a first control action in the host vehicle for mitigating a collision threat only if the intersection is present between the vehicle boundary of the host vehicle and the vehicle boundary of the remote vehicle;

if an intersection is not present in the first priority test, then assessing in a second priority test whether an intersection is present between the trajectory path boundary of one of the host or remote vehicle and vehicle boundary of the other of the host vehicle or remote vehicle, and actuating a second control action in the host vehicle for mitigating a collision threat only if the intersection is present between a respective vehicle boundary and a respective trajectory path boundary;

if an intersection is not present in the second priority test, then assessing in a third priority test whether an intersection is present between the trajectory path boundary of the host vehicle and the trajectory path boundary of the remote vehicle, and actuating a third control action in at least one of the host vehicle or remote vehicle for mitigating a collision threat only if the intersection is present between the trajectory path boundary of the host vehicle and the trajectory path boundary of the remote vehicle.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein a determining a presence of an intersection between the trajectory path boundary of the host vehicle and the trajectory path boundary of the remote vehicle in the third priority test further comprises the steps of determining a location of the potential collision within the intersecting trajectory path boundaries between the host vehicle and the remote vehicle.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein determining the location of the potential collision between the host vehicle and the remote vehicle further comprises the steps of:

identifying discrete trajectory positions along the trajectory path of the host vehicle;

constructing line segments between the discrete time positions in the trajectory path of the host vehicle;

identifying discrete time positions along the trajectory path of the remote vehicle;

constructing line segments between the discrete time positions in the trajectory path of the remote vehicle;

constructing a boundary box around the trajectory path boundary of the host vehicle;

constructing a boundary box around the trajectory path boundary of the remote vehicle;

subdividing the boundary box of the host vehicle and the boundary box of the remote vehicle;

regenerating only the boundary boxes of the host vehicle and the remote vehicle that contain a respective intersecting line segment;

determining if the regenerated boundary box of the host vehicle and the regenerated boundary box of the remote vehicle each contain a plurality of line segments;

if each of the regenerated boundary boxes of the host vehicle and the remote vehicle contain a plurality of intersecting line segments, then repetitively subdividing and regenerating boundary boxes containing the plurality of line segments until the regenerated boundary boxes contain only the intersecting line segments; and

identifying the location of the intersecting line segments between the host vehicle and the remote vehicle.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein a distance to the intersection of the line segments is determined for the host vehicle.

5. The method of claim 3 wherein a time to the intersection of the line segments is determined for the host vehicle.

6. The method of claim 3 wherein boundary box of the host vehicle and the boundary box of the remote vehicle are subdivided in two portions.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein assessing whether an intersection is present between the vehicle boundary of one of the host vehicle or remote vehicle and the trajectory boundary of the other of the host vehicle or remote vehicle further comprises the steps of determining a location of the potential collision between the host vehicle and the remote vehicle.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein determining the location of the potential collision between the host vehicle and the remote vehicle further comprises the steps of:

identifying a line segment that relates to a current position of the vehicle boundary of the host vehicle or remote vehicle;

identifying discrete time positions along the trajectory path of the other of the remote vehicle or host vehicle;

constructing line segments between the discrete time positions in the trajectory path of the other of the remote vehicle or host vehicle;

determining a boundary box around the trajectory path boundary of the other of the remote vehicle or host vehicle;

subdividing the boundary box of the other of the remote vehicle or host vehicle;

regenerating the boundary box of the other of the host vehicle or remote vehicle;

determining whether only a single line segment that intersects the line segment of the host vehicle or remote vehicle is present in the boundary box of the other of the host vehicle or remote vehicle;

if only the single line segment is not present in the boundary box of the other of the remote vehicle or host vehicle, then repetitively subdividing the boundary box and regenerating the boundary box until a single line segment is present for the other of the remote vehicle or host vehicle;

identifying the location of the intersecting line segments between the host vehicle and the remote vehicle.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein the first control action includes a brake apply operation.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein the first control action includes an indicator to the driver of the vehicle to apply vehicle braking manually.

11. The method of claim 1 wherein the second control action includes at least one of a steering maneuver and a speed reduction operation.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein the second control action includes an indicator to the driver of the vehicle to apply at least one of the steering maneuver and the speed reduction operation manually.

13. The method of claim 11 wherein the second control action includes an autonomous vehicle operation for applying at least one of the steering maneuver and the speed reduction operation.

14. The method of claim 1 wherein the third control action includes at least one of a steering maneuver and a speed reduction operation.

15. The method of claim 1 wherein the third control action is a negotiated control action, wherein the host vehicle and the remote vehicle communicate for determining which of the host vehicle or remote vehicle performs at least one of a steering maneuver and a speed reduction operation.

16. The method of claim 15 wherein the third control action includes an indicator to the driver of the vehicle to apply at least one of the steering maneuver and the speed reduction operation manually.

17. The method of claim 15 wherein the third control action includes an autonomous vehicle operation for applying at least one of the steering maneuver and the speed reduction operation.

19. The system of claim 1 further comprising an indicator for alerting the driver of one of the host vehicle or remote vehicle to apply at least one of the steering maneuver and the speed reduction operation.

18. A collision assessment and mitigation system comprising:

a vehicle-to-vehicle communication module for transmitting and receiving messages between a host vehicle and a remote vehicle, the messages received from the remote vehicle include a vehicle position of the remote vehicle and a trajectory path of travel of the remote vehicle;

a threat assessment module for assessing a potential collision between the host vehicle and the remote vehicle, the threat assessment module identifying a vehicle position and a trajectory path of the host vehicle, the threat assessment module constructing a vehicle boundary around the vehicle position of the host vehicle and a trajectory path boundary around the trajectory path of the host vehicle, the threat assessment module constructing a vehicle boundary around the vehicle position of the remote vehicle and a trajectory path boundary around the trajectory path of the remote vehicle, the vehicle threat assessment module assessing a potential collision based on intersections of the respective boundaries between the host vehicle and the remote vehicle;

a vehicle control module for actuating a control action for mitigating the potential collision based on the assessment by the threat assessment module;

wherein the threat assessment module is configured to perform the method comprising the steps of;

assessing in a first priority test whether an intersection between the vehicle boundary of the host vehicle and the vehicle boundary of the remote vehicle is present, and actuating a first control action in the host vehicle only if the intersection is present between the vehicle boundary of the host vehicle and the vehicle boundary of the remote vehicle;

if an intersection is not present in the first priority test, then assessing in a second priority test whether an intersection between the respective trajectory path boundary of one of the host or remote vehicle and a respective vehicle boundary of the other of the host vehicle or remote vehicle is present, and actuating a second control action in the host vehicle only if the intersection is present between a respective vehicle boundary and a respective trajectory path boundary is present;

if an intersection is not present in the second priority test, then assessing in a third priority test whether an intersection between the trajectory path boundary of the host vehicle and the trajectory path boundary of the remote vehicle is present, and applying a third control action in at least one of the host vehicle or remote vehicle only if the intersection is present between the trajectory path boundary of the host vehicle and the trajectory path boundary of the remote vehicle.

20. The system of clam 1 wherein third control action is a negotiated control action, wherein the host vehicle and the remote vehicle communicate for determining which of the host vehicle or remote vehicle performs at least one of a steering maneuver and a speed reduction operation.