Determining fraudulent use of electronic devices utilizing matrix codes

• US 8,468,610 B2
• Filed: 01/27/2011
• Issued: 06/18/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 01/27/2011
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Dish Technologies LLC (Dish Network Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Echostar Technologies LLC (Echostar Corporation)
• Inventors: Beals, William Michael, Zetterower, Charlie William
• Primary Examiner(s): Barron, Jr., Gilberto
• Assistant Examiner(s): Ho, Virginia T
• Application Number:
  US13/015,382
• Publication Number:
  US 20120198572A1
• Time in Patent Office: 873 Days
• Field of Search: None
• US Class Current: 726/34
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/42 using separate channels for security data
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 21/25816 involving client authentication restricting access to computer systems by authenticating users using a predetermined code G06F21/33; cryptographic authentication protocols H04L9/32; networks authentication protocols H04L63/08; authentication in wireless network security H04W12/06
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 21/44236 Monitoring of piracy processes or activities protecting computer platforms against harmful, malicious or unexpected behaviour or activities using intrusion detection and counter measures G06F21/566; computer virus detection and handling G06F21/56
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 21/47815 Electronic shopping payment schemes, payment architectures or payment protocols for electronic shopping systems G06Q20/12
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 21/6187 involving transmission via a telephone network, e.g. POTS

Abstract

In one or more implementations, a computing device may receive information from a matrix code reader that scans multiple matrix codes, each displayed by one of multiple devices. The computing device may determine whether or not the devices are being fraudulently utilized, such as whether the devices are in the same location. Additionally, in some implementations, a computing device may receive a service request from a matrix code reader that includes an associated telephone number. The computing device may extract the number and may handle the service request based on the number. Moreover, in various implementations, a computing device may receive information from a matrix code reader that scans a displayed matrix code. The information may include an electronic signature that is included in the matrix code by the device. After receiving the information, the computing device may analyze the information to determine that the electronic signature is valid.

Claims

1. A method for determining fraudulent use of electronic devices, the method comprising:

receiving, utilizing at least one processing unit, information from at least one matrix code reader device that the at least one matrix code reader device obtained by scanning a plurality of matrix codes wherein each of the plurality of matrix codes was provided by one of a plurality of electronic devices;

analyzing the information received from the at least one matrix code reader device utilizing the at least one processing unit; and

determining, utilizing the at least one processing unit, whether the plurality of electronic devices are located in a same location based at least on said operation of analyzing the information.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein said operation of determining, utilizing the at least one processing unit, whether the plurality of electronic devices are located in a same location based at least on said operation of analyzing the information further comprises:

comparing time differences between at least one of time stamps obtained from each of the plurality of matrix codes or times when each of the plurality of matrix codes was captured by the at least one matrix code reader device;

determining the plurality of electronic devices are not located in the same location when the time differences exceed a time threshold.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein said operation of determining, utilizing the at least one processing unit, whether the plurality of electronic devices are located in a same location based at least on said operation of analyzing the information further comprises:

comparing at least one matrix code reader telephone number associated with the at least matrix code reader and included in the information by the at least one matrix code reader to at least one account telephone number of at least one user account associated with the plurality of electronic devices; and

determining the plurality of electronic devices are not located in the same location when the at least one matrix code reader telephone number is different from the at least one account telephone number.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein said operation of receiving, utilizing at least one processing unit, information from at least one matrix code reader device further comprises receiving a separate set of information for each of the plurality of matrix codes and said operation of determining, utilizing the at least one processing unit, whether the plurality of electronic devices are located in a same location based at least on said operation of analyzing the information further comprises:

comparing matrix code reader telephone numbers associated with the at least matrix code reader and included in the separate sets of information for each of the plurality of matrix codes by the at least one matrix code reader; and

determining the plurality of electronic devices are not located in the same location when any of the matrix code reader telephone numbers included in the separate sets of information for each of the plurality of matrix codes are different from each other.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein said operation of determining, utilizing the at least one processing unit, whether the plurality of electronic devices are located in a same location based at least on said operation of analyzing the information further comprises:

verifying that each of the plurality of matrix codes was at least one of generated or modified by the respective one of the plurality of electronic devices; and

determining the plurality of electronic devices are not located in the same location when at least one of the plurality of matrix codes is not verified as at least one of generated or modified by the respective one of the plurality of electronic devices.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein said operation of verifying that each of the plurality of matrix codes was at least one of generated or modified by the respective one of the plurality of electronic devices further comprises determining that each of the plurality of matrix codes includes an electronic signature.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the electronic signature comprises a hash value of data included in the respective matrix code that is encrypted utilizing an encryption key assigned to the respective electronic device.

8. A system for determining fraudulent use of electronic devices, comprising:

a plurality of electronic devices that each provide one of a plurality of matrix codes comprising;

at least one electronic device processing unit that at least one of generates the respective one of the plurality of matrix codes or modifies the respective one of the plurality of matrix codes; and

at least one output component that transmits the respective one of the plurality of matrix codes to at least one display device;

at least one fraud determination computing device, comprising;

at least one communication component that receives information from at least one matrix code reader device obtained by scanning the plurality of matrix codes; and

at least one fraud determination computing device processing unit that analyzes the information and determines whether the plurality of electronic devices are located in a same location based at least on the analysis.

9. The system of claim 8, wherein the at least one fraud determination computing device processing unit verifies that each of the plurality of matrix codes was at least one of generated or modified by the respective one of the plurality of electronic devices and determines the plurality of electronic devices are not located in the same location when at least one of the plurality of matrix codes is not verified.

10. The system of claim 9, wherein the at least one fraud determination computing device processing unit verifies each of the plurality of matrix codes by determining that each of the plurality of matrix codes includes an electronic signature.

11. The system of claim 10, wherein the electronic signature is generated by the respective electronic device by creating a hash value of data included in the respective matrix code and encrypting the hash value utilizing an encryption key assigned to the respective electronic device.

12. The system of claim 8, wherein the at least one fraud determination computing device processing unit compares time differences between at least one of time stamps obtained from each of the plurality of matrix codes or times when each of the plurality of matrix codes was captured by the at least one matrix code reader device and the at least one fraud determination computing device processing unit determines the plurality of electronic devices are not located in the same location when the time differences exceed a time threshold.

13. The system of claim 8, wherein the at least one matrix code reader obtains at least one matrix code reader telephone number associated with the at least one matrix code reader and includes the at least one telephone number in the information, the at least one fraud determination computing device processing unit compares the at least one telephone number to at least one account telephone number of at least one user account associated with the plurality of electronic devices, and the at least one fraud determination computing device processing unit determines the plurality of electronic devices are not located in the same location when the at least one matrix code reader telephone number is different from the at least one account telephone number.

14. The system of claim 8, wherein the at least one matrix code reader obtains at least one matrix code reader telephone number associated with the at least one matrix code reader, the at least one communication component receives a separate set of information for each of the plurality of matrix codes from the at least one matrix code reader, the at least one matrix code reader includes the at least one matrix code reader telephone number in each of the separate sets of information, and the at least one fraud determination computing device processing unit compares the compares the at least one matrix code reader telephone number included in each of the separate sets of information and determines the plurality of electronic devices are not located in the same location when the at least one matrix code reader telephone number included in one of the separate sets of information is different than the at least one matrix code reader telephone number included in any other of the separate sets of information.

15. The system of claim 8, wherein the at least one communication component receives each of the plurality of matrix codes from the at least one matrix code reader device.