Method and system for vendor management

• US 8,478,659 B2
• Filed: 03/12/2010
• Issued: 07/02/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 09/12/2003
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Altisource Holdings, S.A.R.L. (Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA), Andrei Iancu, Ashley Moody Florida Office of The Attorney General and Successors Thereto, Jeanette Nunez Lieutenant Governor of Florida and Successors Thereto, Joan D. Heuer, Laurel M Lee Florida Secretary of State and Successors Thereto, Steven Mnuchin United States Secretary of The Treasury and Successors Thereto, Timothy E Gribben Commissioner For Bureau of The Fiscal Service Agency of The United States Department of The Treasury and Successors and Assigns Thereto
• Original Assignee: Altisource Solutions S.A R.L. (Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA)
• Inventors: Behmoiras, Ralph J., Erbey, William C., Castner, Arthur J., Kennedy, Christopher, Reno, Keith S.
• Primary Examiner(s): Patel, Jagdish
• Application Number:
  US12/723,358
• Publication Number:
  US 20100268558A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,208 Days
• Field of Search: 705/26.1, 705/26.3, 705/295
• US Class Current: 705/26.35
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0639 Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0875 Itemisation or classification of parts, supplies or services, e.g. bill of materials
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 20/085 involving remote charge determination or related payment systems
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0601 Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/02 Banking, e.g. interest calculation or account maintenance credit or loans G06Q40/03
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/03 Credit; Loans; Processing thereof
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/167 Closing

Abstract

A method and system for managing business transactions, such as mortgages or other financial transactions. A business transaction between an end user and a financial institution includes sub-transactions between the end user and a vendor. A software system performs functions to complete the business transaction. Automated ordering allows an end user to quickly and easily order a sub-transaction without input from the financial institution or the vendor, and also automatically orders sub-transactions upon satisfaction of a trigger event. Vendor management functionality allows a financial institution to manage the transactions of a vendor. Qualitative performance analysis functionality allows an end user to monitor and evaluate a vendor'"'"'s price, turn-around time, quality score, and overall score. Vendor distribution functionality distributes sub-transactions among vendors. Vendor management company functionality allows a vendor management company—a vendor that outsources some or all of its sub-transactions to independent service providers—to effectively use the system.

Claims

1. A method for providing online services between a vendor and a service recipient, the method comprising:

receiving, by at least one processor, a transaction request;

identifying, by the at least one processor, a sub-transaction associated with the transaction request;

identifying, by the at least one processor, a vendor capable of addressing the sub-transaction, the vendor having a calculated vendor score, and the vendor being identified based at least in part on the calculated vendor score;

providing, by the at least one processor, a request for the sub-transaction to a vendor; and

if the vendor agrees to address the sub-transaction, receiving, by the at least one processor, a transaction response,

wherein the transaction response comprises at least one item of information relating to addressing the sub-transaction.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the transaction request is a request for a loan for a real estate purchase.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein identifying, by the at least one processor, the sub-transaction associated with the transaction request comprises:

identifying, by the at least one processor, the sub-transaction from a group of sub-transactions consisting of determination of flood classification status, an inspection, an appraisal, an automated valuation model, and a mortgage insurance policy.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

if the vendor agrees to address the sub-transaction, receiving, by the at least one processor, a confirmation of services provided.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the confirmation of services comprises:

an indication that one or more services addressing the sub-transaction have been provided.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the indication comprises one selected from the group consisting of flood classification status information, inspection status information, appraisal information, automated valuation model information, and mortgage insurance policy information.

7. The method of claim 4, wherein confirmation of services provided for the sub-transaction generates a second sub-transaction.

8. The method of claim 7, further comprising:

generating, by the at least one processor, the second sub-transaction in response to receiving the confirmation of services provided.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the vendor is automatically selected.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein identifying the vendor comprises:

receiving an input from a user, the input specifying the vendor.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein identifying the vendor comprises:

electronically selecting a vendor.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the calculated vendor score is calculated based on one or more of a vendor quality score or a vendor service score.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the calculated vendor score is calculated based on both of the vendor quality score and the vendor service score.

14. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having computer-readable program code embodied therein for providing online services between a vendor and a service recipient, the computer-readable program code comprising:

computer-readable instructions for receiving a transaction request;

computer-readable instructions for identifying a sib-transaction associated with the transaction request;

computer-readable instructions for identifying a vendor capable of addressing the sub-transaction, the vendor being identified based at least in part on a quality score of the vendor;

computer-readable instructions for providing a request for the sub-transaction to a vendor; and

computer-readable instructions for receiving a transaction response comprising at least one item of information relating to addressing the sub-transaction in response to a determination that the vendor agreed to address the sub-transaction.

15. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14, wherein the quality score is based at least in part on a measure of customer satisfaction associated with the vendor and a price associated with the vendor.

16. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15, wherein the vendor is identified based at least in part on a service score of the vendor.

17. A system for providing online services between a vendor and a service recipient, the system comprising:

at least one processor comprising;

a transaction receiving module for receiving a transaction request;

a sub-transaction identifying module for identifying a sub-transaction associated with the transaction request;

a vendor identification module for identifying a vendor capable of addressing the sub-transaction, the vendor being identified based at least in part on a service score of the vendor;

a vendor request providing module for providing a request for the sub-transaction to a vendor; and

a transaction request reception module for receiving a transaction response if the vendor agrees to address the sub-transaction, the transaction response comprising at least one item of information relating to addressing the sub-transaction.

18. The system of claim 17, wherein the service score is based at least in part on a measure of turnaround time associated with the vendor and a measure of order timeliness associated with the vendor.

19. The system of claim 18, wherein the vendor is identified based at least in part on a quality score of the vendor.