Robust operation of tendon-driven robot fingers using force and position-based control laws

• US 8,489,239 B2
• Filed: 11/01/2010
• Issued: 07/16/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 11/01/2010
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration
• Original Assignee: GM Global Technology Operations LLC (General Motors Company), United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration
• Inventors: Abdallah, Muhammad E, Platt, Robert J. Jr., Reiland, Matthew J, Hargrave, Brian, Diftler, Myron A, Strawser, Philip A, Ihrke, Chris A.
• Primary Examiner(s): Amin, Bhavesh V
• Application Number:
  US12/916,803
• Publication Number:
  US 20120109379A1
• Time in Patent Office: 988 Days
• Field of Search: 700245-264
• US Class Current: 700/260
• CPC Class Codes: B25J 15/0009 comprising multi-articulated fingers, e.g. resembling a human hand
• CPC Class Codes: B25J 9/1045 comprising tensioning means

Abstract

A robotic system includes a tendon-driven finger and a control system. The system controls the finger via a force-based control law when a tension sensor is available, and via a position-based control law when a sensor is not available. Multiple tendons may each have a corresponding sensor. The system selectively injects a compliance value into the position-based control law when only some sensors are available. A control system includes a host machine and a non-transitory computer-readable medium having a control process, which is executed by the host machine to control the finger via the force- or position-based control law. A method for controlling the finger includes determining the availability of a tension sensor(s), and selectively controlling the finger, using the control system, via the force or position-based control law. The position control law allows the control system to resist disturbances while nominally maintaining the initial state of internal tendon tensions.

Claims

1. A robotic system comprising:

a robotic finger driven by a tendon, wherein the robotic finger includes a plurality of joints and a tension sensor positioned in or along the robotic finger;

an actuator connected to the tendon and operable to move the robotic finger, via tensioning of the tendon, with respect to at least one of the joints of the robotic finger; and

a control system providing a two-tier control architecture or hierarchy, including a joint-level controller which forms an upper control loop and an actuator-level controller which forms a lower control loop of the two-tier control architecture or hierarchy, wherein the control system is configured for;

determining whether the tension sensor is functioning properly or otherwise available in the robotic finger to measure a tension value of the tendon;

selectively controlling the robotic finger via a force-based control law or a position-based control law, via the joint-level controller, when the tension sensor is available in the robotic finger; and

selectively controlling the robotic finger via only the position-based control law, solely via the actuator controller, when the tension sensor is not available in the robotic finger to measure the tension value.

2. The robotic system of claim 1, further comprising a plurality of the tendons each having a corresponding tension sensor, wherein the control system is configured for selectively controlling the robotic finger via the force-based control law or the position-based control law, via the joint-level controller, when all of the tension sensors are available, and via only the position-based control law via the actuator-level controller when none of the tension sensors are available.

3. The robotic system of claim 2, wherein the control system is further configured for selectively injecting a compliance value to the position-based control law when only some of the tension sensors are available.

4. The robotic system of claim 3, wherein the compliance value is a function of a tension error determined as a difference between a desired tension and an actual tension of one of the tendons.

5. The robotic system of claim 1, where any commanded actuator positions for the actuator that are sent down to the actuator-level controller are constrained by the control system to the range-space of the robotic finger.

6. The robotic system of claim 1, further comprising a hand having a plurality of the robotic fingers, with each robotic finger having a plurality of the tendons, and with each of the plurality of tendons having a corresponding tension sensor, wherein each robotic finger is independently controllable with respect to the other robotic fingers in a manner that is dependent on the number of available tension sensors in the robotic finger that is being independently controlled.

7. The robotic system of claim 1, wherein the lower control loop actively servos to an actuator position of the robotic finger to allow the robotic finger to resist motion in the null-space of a tendon map matrix for the robotic finger, while also nominally maintaining an initial internal tension on the tendon.

