Cattle management method and system

• US 8,474,405 B1
• Filed: 08/13/2012
• Issued: 07/02/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 10/31/1994
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: MWI Veterinary Supply Incorporated
• Original Assignee: MWI Veterinary Supply Incorporated
• Inventors: Pratt, William C.
• Primary Examiner(s): PRICE JR, RICHARD THOMAS
• Application Number:
  US13/584,556
• Publication Number:
  US 20130151310A1
• Time in Patent Office: 323 Days
• Field of Search: 119/51.02, 119/502, 119/511, 119840-842, 452/52, 452/53
• US Class Current: 119/51.02
• CPC Class Codes: A01K 1/0023 Sorting gates
• CPC Class Codes: A01K 1/0209 Feeding pens for pigs or cattle
• CPC Class Codes: A01K 11/006 Automatic identification systems for animals, e.g. electronic devices, transponders for animals identification systems for access to feeding pens A01K1/0209; ear tags with electronic identification means A01K11/004
• CPC Class Codes: A01K 29/00 Other apparatus for animal husbandry
• CPC Class Codes: A01K 29/005 Monitoring or measuring activity, e.g. detecting heat or mating
• CPC Class Codes: A01K 5/02 Automatic devices automatic identification devices for stock A01K11/006
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 8/0858 involving measuring tissue layers, e.g. skin, interfaces
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/063 Operations research, analysis or management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0637 Strategic management or analysis, e.g. setting a goal or target of an organisation; Planning actions based on goals; Analysis or evaluation of effectiveness of goals
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/087 Inventory or stock management, e.g. order filling, procurement or balancing against orders
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/10 Tax strategies
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/12 Accounting

Abstract

An automated method and system for individual animal electronic identification, measurement, and management of cattle in a feedlot. Through the use of a computer system integrated with individual animal identification, multiple measurement and remeasurement systems, and a handling and sorting system, animals are individually identified and measured. The computer system calculates optimum slaughter weight, economic end point and marketing date for shipment to a packing plant. Individual animals are sorted by the computer in response to calculations from the measurements. The computer system stores individual animal measurement, performance and location data, which is used to select animals for shipment to slaughter at the optimum time. At the slaughter facility, the animal'"'"'s identification is used to correlate the live animal physical characteristics and performance data to the carcass characteristics data and build a-database to more accurately identify and measure value-based characteristics in subsequent animals for more effective selection and management.

Claims

1. A method for managing animals for commercial food production, comprising:

entering characteristic data including at least weight in a computer system for an animal;

determining in the computer system, from at least in part the characteristic data, a projected target condition for the animal;

determining in the computer system an estimated time required to reach the projected target condition for the animal;

selecting the animal for a group based at least in part on the estimated time required to reach the projected condition;

feeding the animal with the group in a feed pen for a feeding period; and

administering a first feed additive to the group by dispensing the first feed additive into a first feed ration by a computerized feed additive delivery system.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining an estimated time to reach a target condition for the group in the feed pen based at least in part on feed ration information, a projected feed intake, a projected gain, production value, and production costs.

3. The method of claim 1 where the feed additive delivery system is operable for delivering feed additives into animal feed rations on a customized basis.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising dispensing the first feed additive at a determined optimum time prior to shipment of the group from the feedlot for determining optimum economic value for the group.

5. The method of claim 4 where determining the optimum economic value includes projecting marketing dates of animals, utilizing projected production costs of animals compared to projected market value of such animals, and using that data to select individual animals or groups of animals for shipment to slaughter on a date to substantially maximize economic return of the selected individual animal or group.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising dispensing the first feed additive into the first feed ration at a time prior to an estimated time required to reach a projected condition of the group to facilitate substantially optimizing an economic value of the group.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising administering a subsequent feed additive to the group by dispensing the subsequent feed additive into a subsequent feed ration by the computerized feed additive delivery system.

8. The method of claim 7 where the first feed additive and the subsequent feed additive are different.

9. The method of claim 7, further comprising discontinuing dispensing at least one of the first feed additive or the subsequent feed additive to provide a withdrawal period for the discontinued feed additive.

10. The method of claim 7 where at least one of the first feed additive and the second feed additive is a growth promotant.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising using the computerized feed additive delivery system to dispense multiple feed additives into the first feed ration for administering the feed additives to the group during the feeding period.

12. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining for the animal a projected feed intake and a projected gain from at least in part the characteristic data, the projected target condition, and feed ration information.

13. The method of claim 1 where the computer system comprises a feedlot business system (FBS) computer capable of performing feedlot accounting functions and passing data back and forth between the FBS computer and one or more various computers used in the computer system.

14. The method of claim 13 where the computer system further comprises the computerized feed additive delivery system, a computerized animal drug inventory control and animal health history and drug treatment system, a computerized bunk reader system, or each and every combination thereof.

15. The method of claim 13 where the FBS computer receives and stores data from the computerized feed additive delivery system, a computerized animal drug inventory control and animal health history and drug treatment system, a computerized bunk reader system, or each and every combination thereof.

16. The method of claim 15, further comprising utilizing data received from the computerized feed additive delivery system to calculate a cost of production and feed additive costs for the animal.

17. The method of claim 13, further comprising:

calculating total feed consumption for all animals in the group;

calculating a pro rata share for each animal in the group;

comparing the total feed consumption to an actual amount fed to the animals in the group;

allocating the actual amount fed to the group on a pro rata basis to each animal in the group to provide a pro rata feed allocation; and

storing the pro rata feed allocation in the FBS computer.

18. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining a revised estimated time to reach the projected target condition for the animal based at least in part on actual feed intake, a projected gain, a production value, production costs, and combinations thereof.

19. The method of claim 1, further comprising selecting animals from the group for further processing or management, wherein selecting animals for further processing or management includes one or more of the following:

selecting a time to administer a feed additive growth promotant to the animals;

selecting a growth promotant for administering to an individual animal at a processing location;

selecting a feed additive for feeding to the animals;

selecting a feed ration for feeding to the animals;

selecting a health treatment for administering to an individual animal at a processing location;

selecting a health feed additive for feeding to the animals;

selecting a product for feeding to the animals for improving the quality grading and value of the beef from the animals;

selecting a product for administering to an individual animal at a processing location for improving the quality grading and value of the beef from the individual animal;

selecting animals for shipment to slaughter when a drug withdrawal period has expired for a drug requiring a withdrawal period;

selecting animals for health condition treatment or management; and

selecting and removing animals for shipment to slaughter utilizing at least in part an estimated time required to reach the optimum economic value of the animals.

20. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

entering into the computer system subsequent characteristic data including at least weight for the animal;

determining in the computer system, from at least in part the subsequent characteristic data and the projected target condition, a revised estimated time required to reach the projected target condition;

selecting the animal for a subsequent group based at least in part on the revised estimated time; and

feeding the animal with the subsequent group in a feed pen for a subsequent feeding period.