8. A control system for a robotic finger driven by a tendon and having a plurality of joints, an actuator connected to the tendon that is operable to move the robotic finger via the tendon with respect to at least one of the joints, and a tension sensor positioned in or along the robotic finger, the control system comprising:

a host machine; and

a non-transitory computer-readable medium on which is recorded a control process providing a two-tier control architecture for controlling the finger;

wherein the host machine is configured for providing a two-tier control architecture or hierarchy, including an upper control loop and lower control loop of the two-tier control architecture or hierarchy, and is further configured for;

executing the control process from the computer-readable medium to thereby determine the availability of a tension sensor in the robotic finger suitable for measuring a tension value, including determining whether the tension sensor is functioning properly or otherwise available to measure a tension value of the tendon, and for selectively controlling the robotic finger;

via the upper control loops to selectively apply a force-based control law or a position-based control law when the tension sensor is available to measure the tension value of the tendon; and

via only the lower control loop using only the position-based control law when the tension sensor is not available to measure the tension value.

9. The control system of claim 8, wherein the robotic finger includes a plurality of the tendons each having a corresponding tension sensor, and wherein the host machine is configured for selectively controlling the robotic finger using only the upper control loop, via the force-based control law, when all of the plurality of tension sensors are available in the finger, and via only the lower control loop using only the position-based control law when none of the plurality of tension sensors are available.

10. The control system of claim 9, wherein the host machine is further configured for selectively injecting a compliance value to the position-based control law when only some of the tension sensors are available.

11. The control system of claim 10, wherein the compliance value is a function of a tension error determined by the host machine as a difference between a desired tension and an actual tension of one of the tendons.

12. The control system of claim 8,

wherein the host machine includes a joint controller and an actuator controller, and wherein:

the joint controller is configured for selectively executing the force-based control law or the position-based control law in the upper control loop of the two-tier control architecture or hierarchy to thereby respectively control the force or the position of the joints of the robotic finger; and

the actuator controller is configured for executing only the position-based control law in the lower control loop of the two-tier control architecture or hierarchy to thereby control the position of the actuator.

13. The control system of claim 8, further comprising:

a hand having a plurality of the robotic fingers, with each of the robotic fingers having a plurality of tendons, and with each of the plurality of tendons having a corresponding tension sensor, wherein each of the robotic fingers is independently controllable with respect to the other robotic fingers in a manner dependent on the number of available tension sensors in the robotic finger that is being independently controlled.

14. A method for controlling a tendon-driven robotic finger in a robotic system, wherein the robotic finger is driven by a tendon and has a plurality of joints, and wherein an actuator is connected to the tendon and is operable to move the robotic finger with respect to at least one of the joints via tensioning of the tendon, the method comprising:

determining the availability of a tension sensor for measuring a tension value of the tendon; and

selectively controlling the robotic finger, via a joint-level controller of a control system, using a force-based control law or a position-based control law, when the tension sensor is available to measure the tension value; and

selectively controlling the robotic finger, via an actuator-level controller of the control system, using only the position-based control law when the tension sensor is not available to measure the tension value;

wherein the joint-level controller and the actuator-level controller form a respective upper level and lower level of a two-tier control architecture or hierarchy.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the robotic finger has a plurality of the tendons each having a corresponding tension sensor, the method further comprising:

selectively controlling the robotic finger via the force-based control law or the position-based control law, via the joint-level controller, when all of the tension sensors are available, and via only the position-based control law, via the actuator-level controller, when none of the tension sensors are available.

16. The method of claim 15, further comprising:

selectively injecting a compliance value to the position-based control law when only some of the tension sensors are available.

17. The method of claim 16, further comprising:

calculating the compliance as a function of a tension error, wherein the tension error is determined as a difference between a desired tension and an actual tension of one of the tendons.

18. The method of claim 14, further comprising

constraining, via the control system, any commanded actuator positions for the actuator that are sent down to the actuator controller to the range-space of the robotic finger.